Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 2212-7976
  • E-ISSN: 1874-477X

Abstract

Background

Research on alternative fuels for internal combustion engines is crucial due to climate change and energy security concerns. Ethanol-blended gasoline has been a popular alternative fuel, but biomass limitations restrict its widespread use. Methanol offers a solution as it can be produced from non-food sources, extending ethanol's availability.

Objective

This study explores a ternary fuel blend consisting of gasoline, ethanol, and methanol as an alternative to binary gasoline-ethanol blend. The objective is to investigate if the iso-stoichiometric ternary blend offers equivalent fuel properties to E50 (Ethanol 50%, Gasoline 50% (v/v)) gasohol while potentially enhancing engine performance, reducing emissions, and improving combustion characteristics.

Methods

A single-cylinder, four-stroke, port fuel injection spark ignition engine was used. The engine was tested with three fuels: pure gasoline, E50 blend, and an equivalent iso-stoichiometric GEM blends. Engine tests were conducted at constant load with varying engine speeds. Performance, emission, and combustion parameters were experimentally measured and compared across all fuels.

Results

E50 and its equivalent blends improved brake thermal efficiency but increased brake specific fuel consumption compared to gasoline. It significantly reduced unburned hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions but slightly increased nitrogen oxide emissions.

Conclusion

Formulated E50 equivalent blends have identical air to fuel ratio, lower heating values as conventional binary E50 gasoline-ethanol blends. The study suggests that iso-stoichiometric GEM blends have the potential to be a viable alternative drop-in fuel for E50 in internal combustion engines. The future advancements in GEM blends, particularly in optimizing ratios, could lead to patentable inventions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976325325240916045658
2024-10-11
2025-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Energy Institute. Statistical Review of World Energy 2023. London: Energy Institute2023Available from: https://www.energyinst.org/statistical-review.
  2. RaimiD. ZhuY. NewellR.G. PrestB.C. Global Energy Outlook 2024: Peaks or Plateaus. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future; 2024 Apr 2.Available from: https://www.rff.org/publications/reports/global-energy-outlook-2024
  3. YusufA.A. InambaoF.L. Progress in alcohol-gasoline blends and their effects on the performance and emissions in SI engines under different operating conditions.Int J Ambient Energy202142446548110.1080/01430750.2018.1531261
    [Google Scholar]
  4. AwadO.I. MamatR. AliO.M. Alcohol and ether as alternative fuels in spark ignition engine: A review.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.2018822586260510.1016/j.rser.2017.09.074
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ThakurA.K. KavitiA.K. MehraR. MerK.K.S. Progress in performance analysis of ethanol-gasoline blends on SI engine.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.20176932434010.1016/j.rser.2016.11.056
    [Google Scholar]
  6. WangC. LiY. XuC. BadawyT. SahuA. JiangC. Methanol as an octane booster for gasoline fuels.Fuel2019248768410.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.128
    [Google Scholar]
  7. VerhelstS. TurnerJ.W.G. SileghemL. VancoillieJ. Methanol as a fuel for internal combustion engines.Pror. Energy Combust. Sci.201970438810.1016/j.pecs.2018.10.001
    [Google Scholar]
  8. TopgülT. YücesuH.S. ÇinarC. KocaA. The effects of ethanol–unleaded gasoline blends and ignition timing on engine performance and exhaust emissions.Renew. Energy200631152534254210.1016/j.renene.2006.01.004
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BayraktarH. Experimental and theoretical investigation of using gasoline–ethanol blends in spark-ignition engines.Renew. Energy200530111733174710.1016/j.renene.2005.01.006
    [Google Scholar]
  10. JiaL.W. ShenM.Q. WangJ. LinM.Q. Influence of ethanol–gasoline blended fuel on emission characteristics from a four-stroke motorcycle engine.J. Hazard. Mater.20051231-3293410.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.03.046 15923082
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HsiehW.D. ChenR.H. WuT.L. LinT.H. Engine performance and pollutant emission of an SI engine using ethanol–gasoline blended fuels.Atmos. Environ.200236340341010.1016/S1352‑2310(01)00508‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  12. HuZ. PuG. FangF. WangC. Economics, environment, and energy life cycle assessment of automobiles fueled by bio-ethanol blends in China.Renew. Energy200429142183219210.1016/j.renene.2004.03.014
    [Google Scholar]
  13. AleiferisP.G. Serras-PereiraJ. RichardsonD. Characterisation of flame development with ethanol, butanol, iso-octane, gasoline and methane in a direct-injection spark-ignition engine.Fuel201310925627810.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.088
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ZengW. XuM. ZhangG. ZhangY. ClearyD.J. Atomization and vaporization for flash-boiling multi-hole sprays with alcohol fuels.Fuel20129528729710.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.048
    [Google Scholar]
  15. TakeshitaE.V. RezendeR.V.P. de SouzaS.M.A.G.U. de SouzaA.A.U. Influence of solvent addition on the physicochemical properties of Brazilian gasoline.Fuel20088710-112168217710.1016/j.fuel.2007.11.003
    [Google Scholar]
  16. FrenchR. MaloneP. Phase equilibria of ethanol fuel blends.Fluid Phase Equilib.2005228-229274010.1016/j.fluid.2004.09.012
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BalabinR.M. SyunyaevR.Z. KarpovS.A. Quantitative measurement of ethanol distribution over fractions of ethanol− gasoline fuel.Energy Fuels20072142460246510.1021/ef070081l
    [Google Scholar]
  18. AgarwalA.K. SinghA.P. MauryaR.K. Evolution, challenges and path forward for low temperature combustion engines.Pror. Energy Combust. Sci.20176115610.1016/j.pecs.2017.02.001
    [Google Scholar]
  19. DagautP. TogbéC. Experimental and modeling study of the kinetics of oxidation of ethanol-n-heptane mixtures in a jet-stirred reactor.Fuel201089228028610.1016/j.fuel.2009.06.035
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Barraza-BotetC.L. WooldridgeM.S. Combustion chemistry of iso-octane/ethanol blends: Effects on ignition and reaction pathways.Combust. Flame201818832433610.1016/j.combustflame.2017.10.011
    [Google Scholar]
  21. BadraJ. AlRamadanA.S. SarathyS.M. Optimization of the octane response of gasoline/ethanol blends.Appl. Energy201720377879310.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.084
    [Google Scholar]
  22. YuanH. YangY. BrearM.J. FoongT.M. AndersonJ.E. Optimal octane number correlations for mixtures of toluene reference fuels (TRFs) and ethanol.Fuel201718840841710.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.042
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SinghE. TingasE.A. GoussisD. ImH.G. SarathyS.M. Chemical ignition characteristics of ethanol blending with primary reference fuels.Energy Fuels20193310101851019610.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01423
    [Google Scholar]
  24. GhadikolaeiM.A. Effect of alcohol blend and fumigation on regulated and unregulated emissions of IC engines—A review.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.2016571440149510.1016/j.rser.2015.12.128
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LiL. GeY. WangM. Exhaust and evaporative emissions from motorcycles fueled with ethanol gasoline blends.Sci. Total Environ.201550262763110.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.068 25302450
    [Google Scholar]
  26. JinD. ChoiK. MyungC.L. LimY. LeeJ. ParkS. The impact of various ethanol-gasoline blends on particulates and unregulated gaseous emissions characteristics from a spark ignition direct injection (SIDI) passenger vehicle.Fuel201720970271210.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.063
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ZhangF. WangJ. TianD. WangJ.X. ShuaiS.J. Research on unregulated emissions from an alcohols-gasoline blend vehicle using FTIR, HPLC and GC-MS measuring methods.SAE Int. J. Engines2013621126113710.4271/2013‑01‑1345
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ZhaoL. WangX. WangD. SuX. Investigation of the effects of lean mixtures on combustion and particulate emissions in a DISI engine fueled with bioethanol-gasoline blends.Fuel202026011609610.1016/j.fuel.2019.116096
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SakthivelP. SubramanianK.A. MathaiR. Effects of different compression ratios and spark timings on performance and emissions of a two-wheeler with 30% ethanol-gasoline blend (E30).Fuel202027711811310.1016/j.fuel.2020.118113
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Edwin GeoV. Jesu GodwinD. ThiyagarajanS. SaravananC.G. AlouiF. Effect of higher and lower order alcohol blending with gasoline on performance, emission and combustion characteristics of SI engine.Fuel201925611580610.1016/j.fuel.2019.115806
    [Google Scholar]
  31. YusoffM.N.A.M. ZulkifliN.W.M. MasjukiH.H. Comparative assessment of ethanol and isobutanol addition in gasoline on engine performance and exhaust emissions.J. Clean. Prod.201819048349510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.183
    [Google Scholar]
  32. LiY. GongJ. DengY. YuanW. FuJ. ZhangB. Experimental comparative study on combustion, performance and emissions characteristics of methanol, ethanol and butanol in a spark ignition engine.Appl. Therm. Eng.2017115536310.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.12.037
    [Google Scholar]
  33. AgarwalA.K. KarareH. DharA. Combustion, performance, emissions and particulate characterization of a methanol–gasoline blend (gasohol) fuelled medium duty spark ignition transportation engine.Fuel Process. Technol.2014121162410.1016/j.fuproc.2013.12.014
    [Google Scholar]
  34. TurnerJ. PearsonR. PurvisR. DekkerE. JohanssonK. GEM ternary blends: Removing the biomass limit by using isostoichiometric mixtures of gasoline, ethanol, and methanol.SAE Technical Paper 2011-24-0113.Warrendale (PA)SAE International201110.4271/2011‑24‑0113
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SileghemL. CoppensA. CasierB. VancoillieJ. VerhelstS. Performance and emissions of iso-stoichiometric ternary GEM blends on a production SI engine.Fuel201411728629310.1016/j.fuel.2013.09.043
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ChaichanM.T. Gasoline, ethanol and methanol (GEM) ternary blends utilization as an alternative to conventional Iraqi gasoline to suppress emitted sulfur and lead components to environment.Al-Khwarizmi Eng J20161233851
    [Google Scholar]
  37. TurnerJ.W.G. PearsonR.J. BellA. de GoedeS. WoolardC. Iso-stoichiometric ternary blends of gasoline, ethanol and methanol: Investigations into exhaust emissions, blend properties and octane numbers.SAE Int. J. Fuel Lubr.20125394596710.4271/2012‑01‑1586
    [Google Scholar]
  38. ShayanS.B. SeyedpourS.M. OmmiF. MoosavyS.H. AlizadehM. Impact of methanol–gasoline fuel blends on the performance and exhaust emissions of a SI engine.Int. J. Automot. Eng.201113219227
    [Google Scholar]
  39. MasumB.M. MasjukiH.H. KalamM.A. Rizwanul FattahI.M. PalashS.M. AbedinM.J. Effect of ethanol–gasoline blend on NOx emission in SI engine.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.20132420922210.1016/j.rser.2013.03.046
    [Google Scholar]
  40. PuertolasB.V. NavarroM.M. LopezJ. MurilloR.M. MastralA. GarciaT. Recent solutions for the abatement of hydrocarbon emissions during the cold start of light vehicles.Recent Pat. Chem. Eng.201141365210.2174/2211334711104010036
    [Google Scholar]
  41. JejurkarS. MishraD. A review of recent patents on micro-combustion and applications.Recent Pat. Eng.20093319420910.2174/187221209789117753
    [Google Scholar]
  42. RaoC. Ignition control of advanced combustion engines - a patent landscape.Recent Pat. Mech. Eng.20092215416410.2174/2212797610902020154
    [Google Scholar]
  43. LehmannH. HeimannR. Thermally sprayed thermal barrier coating (TBC) systems: A survey of recent patents.Recent Pat. Mater. Sci.20081214015810.2174/1874464810801020140
    [Google Scholar]
  44. MilojevićS. SavićS. MarićD. StopkaO. KrstićB. StojanovićB. Correlation between emission and combustion characteristics with the compression ratio and fuel injection timing in tribologically optimized diesel engine.Teh. Vjesn.202229412101219
    [Google Scholar]
  45. MilojevićS. GlišovićJ. SavićS. BoškovićG. BukvićM. StojanovićB. Particulate matter emission and air pollution reduction by applying variable systems in tribologically optimized diesel engines for vehicles in road traffic.Atmosphere202415218410.3390/atmos15020184
    [Google Scholar]
  46. MilojevićS. SavićS. MitrovićS. Solving the problem of friction and wear in auxiliary devices of internal combustion engines on the example of reciprocating air compressor for vehicles.Teh. Vjesn.2023301122130
    [Google Scholar]
  47. SambandamP. MurugesanP. ShajahanM.I. SethuramanB. Abdelmoneam HusseinH.M. Sustainability and environmental impact of hydroxy addition on a light-duty generator powered with an ethanol–gasoline blend.J Renew Energy Environ2022928292
    [Google Scholar]
  48. ThamilarasanJ. RavikumarV. YadavS.P.R. Sustainability improvement of ethanol blended gasoline fuelled spark ignition engine by nanoparticles.J. Nanomater.202220221779394710.1155/2022/7793947
    [Google Scholar]
  49. PadmanabhanS. GiridharanK. StalinB. Sustainability and environmental impact of ethanol and oxyhydrogen addition on nanocoated gasoline engine.Bioinorg. Chem. Appl.202220221193641510.1155/2022/1936415 35096035
    [Google Scholar]
  50. ShajahanM.I. SambandamP. MichaelJ.J. Abdelmoneam HusseinH.M. Environmental impact of oxyhydrogen addition on high-speed gasoline engine characteristics.Energy Sources A Recovery Util. Environ. Effects202011410.1080/15567036.2020.1812768
    [Google Scholar]
  51. LiangC. JiC. GaoB. LiuX. ZhuY. Investigation on the performance of a spark-ignited ethanol engine with DME enrichment.Energy Convers. Manage.201258192510.1016/j.enconman.2012.01.004
    [Google Scholar]
  52. HuangY. HuangS. HuangR. HongG. Spray and evaporation characteristics of ethanol and gasoline direct injection in non-evaporating, transition and flash-boiling conditions.Energy Convers. Manage.2016108687710.1016/j.enconman.2015.10.081
    [Google Scholar]
  53. KaravalakisG. ShortD. VuD. The impact of ethanol and iso-butanol blends on gaseous and particulate emissions from two passenger cars equipped with spray-guided and wall-guided direct injection SI (spark ignition) engines.Energy20158216817910.1016/j.energy.2015.01.023
    [Google Scholar]
  54. OzsezenA.N. CanakciM. Performance and combustion characteristics of alcohol–gasoline blends at wide-open throttle.Energy20113652747275210.1016/j.energy.2011.02.014
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Suarez-BertoaR. ZardiniA.A. KeukenH. AstorgaC. Impact of ethanol containing gasoline blends on emissions from a flex-fuel vehicle tested over the Worldwide Harmonized Light duty Test Cycle (WLTC).Fuel201514317318210.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.076
    [Google Scholar]
  56. TurnerD. XuH. CracknellR.F. NatarajanV. ChenX. Combustion performance of bio-ethanol at various blend ratios in a gasoline direct injection engine.Fuel20119051999200610.1016/j.fuel.2010.12.025
    [Google Scholar]
  57. TanakaS HoizumiA Production method for ethanol-blended gasoline.JP Patent 2011006701A2011
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976325325240916045658
Loading
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976325325240916045658
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): alternative fuels; combustion; emissions; equivalent blends; GEM blends; Iso-stoichiometric
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test