Skip to content
2000
Volume 15, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2468-1873
  • E-ISSN: 2468-1881

Abstract

Background

This work is the third part of our initiative to fully describe the internal protein nano environments (NEs) for the three existing types of secondary structure elements (SSE). In our previous work, the NE of both the α-helix and the β-sheet were analyzed. The focus of this and previous research is improving our understanding of the SSEs: α-helices, β-sheets and turns, within protein structures. We found that the structural similarities between turns and α-helices are very high and turns may be considered as the “incomplete” initiation of α-helices. The knowledge we were able to compile during this work might be essential for predicting a tertiary structure of proteins, with higher precision and subsequently being in a more favourable position with regard to designing drugs for certain protein structure/function related diseases. Considering that the formation of secondary structure elements is a crucial step in the general folding of protein 3D structure, an important contribution of this work is augmenting the efficiency of estimating if modelled structures, for example, are predicting SSEs in full agreement to necessary/required/sufficient values of respective SSEs nanoenvironment descriptors. During exactly that modelling phase, preceding the more precise final 3D protein structure construction, our Dictionary of Most Relevant Nanoenvironment Descriptors is able to answer some fundamental questions regarding SSE correctness with regard to nanoenvironment characteristics found to be generally required. Expanding this vision, our current work is part of an effort by our laboratory to create a “dictionary of internal protein nanoenvironments” - DIPN. The ten most studied internal protein nanoenvironments are described in DIPN in physicochemical and structural terms, and this knowledge is now available to be used to aid drug design - probably the most important area of application for the results we are presenting here.

Methods

In the current paper, STING´s database of physical-chemical and structural descriptors was used to gather the necessary information to characterize the NE of loops, or, as they are often called, turns. Given that approximately 20% of all protein-type residues form turns, research in this field is essential, and analysis of the obtained results will further contribute to our comprehension of how proteins fold. In addition, the results in this paper will contribute to the better training of algorithms that evaluate the degree of overall protein structure quality and, consequently, structure prediction. This is currently very important given we are witnessing a revolution in algorithms employing artificial intelligence for protein structure prediction. Powered by the STING’s database (wide-ranging protein structure information source), statistical testing was used to retrieve a set of descriptors that fully delineate the NE of turns. By collecting such data, it is then possible to list the variances with respect to the NE of α-helices and β-sheets and, by doing so, establish the most relevant NE descriptors (MRND) for each of the three SSEs.

Results

The results show that the α-helical and β-sheet Nes, as well as the amino acid residue composition, all behave in a similar fashion as a “key and lock” system. In other words, it is necessary for a set of specific descriptors to assume respective specific values (within the bounds of a very definite value region) to construct the specific secondary structure element NE at a certain protein location.

Conclusion

Consequently, there is a set of descriptors that act together and are required to satisfy specific conditions for secondary structure element occurrences. The very same requirement, we found, occurs in the case of turns.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cnanom/10.2174/0124681873291766240724055136
2024-08-22
2025-10-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DE BrevernA.G. Protein beta-turn assignments.Bioinformation20062006153
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ChoiY. AgarwalS. DeaneC.M. How long is a piece of loop?PeerJ20131e110.7717/peerj.1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DonateL.E. RufinoS.D. CanardL.H.J. BlundellT.L. Conformational analysis and clustering of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: A database for modeling and prediction.Protein Sci.19965122600261610.1002/pro.55600512238976569
    [Google Scholar]
  4. TonioloC. BenedettiE. BENEDETTI E. Intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded peptide Conformation.Crit. Rev. Biochem.19809114410.3109/10409238009105471
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GuruprasadK. RajkumarS. gβ- and gγ-turns in proteins revisited: A new set of amino acid turn-type dependent positional preferences and potentials.J. Biosci.200025214315610.1007/BF0340490910878855
    [Google Scholar]
  6. VENKATACHALAM CM. Stereochemical criteria for polypeptides and proteins. V. Conformation of a system of three linked peptide units. Biopolymers.Orig. Res. Biomol.196861014251436
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DE BrevernAG. Extension of the classical classification of β- turns.Sci. Rep.20166111528442746
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hutchinson EG. A revised set of potentials for β-turn formation in proteins.Protein Sci.1994199422072216
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MazoniI. DIPN: A dictionary of the internal proteins nanoenvironments and their potential for transformation into agricultural assets.Agricultura Digital - PesquisaDesenvolvimento e Inovação nas Cadeias Produtivas2023. pp. 219-233.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GeaN. Computational Electrostatics for Biological Applications.SM. Using Structural and Physical–Chemical Parameters to Identify, Classify, and Predict Functional Districts in Proteins—The Role of Electrostatic Potential. RocchiaW. ChamSpringer2015227254
    [Google Scholar]
  11. de MoraesF.R. NeshichI.A.P. MazoniI. YanoI.H. PereiraJ.G.C. SalimJ.A. JardineJ.G. NeshichG. Improving predictions of protein-protein interfaces by combining amino acid-specific classifiers based on structural and physicochemical descriptors with their weighted neighbor averages.PLoS One201491e8710710.1371/journal.pone.008710724489849
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ViartB. Dias-LopesC. KozlovaE. OliveiraC.F.B. NguyenC. NeshichG. Chávez-OlórteguiC. MolinaF. FelicoriL.F. EPI-peptide designer: A tool for designing peptide ligand libraries based on epitope–paratope interactions.Bioinformatics201632101462147010.1093/bioinformatics/btw01426787662
    [Google Scholar]
  13. PereiraC.D. Characterization of amino acids at the protein-protein interface with the greatest contribution to binding energy and their prediction from structural data.Dissertation(master's degree) - State University of Campinas, Institute of Biology, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LeaB.O.R.R.O. Binding affinity prediction using a nonparametric regression model based on physicochemical and structural descriptors of the nano-environment for protein-ligand interactions.PhD thesis, University of Campinas ,Embrapa Agriculture Informatics, 2016
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Aplicação de técnicas de reconhecimento de padrões usando os descritores estruturais de proteínas da base de dados do software STING para discriminação do sítio catalítico de enzimas.Master's thesis, Universidade estadual de campinas, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. MazoniI. Ivan. Análise do nano-ambiente propício para nucleação e manutenção dos elementos da estrutura secundária no contexto estrutural das proteínas funcionais. PhD Thesis. Campinas: Unicamp, Instituto de Biologia; 2018.
  17. da SilveiraC.H. PiresD.E.V. MinardiR.C. RibeiroC. VelosoC.J.M. LopesJ.C.D. MeiraW.Jr NeshichG. RamosC.H.I. HabeschR. SantoroM.M. Protein cutoff scanning: A comparative analysis of cutoff dependent and cutoff free methods for prospecting contacts in proteins.Proteins200974372774310.1002/prot.2218718704933
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MazoniI. BorroL.C. JardineJ.G. YanoI.H. SalimJ.A. NeshichG. Study of specific nanoenvironments containing α-helices in all-α and (α+β)+(α/β) proteins.PLoS One2018137e020001810.1371/journal.pone.020001829990352
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MazoniI. SalimJ.A. de MoraesF.R. BorroL. NeshichG. A comparison between internal protein nanoenvironments of α-helices and β-sheets.PLoS One20201512e024431510.1371/journal.pone.024431533378364
    [Google Scholar]
  20. OliveiraS.R. AlmeidaG.V. SouzaK.R. RodriguesD.N. Kuser-FalcãoP.R. YamagishiM.E. SantosE.H. VieiraF.D. JardineJ.G. NeshichG. Sting_RDB: A relational database of structural parameters for protein analysis with support for data warehousing and data mining.Genet. Mol. Res.20076491192218058712
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MazoniI. Analysis of the nano-environment conducive to nucleation and maintenance of secondary structure elements in the structural context of functional proteins.PhD Thesis, Campinas state university, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KabschW. SanderC. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.Biopolymers198322122577263710.1002/bip.3602212116667333
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HeinigM. FrishmanD. STRIDE: A web server for secondary structure assignment from known atomic coordinates of proteins.Nucleic Acids Res.200432Web ServerW500W50210.1093/nar/gkh42915215436
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LiW. GodzikA. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences.Bioinformatics2006200616581659
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LoganM. Biostatistical design and analysis using R: A practical guide.John Wiley and Sons2011
    [Google Scholar]
  26. HakravartiL. Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics.John Wiley and Sons1967
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ZarJ.H. Biostatiscal Analysis. In.: Pretice Hall Inc.; 1999. p. Chapters 10 and 16.1999https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221959634_Biostatistical_analysis
    [Google Scholar]
  28. PillaiK.C.S. Some new test criteria in multivariate analysis.Ann. Math. Stat.195526111712110.1214/aoms/1177728599
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SeberG.A.F. Multivariate Observations New York.John Wiley and Sons198410.1002/9780470316641
    [Google Scholar]
  30. NathR. PavurR. A new statistic in the one-way multivariate analysis of variance.Comput. Stat. Data Anal.19852429731510.1016/0167‑9473(85)90003‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  31. HH. The generalization of Student’s ratio.Ann. Math. Stat.19311931360378
    [Google Scholar]
  32. JohnstoneI.M. NadlerB. Roy’s largest root test under rank-one alternatives.Biometrika20171041asw06010.1093/biomet/asw06029430030
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cnanom/10.2174/0124681873291766240724055136
Loading
/content/journals/cnanom/10.2174/0124681873291766240724055136
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test