Skip to content
2000
Volume 33, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 0929-8673
  • E-ISSN: 1875-533X

Abstract

Hydrogel wound dressing has significant advantages in wound treatment. It can shorten the time of wound healing, control the process of wound healing, and effectively promote the healing of damaged tissues in a hydrated environment. Sodium alginate (SA) is a commonly used hydrogel wound dressing material, which can quickly form a three-dimensional network structure hydrogel in a relatively mild environment, but the mechanical properties and stability of a single SA hydrogel are poor. The composite hydrogel prepared by mixing SA with other substances can not only exert the performance of a single substance but also improve the mechanical properties, stability and adsorption of the hydrogel and has a wider application prospect in the field of sustained release control of bioactive substances. Natural polymers have been widely used in the preparation of hemostatic and wound healing materials due to their excellent biocompatibility, degradability, viscoelasticity and easy processing. This paper introduces the research progress of composite hydrogels prepared by SA and natural polymers in mechanical properties, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, tissue repair and sustained release control of bioactive substances, and provides a theoretical basis for the application of SA-based composite hydrogels in wound dressings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmc/10.2174/0109298673362140250530094233
2025-06-20
2026-02-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BroussardK.C. PowersJ.G. Wound dressings: Selecting the most appropriate type.Am. J. Clin. Dermatol.201314644945910.1007/s40257‑013‑0046‑424062083
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ShiC. WangC. LiuH. LiQ. LiR. ZhangY. LiuY. ShaoY. WangJ. Selection of appropriate wound dressing for various wounds.Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.2020818210.3389/fbioe.2020.0018232266224
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GeL. ZhangX. CaoC. GuZ. LiuZ. LiuL. LinB. Feasibility study of the sterilization of pigskin used as wound dressings by neutral electrolyzed water.J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.20127261584158710.1097/TA.0b013e318243a1dc22695426
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GhosalK. KováčováM. HumpolíčekP. VajďákJ. BodíkM. ŠpitalskýZ. Antibacterial photodynamic activity of hydrophobic carbon quantum dots and polycaprolactone based nanocomposite processed via both electrospinning and solvent casting method.Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther.20213510245510.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.10245534311091
    [Google Scholar]
  5. DissemondJ. AugustinM. EmingS.A. GoergeT. HornT. KarrerS. SchumannH. StückerM. Modern wound care – Practical aspects of non-interventional topical treatment of patients with chronic wounds.J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges.201412754155410.1111/ddg.1235124813380
    [Google Scholar]
  6. JiangQ. zhouW. WangJ. TangR. ZhangD. WangX. Hypromellose succinate-crosslinked chitosan hydrogel films for potential wound dressing.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.201691859110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.05.07727222285
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AsensioG. Benito-GarzónL. Ramírez-JiménezR.A. GuadillaY. Gonzalez-RubioJ. AbradeloC. ParraJ. Martín-LópezM.R. AguilarM.R. Vázquez-LasaB. RojoL. Biomimetic gradient scaffolds containing hyaluronic acid and Sr/Zn folates for osteochondral tissue engineering.Polymers20211411210.3390/polym1401001235012034
    [Google Scholar]
  8. SalagierskiS. DziadekM. ZagrajczukB. Domalik-PyzikP. SerafimA. StancuI.C. Cholewa-KowalskaK. When dynamic covalent chemistry meets bioactive glasses – Novel multi-level crosslinked, injectable, self-healing chitosan-based hydrogels.Sustain. Mater. Technol.202439e0085010.1016/j.susmat.2024.e00850
    [Google Scholar]
  9. LiD. WangS. MengY. GuoZ. ChengM. LiJ. Fabrication of self-healing pectin/chitosan hybrid hydrogel via Diels-Alder reactions for drug delivery with high swelling property, pH-responsiveness, and cytocompatibility.Carbohydr. Polym.202126811824410.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11824434127224
    [Google Scholar]
  10. JiangX. ZengF. YangX. JianC. ZhangL. YuA. LuA. Injectable self-healing cellulose hydrogel based on host-guest interactions and acylhydrazone bonds for sustained cancer therapy.Acta Biomater.202214110211310.1016/j.actbio.2021.12.03634990813
    [Google Scholar]
  11. YangK. YangJ. ChenR. DongQ. YangH. GuS. ZhouY. Antibacterial hyaluronic acid hydrogels with enhanced self-healing properties via multiple dynamic bond crosslinking.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.2024256Pt 212832010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12832038040167
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LiX. YangZ. HuG. DongF. XiongY. YuanC. Tri-network, physical cross-linked sodium alginate hydrogel with strongly self-healing capacity and highly tough, for wearable flexible devices.Eur. Polym. J.202420911282310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.112823
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DengK. HuangQ. YanX. DaiY. ZhaoJ. XiongX. WangH. ChenX. ChenP. LiuL. Facile fabrication of a novel, photodetachable salecan-based hydrogel dressing with self-healing, injectable, and antibacterial properties based on metal coordination.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.2024264Pt 113055110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13055138431010
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LiW. FangK. YuanH. LiD. LiH. ChenY. LuoX. ZhangL. YeX. Acid-induced Poria cocos alkali-soluble polysaccharide hydrogel: Gelation behaviour, characteristics, and potential application in drug delivery.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.2023242Pt 212438310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12438337030457
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ChenH. FeiF. LiX. NieZ. ZhouD. LiuL. ZhangJ. ZhangH. FeiZ. XuT. A structure-supporting, self-healing, and high permeating hydrogel bioink for establishment of diverse homogeneous tissue-like constructs.Bioact. Mater.20216103580359510.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.01933869899
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SunJ.Y. ZhaoX. IlleperumaW.R.K. ChaudhuriO. OhK.H. MooneyD.J. VlassakJ.J. SuoZ. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels.Nature2012489741413313610.1038/nature1140922955625
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BagherZ. EhteramiA. SafdelM.H. KhastarH. SemiariH. AsefnejadA. DavachiS.M. MirzaiiM. SalehiM. Wound healing with alginate/chitosan hydrogel containing hesperidin in rat model.J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.20205510137910.1016/j.jddst.2019.101379
    [Google Scholar]
  18. LeeK.Y. AlsbergE. MooneyD.J. Degradable and injectable poly(aldehyde guluronate) hydrogels for bone tissue engineering.J. Biomed. Mater. Res.200156222823310.1002/1097‑4636(200108)56:2<228::AID‑JBM1089>3.0.CO;2‑911340593
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ZhouZ. WangZ. LiuX. ZhaoZ. AnH. WangY. HeY. QinJ. Pectin-based self-healing hydrogel through acylhydrazone connection for controlled drug release and enhanced tumor therapy.J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.20227010321010.1016/j.jddst.2022.103210
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WangL. A physically cross-linked sodium algina gelatin hydrogel with high mechanical strength.ACS Appl. Polym. Mater.202133197320510.1021/acsapm.1c00404
    [Google Scholar]
  21. EmamiZ. EhsaniM. ZandiM. FoudaziR. Controlling alginate oxidation conditions for making alginate-gelatin hydrogels.Carbohydr. Polym.201819850951710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.08030093028
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KimH.C LeeJ.N. KimE. KimM.H. ParkW.H. Self-healable poly(γ-glutamic acid)/chitooligosaccharide hydrogels via ionic and π-interactions.Mater. Lett.202129712998710.1016/j.matlet.2021.129987
    [Google Scholar]
  23. TanW. LongT. WanY. LiB. XuZ. ZhaoL. MuC. GeL. LiD. Dual-drug loaded polysaccharide-based self-healing hydrogels with multifunctionality for promoting diabetic wound healing.Carbohydr. Polym.202331212082410.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12082437059551
    [Google Scholar]
  24. QuadradoR.F.N. ZhaiZ. ZavadinackM. KlassenG. IacominiM. EdgarK.J. FajardoA.R. All-polysaccharide, self-healing, pH-sensitive, in situ-forming hydrogel of carboxymethyl chitosan and aldehyde-functionalized hydroxyethyl cellulose.Carbohydr. Polym.202433612210510.1016/j.carbpol.2024.12210538670749
    [Google Scholar]
  25. YuanN. XuL. XuB. ZhaoJ. RongJ. Chitosan derivative-based self-healable hydrogels with enhanced mechanical properties by high-density dynamic ionic interactions.Carbohydr. Polym.201819325926710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.07129773380
    [Google Scholar]
  26. LiuZ. LiJ. ZhangZ. LiuJ. WuC. YuY. Incorporating self-healing capability in temperature-sensitive hydrogels by non-covalent chitosan crosslinkers.Eur. Polym. J.202318211172810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111728
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ZhaoY. LiR. LiuY. SongL. GaoZ. LiZ. PengX. WangP. An injectable, self-healable, antibacterial, and pro-healing oxidized pullulan polysaccharide/carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel for early protection of open abdominal wounds.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.202325012628210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12628237572809
    [Google Scholar]
  28. GuyotC. CerrutiM. LerougeS. Injectable, strong and bioadhesive catechol-chitosan hydrogels physically crosslinked using sodium bicarbonate.Mater. Sci. Eng. C202111811152910.1016/j.msec.2020.11152933255082
    [Google Scholar]
  29. MahaniniaM.H. WangZ. Rajabi-AbhariA. YanN. Self-healing, flame-retardant, and antimicrobial chitosan-based dynamic covalent hydrogels.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.202325212642210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12642237598822
    [Google Scholar]
  30. KramerR.K. BelgacemM.N. CarvalhoA.J.F. GandiniA. Thermally reversible nanocellulose hydrogels synthesized via the furan/maleimide Diels-Alder click reaction in water.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.201914149349810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.02731494162
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ShaoC. WangM. ChangH. XuF. YangJ. A self-healing cellulose nanocrystal-poly(ethylene glycol) nanocomposite hydrogel via Diels-Alder click reaction.ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.2017576167617410.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01060
    [Google Scholar]
  32. BiH. ZhangX. WangQ. YongQ. XuW. XuM. XuC. WangX. Dynamic reversible disulfide bonds hydrogel of thiolated galactoglucomannan/cellulose nanofibril with self-healing property for protein release.Ind. Crops Prod.202320611761510.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117615
    [Google Scholar]
  33. WangL. DuY. YuanY. MuR.J. GongJ. NiY. PangJ. WuC. Mussel-inspired fabrication of konjac glucomannan/microcrystalline cellulose intelligent hydrogel with pH-responsive sustained release behavior.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.201811328529310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.08329452182
    [Google Scholar]
  34. UllahR. ShahL.A. KhanM.T. Cellulose nanocrystals boosted hydrophobically associated self-healable conductive hydrogels for the application of strain sensors and electronic devices.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.2024260Pt 112937610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.12937638262825
    [Google Scholar]
  35. NewhamG. EvansS.D. OngZ.Y. Mechanically tuneable physical nanocomposite hydrogels from polyelectrolyte complex templated silica nanoparticles for anionic therapeutic delivery.J. Colloid Interface Sci.202261722423510.1016/j.jcis.2022.02.05235276523
    [Google Scholar]
  36. LiL. WangN. JinX. DengR. NieS. SunL. WuQ. WeiY. GongC. Biodegradable and injectable in situ cross-linking chitosan-hyaluronic acid based hydrogels for postoperative adhesion prevention.Biomaterials201435123903391710.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.05024507411
    [Google Scholar]
  37. ZhangM. ZhaoX. Alginate hydrogel dressings for advanced wound management.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.20201621414142810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.31132777428
    [Google Scholar]
  38. WeiL. TanJ. LiL. WangH. LiuS. ChenJ. WengY. LiuT. Chitosan/alginate hydrogel dressing loaded FGF/VE-cadherin to accelerate full-thickness skin regeneration and more normal skin repairs.Int. J. Mol. Sci.2022233124910.3390/ijms2303124935163172
    [Google Scholar]
  39. LiD. WeiZ. XueC. Alginate-based delivery systems for food bioactive ingredients: An overview of recent advances and future trends.Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.20212065345536910.1111/1541‑4337.1284034596328
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wróblewska-KrepsztulJ. RydzkowskiT. Michalska-PożogaI. ThakurV.K. Biopolymers for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications: Recent advances and overview of alginate electrospinning.Nanomaterials20199340410.3390/nano903040430857370
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Bauleth-RamosT. ShihT.Y. ShahbaziM-A. NajibiA.J. MaoA.S. LiuD. GranjaP. SantosH.A. SarmentoB. MooneyD.J. Acetalated dextran nanoparticles loaded into an injectable alginate cryogel for combined chemotherapy and cancer vaccination.Adv. Funct. Mater.20192935190368610.1002/adfm.201903686
    [Google Scholar]
  42. BasuT. BhutaniU. MajumdarS. Cross-linker-free sodium alginate and gelatin hydrogels: A multiscale biomaterial design framework.J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med.202210193614362310.1039/D2TB00028H35507082
    [Google Scholar]
  43. ZhaoX. WuH. GuoB. DongR. QiuY. MaP.X. Antibacterial anti-oxidant electroactive injectable hydrogel as self-healing wound dressing with hemostasis and adhesiveness for cutaneous wound healing.Biomaterials2017122344710.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.01128107663
    [Google Scholar]
  44. MuthukumarT. AnbarasuK. PrakashD. SastryT.P. Effect of growth factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines by the collagen biocomposite dressing material containing Macrotyloma uniflorum plant extract—In vivo wound healing.Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces201412117818810.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.06.01824981560
    [Google Scholar]
  45. FischerM. GebhardF. HammerT. ZurekC. MeurerG. MarquardtC. HoeferD. Microbial alginate dressings show improved binding capacity for pathophysiological factors in chronic wounds compared to commercial alginate dressings of marine origin.J. Biomater. Appl.20173191267127610.1177/088532821770217328355974
    [Google Scholar]
  46. TangN.F.R. HeryantoH. ArmynahB. TahirD. Bibliometric analysis of the use of calcium alginate for wound dressing applications: A review.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.202322813815210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.14036543298
    [Google Scholar]
  47. DaL.C. HuangY.Z. XieH.Q. ZhengB.H. HuangY.C. DuS.R. Membranous extracellular matrix-based scaffolds for skin wound healing.Pharmaceutics20211311179610.3390/pharmaceutics1311179634834211
    [Google Scholar]
  48. HeX. ZengL. ChengX. YangC. ChenJ. ChenH. NiH. BaiY. YuW. ZhaoK. HuP. Shape memory composite hydrogel based on sodium alginate dual crosslinked network with carboxymethyl cellulose.Eur. Polym. J.202115611059210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110592
    [Google Scholar]
  49. XuP. SongJ. DaiZ. XuY. LiD. WuC. Effect of Ca2+ cross-linking on the properties and structure of lutein-loaded sodium alginate hydrogels.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.2021193Pt A536310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.11434688674
    [Google Scholar]
  50. PatelM.A. AbouGhalyM.H.H. Schryer-PragaJ.V. ChadwickK. The effect of ionotropic gelation residence time on alginate cross-linking and properties.Carbohydr. Polym.201715536237110.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.09527702523
    [Google Scholar]
  51. MekaV.S. SingM.K.G. PichikaM.R. NaliS.R. KolapalliV.R.M. KesharwaniP. A comprehensive review on polyelectrolyte complexes.Drug Discov. Today201722111697170610.1016/j.drudis.2017.06.00828683256
    [Google Scholar]
  52. IshiharaM. KishimotoS. NakamuraS. SatoY. HattoriH. Polyelectrolyte complexes of natural polymers and their biomedical applications.Polymers201911467210.3390/polym1104067231013742
    [Google Scholar]
  53. WangZ. GaoS. ZhangW. GongH. XuK. LuoC. ZhiW. ChenX. LiJ. WengJ. Polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan composite hydrogels with sustained release of traditional Tibetan medicine for promoting chronic diabetic wound healing.Biomater. Sci.20219103821382910.1039/D1BM00346A33881045
    [Google Scholar]
  54. YinX. FengS. ChiY. LiuJ. SunK. GuoC. WuZ. Estrogen-functionalized liposomes grafted with glutathione-responsive sheddable chotooligosaccharides for the therapy of osteosarcoma.Drug Deliv.201825190090810.1080/10717544.2018.145892029644882
    [Google Scholar]
  55. MndlovuH. du ToitL.C. KumarP. MarimuthuT. KondiahP.P.D. ChoonaraY.E. PillayV. Development of a fluid-absorptive alginate-chitosan bioplatform for potential application as a wound dressing.Carbohydr. Polym.201922211498810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11498831320082
    [Google Scholar]
  56. TanJ. LuoY. GuoY. ZhouY. LiaoX. LiD. LaiX. LiuY. Development of alginate-based hydrogels: Crosslinking strategies and biomedical applications.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.202323912427510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12427537011751
    [Google Scholar]
  57. BouhadirK.H. LeeK.Y. AlsbergE. DammK.L. AndersonK.W. MooneyD.J. Degradation of partially oxidized alginate and its potential application for tissue engineering.Biotechnol. Prog.200117594595010.1021/bp010070p11587588
    [Google Scholar]
  58. DahlmannJ. KrauseA. MöllerL. KensahG. MöwesM. DiekmannA. MartinU. KirschningA. GruhI. DrägerG. Fully defined in situ cross-linkable alginate and hyaluronic acid hydrogels for myocardial tissue engineering.Biomaterials201334494095110.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.00823141898
    [Google Scholar]
  59. RowleyJ.A. MooneyD.J. Alginate type and RGD density control myoblast phenotype.J. Biomed. Mater. Res.200260221722310.1002/jbm.128711857427
    [Google Scholar]
  60. YangY. WangX. YangF. WangL. WuD. Highly elastic and ultratough hybrid ionic-covalent hydrogels with tunable structures and mechanics.Adv. Mater.20183018170707110.1002/adma.20170707129577453
    [Google Scholar]
  61. DuH. LiuW. ZhangM. SiC. ZhangX. LiB. Cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils based hydrogels for biomedical applications.Carbohydr. Polym.201920913014410.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.02030732792
    [Google Scholar]
  62. FeyissaZ. EdossaG.D. GuptaN.K. NegeraD. Development of double crosslinked sodium alginate/chitosan based hydrogels for controlled release of metronidazole and its antibacterial activity.Heliyon202399e2014410.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e2014437809897
    [Google Scholar]
  63. StagnaroP. SchizziI. UtzeriR. MarsanoE. CastellanoM. Alginate-polymethacrylate hybrid hydrogels for potential osteochondral tissue regeneration.Carbohydr. Polym.2018185566210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.01229421060
    [Google Scholar]
  64. LiangY. HeJ. GuoB. Functional hydrogels as wound dressing to enhance wound healing.ACS Nano2021158126871272210.1021/acsnano.1c0420634374515
    [Google Scholar]
  65. XiangJ. ShenL. HongY. Status and future scope of hydrogels in wound healing: Synthesis, materials and evaluation.Eur. Polym. J.202013010960910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109609
    [Google Scholar]
  66. MotaA. LotfiA.S. BarzinJ. HatamM. AdibiB. KhalajZ. MassumiM. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell behaviors on PCL/Gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds modified with A collagen IV-Derived RGD-Containing peptide.Cell J.201416111024511574
    [Google Scholar]
  67. ThiT.T.H. LeeJ.S. LeeY. ParkK.M. ParkK.D. Enhanced cellular activity in gelatin-poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels without compromising gel stiffness.Macromol. Biosci.201616333434010.1002/mabi.20150032726663697
    [Google Scholar]
  68. AfjoulH. ShamlooA. KamaliA. Freeze-gelled alginate/gelatin scaffolds for wound healing applications: An in vitro, in vivo study.Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl.202011311095710.1016/j.msec.2020.11095732487379
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Joly-DuhamelC. HellioD. DjabourovM. All gelatin networks: 1. Biodiversity and physical chemistry.Langmuir200218197208721710.1021/la020189n
    [Google Scholar]
  70. MaW. ZhouM. DongW. ZhaoS. WangY. YaoJ. LiuZ. HanH. SunD. ZhangM. A bi-layered scaffold of a poly(lactic- co -glycolic acid) nanofiber mat and an alginate–gelatin hydrogel for wound healing.J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med.20219367492750510.1039/D1TB01039E34551047
    [Google Scholar]
  71. AnithaA. SowmyaS. KumarP.T.S. DeepthiS. ChennazhiK.P. EhrlichH. TsurkanM. JayakumarR. Chitin and chitosan in selected biomedical applications.Prog. Polym. Sci.20143991644166710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.008
    [Google Scholar]
  72. CroisierF. JérômeC. Chitosan-based biomaterials for tissue engineering.Eur. Polym. J.201349478079210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.12.009
    [Google Scholar]
  73. WangW. MengQ. LiQ. LiuJ. ZhouM. JinZ. ZhaoK. Chitosan derivatives and their application in biomedicine.Int. J. Mol. Sci.202021248710.3390/ijms2102048731940963
    [Google Scholar]
  74. YangS. LiX. LiuP. ZhangM. WangC. ZhangB. Multifunctional chitosan/polycaprolactone nanofiber scaffolds with varied dual-drug release for wound-healing applications.ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.2020684666467610.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0067433455179
    [Google Scholar]
  75. González-RodríguezM.L. HolgadoM.A. Sánchez-LafuenteC. RabascoA.M. FiniA. Alginate/chitosan particulate systems for sodium diclofenac release.Int. J. Pharm.20022321-222523410.1016/S0378‑5173(01)00915‑211790506
    [Google Scholar]
  76. KaramiF. Saber-SamandariS. Synthesis and characterization of a novel hydrogel based on carboxymethyl chitosan/sodium alginate with the ability to release simvastatin for chronic wound healing.Biomed. Mater.202318202500110.1088/1748‑605X/acb0a336603225
    [Google Scholar]
  77. LiX. ChenS. ZhangB. LiM. DiaoK. ZhangZ. LiJ. XuY. WangX. ChenH. In situ injectable nano- composite hydrogel composed of curcumin, N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan and oxidized alginate for wound healing application.Int. J. Pharm.20124371-211011910.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.08.00122903048
    [Google Scholar]
  78. ZhaoQ. ZhaoX.Y. LiuY. XieH.B. ZhangJ.X. WangL.Y. ZhangJ.W. WuL. Study on bilayer composite hydrogel film for wound dressing based on chitosan/sodium alginate-polyvinyl alcohol.Yaowu Pingjia Yanjiu202346112321232910.7501/j.issn.1674‑6376.2023.11.005
    [Google Scholar]
  79. CidreiraA.C.M. de CastroK.C. HatamiT. LinanL.Z. MeiL.H.I. Cellulose nanocrystals-based materials as hemostatic agents for wound dressings: A review.Biomed. Microdevices20212344310.1007/s10544‑021‑00581‑034491430
    [Google Scholar]
  80. FanX. Morphologycontrollable cellulose/chitosan sponge for deep wound hemostasis with surfactant and porefoaming agent.Mater. Sci. Eng. C202111811140810.1016/j.msec.2020.11140833255011
    [Google Scholar]
  81. FanX. LiY. LiN. WanG. AliM.A. TangK. Rapid hemostatic chitosan/cellulose composite sponge by alkali/urea method for massive haemorrhage.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.20201642769277810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.31232791271
    [Google Scholar]
  82. LaurenceS. BareilleR. BaqueyC. FricainJ.C. Development of a resorbable macroporous cellulosic material used as hemostatic in an osseous environment.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A200573A442242910.1002/jbm.a.3028015880722
    [Google Scholar]
  83. RumiS.S. LiyanageS. AbidiN. Conversion of low-quality cotton to bioplastics.Cellulose20212842021203810.1007/s10570‑020‑03661‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  84. ZhangS. ShanS. ZhangH. GaoX. TangX. ChenK. Antimicrobial cellulose hydrogels preparation with RIF loading from bamboo parenchyma cells: A green approach towards wound healing.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.20222031910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.04635063490
    [Google Scholar]
  85. XieH. XiaH. HuangL. ZhongZ. YeQ. ZhangL. LuA. Biocompatible, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory zinc ion cross-linked quaternized cellulose-sodium alginate composite sponges for accelerated wound healing.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.2021191273910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.04734534578
    [Google Scholar]
  86. NehraP. ChauhanR.P. Antimicrobial activity of nanocellulose composite hydrogel isolated from an agricultural waste.Arch. Microbiol.2023205413310.1007/s00203‑023‑03454‑736959521
    [Google Scholar]
  87. ShinM. LimJ. AnJ. YoonJ. ChoiJ.W. Nanomaterial-based biohybrid hydrogel in bioelectronics.Nano Converg.2023101810.1186/s40580‑023‑00357‑736763293
    [Google Scholar]
  88. DengW. TangY. MaoJ. ZhouY. ChenT. ZhuX. Cellulose nanofibril as a crosslinker to reinforce the sodium alginate/chitosan hydrogels.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.202118989089910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.17234455006
    [Google Scholar]
  89. TangJ. JavaidM.U. PanC. YuG. BerryR.M. TamK.C. Self-healing stimuli-responsive cellulose nanocrystal hydrogels.Carbohydr. Polym.202022911548610.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11548631826484
    [Google Scholar]
  90. BurdickJ.A. PrestwichG.D. Hyaluronic acid hydrogels for biomedical applications.Adv. Mater.20112312H41H5610.1002/adma.20100396321394792
    [Google Scholar]
  91. FallacaraA. BaldiniE. ManfrediniS. VertuaniS. Hyaluronic acid in the third millennium.Polymers201810770110.3390/polym1007070130960626
    [Google Scholar]
  92. MohandasA. AnishaB.S. ChennazhiK.P. JayakumarR. Chitosan–hyaluronic acid/VEGF loaded fibrin nanoparticles composite sponges for enhancing angiogenesis in wounds.Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces201512710511310.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.01.02425660093
    [Google Scholar]
  93. ZhuZ.N. ZhuX.H. GuoX. Coastal tomographic mapping of nonlinear tidal currents and residual currents.Cont. Shelf Res.201714321922710.1016/j.csr.2016.06.014
    [Google Scholar]
  94. ZhangY. Injectable in situ dual crosslinking hyaluronic acid and sodium alginate based hydrogels for drug release.J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.20193012995100710.1080/09205063.2019.161854631084413
    [Google Scholar]
  95. ZhangJ. GeJ. XuY. ChenJ. ZhouA. SunL. GaoY. ZhangY. GuT. NingX. Bioactive multi-engineered hydrogel offers simultaneous promise against antibiotic resistance and wound damage.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.20201644466447410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.24732890556
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Abou-OkeilA. FahmyH.M. El-BisiM.K. Ahmed- FaridO.A. Hyaluronic acid/Na-alginate films as topical bioactive wound dressings.Eur. Polym. J.201810910110910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.09.003
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmc/10.2174/0109298673362140250530094233
Loading
/content/journals/cmc/10.2174/0109298673362140250530094233
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test