Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 2352-0965
  • E-ISSN: 2352-0973

Abstract

Recently, many researchers have studied its performance within Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs). Every ad hoc network protocol focuses on a different set of measurements and traits. The majority of the currently utilized mobility models are employed to provide realistic movement patterns for MANET scenarios. A crucial element in the creation of MANET protocols is simulation. The future topology of a network can be predicted, which enables Quality of service-aware routing to choose a dependable link for data transmission. Ant algorithms, also known as swarm intelligence, are a wider field of study that deals with algorithmic approaches that are motivated by the behaviour of ant colonies and other insects. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) is a subset of this larger topic. Based on the pheromone value deposited over the link, we identified two categories for the link quality in the proposed approach. We have demonstrated how the network's performance is enhanced by the suggested technique. The nodes are moving in the specified terrain dimensions through the Enhanced Manhattan Mobility Model (EMMM). The five QoS performance metrics are analyzed over three MANET routing protocols. The comparison is made over two important factors-mobility and pause time with the proposed ACO technique of reliable links. In the first experiment of different speeds, DSR is 25.5% better than AODV and 5.3% better than DSDVin metric packet dropping, 1.15% better than AODV and 1.01% better than DSDV in Packet Delivery Ratio, 1.5% better than AODV and 1.04% better than DSDV in packet overhead, and 62.7% better than AODV and 73.1% better than DSDV in average end-to-end delay. In the second experiment of pause times, DSR is 25.05% better than AODV and 4.5% better than DSDV in packet dropping, 1.18% better than AODV and 1.01% better than DSDV in packet delivery ratio, 1.01% better than DSDV in throughput, 0 to 0.002% in packet overhead, and 0.02% to 0.005% shorter delay.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965293783240308104343
2024-03-18
2025-11-03

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965293783240308104343
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. GeierJ. Designing and Deploying 802.11 Wireless Networks.2nd edCisco Press2015
     [Google Scholar]
  2. KerberJ. WiFi Analytics: Track. Improve. Grow.Independently published2019
     [Google Scholar]
  3. TambeS.S. Wireless technology in networks.Int. J. of Sci. and Res. Pub.2015513
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ZhangN. BaoH. Wireless network technology and its applications.2009 International Conference on Networks Security, Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing2009, pp. 635-638
     [Google Scholar]
  5. KaurJ. SinghA. A review study on the use of MANET for wireless devices.Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Electronics, Electrical & Computational Intelligence (ICAEEC)IIIT Allahabad India, 31st May - 1st June, 2019, pp. 1-4, 2019
     [Google Scholar]
  6. SubburathinamK. KannanS. ArunachalamV.P. RavichandranT. ValarmathiM.L. An investigation about performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad-hoc network routing protocols in MANET.Int. J. of Comp. Sci. Iss.201073541
     [Google Scholar]
  7. KaurG. ThakurP. Routing protocols in MANET: An overview.2nd International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Instrumentation and Control Technologies (ICICICT)pp. 935-941, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. AlslaimM.N. AlaqelH.A. ZaghloulS.S. A comparative study of MANET routing protocols.The Third International Conference on e-Technologies and Networks for Development (ICeND2014)pp. 178-182, 2014.10.1109/ICeND.2014.6991375
     [Google Scholar]
  9. GuptaA.K. SadawartiH. VermaA.K. MANET routing protocols based on ant colony optimization.IJMO20122424910.7763/IJMO.2011.V1.83
     [Google Scholar]
  10. PandaN. PattanayakB.K. ACO-based secure routing protocols in MANETs.New Paradigm in Decision Science and Management. PatnaikS. IpA. TavanaM. Jainand V. Springer2020100510.1007/978‑981‑13‑9330‑3_18
     [Google Scholar]
  11. AnibrikaB.S.K. AsanteM. AcquahH.B. GhannP. A survey of modern ant colony optimization algorithms for MANET: Routing challenges, perspectives and paradigms.Int. J. of Engg. Res. & Tech.20209952959
     [Google Scholar]
  12. SinghG. KumarN. VermaA.K. ANTALG: An innovative ACO based routing algorithm for MANETs.J. Netw. Comput. Appl.20144515116710.1016/j.jnca.2014.07.006
     [Google Scholar]
  13. KumarJ. SinghA. PandaM.K. BhadauriaH.S. Study and performance analysis of routing protocol based on CBR.Procedia Comput. Sci.201685233010.1016/j.procs.2016.05.172
     [Google Scholar]
  14. KhanM.S. JadoonQ.K. KhanM.I. A comparative performance analysis of MANET routing protocols under security attacks.Mobile and Wireless Technology 2015Springer201531013714510.1007/978‑3‑662‑47669‑7_16
     [Google Scholar]
  15. SoomroA.M. FudzeeM.F.B.M. HussainM. SaimH.M. ZamanG. RahmanA.A-R. AlUbaidanH. NabilM. Comparative review of routing protocols in MANET for future research in disaster management.J. Commun.20221773474410.12720/jcm.17.9.734‑744
     [Google Scholar]
  16. WalunjkarG.M. Rao AnneK. Performance analysis of routing protocols in MANET.Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci.20201721047105210.11591/ijeecs.v17.i2.pp1047‑1052
     [Google Scholar]
  17. BaiF. HelmyA. A survey of mobility models.Wireless Adhoc Networks2004130
     [Google Scholar]
  18. AbdullahA.M. OzenE. BayramogluH. Investigating the impact of mobility models on MANET routing protocols.Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl.2019102253510.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100204
     [Google Scholar]
  19. RahmanM. SohailA. AftabA. Investigating the effects of mobility metrics in mobile Ad Hoc networks.Asian J. of Info. Tech.201968186
     [Google Scholar]
  20. KourS. SinghJ. Performance evaluation of enhanced manhattan mobility model over GM, RWP, manhattan grid, SLAW, and TLW mobility models in MANETs.Rec. Adv. in Comp. Sci. Commun.2022159921000
     [Google Scholar]
  21. AschenbruckN. PadillaG.E. MartiniP. A survey on mobility models for performance analysis in tactical mobile networks.J. of Tele. and Info. Tech.200825461
     [Google Scholar]
  22. LeeK. HongS. KimS.J. SLAW: A mobility model for human walks.IEEE INFOCOM 200919-25 April 2009, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 855-863, 2009.10.1109/INFCOM.2009.5061995
     [Google Scholar]
  23. MaanF. MazharN. MANET routing protocols vs mobility models: A performance evaluation.Proc. Third International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN)15-17 June 2011, Dalian, China, pp. 179-184, 2011.10.1109/ICUFN.2011.5949158
     [Google Scholar]
  24. MunjalA. CampT. AschenbruckN. Changing trends in modeling mobility.J. of Elec. and Comp. Engg.2012201211510.1155/2012/372572
     [Google Scholar]
  25. SelviF.A.P. ManikandanM.S.K. Ant based multipath backbone routing for load balancing in MANET.IET Commun.201711113614110.1049/iet‑com.2016.0574
     [Google Scholar]
  26. KourS. UbhiJ.S. A novel approach to predict mobility pattern of mobile nodes in mobile ad-hoc networks.J. Sci. Ind. Res.201877629632
     [Google Scholar]
  27. KourS. UbhiJ.S. Performance analysis of mobile nodes in mobile ad-hoc networks using enhanced manhattan mobility model.J. Sci. Ind. Res.2019786972
     [Google Scholar]
  28. KourS. UbhiJ.S. SinghM. QoS improvement using enhanced manhattan mobility model on proposed ant colony optimization technique in MANETs.J. Sci. Ind. Res.202382616628
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Al-ShareedaM.A. ManickamS. COVID-19 vehicle based on an efficient mutual authentication scheme for 5g-enabled vehicular fog computing.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health202219231561810.3390/ijerph19231561836497709
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Al-ShareedaM.A. AnbarM. ManickamS. HasbullahI.H. SE-CPPA: A secure and efficient conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme in vehicular Ad-Hoc networks.Sensors20212124820610.3390/s2124820634960311
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Al-ShareedaM.A. AnbarM. ManickamS. HasbullahI.H. Towards identity-based conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vehicular ad hoc networks.IEEE Access2021911322611323810.1109/ACCESS.2021.3104148
     [Google Scholar]
  32. MohammedB.A. Al-ShareedaM.A. ManickamS. Al-MekhlafiZ.G. AlreshidiA. AlazmiM. AlshudukhiJ.S. AlsaffarM. FC-PA: Fog computing-based pseudonym authentication scheme in 5g-enabled vehicular networks.IEEE Access202311185711858110.1109/ACCESS.2023.3247222
     [Google Scholar]
  33. ShareedaA.M.A. ManickamS. MSR-DoS: Modular square root-based scheme to resist denial of service (DoS) attacks in 5G-enabled vehicular networks.IEEE Access20221012060612061510.1109/ACCESS.2022.3222488
     [Google Scholar]
  34. MohanC.B. BaskaranR. Survey on recent research and implementation of ant colony optimization in various engineering applications.Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst.20114456658210.1080/18756891.2011.9727813
     [Google Scholar]
  35. KourS. SinghM. SarangalH. SinghB. Terrain dimensions and node density analysis of MANET using NS2 and BonnMotion.Lect. Note. Data Eng. Communicat. Technolog.202317116317510.1007/978‑981‑99‑1767‑9_13
     [Google Scholar]
  36. KourS. KumarR. KaurS. SinghM. SarangalH. SinghB. Comparative analysis of low and high scalable VANET in terms of receive rate, packets received, MAC/PHY overhead and average goodput.Procedia Comput. Sci.202323021422210.1016/j.procs.2023.12.076
     [Google Scholar]
  37. KaurR. SinghE.G. KumarA. KourS. A review study of vanet, mobility models and traffic generator tools.Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics, IC3I 202214-16 December 2022, Uttar Pradesh, India, pp. 1055–1060, 2022.10.1109/IC3I56241.2022.10072874
     [Google Scholar]
  38. SarangalH. SinghB. SinghM. GrewalV. KourS. Relative analysis of OCDMA-FSO and FSO under normal, haze and fog conditions.Lect. Notes Netw. Syst.202353547147910.1007/978‑981‑99‑4284‑8_39
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965293783240308104343
Loading
Analyze the Impact of Mobility and Pause Time on ACO based MANET Routing Protocols
Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering 18, 699 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0123520965293783240308104343
/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965293783240308104343
/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965293783240308104343
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

file format download Download

  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): ACO; EMMM; MANET; performance metrics; routing protocols

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test