Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2212-7976
  • E-ISSN: 1874-477X

Abstract

Background

The luffing mechanism of the truck crane is one of the key components of the crane, which is used to control the extension and contraction of the telescopic boom to achieve the luffing function of the crane. With the development of the engineering environment, the lifting height of the truck crane is getting higher and higher, the lifting mass is getting bigger and bigger, and the force situation of the crane luffing mechanism is becoming more and more complicated, in order to improve the stability of the lifting process, it is necessary to carry out the optimization work of the luffing mechanism.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to optimize the luffing mechanism of the truck crane, improve the lifting performance, and improve the stability of the lifting process.

Methods

Inspired by the patent, this paper takes the position of the three hinge points of the luffing mechanism of the truck crane as a research object, carrying on the force analysis, through the mathematical model. The multi-objective optimization model is established with the maximum force, maximum total length change rate and maximum stroke of the variable amplitude hydraulic cylinder as the optimization objectives. The multi-objective genetic algorithm was selected to compute the optimization model. Finally, the satisfaction function based on the robust design method and analytic hierarchy process is established, the optimization results are sorted and screened, and the optimal solution of the three optimization objectives is obtained.

Results

The mathematical model of the structural force was established through mathematical derivation, and the optimization model was solved using MATLAB combined with multi-objective genetic algorithm, and the optimization results show that the force, total length change rate and range of amplitude of the luffing mechanism have been improved.

Conclusion

The mathematical model, the multi-objective optimization method and the satisfaction function method are effective for the optimization of the luffing mechanism. It can be extended and applied to other construction machinery with boom luffing mechanisms and provide a reference for patent application.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976290153240417054900
2024-04-22
2025-09-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. FenglinY. WenjunM. JieZ. The relationship between eccentric structure and super-lift device of all-terrain crane based on the overall stability.J. Mech. Sci. Technol.20203462365237010.1007/s12206‑020‑0513‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  2. XuJ. ZhuoY. QiZ. WangG. ZhaoT. WangT. Instability load analysis of a telescopic boom for an all-terrain crane.Mech Sci2022132991100910.5194/ms‑13‑991‑2022
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KooB. ChangS.M. KangS.H. Natural mode analysis of a telescopic boom system with multiple sections using the Rayleigh-Ritz method.J. Mech. Sci. Technol.20183241677168410.1007/s12206‑018‑0324‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  4. YaoJ. XingF. FuY. QiuX. ZhouZ. HouJ. Failure analysis of torsional buckling of all-terrain crane telescopic boom section.Eng. Fail. Anal.201773728410.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.12.006
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhouQ. LiuY. XieY. ZhangX. Analysis on anti-overturning stability of a truck crane based on zero moment point theory.Dyna202297328128710.6036/10484
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PalbergM.R. BrandtJ. ThomasS.S. Crane, construction machine or industrial truck simulator.US Patent 11634306B22023
  7. LiS. WanC.F. HouZ. Structural optimization research on superstructure of jib crane.J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng.20173972779278710.1007/s40430‑017‑0718‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KimD.S. LeeJ. Structural design of a level-luffing crane through trajectory optimization and strength-based size optimization.Struct. Multidiscipl. Optim.201551251553110.1007/s00158‑014‑1139‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LiK.L. WangL.L. ShanN. TangW.X. Fea analysis for the trunk beam of the portal crane.Appl. Mech. Mater.201452929129510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.529.291
    [Google Scholar]
  10. WangY. XiaoH. LuS. FengM. Dynamics simulation analysis of protal crane boom system based on adams. 2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering.20-21 August 2011; Wuhan, China.201129029210.1109/CCIENG.2011.6008015
    [Google Scholar]
  11. JiaoQ. QinY. HanY. GuJ. ChengY. Modeling and optimization of pulling point position of luffing jib on portal crane.Math. Probl. Eng.202120211810.1155/2021/4627257
    [Google Scholar]
  12. XuJ. WengQ. WuJ. Analysis and optimization of folding-boom arm system luffing stability.Ferroelectrics20205621738410.1080/00150193.2020.1760595
    [Google Scholar]
  13. XuY XingB CaiL Optimization of hinge point in luffing mechanism of aerial working vehicle based on PSO algorithm.E3S Web Conf20212330403410.1051/e3sconf/202123304034
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LuoZH. Optimization design for luffing mechanism of portal slewing crane.Appl Mech Mater201457730530910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.577.305
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Liebherr Werk Ehingen. Crane, mobile crane having a guyed telescopic boom.US Patent 2023242383A12023
  16. PanagantN. PholdeeN. BureeratS. YildizA.R. MirjaliliS. A comparative study of recent multi-objective metaheuristics for solving constrained truss optimisation problems.Arch. Comput. Methods Eng.20212854031404710.1007/s11831‑021‑09531‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ShanuV MillieP VaclavS. A comprehensive review on NSGA-II for multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems.IEEE Access20219577579110.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070634
    [Google Scholar]
  18. DebK. PratapA. AgarwalS. MeyarivanT. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II.IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.20026218219710.1109/4235.996017
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AgastraE. PelosiG. SelleriS. TaddeiR. Taguchi’s method for multi-objective optimization problems.Int. J. RF Microw. Comput.-Aided Eng.201323335736610.1002/mmce.20680
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ZhouW. WangZ. XieW. Weighted signal-to-noise ratio robust design for a new double sampling npx chart.Comp. Indust Eng.202013911110.1016/j.cie.2019.106124
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ChanH.K. SunX. ChungS.H. When should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process?Decis. Support Syst.201912511311410.1016/j.dss.2019.113114
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976290153240417054900
Loading
/content/journals/meng/10.2174/0122127976290153240417054900
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test