Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 2212-7976
  • E-ISSN: 1874-477X

Abstract

Introduction

3D printing has become an activity changer in some sectors allowing the creation of personalized parts. With its growing popularity in areas needing mechanical capabilities, it is essential to grasp how the printing settings impact the mechanical traits of the printed pieces.

Methods

This paper presents a novel investigation into the impact of critical 3D printing parameters on the mechanical characteristics of polylactic acid (PLA), a widely used biocompatible and biodegradable polymer. Our experimental approach systematically evaluated the effects of various printing parameters including infill density, raster orientation, outline overlap, and print speed on the printed parts' tensile strength and Young's modulus. This could prepare the way for future patent applications in 3D printing optimization.

Results

The results consistently showed that increasing the infill density and outline overlap improved tensile strength and Young's modulus. However, higher print speeds decreased both underscoring the practical application of our unique findings. This research is a pioneering effort providing engineers and designers with valuable direction for working with 3D-printed PLA parts in aerospace, automotive, and biomedical applications.

Conclusion

It significantly adds to the expanding corpus of research on the connection between 3D printing process variables and the mechanical characteristics of advanced polymeric materials.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976328835241016094600
2024-12-12
2025-12-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. TlibaK. PenasO. DialloT.M.L. Ben KhalifaR. Ben YahiaN. CholeyJ-Y. Model based systems engineering approach for the improvement of manufacturing system flexibility. 2020 21st International Conference on Research and Education in Mechatronics (REM).2020Cracow, Poland202010.1109/REM49740.2020.9313871
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ZoccaA. FranchinG. ColomboP. GünsterJ. Additive manufacturing.Encyclopedia of materials: Technical ceramics and glasses.OxfordElsevier202120322110.1016/B978‑0‑12‑803581‑8.12081‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HullC.W. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography.US Patent 4575330A1984
  4. AshishN. 3D printing in Medicine: Current challenges and potential applications. 3D printing technology in nanomedicine.AmsterdamElsevier201910.1016/B978‑0‑12‑815890‑6.00001‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ShahrubudinN. LeeT.C. RamlanR. An overview on 3D printing technology: Technological, materials, and applications.Procedia Manuf.2019351286129610.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KolamroudiM.K. AsmaelM. IlkanM. KordaniN. Developments on Electron Beam Melting (EBM) of Ti–6Al–4V: A review.Trans. Indian Inst. Met.202174478379010.1007/s12666‑021‑02230‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Al RashidA. KhanS.A. Al-GhamdiS.G. KoçM. Additive manufacturing: Technology, applications, markets, and opportunities for the built environment.Autom. Construct.202011810326810.1016/j.autcon.2020.103268
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MahmoodA. AkramT. ChenH. ChenS. On the evolution of additive manufacturing (3D/4D Printing) technologies: Materials, applications, and challenges.Polymers (Basel)20221421469810.3390/polym14214698 36365695
    [Google Scholar]
  9. RajpurohitS.R. DaveH.K. Analysis of tensile strength of a fused filament fabricated PLA part using an open-source 3D printer.Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.20191015-81525153610.1007/s00170‑018‑3047‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SturmL.D. AlbakriM.I. TarazagaP.A. WilliamsC.B. In situ monitoring of material jetting additive manufacturing process via impedance based measurements.Addit. Manuf.20192845646310.1016/j.addma.2019.05.022
    [Google Scholar]
  11. BhattP.M. KabirA.M. PeraltaM. BruckH.A. GuptaS.K. A robotic cell for performing sheet lamination-based additive manufacturing.Addit. Manuf.20192727828910.1016/j.addma.2019.02.002
    [Google Scholar]
  12. JeongW. KwonY.S. KimD. Three-dimensional printing of tungsten structures by directed energy deposition.Mater. Manuf. Process.201934998699210.1080/10426914.2019.1594253
    [Google Scholar]
  13. VazV.M. KumarL. 3D printing as a promising tool in personalized medicine.AAPS PharmSciTech20212214910.1208/s12249‑020‑01905‑8 33458797
    [Google Scholar]
  14. JandyalA. ChaturvediI. WazirI. RainaA. Ul HaqM.I. 3D printing – A review of processes, materials and applications in industry 4.0.Sustainable Operat Comp20223334210.1016/j.susoc.2021.09.004
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ZhangX. ChenL. MulhollandT. OsswaldT.A. Effects of raster angle on the mechanical properties of PLA and Al/PLA composite part produced by fused deposition modeling.Polym. Adv. Technol.20193082122213510.1002/pat.4645
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Asadollahi-YazdiE. GardanJ. LafonP. Multi-objective optimization of additive manufacturing process.IFAC-PapersOnLine2018511115215710.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.250
    [Google Scholar]
  17. TranP. NgoT.D. GhazlanA. HuiD. Bimaterial 3D printing and numerical analysis of bio-inspired composite structures under in-plane and transverse loadings.Compos., Part B Eng.201710821022310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.083
    [Google Scholar]
  18. RajaguruK. KarthikeyanT. VijayanV. Additive manufacturing – State of art.Mater. Today Proceed.202021162863310.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.728
    [Google Scholar]
  19. DaminaboS.C. GoelS. GrammatikosS.A. NezhadH.Y. ThakurV.K. Fused deposition modeling-based additive manufacturing (3D printing): Techniques for polymer material systems.Mater. Today Chem.20201610024810.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100248
    [Google Scholar]
  20. GaoG. XuF. XuJ. TangG. LiuZ. A survey of the influence of process parameters on mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts.Micromachines (Basel)202213455310.3390/mi13040553 35457856
    [Google Scholar]
  21. AlafaghaniA. QattawiA. AlrawiB. GuzmanA. Experimental optimization of fused deposition modelling processing parameters: A design-for-manufacturing approach.Procedia Manuf.20171079180310.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079
    [Google Scholar]
  22. AloyaydiB.A. SivasankaranS. AmmarH.R. Influence of infill density on microstructure and flexural behavior of 3D printed PLA thermoplastic parts processed by fusion deposition modeling.AIMS Mater. Sci.2019661033104810.3934/matersci.2019.6.1033
    [Google Scholar]
  23. KreigerM. PearceJ.M. Environmental impacts of distributed manufacturing from 3-D printing of polymer components and products.Proc. MRS20131492859010.1557/opl.2013.319
    [Google Scholar]
  24. HikmatM. RostamS. AhmedY.M. Investigation of tensile property-based Taguchi method of PLA parts fabricated by FDM 3D printing technology.Results Eng.20211110026410.1016/j.rineng.2021.100264
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Heidari-RaraniM. EzatiN. SadeghiP. BadrossamayM.R. Optimization of FDM process parameters for tensile properties of polylactic acid specimens using Taguchi design of experiment method.J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater.202235122435245210.1177/0892705720964560
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KechagiasJ.D. VidakisN. PetousisM. MountakisN. A multi-parametric process evaluation of the mechanical response of PLA in FFF 3D printing.Mater. Manuf. Process.202338894195310.1080/10426914.2022.2089895
    [Google Scholar]
  27. TontowiA. RamdaniL. ErdizonR. BarorohD. Optimization of 3D-printer process parameters for improving quality of polylactic acid printed part.Int J Eng Technol20179258960010.21817/ijet/2017/v9i2/170902044
    [Google Scholar]
  28. AbouelmajdM. BahlaouiA. ArroubI. Experimental analysis and optimization of mechanical properties of FDM-processed polylactic acid using Taguchi design of experiment.Int J Simul Multi Des Opti2021123010.1051/smdo/2021031
    [Google Scholar]
  29. NgoT.D. KashaniA. ImbalzanoG. NguyenK.T.Q. HuiD. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges.Compos., Part B Eng.201814317219610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
    [Google Scholar]
  30. LiuY. WangT. ChenH. Impact behaviors of additively manufactured metals and structures: A review.Int. J. Impact Eng.202419110499210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.104992
    [Google Scholar]
  31. FountasN.A. PapantoniouI. KechagiasJ.D. ManolakosD.E. VaxevanidisN.M. Modeling and optimization of flexural properties of FDM-processed PET-G specimens using RSM and GWO algorithm.Eng. Fail. Anal.202213810634010.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106340
    [Google Scholar]
  32. SoodA.K. OhdarR.K. MahapatraS.S. Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement.J. Adv. Res.201231819010.1016/j.jare.2011.05.001
    [Google Scholar]
  33. AtakokG. KamM. KocH.B. Tensile, three-point bending and impact strength of 3D printed parts using PLA and recycled PLA filaments: A statistical investigation.J. Mater. Res. Technol.2022181542155410.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.013
    [Google Scholar]
  34. BennettT.L. GheorghescuG.M. Printing 3D objects with automatic dimensional accuracy compensation.US Patent 10,761,497 B22020
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976328835241016094600
Loading
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976328835241016094600
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test