Adolescent Psychiatry - Online First

Studies on mental health rates among primary school children are still limited, particularly related to psychological trauma and its relationship to other mental health challenges. The objective of this study was to (1) examine the prevalence of PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms in primary school children before the Covid-19 pandemic; (2) identify the relationship between PTSD, depression and anxiety symptoms; and (3) investigate potential gender differences in PTSD symptoms.

This is the first cross-sectional study examining the rates of trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety symptoms in primary school children before the covid-19 pandemic in Malaysia. Two hundred and twenty-one students participated in this study. They were recruited from four primary schools that volunteered to participate in this study. PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), Child PTSD Symptoms Scale-5 (CPSS-5), The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale version (CESD), and the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS) were used to survey psychological symptoms.

Most of the students, or 54.3% of them, have experienced at least one traumatic event. Of 221 students, 39.4% reported having PTSD symptoms, 38% reported having depressive symptoms, and 19% reported having anxiety symptoms. Female students were more likely to report PTSD symptoms compared to male students. The first regression analysis model indicated that depressive symptoms were the only significant predictors of PTSD. In the second model, religion, family income, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms were significant predictors of depressive symptoms. In the third model, depressive symptoms were the sole significant predictors of anxiety.

This pre-pandemic timeframe study offers crucial baseline information for understanding mental health conditions and ensures accurate assessment of how the pandemic may have influenced rates of anxiety, depression, and PTSD.

The study reveals that primary school children experience high levels of trauma, PTSD, depression, and anxiety, especially before the COVID-19 pandemic. During the early phases of the pandemic, these mental health issues have been largely neglected in Malaysia, with limited preventative and therapeutic interventions available. Future research should focus on documenting the prevalence of these issues in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.

People diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) often endorse suicidality. One of the leading theories on the causes of suicidality, the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide (IPTS), argues that this suicidal desire is driven by perceived burdensomeness (PB), the belief that others are better off without the individual, and thwarted belongingness (TB), the unmet need for social connection. Given that a distinguishing characteristic of BPD is the prevalence of interpersonal difficulties and negative cognitions, the IPTS is an important framework to use when looking at the link between BPD and suicidality. The relationship between BPD, PB, TB, and suicidality has been researched in the past, but this relationship within the context of a dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) partial hospital program (PHP) has yet to be analyzed.

This study examined the relationship between these measures in a DBT PHP for adolescents/young adults.

One hundred seventy-six adolescents/young adults in a comprehensive DBT PHP completed surveys measuring suicidality, TB, PB, and BPD symptoms upon intake and discharge.

Analyses found that all outcome measures significantly improved from admission to discharge and that most variables were positively correlated. Results also showed that PB and depression scores emerged as unique predictors of suicidality at discharge.

An adherent DBT PHP can be an effective treatment option for adolescents/young adults endorsing BPD symptoms, TB, PB, and suicidality. Future studies should examine the specific aspects of DBT that are most important in decreasing these symptoms.

The objective of this review is to explore the impact of social media use on the mental health of teenagers, considering both advantages and disadvantages through a Narrative evaluation of recent studies.

A Narrative review of current literature was conducted to assess the effects of social media on adolescent mental health. The findings were categorized into seven areas: general mental health effects, specific issues such as anxiety and depression, behavioral impacts like addiction and self-regulation, effects on vulnerable populations, the influence of COVID-19, digital mental health services, ethical considerations with AI, and implications for academic achievement and public health.

Social media use has both positive and negative effects on adolescent mental health. It is associated with an increase in behavioral issues such as addiction and mental health problems like anxiety and depression. Vulnerable groups, including LGBTQ+ youth and victims of cyberbullying, face heightened risks. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated these mental health challenges, though social media provided essential support networks. Digital mental health services were beneficial but raised ethical concerns, particularly regarding privacy and the need for culturally sensitive interventions.

The review underscores the need for balanced strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of social media on adolescent mental health. Comprehensive digital literacy programs, culturally relevant interventions, and ethical considerations in digital mental health services are crucial to supporting adolescent well-being in the digital age.

The transdiagnostic construct of aggression in children and adolescents is often characterized by distinct mental phenomena, such as irritability, emotional dysregulation (ED), anger, and outbursts. However, these terms are frequently interchanged in clinical settings despite their distinct semantic nuances. Therefore, it is critical to delve into the complex dynamics of aggression, irritability, and emotional dysregulation in the child and adolescent population.

An extensive search was conducted across diverse databases using the keywords “Aggression,” “Violence,” “Irritability,” and “Emotional dysregulation.” This search encompassed articles on childhood aggression, covering its prevalence, risk factors, clinical manifestations, assessment methods, treatment modalities, and prognostic indicators. Initial screening identified 261 articles, with 40 selected for the initial draft and an additional 15 included later, either manually or via reverse citations.

The appraisal of aggression is challenging due to its terminology and diagnostic complexities, especially in distinguishing normative behavior from psychopathological impairments. There is a significant lack of empirical evidence, like systematic reviews concerning the heterogenous dimensional understanding of aggression, including its social determinants, comorbidities, and targeted interventions. Likewise, there is a crucial need to assess comorbid conditions like ADHD, DMDD, and ODD to gain deeper insights into their developmental, social, and biological determinants. Emphasizing comorbidity assessment and age of onset during initial diagnostic evaluations is vital, followed by a structured approach to interventions encompassing behavioral and pharmacological strategies.

There is a need for a stepwise multidimensional assessment towards contextual understanding of aggression and sequencing the treatment of aggression in children and adolescents. It is paramount to incorporate tailored interventions with shared decision-making.