Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2212-7976
  • E-ISSN: 1874-477X

Abstract

Sustainable manufacturing is intricately characterized as the conscientious creation of goods and services employing environmentally harmonious techniques and methodologies. These approaches are specifically devised to curtail ecological harm by conserving energy, preserving natural resources, and fortifying the well-being of communities and materials alike. Its paramount significance lies in its capacity to discern issues inherent in the stages of planning, designing, scrutinizing, and augmenting manufacturing processes, with potential innovations protected by patents. This current discourse aspires to expound upon the multifaceted dimensions of sustainable manufacturing, encompassing the delineation of pertinent metrics, a comprehensive examination of the diverse environmental ramifications intrinsic to sustainable manufacturing, and an exploration of the very essence of sustainability within the manufacturing paradigm, including consideration of technologies that contribute to eco-conscious practices. Moreover, this paper delves into the myriad challenges that confront sustainable manufacturing, offering a nuanced analysis, while simultaneously shedding light on the latent opportunities that reside within this realm, potentially protected by patents. In essence, the narrative woven herein endeavors to provide an extensive panorama of the intricate tapestry that is sustainable manufacturing, featuring innovative solutions that will be secured through patent protection. By dissecting its constituent elements and navigating through the challenges and prospects, we aim to foster a profound understanding of the holistic implications and potential transformative pathways within the realm of eco-conscious production methodologies, incorporating the advancements that contribute to sustainable manufacturing practices. In conclusion, the exploration of sustainable manufacturing's various dimensions, challenges, and opportunities not only contributes to a comprehensive understanding of its intricacies but also serves as a foundation for fostering eco-conscious production methods and transformative pathways in manufacturing practices, with the protection and dissemination of patented technologies playing a pivotal role in driving sustainable innovations.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976297708240422093250
2024-04-29
2025-09-30

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976297708240422093250
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. International Organization for StandardizationISO 14001:2015 - Environmental management systems: Requirements with guidance for use.GenevaISO2015
     [Google Scholar]
  2. HischierR. WeidemaB. AlthausH-J. Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.2.DübendorfSwiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories2010
     [Google Scholar]
  3. JawahirI. DillonO. RouchK. JoshiK.J. VenkatachalamA. JaafarI.H. Total life-cycle considerations in product design for sustainability: A framework for comprehensive evaluation. Proceedings of the 10th international research/expert conference. Barcelona, Spain.2006Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:13808300
  4. WanigarathneP. LiewJ. WangX. DillonO.Jr JawahirI. Assessment of process sustainability for product manufacture in machining operations.Proceedings of the Global Conference on Sustainable Product Development and Life Cycle EngineeringBerlin, Germany2004
     [Google Scholar]
  5. FikselJ McDanielJ MendenhallC Measuring progress towards sustainability principles, process, and best practices. Ohio: Battelle Memorial Institute1999Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14237812
    [Google Scholar]
  6. FengS.C. JoungC.B. LiG. Development overview of sustainable manufacturing metrics.In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering; 2010 May 19-21; Hefei, China.DübendorfSwiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories2010311316Available from: https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=904931
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DreherJ. LawlerM. StewartJ. StrasorierG. ThorneM. General Motors metrics for sustainable manufacturing.Cambridge, (MA)MIT Sloan School of Management2009https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/58609
     [Google Scholar]
  8. ChoiA.C.K. KaebernickH. LaiW.H. Manufacturing processes modelling for environmental impact assessment.J. Mater. Process. Technol.1997701-323123810.1016/S0924‑0136(97)00067‑8
     [Google Scholar]
  9. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social AffairsIndicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies.3rd edNew York: United Nations2007Available at:SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT.UN.ORG.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. KumarA. ShrivastavaV.K. KumarP. KumarA. GulatiV. Predictive and experimental analysis of forces in die-less forming using artificial intelligence techniques.Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part, E J. Process Mech. Eng.202410.1177/09544089241235473
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GoyalG. KumarA. SharmaD. Recent applications of rapid prototyping with 3D printing: a review 3D Printing Technologies: Digital Manufacturing, Artificial Intelligence, Industry 40.Berlin, BostonDe Gruyter202424525810.1515/9783111215112‑012
     [Google Scholar]
  12. GoyalG. KumarA. GuptaA. Recent developments in 3D printing: a critical analysis and deep dive into innovative real-world applications 3D Printing Technologies: Digital Manufacturing, Artificial Intelligence, Industry 40.Berlin, BostonDe Gruyter202433535210.1515/9783111215112‑016
     [Google Scholar]
  13. KumarA. KumarP. SharmaN. SrivastavaA.K. 3D Printing Technologies: Digital Manufacturing, Artificial Intelligence, Industry 40.Berlin, BostonDe Gruyter202410.1515/9783111215112
     [Google Scholar]
  14. TadesseH SinghB DeressoH Investigation of production bottlenecks and productivity analysis in soft drink industry: a case study of East Africa Bottling Share Company.Int J Interact Des Manuf202410.1007/s12008‑023‑01715‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  15. KumarA. RaniS. RatheeS. BhatiaS. Security and risk analysis for intelligent cloud computing: methods, applications, and preventions. 1st.CRC Press202310.1201/9781003329947
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Human development report 2010: the real wealth of nations: pathways to human development.RePEc2010Available from: https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2010
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BrentA. LabuschagneC. Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry (13 pp+ 4).Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.200611131510.1065/lca2006.01.233
     [Google Scholar]
  18. HutchinsM.J. RichterJ.S. HenryM.L. SutherlandJ.W. Development of indicators for the social dimension of sustainability in a U.S. business context.J. Clean. Prod.201921268769710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.199
     [Google Scholar]
  19. DiazN. RedelsheimerE. DornfeldD. Energy consumption characterization and reduction strategies for milling machine tool use.Proceedings of the 18th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Technische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweig, GermanyMay 2nd-4th, 201110.1007/978‑3‑642‑19692‑8_46
     [Google Scholar]
  20. MarketGMT Global machine tools market by product type (milling machines, drilling machines, turning machines, grinding machines, electrical discharge machines), automation type, industry segment, sales channel, and region—global forecast to 2027.2021https://www.marketsandmarkets.com
  21. SrivastavaA.K. KumarA. KumarP. Research progress in metal additive manufacturing: challenges and opportunities.Int J Interact Des Manuf202310.1201/9781003406488
     [Google Scholar]
  22. AjayS. ParveenH. AlMangourB. Handbook of smart manufacturing: forecasting the future of industry 40. 1st.CRC Press202310.1201/9781003333760
     [Google Scholar]
  23. MostafaS. DumrakJ. Waste elimination for manufacturing sustainability.Procedia Manuf.20152111610.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.003
     [Google Scholar]
  24. KumarA. MittalR.K. HaleemA. Advances in Additive Manufacturing: Artificial Intelligence, Nature-Inspired, and Biomanufacturing.1st edAmsterdamElsevier202345010.1016/C2020‑0‑03877‑6
     [Google Scholar]
  25. KumarA. KumarV. ModgilV. KumarA. Stochastic Petri Nets modelling for performance assessment of a manufacturing unit.Mater. Today Proc.202256Part 121521910.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.073
     [Google Scholar]
  26. ChristyJ.V. MouradA-H.I. ArunachalamR. Sustainable manufacturing and optimization of squeeze stir cast rods using recycled aluminum and alumina reinforcements.In: Proceedings of the ASME 2020 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference2020 Jul 20–24New YorkAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers202010.1115/PVP2020‑21788
     [Google Scholar]
  27. ChoudhariC. NarkhedeB. MahajanS. Modeling and simulation with experimental validation of temperature distribution during solidification process in Sand casting.Int. J. Comput. Appl.20137816232910.5120/13607‑1399
     [Google Scholar]
  28. AllenJ.F. CannonF.S. Nieto-DelgadoC. Full-scale air emissions monitoring and casting quality demonstration of a hybrid hydrolyzed collagen–alkali silicate core binder.Int. J. Met. Cast.201610217218910.1007/s40962‑016‑0021‑y
     [Google Scholar]
  29. MizukiT. KannoT. Establishment of casting manufacturing technology by introducing an artificial sand mold with furan resin and realizing a clean foundry.Int. J. Met. Cast.201812477277810.1007/s40962‑018‑0209‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  30. KumaravadivelA. NatarajanU. Application of Six-Sigma DMAIC methodology to sand-casting process with response surface methodology.Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.2013695-81403142010.1007/s00170‑013‑5119‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  31. TimelliG. CaliariD. RakhmonovJ. Influence of process parameters and Sr addition on the microstructure and casting defects of LPDC A356 alloy for engine blocks.J. Mater. Sci. Technol.201632651552310.1016/j.jmst.2016.03.010
     [Google Scholar]
  32. GatesS.J. KorneliusG. RenckenS.C. FaganN.M. CowxP. ElsL. The use of fine water sprays to suppress fume emissions when casting ferromanganese.Clean Air Journal201525226610.17159/2410‑972X/2015/v25n2a3
     [Google Scholar]
  33. HayashiT. WatanabeI. KurogiT. ShiraishiT. MurataH. Effect of laser emission parameters on mechanical and physical properties of cast pure titanium.J. Spectrosc.2014201486230510.1155/2014/862305
     [Google Scholar]
  34. BandyopadhyayA. ZhangY. BoseS. Recent developments in metal additive manufacturing.Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng.2020289610410.1016/j.coche.2020.03.001 32432024
     [Google Scholar]
  35. ZhengJ. ZhouX. YuY. WuJ. LingW. MaH. Low carbon, high efficiency and sustainable production of traditional manufacturing methods through process design strategy: Improvement process for sand casting defects.J. Clean. Prod.202025311991710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119917
     [Google Scholar]
  36. MackC.A. Fifty years of Moore’s law.IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf.201124220220710.1109/TSM.2010.2096437
     [Google Scholar]
  37. SimiariZ. ShojaeeM. OladghaffariP. E-waste management and presentation of a suitable approach for disposal of these wastes: a case study in North of Iran, Nowshahr.Environ. Dev. Sustain.20202232087209810.1007/s10668‑018‑0278‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  38. MathiyazhaganK. SenguptaS. MathivathananD. Challenges for implementing green concept in sustainable manufacturing: a systematic review.OPSEARCH2019561327210.1007/s12597‑019‑00359‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  39. VinodhS. ManjunatheshwaraK.J. Karthik SundaramS. KirthivasanV. Application of fuzzy quality function deployment for sustainable design of consumer electronics products: a case study.Clean Technol. Environ. Policy20171941021103010.1007/s10098‑016‑1296‑7
     [Google Scholar]
  40. YouZ. HouW. WangX. MaJ. LiuJ. Design strategies for developing sustainable consumer electronics.J Resid Sci Technol2016134S219S22610.12783/issn.1544‑8053/13/4/S29
     [Google Scholar]
  41. KaebernickH. KaraS. SunM. Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements.Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf.200319646146810.1016/S0736‑5845(03)00056‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Bereketliİ. GenevoisM.E. UlukanH.Z. Green product design for mobile phones.Int J Econom Manage Enginee200931018501854
     [Google Scholar]
  43. LeeA.H.I. LinC.Y. An integrated fuzzy QFD framework for new product development.Flex. Serv. Manuf. J.2011231264710.1007/s10696‑011‑9076‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  44. WuY.H. HoC.C. Integration of green quality function deployment and fuzzy theory: a case study on green mobile phone design.J. Clean. Prod.201510827128010.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.013
     [Google Scholar]
  45. YounesiM. RoghanianE. A framework for sustainable product design: a hybrid fuzzy approach based on Quality Function Deployment for Environment.J. Clean. Prod.201510838539410.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.028
     [Google Scholar]
  46. HassanM.F. ShahM.H.M. YunosM.Z. Integration of ECQFD in conceptual design activities for enabling environmentally conscious design.J. Eng. Appl. Sci.201611424892495
     [Google Scholar]
  47. YungW.K.C. ChanH.K. SoJ.H.T. WongD.W.C. ChoiA.C.K. YueT.M. A life-cycle assessment for eco-redesign of a consumer electronic product.J. Eng. Des.2011222698510.1080/09544820902916597
     [Google Scholar]
  48. MobergÅ. BorggrenC. AmbellC. Simplifying a life cycle assessment of a mobile phone.Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.201419597999310.1007/s11367‑014‑0721‑6
     [Google Scholar]
  49. AndraeA. XiaM. ZhangJ. TangX. Practical eco-design and eco-innovation of consumer electronics—The case of mobile phones.Challenges201671310.3390/challe7010003
     [Google Scholar]
  50. SilvaN.D. JawahirI.S. JrO.D. RussellM. A new comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of product sustainability at the design and development stage of consumer electronic products.Int J Sustainable Manufacturing20091325126410.1504/IJSM.2009.023973
     [Google Scholar]
  51. van ErpR. SoleimanzadehR. NelaL. KampitsisG. MatioliE. Co-designing electronics with microfluidics for more sustainable cooling.Nature2020585782421121610.1038/s41586‑020‑2666‑1 32908265
     [Google Scholar]
  52. LjungbergL.Y. Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products.Mater. Des.200728246647910.1016/j.matdes.2005.09.006
     [Google Scholar]
  53. CaoH.J. LiuF. LiC.B. LiuC. An integrated method for product material selection considering environmental factors and a case study. Materials Science Forum.In: Uetikon-Zuerich, SwitzerlandTrans Tech Publications20061032103510.4028/0‑87849‑421‑9.1032
     [Google Scholar]
  54. ChanJ.W.K. TongT.K.L. Multi-criteria material selections and end-of-life product strategy: Grey relational analysis approach.Mater. Des.20072851539154610.1016/j.matdes.2006.02.016
     [Google Scholar]
  55. MeyerD.E. KatzJ.P. Analyzing the environmental impacts of laptop enclosures using screening-level life cycle assessment to support sustainable consumer electronics.J. Clean. Prod.201611236938310.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.143
     [Google Scholar]
  56. ManjunatheshwaraK.J. VinodhS. Grey-based decision-making method for sustainable material selection of tablet device enclosure.Clean Technol. Environ. Policy201820102345235610.1007/s10098‑018‑1610‑7
     [Google Scholar]
  57. LiG.D. YamaguchiD. NagaiM. A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem.Math. Comput. Model.2007463-457358110.1016/j.mcm.2006.11.021
     [Google Scholar]
  58. ZinkT. MakerF. GeyerR. AmirtharajahR. AkellaV. Comparative life cycle assessment of smartphone reuse: repurposing vs. refurbishment.Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.20141951099110910.1007/s11367‑014‑0720‑7
     [Google Scholar]
  59. NoonM.S. LeeS.J. CooperJ.S. A life cycle assessment of end-of-life computer monitor management in the Seattle metropolitan region.Resour. Conserv. Recycling201157222910.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.017
     [Google Scholar]
  60. WangQ. HuangN. CaiH. ChenX. WuY. Water strategies and practices for sustainable development in the semiconductor industry.Water Cycle20234121610.1016/j.watcyc.2022.12.001
     [Google Scholar]
  61. LunaF.M.T. CavalcanteJ.B. SilvaF.O.N. CavalcanteC.L.Jr Studies on biodegradability of bio-based lubricants.Tribol. Int.20159230130610.1016/j.triboint.2015.07.007
     [Google Scholar]
  62. ShahR. WoydtM. ZhangS. The economic and environmental significance of sustainable lubricants.Lubricants2021922110.3390/lubricants9020021
     [Google Scholar]
  63. BoniniS. SwartzS. Profits with purpose: How organizing for sustainability can benefit the bottom line.McKinsey on Sustainability & Resource Productivity201421115
     [Google Scholar]
  64. IBM Institute for Business ValueSustainability remains a business imperative, but current approaches are falling short.United States: IBM2024https://newsroom.ibm.com/2024-02-28-IBM-Study-Sustainability-Remains-a-Business-Imperative%2C-But-Current-Approaches-are-Falling-Short
     [Google Scholar]
  65. IBM Institute for Business ValueBeyond checking the box: how to create business value with embedded sustainability.United States: IBM2024https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/sustainability-business-value
     [Google Scholar]
  66. MaddenB.J. Bet on innovation, not Environmental, Social and Governance metrics, to lead the Net Zero transition.Syst. Res. Behav. Sci.202340341742810.1002/sres.2915
     [Google Scholar]
  67. GebhardtM. ThunT.W. SeeflothM. ZülchH. Managing sustainability—Does the integration of environmental, social and governance key performance indicators in the internal management systems contribute to companies’ environmental, social and governance performance?Bus. Strategy Environ.20233242175219210.1002/bse.3242
     [Google Scholar]
  68. RaulMT Method for establishing an environmental certification value of an energy generation facility.EP Patent 4303791A12024
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976297708240422093250
Loading
Crafting a Sustainable Future: Exploring Research, Overcoming Challenges, and Anticipating Trends in Manufacturing and Design Engineering
Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering 18, 26 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0122127976297708240422093250
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976297708240422093250
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976297708240422093250
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): conscientious creation; diverse environmental ramifications; eco-conscious production methodologies; ecological harm; environmentally harmonious techniques; holistic implications; Sustainable manufacturing

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test