Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 10
  • ISSN: 2352-0965
  • E-ISSN: 2352-0973

Abstract

Background

Adaptive controller has contributed to a generic approach for modeling and controlling various complicated systems. In the non-minimum phase (NMP) system, inversion-based feedforward tracking is not achievable, as its inverse transfer model is unstable. To overcome the set point tracking problem of the non-minimum phase system, model reference adaptive control is used as inversion-based feedforward control, and state feedback is used as feedback control in the two-degree-of-freedom (TDOF) structure. Here, the model reference adaptive control (MRAC) scheme is used for obtaining the desired response of the system with a small steady-state error, whereas the state feedback technique provides stabilization of the system. The presence of a delay in the transfer function turns the system into a non-minimum phase system. The time-delay system is widely applied as a benchmark for designing different control methodologies.

Aims

In this study, a two-degree-of-freedom inversion-based model reference adaptive control for a time-delay system was implemented.

Objective

A two-degree-of-freedom inversion-based model reference adaptive control for a class of time-delay systems was implemented so that the system could track the reference input. Moreover, it also provided stability to the given system.

Methods

Different techniques, such as two-degree-of-freedom inversion-based model reference adaptive control, Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) control, and (FOPID) control, were discussed for the stabilization of a class of time-delay systems. Here, an inversion-based model reference adaptive control structure with rules of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), along with a state feedback control technique, was applied for the delay system so that the system could track the reference input.

Results

By the analysis of different techniques, it was observed that the combined form of MRAC and state feedback control scheme was able to provide a suitable tracking response. Here, the unit step signal was used as the reference input. In a time-delay system, an initial undershoot was observed; however, using a two-degree-of-freedom inversion-based MRAC technique, the initial undershoot was almost nullified. The two-degree-of-freedom technique was also found to provide a better tracking response compared to PID control and (FOPID) control technique, as also elaborated in this study.

Conclusion

The results of the simulation using MATLAB indicated that the proposed two-degree-of-freedom inversion-based adaptive control technique provides a better tracking response compared to PID control and fractional order PID control. However, for the stabilization of time-delay systems, other methodologies may be implemented.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965245114231005062309
2025-05-26
2026-01-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AstromK.J. WittenmarkB. Adaptive Control.2nd edPearson Education Asia2001185225
    [Google Scholar]
  2. PatilP. AnchanS.S. RaoC.S. Improved PID controller design for an unstable second order plus time delay non-minimum phase systems.Results in Control and Optimization20227410011710.1016/j.rico.2022.100117
    [Google Scholar]
  3. PalM. SarkarG. BaraiR.K. RoyT. Model reference adaptive feed-forward control for non-minimum phase system in two-degree-of-freedom frameworkA selection from AMSE20178697
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GarcíaP. AlbertosP. HägglundT. Control of unstable non-minimum-phase delayed systems.J. Process Contr.200616101099111110.1016/j.jprocont.2006.06.007
    [Google Scholar]
  5. AzizN.N.A. YusoffM.I. SolihinM.I. AkmeliawatiR. Two degrees of freedom control of a ball and beam system5th International Conference on Mechatronics (ICOM’13)201311210.1088/1757‑899X/53/1/012070
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PalM. RoyT. SarkarG. BaraiR.K. Design of adaptive two-degree-of-freedom controller for inversion based reference input tracking of non-minimum phase system.Michael Faraday IET International Summit, vol. 14(6), 2015.10.1049/cp.2015.1610
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PalM. SarkarG. BaraiR.K. RoyT. Two-degree-of-freedom control of non-minimum phase mechanical system.Modelling and Simulation in Science, Technology and Engineering Mathematics, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing201874936537810.1007/978‑3‑319‑74808‑5_31
    [Google Scholar]
  8. XuG. WuT. ZhangJ. YueG. The two-degree-of-freedom parallel control for inverse response plus time delay.Systems Science & Control Engineering201972909510.1080/21642583.2019.1661313
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SwarnkarP. JainS. K. NemaR. K. Comparative analysis of MIT rule and lyapunov rule in model reference adaptive control schemeInnovative Systems Design and Engineering201124
    [Google Scholar]
  10. AnbuS. JayaN. Design of Adaptive Controller Based On Lyapunov Stability for a CSTR,Int. J. Sci. Res. Innov.201481176179
    [Google Scholar]
  11. PalM. SarkarG. BaraiR.K. RoyT. Two-degree-of-freedom based model reference adaptive control of non-minimum phase system.IETE Journal of Research, vol. 69, issue 7,pp. 4337-4348, 2021.10.1080/03772063.2021.1939802
    [Google Scholar]
  12. VinagreB.M. PetrášI. PodlubnyI. ChenY.Q. Using fractional order adjustment rules and fractional order reference models in model-reference adaptive control.Nonlinear Dyn.2002291/426927910.1023/A:1016504620249
    [Google Scholar]
  13. BalaskaH. LadaciS. DjouambiA. Direct fractional order MRAC adaptive control design for a class of fractional order commensurate linear systems.J. Control Decis.202036337110.1080/23307706.2020.1809022
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KangS. WuH. YangX. LiY. WangY. Fractional-order robust model reference adaptive control of piezo-actuated active vibration isolation systems using output feedback and multi-objective optimization algorithm.J. Vib. Control20192611710.1177/1077546319875260
    [Google Scholar]
  15. BouroubaB. SchulteH. LadaciS. A novel MRAC-based fractional adaptive control design for a class of fractional order linear systemsInternational Conference on Systems and Control, 2019pp. 303-30810.1109/ICSC47195.2019.8950529
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ZhaoS. Practical solutions to the Non-Minimum Phase and vibration problems under the disturbance rejection paradigm.Cleveland State University2012
    [Google Scholar]
  17. NagrathI.J. GopalM. Control Systems Engineering.5th edNew Age International Publishers2009
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LuzG.R. dos Santos ConceiçãoW.A. de Matos JorgeL.M. ParaísoP.R. AndradeC.M.G. Dynamic modeling and control of soybean meal drying in a direct rotary dryer.Food Bioprod. Process.2010882-3909810.1016/j.fbp.2010.01.008
    [Google Scholar]
  19. BoraseR.P. MaghadeD.K. SondkarS.Y. PawarS.N. A review of PID control, tuning methods and applications.Int. J. Dyn. Control202181882710.1007/s40435‑020‑00665‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  20. VermaB. PadhyP.K. Optimal PID controller design with adjustable maximum sensitivity.IET Control Theory Appl.20181281156116510.1049/iet‑cta.2017.1078
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LiX. GaoL. Robust fractional-order PID tuning method for a plant with an uncertain parameter.Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst.20211931302131010.1007/s12555‑019‑0866‑y
    [Google Scholar]
  22. BirsI. MuresanC. NascuI. IonescuC. A survey of recent advances in fractional order control for time delay systemsIEEE Access, vol. 7, PP30951-30965 2019.10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2902567
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965245114231005062309
Loading
/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965245114231005062309
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test