Skip to content
2000
Volume 22, Issue 12
  • ISSN: 1570-1786
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6255

Abstract

The group includes eight well-characterized and established species, whose classification and identification have been arduous and intense tasks. The similarity between group species and the discovery of new strains have complicated their classification and identification. The chemical profile can be complementary, along with molecular methodologies, to classify species. With this issue in mind, we performed a comparative study on natural compounds isolated from and . We isolated compounds from and elucidating their chemical structure by spectroscopic methods. The data suggests that indolic compounds are isolated from , preferentially serving to identify this species. Moreover, macrolactin compounds are extremely specific for since these compounds are not isolated from any other species. Therefore, the chemical profile of each species can be related to a species of this group, helping to define the type of species. In addition, the data achieved suggest that although genomically and can be indistinguishable, both species should be treated differently.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786392470250630095757
2025-07-16
2025-12-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786392470250630095757
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ehling-SchulzM. LereclusD. KoehlerT.M. Microbiol. Spectr20197310.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3‑0032‑2018 31111815
     [Google Scholar]
  2. MorandiniL. CaulierS. BragardC.; Mahillon,J. Microbiol. Res.202428312769710.1016/j.micres.2024.127697 38522411
     [Google Scholar]
  3. LiuY. LaiQ. GökerM. Meier-KolthoffJ.P. WangM. SunY. WangL. ShaoZ. Sci. Rep.2015511408210.1038/srep14082 26373441
     [Google Scholar]
  4. LiuY. DuJ. LaiQ. ZengR. YeD. XuJ. ShaoZ. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.20176782499250810.1099/ijsem.0.001821 28792367
     [Google Scholar]
  5. TuipulotuD.E. MathurA. NgoC. ManS.M. Trends Microbiol.20212945847110.1016/j.tim.2020.09.003 33004259
     [Google Scholar]
  6. SansineneaE. Bacillus thuringiensis Biotechnology.NetherlandsSpringer201210.1007/978‑94‑007‑3021‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BazinetA.L. BMC Evol. Biol.201717117610.1186/s12862‑017‑1020‑1 28768476
     [Google Scholar]
  8. KolstøA.B. LereclusD. MockM. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.2002264295108 12012872
     [Google Scholar]
  9. RaskoD.A. AltherrM.R. HanC.S. RavelJ. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.200529230332910.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.005 15808746
     [Google Scholar]
  10. MarrolloR. In: The diverse Faces of Bacillus cereus.Elsevier201611310.1016/B978‑0‑12‑801474‑5.00001‑3
     [Google Scholar]
  11. StrubeM.L. Bioinformatics Advances202111vbab02010.1093/bioadv/vbab020 36700109
     [Google Scholar]
  12. SalazarB. OrtizA. KeswaniC. MinkinaT. MandzhievaS. Pratap SinghS. RekadwadB. BorrissR. JainA. SinghH.B. SansineneaE. Microb. Ecol.202386112410.1007/s00248‑022‑02044‑2 35604432
     [Google Scholar]
  13. OrtizA. SansineneaE. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.2021105389189710.1007/s00253‑020‑11030‑y 33417042
     [Google Scholar]
  14. OrtizA. SansineneaE. Mini Rev. Med. Chem.201919537338010.2174/1389557518666180829113612 30156158
     [Google Scholar]
  15. VacaJ. OrtizA. SansineneaE. Arch. Microbiol.202320511310.1007/s00203‑022‑03356‑0 36463345
     [Google Scholar]
  16. CastroM. JiménezJ. OrtizA. SansineneaE. Lett. Org. Chem.2020172909510.2174/1570178616666190718125617
     [Google Scholar]
  17. CalderonA. RosalesD. OrtizA. SansineneaE. Tetrahedron Lett.202414915527810.1016/j.tetlet.2024.155278
     [Google Scholar]
  18. SalazarF. OrtizA. SansineneaE. Curr. Microbiol.202077113409341310.1007/s00284‑020‑02200‑2 32944805
     [Google Scholar]
  19. VacaJ. SalazarF. OrtizA. SansineneaE. J. Antibiot.2020731179880210.1038/s41429‑020‑0333‑2 32483303
     [Google Scholar]
  20. SansineneaE. SalazarF. JiménezJ. MendozaÁ. OrtizA. Tetrahedron Lett.201657242604260710.1016/j.tetlet.2016.04.117
     [Google Scholar]
  21. OrtizA. SansineneaE. J. Chem.201820181710.1155/2018/6040814
     [Google Scholar]
  22. SalazarF. OrtizA. SansineneaE. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist.20171117718210.1016/j.jgar.2017.08.008
     [Google Scholar]
  23. SoufianeB. CôtéJ.C. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.2013341212713710.1111/1574‑6968.12106 23413955
     [Google Scholar]
  24. LiuY. LaiQ. ShaoZ. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.201868110611210.1099/ijsem.0.002466 29095136
     [Google Scholar]
  25. LaemmliU.K. Nature1970227525968068510.1038/227680a0 5432063
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786392470250630095757
Loading
A Comparative Study of the Chemical Profile from Species of the Bacillus cereus Group
Lett. Org. Chem. 22, 966 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701786392470250630095757
/content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786392470250630095757
/content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786392470250630095757
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

file format download Download

  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): B. weihenstephanensis; Bacillus cereus group; Bacillus taxonomy; chemical profile; indolic compounds; macrolactins; natural compounds

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test