Full text loading...
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Imunofan, a synthetic peptide adjuvant, compared to Freund’s adjuvant. We hypothesized that imunofan would enhance protective immunity while avoiding the adverse effects associated with traditional adjuvants.
Imunofan (836 Da) was synthesized via SPPS, purified by RP-HPLC, and validated by LC-MS. A chimeric antigen (ESI) encoding EspA, StxB, and Intimin was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) using the pET28-ESI plasmid, induced with IPTG, and purified via Ni-NTA chromatography. BALB/c mice (n = 10/group) were immunized with: (1) ESI+Imunofan, (2) ESI+Freund’s adjuvant, (3) ESI alone, or (4) Imunofan alone. IgG titers were measured by ELISA, and protection was assessed via bacterial shedding (log10 CFU/g feces) post-challenge with E. coli O157:H7.
ESI+Freund’s adjuvant elicited the highest IgG response (mean ± SEM: 12.3 ± 0.8 log10; p < 0.05 vs. ESI alone). Surprisingly, ESI+Imunofan showed a comparable reduction in bacterial shedding (3.1 ± 0.4 log10 CFU/g vs. Freund’s adjuvant: 2.9 ± 0.3; p > 0.1), despite lower IgG (9.1 ± 0.6 log10). ESI alone reduced shedding (4.2 ± 0.5 log10; p < 0.01 vs. control), outperforming Imunofan alone (5.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.05).
Imunofan’s structural authenticity and functional efficacy were demonstrated. Its comparable protection to Freund’s adjuvant, despite weaker humoral responses, suggests a unique role in modulating non-antibody-mediated immunity. These findings support imunofan as a safer alternative to conventional adjuvants.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
References
Data & Media loading...