Skip to content
2000
image of A Quantitative Study Focusing on Parents’ Perceptions of Boundary Setting and its Impact on their Relationship with their Children

Abstract

Introuction

This study examines how parents’ perceptions of boundaries influence their relationship with their children.

Methods

The survey was conducted in 2024, with the participation of parents of children aged 6-14. Particularly, ninety people participated in this survey, of whom 84.4% were women (n= 76) and 15.6% were men (n= 14). Two questionnaires were used. The first (Boundaries Quiz - BQ) measures the degree of familiarity with boundaries, and the second (Child-Parent Relationship Scale - CPRS) assesses parents' perceptions of their relationship with their children.

Results

The results showed a normal distribution of data regarding the familiarity with boundaries (= 0.87), while the quality of the relationship showed a non-normal distribution in all three question categories (Conflicts = 0.017, Closeness = 0.001, Dependence = 0.007). Parents seemed to face problems setting their boundaries, especially in cases of divorce (Mean= 19.6, Standard Deviation= 10.15). A statistically significant difference was observed between divorced parents and those with a cohabitation agreement (= 0.023). It was also found that family status significantly influenced how parents set boundaries, in contrast to their profession.

Discussion

Parental boundaries towards children are crucial for their holistic development, providing guidance and security.

Conclusion

In general, the study concluded that the majority of parents experience problems setting their boundaries. The present study had some limitations due to the small sample and the fact that the sample composition is heavily skewed. Future studies must be concluded, including larger samples, leading to more reliable results.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/aps/10.2174/0122106766381622251022093535
2025-10-23
2025-11-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/aps/10.2174/0122106766381622251022093535
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aloia L.S. Parent–child relationship satisfaction: The influence of family communication orientations and relational maintenance behaviors. Fam. J. (Alex. Va.) 2020 28 1 83 89 10.1177/1066480719896561
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Amato P.R. Booth A. Consequences of parental divorce and marital unhappiness for adult wellbeing. Soc. Forces 1991 69 3 895 914 10.2307/2579480
    [Google Scholar]
  3. An J. Zhu X. Shi Z. An J. A serial mediating effect of perceived family support on psychological well-being. BMC Public Health 2024 24 1 940 10.1186/s12889‑024‑18476‑z 38566105
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Casas F. Coenders G. González M. Malo S. Bertran I. Figuer C. Testing the relationship between parents’ and their children’s subjective well-being. J Happiness Stud. 2012 13 6 1031 1051 10.1007/s10902‑011‑9305‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiang S.C. Bai S. Bidirectional associations between parenting stress and child psychopathology: The moderating role of maternal affection. Dev. Psychopathol 2023 29 1 11 10.1017/S0954579423001177 37771133
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen O. Finzi-Dottan R. Parent?child relationships during the divorce process; from attachment theory and intergenerational perspective. Contemp. Fam. Ther. 2005 27 1 81 99 10.1007/s10591‑004‑1972‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooney T.M. Young adults’ relations with parents: The influence of recent parental divorce. J. Marriage Fam. 1994 56 1 45 56 10.2307/352700
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dorrance Hall E. McNallie J. The mediating role of sibling maintenance behavior expectations and perceptions in the relationship between family communication patterns and relationship satisfaction. J. Fam. Commun. 2016 16 4 386 402 10.1080/15267431.2016.1215316
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Driscoll K. Pianta R.C. Mothers’ and fathers’ perceptions of conflict and closeness in parent-child relationships during early childhood. J. Early Child. Infant Psychol. 2011 7 1 24
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Frank H. Young adults’ relationship with parents and siblings: The role of marital status, conflict and post-divorce predictors. J. Divorce & Remarriage 2007 46 3-4 105 124 10.1300/J087v46n03_07
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuller-Iglesias H.R. Webster N.J. Antonucci T.C. The complex nature of family support across the life span: Implications for psychological well-being. Dev. Psychol. 2015 51 3 277 288 10.1037/a0038665 25602936
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Grevenstein D. Bluemke M. Schweitzer J. Aguilar-Raab C. Better family relationships––higher well-being: The connection between relationship quality and health related resources. Ment. Health Prev. 2019 14 200160 10.1016/j.mph.2019.200160
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jager J. Bornstein M.H. Putnick D.L. Hendricks C. Family members’ unique perspectives of the family: Examining their scope, size, and relations to individual adjustment. J. Fam. Psychol. 2012 26 3 400 410 10.1037/a0028330 22545933
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mayseless O. Scharf M. Too close for comfort: Inadequate boundaries with parents and individuation in late adolescent girls. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 2009 79 2 191 202 10.1037/a0015623 19485636
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Obrenovic B. Jianguo D. Khudaykulov A. Khan M.A.S. Work-family conflict impact on psychological safety and psychological well-being: A job performance model. Front. Psychol. 2020 11 475 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00475 32296367
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Piaget J. Inhelder B. The psychology of the child. New York Basic books 2008
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Plomin R. Daniels D. Why are children in the same family so different from one another? Int. J. Epidemiol. 2011 40 3 563 582 10.1093/ije/dyq148 21807642
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ramsey M.L. GitimuWaithaka A. Gitimu P.L. Influence of age and parental marital status on parent-child relationships: College students perspective. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2016 6 1 23 32
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Thomas P.A. Liu H. Umberson D. Family relationships and well-being. Innov. Aging 2017 1 3 igx025 10.1093/geroni/igx025 29795792
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Vanwoerden S. Kalpakci A. Sharp C. The relations between inadequate parent-child boundaries and borderline personality disorder in adolescence. Psychiatry Res. 2017 257 462 471 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.015 28837938
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Vanwoerden S. Byrd A.L. Vine V. Beeney J.E. Scott L.N. Stepp S.D. Momentary borderline personality disorder symptoms in youth as a function of parental invalidation and youth‐perceived support. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2022 63 2 178 186 10.1111/jcpp.13443 34036585
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Vygotsky L.S. Cole M. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press 1978
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wu Z. Wan D. Gong W. Jiang M. 2022 Family interaction, psychological capital, and health risk——How family affect individual’s health outcome. Research Square 10.21203/rs.3.rs‑2206634/v1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/aps/10.2174/0122106766381622251022093535
Loading
A Quantitative Study Focusing on Parents’ Perceptions of Boundary Setting and its Impact on their Relationship with their Children
Bentham Science Publishers ; https://doi.org/10.2174/0122106766381622251022093535
/content/journals/aps/10.2174/0122106766381622251022093535
/content/journals/aps/10.2174/0122106766381622251022093535
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keywords: Parents ; quantitative study ; boundary setting ; relationship ; children ; perceptions

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test