Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 10
  • ISSN: 2352-0965
  • E-ISSN: 2352-0973

Abstract

Introduction

The current research on the mental health risks of music has shortcomings in data collection, individual differences, and evaluation criteria. For this reason, this article will use neuroplasticity EEG and magnetic resonance imaging techniques to provide a basis for early identification and prevention of music-related mental health risks.

Methods

First, EEG was used to perform neuroimaging tests on participants, and it was observed that music stimulation can cause specific changes in brain electrical activity, and the EEG characteristics were preprocessed; then magnetic resonance imaging technology was used to further reveal the structural and functional changes of the brain under music stimulation, and the potential regulatory effects of music on mental health risks were discovered.

Results

The average Valence score of participants after playing positive music increased from 3.5 points to 7.15 points, and the degree of pleasure increased by 3.65 points (<0.05) with statistically significant differences; the influence of brainwave music on beta waves is also more significant (<0.01). Discussion: The results of this study show that music has a significant impact on mental health. Positive music can significantly improve the pleasure of participants, while bad music may lead to a decrease in pleasure.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that music significantly influences brain activity and emotional states, as evidenced by EEG and MRI data. Positive music enhances pleasure and modulates beta waves, suggesting a protective effect on mental health, while negative music may pose emotional risks. These neurobiological markers offer objective tools for early prediction and personalized intervention in music-related mental health issues. Despite limitations in sample size and short-term observation, our findings advance the use of neuroimaging in identifying at-risk individuals and support the development of music-based preventive strategies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965338959250401013027
2025-05-22
2026-01-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. RahmanJ.S. GedeonT. CaldwellS. JonesR. JinZ. Towards effective music therapy for mental health care using machine learning tools: human affective reasoning and music genres.J. Artif. Intell. Soft Comput. Res.202111152010.2478/jaiscr‑2021‑0001
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ZhouZ. ZhouR. WeiW. LuanR. LiK. Effects of music-based movement therapy on motor function, balance, gait, mental health, and quality of life for patients with Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin. Rehabil.202135793795110.1177/0269215521990526 33517767
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GustavsonD.E. ColemanP.L. IversenJ.R. MaesH.H. GordonR.L. LenseM.D. Mental health and music engagement: review, framework, and guidelines for future studies.Transl. Psychiat.202111137010.1038/s41398‑021‑01483‑8 34226495
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KresovichA. Reffner CollinsM.K. RiffeD. CarpentierF.R.D. A content analysis of mental health discourse in popular rap music.JAMA Pediatr.2021175328629210.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5155 33284350
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SanfilippoK.R.M. StewartL. GloverV. How music may support perinatal mental health: an overview.Arch. Women Ment. Health202124583183910.1007/s00737‑021‑01178‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SilvermanM.J. Music-based affect regulation and unhealthy music use explain coping strategies in adults with mental health conditions.Community Ment. Health J.202056593994610.1007/s10597‑020‑00560‑4 31997124
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KoopsL.H. KuebelC.R. Self-reported mental health and mental illness among university music students in the United States.Res. Stud. Music. Educ.202143212914310.1177/1321103X19863265
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MusgraveG. Music and wellbeing vs. musicians’ wellbeing: examining the paradox of music-making positively impacting wellbeing, but musicians suffering from poor mental health.Cult. Trends202332328029510.1080/09548963.2022.2058354
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GerginÖ.Ö. PehlivanS.S. Erkanİ. BayramA. AksuR. GörkemS.B. BiçerC. YıldızK. The effect of playing music and mother’s voice to children on sedation level and requirement during pediatric magnetic resonance imaging.Explore (NY)202319460060610.1016/j.explore.2023.01.001 36628804
    [Google Scholar]
  10. TianY. MaL. XuX. ChenS. The influence of listening to music on adults with left-behind experience revealed by EEG-based connectivity.Sci. Rep.2020101757510.1038/s41598‑020‑64381‑x 32372046
    [Google Scholar]
  11. XiL.X. JuW.J. DanW. XiangQ.W. PingS.Y. XinT.Y. TianD.W. Comparative analysis of brainwave music translated from spontaneous EEG between major depression disorders and healthy peopleBra.-Appar. Commun.: J. Bacom.20221110712510.1080/27706710.2022.2112535
    [Google Scholar]
  12. FedotchevA. ParinS. PolevayaS. ZemlianaiaA. EEG-based musical neurointerfaces in the correction of stress-induced states.Brain Comput. Interf. (Abingdon)2022911610.1080/2326263X.2021.1964874
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ZhouT.H. LiangW. LiuH. WangL. RyuK.H. NamK.W. EEG emotion recognition applied to the effect analysis of music on emotion changes in psychological healthcare.Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Heal.202220137810.3390/ijerph20010378 36612700
    [Google Scholar]
  14. WuK. AndersonJ. TownsendJ. FrazierT. BrandtA. KarmonikC. Characterization of functional brain connectivity towards optimization of music selection for therapy: a fMRI study.Int. J. Neurosci.2019129988288910.1080/00207454.2019.1581189 30744538
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ZhangK. LiuH. YeJ. Role of music tempo in choosing from large and small choice sets: insights from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).Mark. Lett.202334463365210.1007/s11002‑023‑09672‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  16. JoH.J. PerezM.A. Corticospinal-motor neuronal plasticity promotes exercise-mediated recovery in humans with spinal cord injury.Brain202014351368138210.1093/brain/awaa052 32355959
    [Google Scholar]
  17. TimmermannA. TascioD. JabsR. BoehlenA. DomingosC. SkubalM. HuangW. KirchhoffF. HennebergerC. Bilkei-GorzoA. SeifertG. SteinhäuserC. Dysfunction of NG2 glial cells affects neuronal plasticity and behavior.Glia20237161481150110.1002/glia.24352 36802096
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ByrnsA. AbdessalemH.B. CuestaM. BruneauM-A. BellevilleS. FrassonC. EEG Analysis of the contribution of music therapy and virtual reality to the improvement of cognition in Alzheimer’s disease.J. Biomed. Sci. Eng.202013818720110.4236/jbise.2020.138018
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HossainS.A. RahmanA. ChakrabartyA. RashidM.A. KuwanaA. KobayashiH. Emotional state classification from music-based features of multichannel EEG signals.Bioengineering20231019910.3390/bioengineering10010099 36671671
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KnollF. HammernikK. ZhangC. MoellerS. PockT. SodicksonD.K. AkçakayaM. Deep-learning methods for parallel magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction: A survey of the current approaches, trends, and issues.IEEE Signal Process. Mag.202037112814010.1109/MSP.2019.2950640 33758487
    [Google Scholar]
  21. AhmadR. BoumanC.A. BuzzardG.T. ChanS. LiuS. ReehorstE.T. SchniterP. Plug-and-play methods for magnetic resonance imaging: Using denoisers for image recovery.IEEE Signal Process. Mag.202037110511610.1109/MSP.2019.2949470 33953526
    [Google Scholar]
  22. TharwatA. Independent component analysis: An introduction.Appl. Comp. Inform.202117222224910.1016/j.aci.2018.08.006
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LassanceN. DeMiguelV. VrinsF. Optimal portfolio diversification via independent component analysis.Oper. Res.2022701557210.1287/opre.2021.2140
    [Google Scholar]
  24. YangZ. HuangY. Algorithm for speech emotion recognition classification based on Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and broad learning system.Evol. Intell.20221542485249410.1007/s12065‑020‑00532‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  25. AbeysingheA. FardM. JazarR. ZambettaF. DavyJ. Mel frequency cepstral coefficient temporal feature integration for classifying squeak and rattle noise.J. Acoust. Soc. Am.2021150119320110.1121/10.0005201 34340510
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ZhuH. LiuQ. YuanN.J. ZhangK. ZhouG. ChenE. Pop music generation: From melody to multi-style arrangement.ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data202014513110.1145/3374915
    [Google Scholar]
  27. GuoL. LiuM. DingT. ZhangY. JieW. Research on music melody generation algorithm based on labview digital images.J. Xi’an Univer. Technol.2020361657110.19322/j.cnki.issn.1006‑4710.2020.01.009
    [Google Scholar]
  28. YueT. LiQ. WangR. LiuZ. GuoM. BaiF. ZhangZ. WangW. ChengY. WangH. Comparison of hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and zung self-rating anxiety/depression scale (SAS/SDS) in evaluating anxiety and depression in patients with psoriatic arthritis.Dermatology2020236217017810.1159/000498848 31434087
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Campo-AriasA. Blanco-OrtegaJ.D. Pedrozo-PupoJ.C. Brief spanish zung self-rating anxiety scale: Dimensionality, internal consistency, nomological validity, and differential item functioning among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in colombia.J. Nurs. Meas.202230340741810.1891/JNM‑D‑20‑00125 34518431
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WanZ. YangR. HuangM. ZengN. LiuX. A review on transfer learning in EEG signal analysis.Neurocomputing202142111410.1016/j.neucom.2020.09.017
    [Google Scholar]
  31. WangT.C. LiW.Y. LaiJ.C.Y. KuoT.B.J. YangC.C.H. Nociception effect on frontal electroencephalogram waveform and phase-amplitude coupling in laparoscopic surgery.Anesth. Analg.202313851070108010.1213/ANE.0000000000006609 37428681
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965338959250401013027
Loading
/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965338959250401013027
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test