Skip to content
2000
image of Efficacy and Safety of Ionic Contra-viral Therapy (Digoxin-Furosemide) in the Treatment of Multiple Cutaneous Warts: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis

Abstract

Introduction

The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of intralesional Ionic Contra-Viral Therapy (ICVT)-a combination of digoxin and furosemide-in the treatment of multiple cutaneous warts.

Methods

This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024544551). A comprehensive literature search was performed up to April 2024 across PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials involving adults with ≥2 cutaneous warts treated with intralesional digoxin and furosemide, assessing outcomes, such as complete and partial clearance, wart size reduction, and adverse events. Exclusion criteria included case reports, reviews, and preclinical studies. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved through consensus. The Cochrane RoB 2 tool was used for risk of bias assessment. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. The quality of evidence was graded using the GRADE framework.

Results

Seven randomized trials, including a total of 391 patients, were analyzed. The ICVT group demonstrated significantly higher complete wart clearance compared to placebo (56.8% . 2.8%; RR = 13.27, 95% CI = 2.93-60.17; = 0.0018). Partial response was lower in the ICVT group (5.08% . 10%; RR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.09-5.09; = 0.69). Adverse events occurred more frequently in the ICVT group (85% . 58.8%; RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.47-3.79; = 0.59; I2 = 97%). Pain during injection was also more commonly reported in the ICVT group (96.6% . 63.3%; RR = 1.45, 95% CI = 0.29-7.22; = 0.65; I2 = 99%). The certainty of evidence was rated as very low for complete clearance, moderate for partial response, and low for adverse events and injection pain. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) indicated that the required information size was not met for any of the outcomes.

Discussion

While the results suggest that ICVT may be effective in achieving complete clearance of multiple cutaneous warts, the current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and potential biases. The higher incidence of adverse events and injection-related pain raises safety concerns. The low to very low certainty of evidence, coupled with the TSA findings, underscores the need for more rigorous investigation. Variability in trial design, dosing protocols, and outcome reporting further limits the applicability of current findings.

Conclusion

Intralesional ICVT shows promise as a therapeutic option for multiple cutaneous warts, particularly in achieving complete clearance. However, due to the limited certainty of available evidence and inconsistent safety data, further large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate these findings and establish standardized treatment protocols.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cdrr/10.2174/0125899775373642250630065739
2025-07-24
2025-09-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kyriakis K.P. Pagana G. Michailides C. Emmanuelides S. Palamaras I. Terzoudi S. Lifetime prevalence fluctuations of common and plane viral warts. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2007 21 2 260 262 10.1111/j.1468‑3083.2006.01833.x 17243971
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Sterling J.C. Handfield-Jones S. Hudson P.M. Guidelines for the management of cutaneous warts. Br. J. Dermatol. 2001 144 1 4 11 10.1046/j.1365‑2133.2001.04066.x 11167676
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Loo S.K. Tang W.Y. Warts (non-genital). BMJ Clin Evid 2009 2009 1710 21726478
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nai-Ming L. Yuk-Ming William T. Warts (non-genital). BMJ Clin Evid 2007 2007 1710 19454080
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Witchey D.J. Witchey N.B. Roth-Kauffman M.M. Kauffman M.K. Plantar warts: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical management. J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2018 118 2 92 105 10.7556/jaoa.2018.024 29379975
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Buck H. Jr W. Warts (genital). BMJ Clin Evid 2010 2010 1602 21418685
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Massing A.M. Epstein W.L. Natural history of warts. A two-year study. Arch. Dermatol. 1963 87 3 306 310 10.1001/archderm.1963.01590150022004 13933441
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kilkenny M. Marks R. The descriptive epidemiology of warts in the community. Australas. J. Dermatol. 1996 37 2 80 86 10.1111/j.1440‑0960.1996.tb01010.x 8687332
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kwok C.S. Gibbs S. Bennett C. Holland R. Abbott R. Topical treatments for cutaneous warts. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012 2012 9 CD001781 22972052
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kwok C.S. Holland R. Gibbs S. Efficacy of topical treatments for cutaneous warts: A meta-analysis and pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br. J. Dermatol. 2011 165 2 233 246 10.1111/j.1365‑2133.2011.10218.x 21219294
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lynch MD Cliffe J Morris-Jones R Management of cutaneous viral warts. BMJ 2014 348 (may27 8) g3339. 10.1136/bmj.g3339 24865780
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Harwood C.A. Surentheran T. Sasieni P. Increased risk of skin cancer associated with the presence of epidermodysplasia verruciformis human papillomavirus types in normal skin. Br. J. Dermatol. 2004 150 5 949 957 10.1111/j.1365‑2133.2004.05847.x 15149508
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tao Z. Ran L. Jian-Hua W. Epidemiological survey of warts in Chinese military recruits: A cross-sectional and follow-up study. Heliyon 2023 9 6 e16989 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16989 37332915
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nindl I. Gottschling M. Stockfleth E. Human papillomaviruses and non-melanoma skin cancer: Basic virology and clinical manifestations. Dis. Markers 2007 23 4 247 259 10.1155/2007/942650 17627060
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jagati A. Chaudhary M. Brar A. Agarwal P. Chavda V. Rathod S. A study of comparison and evaluation of various intralesional therapies in cutaneous warts. Indian Dermatol. Online J. 2023 14 4 487 492 10.4103/idoj.idoj_492_22 37521234
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fields J.R. Saikaly S.K. Schoch J.J. Intralesional immunotherapy for pediatric warts: A review. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2020 37 2 265 271 10.1111/pde.14094 31930595
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gupta S. Malhotra A.K. Verma K.K. Sharma V.K. Intralesional immunotherapy with killed Mycobacterium w vaccine for the treatment of anogenital warts: An open label pilot study. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2008 22 9 1089 1093 10.1111/j.1468‑3083.2008.02719.x 18484970
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bruggink S.C. Eekhof J.A.H. Egberts P.F. van Blijswijk S.C.E. Assendelft W.J.J. Gussekloo J. Natural course of cutaneous warts among primary schoolchildren: A prospective cohort study. Ann. Fam. Med. 2013 11 5 437 441 10.1370/afm.1508 24019275
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fathi R. Tsoukas M.M. Genital warts and other HPV infections: Established and novel therapies. Clin. Dermatol. 2014 32 2 299 306 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.08.014 24559567
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rezai M.S. Ghasempouri H. Asqary Marzidareh O. Yazdani Cherati J. Rahmatpour Rokni G. Intralesional injection of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine into resistant palmoplantar warts: A randomized controlled trial. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2019 44 1 10 17 30666071
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Al-Sabak H. Al-Hattab M. Al-Rammahi M. Al-Dhalimi M. The efficacy of intralesional vitamin D3 injection in the treatment of cutaneous warts: A clinical therapeutic trial study. Skin Res. Technol. 2023 29 8 e13442 10.1111/srt.13442 37632174
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mobasher P. Zamanian A. Jazi G. Efficacy of intralesional injection of mumps-measles-rubella vaccine in patients with wart. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2014 3 1 107 10.4103/2277‑9175.129701 24804181
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gunter J. Genital and perianal warts: New treatment opportunities for human papillomavirus infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003 189 3 S3 S11 [Suppl. 10.1067/S0002‑9378(03)00789‑0 14532897
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhu P. Qi R.Q. Yang Y. Clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous warts (2022). J. Evid. Based Med. 2022 15 3 284 301 10.1111/jebm.12494 36117295
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lipke M.M. An armamentarium of wart treatments. Clin. Med. Res. 2006 4 4 273 293 10.3121/cmr.4.4.273 17210977
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ȘandruF RaduAM PetcaA DumitrașcuMC PetcaRC RomanAM Unveiling the therapeutic horizon: HPV vaccines and their impact on cutaneous diseases—A comprehensive review Vaccines 2024 12 3 228 10.3390/vaccines12030228 38543862
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fouda I. Mohammed H.A.K. Mohammed G.M.Y. Intralesional quadrivalent human papilloma virus vaccine versus candida antigen in the treatment of multiple recalcitrant non-genital warts. Dermatol. Pract. Concept. 2024 14 2 12 10.5826/dpc.1402a66 38810062
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibbs S. Harvey I. Sterling J. Stark R. Local treatments for cutaneous warts: Systematic review * Commentary: Systematic reviewers face challenges from varied study designs. BMJ 2002 325 7362 461 10.1136/bmj.325.7362.461 12202325
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Luk N.M. Tang W.Y.M. Tang N.L.S. Topical 5-fluorouracil has no additional benefit in treating common warts with cryotherapy: A single-centre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2006 31 3 394 397 10.1111/j.1365‑2230.2006.02105.x 16681586
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Choi J.W. Cho S. Lee J.H. Does immunotherapy of viral warts provide beneficial effects when it is combined with conventional therapy? Ann. Dermatol. 2011 23 3 282 287 10.5021/ad.2011.23.3.282 21909196
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Khaled A. Ben Romdhane S. Kharfi M. Zeglaoui F. Fazaa B. Kamoun M.R. Assessment of cryotherapy by liquid nitrogen in the treatment of hand and feet warts. Tunis. Med. 2009 87 10 690 692 20187359
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nguyen N.V. Burkhart C.G. Cryosurgical treatment of warts: Dimethyl ether and propane versus liquid nitrogen - Case report and review of the literature. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2011 10 10 1174 1176 21968668
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Connolly M. Bazmi K. O’Connell M. Lyons J.F. Bourke J.F. Cryotherapy of viral warts: A sustained 10-s freeze is more effective than the traditional method. Br. J. Dermatol. 2001 145 4 554 557 10.1046/j.1365‑2133.2001.04449.x 11703280
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Chang C.H. Sung Z.Y. Huang Y.C. Efficacy of intralesional candida injection in the treatment of cutaneous warts: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2024 104 adv40819 10.2340/actadv.v104.40819 39420872
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Bruggink S.C. Gussekloo J. Berger M.Y. Zaaijer K. Assendelft W.J. de Waal M.W. Cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen versus topical salicylic acid application for cutaneous warts in primary care: Randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 2010 182 15 1624 1630 10.1503/cmaj.092194 20837684
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Fawzy M. Nofal E. Abdelkhalek N. Ehab R. Intralesional bivalent and quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccines didn’t significantly enhance the response of multiple anogenital warts when co-administered with intralesional Candida antigen immunotherapy. A randomized controlled trial. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2023 315 10 2813 2823 10.1007/s00403‑023‑02698‑z 37573268
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Friedman P.C. Management of difficult-to-treat warts: Traditional and new approaches. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2021 22 3 379 394 10.1007/s40257‑020‑00582‑4 33432476
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Aldahan A.S. Mlacker S. Shah V.V. Efficacy of intralesional immunotherapy for the treatment of warts: A review of the literature. Dermatol. Ther. 2016 29 3 197 207 10.1111/dth.12352 26991521
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Majid I. Imran S. Immunotherapy with intralesional Candida albicansantigen in resistant or recurrent warts: A study. Indian J. Dermatol. 2013 58 5 360 365 10.4103/0019‑5154.117301 24082180
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Doorbar J. Molecular biology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer. Clin. Sci. 2006 110 5 525 541 10.1042/CS20050369 16597322
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Clifton M.M. Johnson S.M. Roberson P.K. Kincannon J. Horn T.D. Immunotherapy for recalcitrant warts in children using intralesional mumps or Candida antigens. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2003 20 3 268 271 10.1046/j.1525‑1470.2003.20318.x 12787281
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Johnson S.M. Horn T.D. Intralesional immunotherapy for warts using a combination of skin test antigens: A safe and effective therapy. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2004 3 3 263 265 15176159
    [Google Scholar]
  43. King M. Johnson S.M. Horn T.D. Intralesional immunotherapy for genital warts. Arch. Dermatol. 2005 141 12 1606 1607 10.1001/archderm.141.12.1606 16365274
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mulhem E. Pinelis S. Treatment of nongenital cutaneous warts. Am. Fam. Physician 2011 84 3 288 293 21842775
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Munn S.E. Higgins E. Marshall M. Clement M. A new method of intralesional bleomycin therapy in the treatment of recalcitrant warts. Br. J. Dermatol. 1996 135 6 969 971 10.1046/j.1365‑2133.1996.d01‑1104.x 8977721
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Horn T.D. Johnson S.M. Helm R.M. Roberson P.K. Intralesional immunotherapy of warts with mumps, Candida, and Trichophyton skin test antigens: A single-blinded, randomized, and controlled trial. Arch. Dermatol. 2005 141 5 589 594 10.1001/archderm.141.5.589 15897380
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Chesson H.W. Dunne E.F. Hariri S. Markowitz L.E. The estimated lifetime probability of acquiring human papillomavirus in the United States. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2014 41 11 660 664 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000193 25299412
    [Google Scholar]
  48. de Villiers E.M. Fauquet C. Broker T.R. Bernard H.U. zur Hausen H. Classification of papillomaviruses. Virology 2004 324 1 17 27 10.1016/j.virol.2004.03.033 15183049
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Gardella B. Gritti A. Soleymaninejadian E. New perspectives in therapeutic vaccines for HPV: A critical review. Medicina 2022 58 7 860 10.3390/medicina58070860 35888579
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu D.M. Chen L.X. Zhuang X.Y. Han H. Mo M. Advances in molecular basis of response to immunotherapy for penile cancer: Better screening of responders. Front. Oncol. 2024 14 1394260 10.3389/fonc.2024.1394260 39087027
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Melief C.J.M. van der Gracht E. Wiekmeijer A.S. Combination immunotherapy with synthetic long peptides and chemotherapy or PD-1 blocker for cancers caused by human papilloma virus type 16. Semin. Immunopathol. 2023 45 2 273 277 10.1007/s00281‑023‑00986‑4 36780000
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wu L. Wang W. Zhang J. Detection of five types of HPV genotypes causing anogenital warts (Condyloma Acuminatum) using PCR-Tm analysis technology. Front. Microbiol. 2022 13 857410 10.3389/fmicb.2022.857410 35655998
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sarier M. Sepin N. Emek M. Konuk E.Y. Kaplan T. Yuksel B.A. Evaluation of the optimal sampling approach for HPV genotyping in circumcised heterosexual men with genital warts. J. Infect. Chemother. 2023 29 5 475 480 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.01.017 36731776
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Turner T.B. Huh W.K. HPV vaccines: Translating immunogenicity into efficacy. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2016 12 6 1403 1405 10.1080/21645515.2015.1103936 26512762
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Rafael T.S. Rotman J. Brouwer O.R. Immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of HPV-associated (Pre-)Cancer of the Cervix, Vulva and Penis. J. Clin. Med. 2022 11 4 1101 10.3390/jcm11041101 35207374
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Link F. Szántó J. Blaskovic D. Raus J. Dobrocká E. Pristasová S. Interaction of heart glycosides and viruses. Acta Virol. 1966 10 5 455 461 4380365
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Amarelle L. Lecuona E. The antiviral effects of Na,K-ATPase inhibition: A minireview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018 19 8 2154 10.3390/ijms19082154 30042322
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Hartley C. Hartley M. Pardoe I. Knight A. Ionic Contra-Viral Therapy (ICVT); A new approach to the treatment of DNA virus infections. Arch. Virol. 2006 151 12 2495 2501 10.1007/s00705‑006‑0824‑x 16932984
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Bosch F.X. de Sanjosé S. Chapter 1: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer--burden and assessment of causality. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 2003 2003 31 3 13 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003479 12807939
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Sterne JAC Savović JAC Page MJ RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019 366 l4898 10.1136/bmj.l4898 31462531
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Guyatt G. Oxman A.D. Akl E.A. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011 64 4 383 394 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026 21195583
    [Google Scholar]
  62. BrożekJL AklEA Alonso-CoelloP et al Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines Allergy 2009 64 5 669 677 10.1111/j.1398‑9995.2009.01973.x 19210357
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Balshem H. Helfand M. Schünemann H.J. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011 64 4 401 406 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015 21208779
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Brok J. Thorlund K. Wetterslev J. Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2009 38 1 287 298 10.1093/ije/dyn188 18824466
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Brok J. Thorlund K. Gluud C. Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2008 61 8 763 769 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.007 18411040
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Škubník J. Pavlíková V, Rimpelová S. Cardiac glycosides as immune system modulators. Biomolecules 2021 11 5 659 10.3390/biom11050659 33947098
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Menger L. Vacchelli E. Adjemian S. Cardiac glycosides exert anticancer effects by inducing immunogenic cell death. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012 4 143 143ra99 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003807 22814852
    [Google Scholar]
  68. van der Kolk T. Dillingh M.R. Rijneveld R. Topical ionic contraviral therapy comprised of digoxin and furosemide as a potential novel treatment approach for common warts. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2017 31 12 2088 2090 10.1111/jdv.14527 28833595
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Rijsbergen M. Rijneveld R. Todd M. No effect of topical digoxin and furosemide gel for patients with external anogenital warts. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020 34 1 e45 e46 10.1111/jdv.15894 31430405
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Rijsbergen M. Niemeyer-van der Kolk T. Hogendoorn G. A randomized controlled proofofconcept trial of digoxin and furosemide in adults with cutaneous warts. Br. J. Dermatol. 2019 180 5 1058 1068 10.1111/bjd.17583 30580460
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Delmonte S. Benardon S. Cariti C. Ribero S. Ramoni S. Cusini M. Anogenital warts treatment options: A practical approach. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020 155 3 261 268 10.23736/S0392‑0488.18.06125‑4 30251804
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Stanley M.A. Genital human papillomavirus infections: Current and prospective therapies. J. Gen. Virol. 2012 93 4 681 691 10.1099/vir.0.039677‑0 22323530
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Wiley DJ Douglas J Beutner K External genital warts: Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention Clin Inf Di 2002 35 S2 S210 S224 (Suppl. 2) 10.1086/342109 12353208
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Siddiqui S. Comparison of efficacy of cryotherapy versus ionic contraviral therapy (ICVT) in the treatment of viral warts. J. Pak. Assoc. Dermatol. 2022 32 1 15 21
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Abdelaal M.A. Abdelaziz H.M. Ahmed K.A. Elsaie M.L. Comparative study of intralesional vitamin d3 injection and candida albicans antigen in treating plantar warts. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2021 20 5 546 549 10.36849/JDD.5264 33938709
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Mohta A. Kushwaha R.K. Gautam U. Sharma P. Nyati A. Jain S.K. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine versus intralesional vitamin D3 for the treatment of warts in children. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2020 37 5 853 859 10.1111/pde.14280 32681688
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Surani A.S. Un R. Marfatia Y. Efficacy of intralesional measles mumps rubella vaccine in the treatment of verruca vulgaris: An interventional study. Cureus 2023 15 1 e34338 10.7759/cureus.34338 36865954
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Mullen S.A. Myers E.L. Brenner R.L. Nguyen K.T. Harper T.A. Welsh D. Systematic review of intralesional therapies for cutaneous warts. JID Innov 2024 4 3 100264 10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100264 38585192
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Nasr M. Abdelaty S. Elkholy B.M. A comparative clinicodermoscopic study of intralesional injection of combined digoxin and furosemide, Candida antigen, and vitamin D3 for multiple warts. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2023 22 4 1344 1353 10.1111/jocd.15581 36606379
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Babula P. Masarik M. Adam V. Provaznik I. Kizek R. From Na+/K+-ATPase and cardiac glycosides to cytotoxicity and cancer treatment. Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2013 13 7 1069 1087 10.2174/18715206113139990304 23537048
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Prassas I. Diamandis E.P. Novel therapeutic applications of cardiac glycosides. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008 7 11 926 935 10.1038/nrd2682 18948999
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Litan A. Langhans S.A. Cancer as a channelopathy: Ion channels and pumps in tumor development and progression. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015 9 86 10.3389/fncel.2015.00086 25852478
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Reddy D. Kumavath R. Barh D. Azevedo V. Ghosh P. Anticancer and antiviral properties of cardiac glycosides: A review to explore the mechanism of actions. Molecules 2020 25 16 3596 10.3390/molecules25163596 32784680
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Schneider N. Cerella C. Simões C.M.O. Diederich M. Anticancer and immunogenic properties of cardiac glycosides. Molecules 2017 22 11 1932 10.3390/molecules22111932 29117117
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Winnicka K. Bielawski K. Bielawska A. Cardiac glycosides in cancer research and cancer therapy. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2006 63 2 109 115 17514873
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Kepp O. Menger L. Vacchelli E. Anticancer activity of cardiac glycosides. OncoImmunology 2012 1 9 1640 1642 10.4161/onci.21684 23264921
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Ockenfels H.M. Therapeutic management of cutaneous and genital warts. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2016 149 892 899 10.1111/ddg.12838 27607030
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Lofty A.R. Elbakry A.M. Omar G.A.B. Hamdino M. Intralesional combined furosemide and digoxin in cutaneous warts treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Dermatol. Ther. 2022 35 12 e15935 10.1111/dth.15935 36226802
    [Google Scholar]
  89. khattab F, Essam R, Elhadidy RF, Anis N. Intralesional combined digoxin and furosemide versus intralesional 5-flurouracil for the treatment of recalcitrant plantar warts: A prospective, randomized study. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2024 316 7 411 10.1007/s00403‑024‑03014‑z 38878078
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Fathy G. Abo-Elmagd W.M. Afify A.A. Intralesional combined digoxin and furosemide in plantar warts: Does it work? J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2021 20 8 2606 2611 10.1111/jocd.13913 33389796
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Ringin S. The effectiveness of cutaneous wart resolution with current treatment modalities. J. Cutan. Aesthet. Surg. 2020 13 1 24 30 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_62_19 32655247
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Muse M.E. Stiff K.M. Glines K.R. Cline A. Feldman S.R. A review of intralesional wart therapy. Dermatol. Online J. 2020 26 3 263 10.5070/D3263048027 32609439
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Liu J. Li H. Yang F. Epidemiology and clinical profile of cutaneous warts in Chinese college students: A cross-sectional and follow-up study. Sci. Rep. 2018 8 1 15450 10.1038/s41598‑018‑33511‑x 30337549
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Redzic N. Benoy I. Vanden Broeck D. Bogers J.P. Efficacy of AV2-Salicylic acid combination therapy for cutaneous warts: Study protocol for a single-center randomized controlled trial. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 2020 17 100534 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100534 32211559
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Rivera A. Tyring S.K. Therapy of cutaneous human Papillomavirus infections. Dermatol. Ther. 2004 17 6 441 448 10.1111/j.1396‑0296.2004.04047.x 15571494
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Arcangeli A. Crociani O. Lastraioli E. Masi A. Pillozzi S. Becchetti A. Targeting ion channels in cancer: A novel frontier in antineoplastic therapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009 16 1 66 93 10.2174/092986709787002835 19149563
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Nofal A. Nofal E. Yosef A. Nofal H. Treatment of recalcitrant warts with intralesional measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: A promising approach. Int. J. Dermatol. 2015 54 6 667 671 10.1111/ijd.12480 25070525
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Attwa E. Elawady R. Salah E. ‘Cryo-immuno-therapy’ is superior to intralesional Candida antigen monotherapy in the treatment of multiple common warts. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 2021 32 8 1018 1025 10.1080/09546634.2020.1720585 32009473
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Cockayne S Hewitt C Hicks K Cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of plantar warts (verrucae): A randomised controlled trial BMJ 2011 342 jun07 1 d3271 10.1136/bmj.d3271 21652750
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Silverberg J.I. Silverberg N.B. The U.S. prevalence of common warts in childhood: A population-based study. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2013 133 12 2788 2790 10.1038/jid.2013.226 23657500
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cdrr/10.2174/0125899775373642250630065739
Loading
/content/journals/cdrr/10.2174/0125899775373642250630065739
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test