Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2212-7976
  • E-ISSN: 1874-477X

Abstract

Background

In recent years, patents have shown that upper-limb rehabilitation robots play a significant role in home-based rehabilitation training for stroke hemiplegia patients. Changes in muscle tension during the flaccid paralysis phase cause the rehabilitation robot to deviate from the predetermined motion trajectory. This poses a challenge to the mathematical modeling of the rehabilitation robot and the design of the nonlinear extended state observer (NESO).

Objective

To address the problem of trajectory tracking errors caused by changes in the patient's muscle tension, a method based on optimizing the nonlinear function within the NESO is proposed.

Methods

First, a mathematical model of the upper-limb rehabilitation robot is established to obtain the dynamic relationship between the robot's velocity and the input voltage. Second, the nonlinear function of the NESO is optimized by adjusting the gain values of the sine and tangent functions to effectively estimate muscle tension and reduce the problem of accumulative error due to changes in muscle tension. Finally, comparative simulations of trajectory tracking including the optimized nonlinear function as well as the sine, tangent and power functions are performed on the MATLAB platform.

Results

The NESO is constructed to estimate changes in muscle tension based on sine, tangent, and power functions, as well as optimized nonlinear functions. The equivalent gain values of each function and the muscle tension estimation curves of the NESO are compared. The simulation results show that the equivalent gain value of the optimized nonlinear function acting in NESO is increased to more than 8 and the convergence time is reduced by 11.9% accordingly. This conclusion is validated by simulations and practical tests.

Conclusion

The optimized nonlinear function shortens the estimation time of the NESO for changes in muscle tension, which can provide a reference value for the design of observers for upper-limb rehabilitation robots of patients in the flaccid paralysis stage.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976308372240606105804
2024-06-25
2025-09-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ZhangM. ChenJ. LingZ. Quantitative evaluation system of upper limb motor function of stroke patients based on desktop rehabilitation robot.Sensors (Basel)2022223117010.3390/s22031170 35161913
    [Google Scholar]
  2. EslamiM. MokhtarianA. PirmoradianM. SeifzadehA. RafiaeiM. Design and fabrication of a passive upper limb rehabilitation robot with adjustable automatic balance based on variable mass of end-effector.J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng.2020421262910.1007/s40430‑020‑02707‑6
    [Google Scholar]
  3. JiangJ. GuoS. ZhangL. Motor ability evaluation of the upper extremity with point-to-point training movement based on end-effector robot-assisted training system.J. Healthc. Eng.202220221939844
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LiuY. LiC. JiL. Development and implementation of an end-effector upper limb rehabilitation robot for hemiplegic patients with line and circle tracking training.J. Healthc. Eng.201720174931217
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HongCheng RuiHuang JingQiu A survey of rehabilitation robot and its clinical applications.ROBOT2021435606619
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MasieroS. CeliaA. RosatiG. ArmaniM. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.200788214214910.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032 17270510
    [Google Scholar]
  7. YuH-Y. Analysis of the effect of early rehabilitation nursing on patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.Zhongguo Xiandai Yaowu Yingyong20211521229231
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GargA. AggarwalP. AggarwalY. Machine learning models for predicting the compressive strength of concrete containing nano silica.Comput. Concr.202230133
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BarbozaF. KimuraH. AltmanE. Machine learning models and bankruptcy prediction.Expert Syst. Appl.20178340541710.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.006
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GargA. BelarbiM.O. TounsiA. LiL. SinghA. MukhopadhyayT. Predicting elemental stiffness matrix of FG nanoplates using Gaussian Process Regression based surrogate model in framework of layerwise model.Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem.202214377979510.1016/j.enganabound.2022.08.001
    [Google Scholar]
  11. JinB. XuX. Price forecasting through neural networks for crude oil, heating oil, and natural gas.MeasurementEnergy2024100001
    [Google Scholar]
  12. XuX. ZhangY. Corn cash price forecasting with neural networks.Comput. Electron. Agric.202118410612010.1016/j.compag.2021.106120
    [Google Scholar]
  13. XuX. ZhangY. House price forecasting with neural networks.Intelligent Sys Appl20211220005210.1016/j.iswa.2021.200052
    [Google Scholar]
  14. YangS.X. MengM. An efficient neural network approach to dynamic robot motion planning.Neural Netw.200013214314810.1016/S0893‑6080(99)00103‑3 10935758
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ChaiR. NiuH. CarrascoJ. ArvinF. YinH. LennoxB. Design and experimental validation of deep reinforcement learning-based fast trajectory planning and control for mobile robot in unknown environment.IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.20243545778579210.1109/TNNLS.2022.3209154 36215389
    [Google Scholar]
  16. XuX. ZhangY. Price forecasts of ten steel products using Gaussian process regressions.Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell.202312610687010.1016/j.engappai.2023.106870
    [Google Scholar]
  17. JinB. XuX. Forecasting wholesale prices of yellow corn through the Gaussian process regression.Neural Comput. Appl.202436158693871010.1007/s00521‑024‑09531‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  18. WuY. FengJ. Development and application of artificial neural network.Wirel. Pers. Commun.201810221645165610.1007/s11277‑017‑5224‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AsadollahfardiG. Artificial Neural Network. In: Asadollahfardi G, editor.Water Quality Management: Assessment and Interpretation.SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology. Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer2016779110.1007/978‑3‑662‑44725‑3_6
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HanJ. From PID to active disturbance rejection control.IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.200956390090610.1109/TIE.2008.2011621
    [Google Scholar]
  21. GaoQ. DongJ. Feedforward compensation design for observation error of extended state observer.Guofang Ke-ji Daxue Xuebao2019410593102
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LiL. CaoW. YangH. GengQ. Trajectory tracking control for a wheel mobile robot on rough and uneven ground.Mechatronics20228310274110.1016/j.mechatronics.2022.102741
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ZhangZ. ChengJ. GuoY. PD-based optimal ADRC with improved linear extended state observer.Entropy202123788810.3390/e23070888 34356430
    [Google Scholar]
  24. GaoZ. Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning.ACC200349894996
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MohammadiA. DallaliH. Disturbance observer applications in rehabilitation robotics: an overview.Powered Prostheses2020113133
    [Google Scholar]
  26. LongY. DuZ. CongL. WangW. ZhangZ. DongW. Active disturbance rejection control based human gait tracking for lower extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton.ISA Trans.20176738939710.1016/j.isatra.2017.01.006 28108003
    [Google Scholar]
  27. LiH. SunC. ZhangJ. Trajectory tracking control of lower limb exoskeleton rehabilitation robot based on extended state observer.2022 IEEE 17th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA),IEEE, 2022: 1294-1299
    [Google Scholar]
  28. CuiX. WangB. LuH. ChenJ. Design and passive training control of elbow rehabilitation robot.Electronics20211010114710.3390/electronics10101147
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ZhaoZ.L. GuoB.Z. A novel extended state observer for output tracking of MIMO systems with mismatched uncertainty.IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr.201863121121810.1109/TAC.2017.2720419
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ShenZ. ZhangX. Recursive sliding-mode dynamic surface adaptive control for ship trajectory tracking with nonlinear gains.Acta Automatica Sinica2018441018331841
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PuM. LiuP. Advanced fal function and three novel nonlinear extended state observers.Control and Decision202136716551662
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ChenZ. ZhangZ. Fal function improvement of ADRC and its application in quadrotor aircraft attitude control.Control and Decision2018331019011907
    [Google Scholar]
  33. QiaoX. ZhouW. Fal function improvement of ADRC and its application in Drag-Free satellite.Hangtian Kongzhi20224043844
    [Google Scholar]
  34. AoleS. ElamvazuthiI. WaghmareL. PatreB. MeriaudeauF. Improved active disturbance rejection control for trajectory tracking control of lower limb robotic rehabilitation exoskeleton.Sensors20202013368110.3390/s20133681 32630115
    [Google Scholar]
  35. LiuB. ZhuC. JinY. Speed control for the lateral swing of aerial cameras based on an improved extended state observer.Zhongguo Gongcheng Xuekan201841212413110.1080/02533839.2018.1437369
    [Google Scholar]
  36. HuaS. QiuY. Active disturbance rejection control for attitude of unmanned helicopter based on improved fal function.Electronics Optics & Control2022290416
    [Google Scholar]
  37. YanG. LiY. Attitude control of quadrotor based on improved auto disturbance rejection.Dianzi Celiang Jishu201942167177
    [Google Scholar]
  38. MoiziardV. LansamanT. Mauruc SoubiracE. Assessment of the upper limb of the tetraplegic patient.Hand Surg. Rehabil.202241S137S14710.1016/j.hansur.2019.02.004 34265478
    [Google Scholar]
  39. ChuangL. WuC. LinK. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of myotonometric measurement of muscle tone, elasticity, and stiffness in patients with stroke.Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.201293353254010.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.014 22222143
    [Google Scholar]
  40. BabaiaslM. MahdiounS.H. JaryaniP. YazdaniM. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol.2016114263280 25600057
    [Google Scholar]
  41. MengD GuoZ Iterative learning control method for rehabilitation mechanical device based on extended state observer.CN Patent 112068434A2020
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976308372240606105804
Loading
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976308372240606105804
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test