Skip to content
2000
Volume 16, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2772-574X
  • E-ISSN: 2772-5758

Abstract

Background

Distillery vinasse is one of the promising bio-fertilizers, as it contains significant amounts of essential chemical elements, allied with sorghum that is widely used in the diet of ruminant animals and has been considered as an alternative to the production of other cereals or forages. This study aimed to evaluate saccharin sorghum silage from fertilization with vinasse.

Methods

The research was conducted using the BRS-511, CR-1339, and CR-1342 genotypes. The silage was held for 170 days after sowing, with experimental design in blocks with triple factorial (genotypes x fertilization x inoculation) totaling 54 installments. At 95 days, the silos were opened for sample collection and analysis bromatological analysis.

Results

The results indicate the primary source of variation was genotype, characterizing them with different potentials in productivity and better results for BRS-511, CR-1339, and CR-1342. The bromatological results indicate good quality for CR-1339 and CR-1342 hybrids, however, better digestability for BRS-511. There was no observable difference between the factors of fertilization. The inoculation additive assists in the reduction of lignin appears to be high. PCA analysis showed differences between cultivars (BRS-511, CR-1339, and CR-1342) and fertilization. However, the PCAs showed the genotypes show similar results with conventional fertilization and sugarcane vinasse.

Conclusion

The study reflected the possibility of producing sweet sorghum silage with soil sugarcane vinasse fertilization as fertilizer.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rafna/10.2174/012772574X297369240506044541
2024-05-27
2025-10-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/rafna/10.2174/012772574X297369240506044541
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. RodriguesJ.A.S. Improvement of forage sorghum and production of high quality silage.Embrapa Corn and Sorgo-Article in conference proceedings (ALICE)Latin American Symposium Productivity in Cutter Farm2012
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Pereira FilhoI RodriguesJ. Sorghum: The producer asks, Embrapa responds.2015
     [Google Scholar]
  3. MurphyR.L. KleinR.R. MorishigeD.T. BradyJ.A. RooneyW.L. MillerF.R. Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum.PNAS20111646916474
     [Google Scholar]
  4. CifuentesR. BressaniR. RolzC. The potential of sweet sorghum as a source of ethanol and protein.Energy Sustain. Dev.2014211319
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Zegada-LizarazuW. MontiA. Are we ready to cultivate sweet sorghum as a bioenergy feedstock? A review on field management practices.Biomass Bioenergy201240112
     [Google Scholar]
  6. MarafonA.C. SalomonK.R. AmorimE.L.C. PeiterF.S. Use of sugarcane vinasse to biogas, bioenergy, and biofertilizer production.Elsevier2020179194
     [Google Scholar]
  7. SenatoreD. QueiroloA. MonzaJ. BajsaN. Using sugar cane vinasse as a biofertilizer: effects on soil microbial community due to periodical application.Environmental Sustainability.20236217318210.1007/s42398‑023‑00262‑z
     [Google Scholar]
  8. SantosJ.R. BicudoS.J. NakagawaJ. de AlbuquerqueA.W. CardosoC.L. Soil chemical attributes and corn productivity affected by soil amendments and management.Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient.200610232333010.1590/S1415‑43662006000200011
     [Google Scholar]
  9. da SilvaB. TelesM.G. JúniorG.G. Growth of eucalyptus seedlings irrigated with different vinasse concentrations.Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci.20161018115121
     [Google Scholar]
  10. de SouzaV.G. PereiraO.G. de MoraesS.A. GarciaR. Nutritional value of sorghum silages.Braz. J. Zootechnics2003329753759
     [Google Scholar]
  11. PinhoR.G.V. de VasconcelosR.C. BorgesI.D. de ResendeA.V. Productivity and quality of corn and sorghum silage depending on sowing time.Bragantia200766223524510.1590/S0006‑87052007000200007
     [Google Scholar]
  12. NeumannM. RestleJ. FilhoD.C.A. BrondaniI.L. de PellegriniL.G. de FreitasA.K. Evaluation of the nutritive value of the plant and silage of different sorghum hybrids (Sorghum bicolor, L. Moench).Braz. J. Zootechnics.2002311Suppl.293301
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Senar, Corn and sorghum silage: production, ensiling and use.Brasília, DF, BrazilNational Rural Learning Service2011
     [Google Scholar]
  14. VoltoliniT.V. de AraújoG.G.L. SouzaR.A. Silagem de capim-buffel: alternativa para a alimentação de ruminantes na região Semiárida. Embrapa Semiárido-Documentos.INFOTECA-E2014
     [Google Scholar]
  15. CaviglioneJ.H. KiihlL.R.B. CaramoriP.H. OliveiraD. GaldinoJ. BorrozinoE. Climate charts for the State of Paraná.LondonIapar2000
     [Google Scholar]
  16. IAPAR, Paraná climate charts.Paraná Agronomic Institute2015
     [Google Scholar]
  17. AcquaN.H.D. SilvaG.P. BenitesV.M. de AssisR.L. SimonG.A. Soil sampling methods in areas under direct planting in Southwest Goiano.Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient.2013172117122
     [Google Scholar]
  18. SilvaD.J. de QueirozA.C. Food analysis: Chemical and biological methods.UFV2002
     [Google Scholar]
  19. CETESB, Vinaca: Criteria and procedures for application to agricultural soil.CETESB2005
     [Google Scholar]
  20. AOAC, Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists.Hoboken, NJ, USAJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc2013
     [Google Scholar]
  21. SoestP.J.V. RobertsonJ.B. LewisB.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.J. Dairy Sci.1991741035833597
     [Google Scholar]
  22. RCoreTeam. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: RDocumentation.2022Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
  23. HothornT. BretzF. WestfallP. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.Biom. J.200850334636310.1002/bimj.200810425 18481363
     [Google Scholar]
  24. KurniawanW. BainA. Qual- ity and fermentation characteristic of corn stover - rubber cas- sava (Manihot glaziovii M.A) combination silage.IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.2019287012022
     [Google Scholar]
  25. RodriguesP.H.M. PinedoL.A. MeyerP.M. da SilvaT.H. Sorghum silage quality as determined by chemical–nutritional factors.Grass and Forage Science2020754462473
     [Google Scholar]
  26. RibeiroC.G.M. GonçalvesL.C. RodriguesJ.A.S. RodriguezN.M. BorgesI. BorgesA.L.C.C. Silage fermentation pattern of five sorghum genotypes.Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec.20075961531153710.1590/S0102‑09352007000600028
     [Google Scholar]
  27. JúniorR.G. GonçalvesL.C. RodriguesJ.A.S. Borges, ALCC Fibrous fractions of original materials and silages of three genotypes of millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L). R. BR.), in different fermentation periods.Brazilian Corn and Sorghum Magazine200542243250
     [Google Scholar]
  28. KrizsanS.J. RandbyA.T. The effect of fermentation quality on the voluntary intake of grass silage by growing cattle fed silage as the sole feed.J. Anim. Sci.200785498499610.2527/jas.2005‑587 17178806
     [Google Scholar]
  29. dos SantosW.C.C. do NascimentoW.G. MagalhãesA.L.R. SilvaD.K.A. SilvaW.J.C.S. SantanaA.V.S. Nutritive value, total losses of dry matter and aerobic stability of the silage from three varieties of sugarcane treated with commercial microbial additives.Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.20152041810.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.03.004
     [Google Scholar]
  30. MizubutiI.Y. de Azambuja RibeiroE.L. da Rocha, MA Consumption and apparent digestibility of corn (Zea mays L.), Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) silages.Braz. J. Zootechnics2002311267272
     [Google Scholar]
  31. KakaboukiI. BilalisD. KarkanisA. ZervasG. TsiplakouE. HelaD. Effects of fertilization and tillage system on growth and crude protein content of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An al- ternative forage crop.Emir. J. Food Agric.20142611810.9755/ejfa.v26i1.16831
     [Google Scholar]
  32. NeumannM. RestleJ. NornbergJ.L. FilhoD.C.A. MelloR.O. SouzaA.N.M. Assessment of the quality and nutritional value of sorghum hybrid silage (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench).Brazilian Corn and Sorghum Magazine200431120133
     [Google Scholar]
  33. AvelinoP.M. an Miranda NeivaJ. de AraujoV.L. AlexandrinoE. Chemical composition of sorghum hybrid silages grown at different plant densities.Rev. Cienc. Agron.201142120821510.1590/S1806‑66902011000100026
     [Google Scholar]
  34. JuniorM.A.P.O. RetoreM. ManarelliD.M. de SouzaF.B. LedesmaL.L.M. OrricoA.C.A. Forage potential and silage quality of four varieties of saccharine sorghum.Brazilian Agricultural Research1590501212011207
     [Google Scholar]
  35. FageriaN. MoreiraA. The role of mineral nutrition on root growth of crop plants.Advances in agronomyElsevier2011110251331
     [Google Scholar]
  36. FaquinV. Plant Mineral Nutrition.BrazilFederal University of Lavras2005
     [Google Scholar]
  37. TaboadaA. Novo-UzalE. FloresG. LouredaM. Ros BarcelóA. MasaA. PomarF. Digestibility of silages in relation to their hydroxycinnamic acid content and lignin composition.J. Sci. Food Agric.20109071155116210.1002/jsfa.3933 20393996
     [Google Scholar]
  38. VeriatoF.T. PiresD.A.D.A. TolentinoD.C. AlvesD.D. JaymeD.C. MouraM.M.A. Fermentation characteristics and nutritive values of sorghum silages.Acta Sci. Anim. Sci.20184013445810.4025/actascianimsci.v40i1.34458
     [Google Scholar]
  39. BikkerP. JansmanA.J.M. Review: Composition and utilisation of feed by monogastric animals in the context of circular food production systems.Animal202317100892
     [Google Scholar]
  40. OliveiraB.S. PereiraL.G.R. AzevêdoJ.A.G. RodriguesJ.A.S. VelascoF.O. NevesA.L.A. Silage quality of six sorghum cultivars for sheep.Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras.2018532256264
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Faria JúniorW.G. GonçalvesL.C. PiresD.A.A. RodriguesJ.A.S. RamirezM.A. Sorghum silage for dairy cattle.Feed for dairy cattle.1st edBelo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFEPMVZ20094364
     [Google Scholar]
  42. PassiniR. SilveiraA.C. TittoE.A.L. RodriguesP.H.M. ArrigoniM.D.B. CostaC. Wet corn and sorghum grain silage and protein levels on performance and carcass characteristics of super-early steers.Acta Sci. Anim. Sci.20082401133
     [Google Scholar]
  43. RodriguesR.C. Bromatological food analysis methods: Physical, chemical and bromatological methods.1st edPelotas, RS, BrazilEmbrapa Temperate Climate2010
     [Google Scholar]
  44. YilmazS. OzelA. AtakM. EraymanM. Effects of seeding rates on competition indices of barley and vetchintercropping systems in the Eastern Mediterranean.Turk. J. Agric. For.20153913514310.3906/tar‑1406‑155
     [Google Scholar]
  45. CapstaffN.M. MillerA.J. Improving the yield and nutritional quality of forage crops.Front. Plant Sci.2018953510.3389/fpls.2018.00535 29740468
     [Google Scholar]
  46. ColdebellaA. GenteliniA. PianaP. ColdebellaP. BoscoloW. FeidenA. Effluents from fish farming ponds: A view from the perspective of its main components.Sustainability2017102310.3390/Su10010003
     [Google Scholar]
  47. BorcardD. GilletF. LegendreP. Numerical Ecology with R.Springer International Publishing2018
     [Google Scholar]
  48. OlsenR.L. ChappellR.W. LoftisJ.C. Water quality sample collection, data treatment and results presentation for principal components analysis-literature review and illinois river watershed case study.Water Res.20124693110312210.1016/j.watres.2012.03.028 22487543
     [Google Scholar]
  49. de Mello PradoR. CaioneG. CamposC.N.S. Filter cake and vinasse as fertilizers contributing to conservation agriculture.Appl. Environ. Soil Sci.201320131810.1155/2013/581984
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rafna/10.2174/012772574X297369240506044541
Loading
Production and Chemical Characterization of Silage from Saccharine Sorghum Fertirrigated with Sugarcane Vinasse
Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric 16, 206 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/012772574X297369240506044541
/content/journals/rafna/10.2174/012772574X297369240506044541
/content/journals/rafna/10.2174/012772574X297369240506044541
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

file format download Download

  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Agroindustrial residue; fertilizer; saccharine; silage; vinasse management; waste reuse

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test