Skip to content
2000
Volume 19, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1872-2105
  • E-ISSN: 2212-4020

Abstract

Background

The world is currently facing a growing concern regarding freshwater scarcity, which has arisen as a result of a complex interplay of various factors. Renewable energy-powered water desalination is a feasible solution to address freshwater scarcity.

Methods

This patent study presents a comprehensive investigation of the performance of a conventional solar still (CSS) and its modified versions, such as a still with copper plates, a still with PCM and a still with PCM and 3 wt% CuO nanoparticles blend. The experiments were carried out concurrently under identical circumstances for the CSS and the proposed stills. Prior to usage, the CuO nanoparticles and their blend with PCM were characterized through various analyses.

Results

The investigation showcased the copper plate attached solar still with 3 wt% CuO nanoparticles blended with PCM significantly improved the distillate production, achieving approximately 6.85 kg/m2/day. This represents an increment of approximately 23.42% compared to the still with copper plate and PCM and 69.14% related to the CSS.

Conclusion

Moreover, the solar still with 3 wt% CuO nanoparticles blended with PCM demonstrated a thermal efficiency of 74.23% and an exergy efficiency of 9.75%. The production cost of distillate for all four stills remained at $0.03 per kg. These findings highlight the effectiveness of the proposed copper plate attached solar still with 3 wt% CuO nanoparticles blended with PCM as a viable method for producing potable water.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/nanotec/10.2174/0118722105275724231130100817
2024-01-03
2025-09-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/nanotec/10.2174/0118722105275724231130100817
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DumkaP. KushwahY. SharmaA. MishraD.R. Comparative analysis and experimental evaluation of single slope solar still augmented with permanent magnets and conventional solar still.Desalination2019459344510.1016/j.desal.2019.02.012
     [Google Scholar]
  2. BalachandranG.B. DavidP.W. MariappanR.K. KabeelA.E. AthikesavanM.M. SathyamurthyR. Improvising the efficiency of single-sloped solar still using thermally conductive nano-ferric oxide.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20202726321913220410.1007/s11356‑019‑06661‑2 31709486
     [Google Scholar]
  3. AskariI.B. AmeriM. CaliseF. Energy, exergy and exergo-economic analysis of different water desalination technologies powered by Linear Fresnel solar field.Desalination2018425376710.1016/j.desal.2017.10.008
     [Google Scholar]
  4. AskariI.B. AmeriM. Solar Rankine Cycle (SRC) powered by Linear Fresnel solar field and integrated with Multi Effect Desalination (MED) system.Renew. Energy2018117527010.1016/j.renene.2017.10.033
     [Google Scholar]
  5. RahbarN. AsadiA. Fotouhi-BafghiE. Performance evaluation of two solar stills of different geometries: Tubular versus triangular: Experimental study, numerical simulation, and second law analysis.Desalination2018443445510.1016/j.desal.2018.05.015
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ChenZ. PengJ. ChenG. Analysis of heat and mass transferring mechanism of multi-stage stacked-tray solar seawater desalination still and experimental research on its performance.Sol. Energy201714227828710.1016/j.solener.2016.12.028
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BaluM.A. RaoD.V.S.K. PremalathaK.M. Performance analysis of biomass-based absorber solar still through ANN and MLR approach.Desalination Water Treat.201812726227110.5004/dwt.2018.22759
     [Google Scholar]
  8. AbujazarM.S.S. FatihahS. KabeelA.E. Seawater desalination using inclined stepped solar still with copper trays in a wet tropical climate.Desalination201742314114810.1016/j.desal.2017.09.020
     [Google Scholar]
  9. MoradM.M. El-MaghawryH.A.M. WasfyK.I. A developed solar-powered desalination system for enhancing fresh water productivity.Sol. Energy2017146202910.1016/j.solener.2017.02.002
     [Google Scholar]
  10. WuG. KutluC. ZhengH. SuY. CuiD. A study on the maximum gained output ratio of single-effect solar humidification-dehumidification desalination.Sol. Energy20171571910.1016/j.solener.2017.08.014
     [Google Scholar]
  11. AberueeM.J. BaniasadiE. Ziaei-RadM. Performance analysis of an integrated solar based thermo-electric and desalination system.Appl. Therm. Eng.201711039941110.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.199
     [Google Scholar]
  12. KabeelA.E. El-SaidE.M.S. Experimental study on a modified solar power driven hybrid desalination system.Desalination201844311010.1016/j.desal.2018.05.017
     [Google Scholar]
  13. ChenH.C. ChenY.R. YangK.H. Effective reduction of water molecules’ interaction for efficient water evaporation in desalination.Desalination2018436919710.1016/j.desal.2018.02.013
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ShahzadM.W. BurhanM. GhaffourN. NgK.C. A multi evaporator desalination system operated with thermocline energy for future sustainability.Desalination201843526827710.1016/j.desal.2017.04.013
     [Google Scholar]
  15. JafarG.B.A. AssariM.R. Basirat TabriziH. Passive and active performance of a multi-side-stepped square pyramid solar still; experimental and modeling.J. Energy Storage20203210183210.1016/j.est.2020.101832
     [Google Scholar]
  16. ElashmawyM. AlshammariF. Atmospheric water harvesting from low humid regions using tubular solar still powered by a parabolic concentrator system.J. Clean. Prod.202025612032910.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120329
     [Google Scholar]
  17. AroraS. SinghH.P. SahotaL. Performance and cost analysis of photovoltaic thermal (PVT)-compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) collector integrated solar still using CNT-water based nanofluids.Desalination202049511459510.1016/j.desal.2020.114595
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ElbarA.R.A. YousefM.S. HassanH. Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and enviroeconomic (4E) evaluation of a new integration of solar still with photovoltaic panel.J. Clean. Prod.201923366568010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.111
     [Google Scholar]
  19. KabeelA.E. HarbyK. AbdelgaiedM. EisaA. Performance of the modified tubular solar still integrated with cylindrical parabolic concentrators.Sol. Energy202020418118910.1016/j.solener.2020.04.080
     [Google Scholar]
  20. MadiouliJ. LashinA. ShigidiI. BadruddinI.A. KessentiniA. Experimental study and evaluation of single slope solar still combined with flat plate collector, parabolic trough and packed bed.Sol. Energy202019635836610.1016/j.solener.2019.12.027
     [Google Scholar]
  21. ElashmawyM. AlhadriM. AhmedM.M.Z. Enhancing tubular solar still performance using novel PCM-tubes.Desalination202150011488010.1016/j.desal.2020.114880
     [Google Scholar]
  22. VigneswaranV.S. KumarP.G. SakthivadivelD. Energy, Exergy, and Economic analysis of low thermal conductivity basin solar still integrated with Phase Change Material for energy storage.J. Energy Storage20213410219410.1016/j.est.2020.102194
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ChaichanM.T. AbaasK.I. KazemH.A. Design and assessment of solar concentrator distillating system using phase change materials (PCM) suitable for desertic weathers.Desalination Water Treat.20165732148971490710.1080/19443994.2015.1069221
     [Google Scholar]
  24. GrewalR. KumarM. Performance evaluation of a concatenated stepped solar still system loaded with different masses of energy storage material.Energy202225912500510.1016/j.energy.2022.125005
     [Google Scholar]
  25. LiW. LiJ. MaT. Construction of Core–shell Sb2s3 @Cds nanorod with enhanced heterointerface interaction for chromium‐containing wastewater treatment.Small20231942230273710.1002/smll.202302737
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (a ZhuZ. LiJ. LiW. Simulated-sunlight-driven Cr(vi) reduction on a type-II heterostructured Sb2S3/CdS photocatalyst.Environ. Sci. Nano2022951738174710.1039/D2EN00050D
     [Google Scholar]
  27. (b LiW. HeS. SuZ. XuW. WangX. A BiOCl-CuO photocatalyst based on p-n heterojunction and its photocatalytic performance under visible-light.Appl. Surf. Sci.201947070771510.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.174
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (a AbdullahA.S. EssaF.A. BachaH.B. OmaraZ.M. Improving the trays solar still performance using reflectors and phase change material with nanoparticles.J. Energy Storage20203110174410.1016/j.est.2020.101744
     [Google Scholar]
  29. (b RaphaelH RazK EllaF. Phase-change nanoparticle.WO Patent 2016084082A12016
  30. Dsilva Winfred RufussD. SuganthiL. IniyanS. DaviesP.A. Effects of nanoparticle-enhanced phase change material (NPCM) on solar still productivity.J. Clean. Prod.201819292910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.201
     [Google Scholar]
  31. AkpinarE.K. Drying of mint leaves in a solar dryer and under open sun: Modelling, performance analyses.Energy Convers. Manage.201051122407241810.1016/j.enconman.2010.05.005
     [Google Scholar]
  32. KandealA.W. El-ShafaiN.M. AbdoM.R. Improved thermo-economic performance of solar desalination via copper chips, nanofluid, and nano-based phase change material.Sol. Energy20212241313132510.1016/j.solener.2021.06.085
     [Google Scholar]
  33. MandalS.K. KumarS. SinghP.K. Performance investigation of CuO-paraffin wax nanocomposite in solar water heater during night.Thermochim. Acta2019671364210.1016/j.tca.2018.11.003
     [Google Scholar]
  34. DingM. LuH. SunY. Superelastic 3D assembled clay/graphene aerogels for continuous solar desalination and oil/organic solvent absorption.Adv. Sci.2022936220520210.1002/advs.202205202 36354171
     [Google Scholar]
  35. ApriandanuD.O.B. YulizarY. Tinospora crispa leaves extract for the simple preparation method of CuO nanoparticles and its characterization.Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects20192010040110.1016/j.nanoso.2019.100401
     [Google Scholar]
  36. DingM. ZhaoD. LiuH. Ink‐Stained chalk: A low‐cost 3D evaporator for efficient and stable solar desalination.Sol. RRL202379230002610.1002/solr.202300026
     [Google Scholar]
  37. XiongT. OkY.S. DissanayakeP.D. Preparation and thermal conductivity enhancement of a paraffin wax-based composite phase change material doped with garlic stem biochar microparticles.Sci. Total Environ.202282715434110.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154341 35257765
     [Google Scholar]
  38. HeY. ZhaoD. WangH. 3D graphene composite foams for efficient and stable solar desalination of high‐salinity brine.Sol. RRL2023714230031310.1002/solr.202300313
     [Google Scholar]
  39. ShaoC. GuoB. LuB. PDI‐based organic small molecule regulated by inter/intramolecular interactions for efficient solar vapor generation.Small20231952230585610.1002/smll.202305856 37635112
     [Google Scholar]
  40. BanoqitahE. SathyamurthyR. MoustafaE.B. Enhancement and prediction of a stepped solar still productivity integrated with paraffin wax enriched with nano-additives.Case Stud. Therm. Eng.20234910321510.1016/j.csite.2023.103215
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Adibi ToosiS.S. GoshayeshiH.R. ZahmatkeshI. NejatiV. Experimental assessment of new designed stepped solar still with Fe3O4 + graphene oxide + paraffin as nanofluid under constant magnetic field.J. Energy Storage20236210679510.1016/j.est.2023.106795
     [Google Scholar]
  42. AbdelgaiedM. AttiaM.E.H. KabeelA.E. ZayedM.E. Improving the thermo-economic performance of hemispherical solar distiller using copper oxide nanofluids and phase change materials: Experimental and theoretical investigation.Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells202223811159610.1016/j.solmat.2022.111596
     [Google Scholar]
  43. KabeelA.E. SathyamurthyR. ManokarA.M. SharshirS.W. EssaF.A. ElshiekhA.H. Experimental study on tubular solar still using Graphene Oxide Nano particles in Phase Change Material (NPCM’s) for fresh water production.J. Energy Storage20202810120410.1016/j.est.2020.101204
     [Google Scholar]
  44. PrasadA.R. AttiaM.E.H. Al-KouzW. AfzalA. AthikesavanM.M. SathyamurthyR. Energy and exergy efficiency analysis of solar still incorporated with copper plate and phosphate pellets as energy storage material.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20212835486284863610.1007/s11356‑021‑14080‑5 33913110
     [Google Scholar]
  45. SuraparajuS.K. NatarajanS.K. Productivity enhancement of single-slope solar still with novel bottom finned absorber basin inserted in phase change material (PCM): Techno-economic and enviro-economic analysis.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20212833459854600610.1007/s11356‑021‑13495‑4 33890213
     [Google Scholar]
  46. GrewalR. KumarM. Comparative study on stepped solar distillers internally loaded with different masses of phase change material.Int. J. Energy Res.2022469129481296210.1002/er.8071
     [Google Scholar]
  47. ChaichanM.T. KazemH.A. Single slope solar distillator productivity improvement using phase change material and Al2O3 nanoparticle.Sol. Energy201816437038110.1016/j.solener.2018.02.049
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/nanotec/10.2174/0118722105275724231130100817
Loading
Improved Thermal Performance and Distillate of Conventional Solar Still via Copper Plate, Phase Change Material and CuO Nanoparticles
Recent Pat Nanotechnol 19, 483 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0118722105275724231130100817
/content/journals/nanotec/10.2174/0118722105275724231130100817
/content/journals/nanotec/10.2174/0118722105275724231130100817
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Conventional solar still; CuO nanoparticles; freshwater scarcity; PCM; PLGB; renewable energy

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test