Skip to content
2000
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1570-1638
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6220

Abstract

Fifty percent of people worldwide suffer from periodontitis, a chronic inflammation of the soft tissue that surrounds the teeth. Effective filling of dental pockets is paramount for successful treatment outcomes in periodontal therapy. This review examines all the important aspects of -forming dental cement for filling dental pockets. It focuses on the effectiveness of forming dental cement in filling periodontal pockets, the conditions necessary for their retention, their interaction with the periodontal environment and their potential performance in clinical practice. Through an in-depth analysis of current literature and clinical evidence, this review highlights the promising role of forming dental cement in enhancing periodontal therapy outcomes. The effectiveness of various filling systems, such as thermosensitive hydrogels, gel systems, microparticulate systems, and forming implants, is critically examined in this study. The advantages and disadvantages of each system are thoroughly examined, with a focus on their clinical uses and efficacy in the treatment of periodontitis. It explains the essential requirements for these cements in the periodontal environment, such as low viscosity for simple administration, the right setting time for stability, and regulated drug release mechanisms to sustain therapeutic concentrations over time. Alongside issues with formulation stability and biocompatibility, the suitability of these materials for the unique conditions present in periodontal pockets is assessed. In order to optimize these materials for better therapeutic effects and enhanced outcomes for patients in periodontal therapy, this study outlines potential directions for future research. It highlights the potential of forming dental cement to transform periodontal treatment by combining recent research findings with practical applications.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cddt/10.2174/0115701638353043250613185624
2025-06-27
2026-03-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. NazirM.A. Prevalence of periodontal disease, its association with systemic diseases and prevention.Int. J. Health Sci. (Qassim)20171127280 28539867
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SedghiL.M. BacinoM. KapilaY.L. Periodontal disease: The good, the bad, and the unknown.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.202111December76694410.3389/fcimb.2021.766944 34950607
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MahmoudM.M. The optimization of modified composite nano-materials as a novel approach to dental hygiene remediation.Thesis American University Sharjah2019
    [Google Scholar]
  4. KönönenE. GursoyM. GursoyU. Periodontitis: A multifaceted disease of tooth-supporting tissues.J. Clin. Med.201988113510.3390/jcm8081135 31370168
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HawrylukD.A. Understanding periodontal pockets: Insights from st. Lawrence dentistry.2023Available from: https://www.stlawrencedentistry.com/blog/dental-treatment/understanding-periodontal-pockets-insights-from-st-lawrence-dentistry/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. El-GendyR. JunaidS. LamS.K.L. Developing a tooth in situ organ culture model for dental and periodontal regeneration research.Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.2021858141310.3389/fbioe.2020.581413 33537288
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AljateeliM. KotichaT. BashutskiJ. Surgical periodontal therapy with and without initial scaling and root planing in the management of chronic periodontitis: A randomized clinical trial.J. Clin. Periodontol.201441769370010.1111/jcpe.12259 24730621
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MarconciniS. GouldingM. OldoiniG. AttanasioC. GiammarinaroE. GenovesiA. Clinical and patient‐centered outcomes post non‐surgical periodontal therapy with the use of a non‐injectable anesthetic product: A randomized clinical study.J. Investig. Clin. Dent.2019104e1244610.1111/jicd.12446 31353819
    [Google Scholar]
  9. KempeS. MäderK. In situ forming implants: An attractive formulation principle for parenteral depot formulations.J. Control. Release2012161266867910.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.016 22543012
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DoM.P. NeutC. MetzH. In-situ forming composite implants for periodontitis treatment: How the formulation determines system performance.Int. J. Pharm.20154861-2385110.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.03.026 25791762
    [Google Scholar]
  11. WoelberJ.P. BremerK. VachK. An oral health optimized diet can reduce gingival and periodontal inflammation in humans - a randomized controlled pilot study.BMC Oral Health20171712810.1186/s12903‑016‑0257‑1 27460471
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GaneshA. MuthuM.S. MohanA. KirubakaranR. Prevalence of early childhood caries in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian J. Public Health201866S3S1110.4103/ijph.ijph_1078_22
    [Google Scholar]
  13. DonosN. The periodontal pocket.Periodontol. 2000201876171510.1111/prd.12203 29194794
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KinaneD.F. StathopoulouP.G. PapapanouP.N. Periodontal diseases.Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers2017311703810.1038/nrdp.2017.38 28805207
    [Google Scholar]
  15. AlJehaniY.A. Risk factors of periodontal disease: Review of the literature.Int. J. Dent.201420141910.1155/2014/182513 24963294
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KudiyirickalM.G. PappachanJ.M. Periodontitis: An often-neglected complication of diabetes.World J. Diabetes202415331832510.4239/wjd.v15.i3.318 38591080
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SlotsJ. Periodontitis: Facts, fallacies and the future.Periodontol. 2000201775172310.1111/prd.12221 28758294
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HarveyJ.D. Periodontal microbiology.Dent. Clin. North Am.201761225326910.1016/j.cden.2016.11.005 28317565
    [Google Scholar]
  19. JainS. Periodontal Pocket.In: Textbook of Periodontics.Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers201710.5005/jp/books/13037_23
    [Google Scholar]
  20. AdelfioM. Martin-MoldesZ. Erndt-MarinoJ. Three‐dimensional humanized model of the periodontal gingival pocket to study oral microbiome.Adv. Sci. (Weinh.)20231012220547310.1002/advs.202205473 36825685
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HeboyanA. VardanyanA. KarobariM.I. Dental luting cements: An updated comprehensive review.Molecules2023284161910.3390/molecules28041619 36838607
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MaletinA. KneževićM.J. KoprivicaD.Đ. VeljovićT. PuškarT. MilekićB. Dental resin-based luting materials.Review Polymers20231520415610.3390/polym15204156
    [Google Scholar]
  23. FengJ. ChengL. ZhouX. In situ antibiofilm effect of glass-ionomer cement containing dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate.Dent. Mater.2015318992100210.1016/j.dental.2015.05.005 26059241
    [Google Scholar]
  24. AshishG. RahulY. MukeshR. PrakashM. Formulation and evaluation of in situ gel containing ciprofloxacin hydrochloride in the treatment of periodontitis.Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res.201710615415910.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i6.17558
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SwainG.P. PatelS. GandhiJ. ShahP. Development of moxifloxacin hydrochloride loaded in-situ gel for the treatment of periodontitis: In-vitro drug release study and antibacterial activity.J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res.20199319020010.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.001 31080718
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KesharwaniP. BishtA. AlexanderA. DaveV. SharmaS. Biomedical applications of hydrogels in drug delivery system: An update.J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.20216610291410.1016/j.jddst.2021.102914
    [Google Scholar]
  27. BjørndalL. AmalooC. MarkvartM. Maxillary sinus impaction of a core carrier causing sustained apical periodontitis, sinusitis, and nasal stenosis: A 3-year follow-up.J. Endod.201642121851185810.1016/j.joen.2016.07.027 27769679
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ThakurR.R.S. McMillanH.L. JonesD.S. Solvent induced phase inversion-based in situ forming controlled release drug delivery implants.J. Control. Release2014176182310.1016/j.jconrel.2013.12.020 24374003
    [Google Scholar]
  29. WangX. BurgessD.J. Drug release from in situ forming implants and advances in release testing.Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.202117811391210.1016/j.addr.2021.113912
    [Google Scholar]
  30. LizambardM. MenuT. FossartM. In-situ forming implants for the treatment of periodontal diseases: Simultaneous controlled release of an antiseptic and an anti-inflammatory drug.Int. J. Pharm.201957211883310.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118833 31715363
    [Google Scholar]
  31. BakhrushinaE.O. SakharovaP.S. KonogorovaP.D. Burst release from in situ forming PLGA-based implants: 12 effectors and ways of correction.Pharmaceutics202416111510.3390/pharmaceutics16010115 38258125
    [Google Scholar]
  32. WangX. BaoQ. SuhM.S. KastelloriziosM. WangR. BurgessD.J. Novel adapter method for in vitro release testing of in situ forming implants.Int. J. Pharm.202262112177710.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121777 35489601
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SuhM.S. KastelloriziosM. TipnisN. Effect of implant formation on drug release kinetics of in situ forming implants.Int. J. Pharm.202159212010510.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120105 33232755
    [Google Scholar]
  34. HatefiA. AmsdenB. Biodegradable injectable in situ forming drug delivery systems.J. Control. Release2002801-392810.1016/S0168‑3659(02)00008‑1 11943384
    [Google Scholar]
  35. DesaleS.S. CohenS.M. ZhaoY. KabanovA.V. BronichT.K. Biodegradable hybrid polymer micelles for combination drug therapy in ovarian cancer.J. Control. Release2013171333934810.1016/j.jconrel.2013.04.026 23665258
    [Google Scholar]
  36. PadmasriB. NagarajuR. PrasanthD. A comprehensive review on in situ gels.Int J Appl Pharm2020126243310.22159/ijap.2020v12i6.38918
    [Google Scholar]
  37. DhanyaK.P. SijiC. JamshiyaE. NihalP. DeepthiO. In situ gel drug delivery system: A review.J. Pharm. Res. Int.202234384510.9734/jpri/2022/v34i29B36056
    [Google Scholar]
  38. YangX. ShiL. GuoX. GaoJ. OssipovD. Convergent in situ assembly of injectable lipogel for enzymatically controlled and targeted delivery of hydrophilic molecules.Carbohydr. Polym.2016154626910.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.028 27577897
    [Google Scholar]
  39. BashirR. MajeedA. AliT. FarooqS. KhanN.A. Floating oral in-situ gel: A review.J. Drug Deliv. Ther.20199244244810.22270/jddt.v9i2.2372
    [Google Scholar]
  40. SinghN.K. LeeD.S. In situ gelling pH- and temperature-sensitive biodegradable block copolymer hydrogels for drug delivery.J. Control. Release201419321422710.1016/j.jconrel.2014.04.056 24815421
    [Google Scholar]
  41. ÁlvarezA.L. EspinarF.O. MéndezJ.B. The application of microencapsulation techniques in the treatment of endodontic and periodontal diseases.Pharmaceutics20113353857110.3390/pharmaceutics3030538 24310596
    [Google Scholar]
  42. ViglianisiG. SantonocitoS. LupiS.M. Impact of local drug delivery and natural agents as new target strategies against periodontitis: New challenges for personalized therapeutic approach.Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis.20231462040622323119104310.1177/20406223231191043 37720593
    [Google Scholar]
  43. RichardB.W. Controlled release drug delivery system for the periodontal pocket.US Patent 4780320A,2024
  44. ZiębaM. ChaberP. DualeK. Polymeric carriers for delivery systems in the treatment of chronic periodontal disease.Polymers2020127157410.3390/polym12071574 32679893
    [Google Scholar]
  45. JoshiD. GargT. GoyalA.K. RathG. Advanced drug delivery approaches against periodontitis.Drug Deliv.201623236337710.3109/10717544.2014.935531 25005586
    [Google Scholar]
  46. WankhadeV.P. HiweK.A. AtramS.C. Dental drug delivery system used in periodontitis.J. Dent. Res.202310418519310.4103/jdrr.jdrr_12_22
    [Google Scholar]
  47. AnartheR. KaleP. ManiA. KendreS. Local drug delivery in periodontitis: An innovative treatment modality.Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res.2021129461610.13040/IJPSR.0975‑8232.12
    [Google Scholar]
  48. NasraM.M.A. KhiriH.M. HazzahH.A. AbdallahO.Y. Formulation, in-vitro characterization and clinical evaluation of curcumin in-situ gel for treatment of periodontitis.Drug Deliv.201724113314210.1080/10717544.2016.1233591 28156166
    [Google Scholar]
  49. SamalH.B. PatraC.N. BoyeenaL. DasI.J. Novel periodontal pocket drug delivery systems for the treatment of periodontitis.INDIAN DRUGS202158372110.53879/id.58.03.11958
    [Google Scholar]
  50. NandgudeT. HasbeP. DeshpandeA. KolsureA. DanielK. NandgudeT.D. Transmucosal drug delivery system in periodontal diseases: A review.Pharm. Res.2018121222
    [Google Scholar]
  51. WangW. ZhangG. WangY. An injectable and thermosensitive hydrogel with nano-aided NIR-II phototherapeutic and chemical effects for periodontal antibacteria and bone regeneration.J. Nanobiotechnology202321136710.1186/s12951‑023‑02124‑6 37805588
    [Google Scholar]
  52. PakzadY. GanjiF. Thermosensitive hydrogel for periodontal application: In vitro drug release, antibacterial activity and toxicity evaluation.J. Biomater. Appl.201630791992910.1177/0885328215614191 26686586
    [Google Scholar]
  53. HasanM.M. HabibM.L. AnwaruzzamanM. KamruzzamanM. KhanM.N. RahmanM.M. Processing techniques of chitosan-based interpenetrating polymer networks, gels, blends, composites and nanocomposites.In: Handbook of Chitin and Chitosan: Composites and Nanocomposites from Chitin and Chitosan, Manufacturing and Characterisations.Elsevier2020619310.1016/B978‑0‑12‑817968‑0.00003‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  54. KhanB. ArbabA. KhanS. FatimaH. BibiI. ChowdhryN.P. Recent progress in thermosensitive hydrogels and their applications in drug delivery area.MedComm Biomater Appl20232e5510.1002/mba2.55
    [Google Scholar]
  55. RomeroJ.F. Díaz-BarriosA. GonzálezG. Biocompatible thermo-responsive N-vinylcaprolactam based hydrogels for controlled drug delivery systems.Bionatura2021621712171910.21931/RB/2021.06.02.8
    [Google Scholar]
  56. MakvandiP. ShabaniM. RabieeN. Engineering and development of a tissue model for the evaluation of microneedle penetration ability, drug diffusion, photothermal activity, and ultrasound imaging: A promising surrogate to ex vivo and in vivo tissues.Adv. Mater.20233518221003410.1002/adma.202210034 36739591
    [Google Scholar]
  57. LiuJ. RuanJ. WeirM.D. Periodontal bone-ligament-cementum regeneration via scaffolds and stem cells.Cells20198653710.3390/cells8060537 31167434
    [Google Scholar]
  58. SamalH.B. DasI.J. BoyeenaL. PatraN. Curcumin in-situ gel for the local treatment of periodontitis: Preparation, in-vitro evaluation and clinical assessment.J Pharm Chem20225911810.53879/id.59.11.13253
    [Google Scholar]
  59. BaghwanR.R. AmbekarA.W. TamboliS.S. Formulation, development and evaluation of in-situ periodontal gel containing ofloxacin.Res J Pharm Technol20211494609461410.52711/0974‑360X.2021.00801
    [Google Scholar]
  60. OberoiP SinghJ SharmaG GroverV KaurIP Preparation and characterization of in-situ gelling systems containing curcumin loaded solid lipid nanoparticles for periodontitis.CTBEB202120210.19080/CTBEB.2021.20.556032
    [Google Scholar]
  61. PhamD.T. PhewchanP. NavesitK. ChokamonsirikunA. KhemwongT. TiyaboonchaiW. Development of metronidazole-loaded in situ thermosensitive hydrogel for periodontitis treatment.Turk. J. Pharm. Sci.202118451051610.4274/tjps.galenos.2020.09623 34496558
    [Google Scholar]
  62. ZhangY. DingN. ZhangT. SunQ. HanB. YuT. A Tetra-PEG hydrogel based aspirin sustained release system exerts beneficial effects on periodontal ligament stem cells mediated bone regeneration.Front Chem.20197October68210.3389/fchem.2019.00682 31681732
    [Google Scholar]
  63. LuanJ. LiR. XuW. Functional biomaterials for comprehensive periodontitis therapy.Acta Pharm. Sin. B20231362310233310.1016/j.apsb.2022.10.026 37425066
    [Google Scholar]
  64. BalbinotG.S. LeituneV.C.B. ZattaK.C. BeninT. GuterresS.S. CollaresF.M. Controlled drug delivery from metronidazole-containing bioactive endodontic cements.Dent. Mater.202339983984510.1016/j.dental.2023.07.006 37500315
    [Google Scholar]
  65. LiangL. ShengY. WangM. LiX. ChengZ. Effectiveness of internet-based nursing interventions for the treatment of patients with periodontitis.BMC Oral Health202424138610.1186/s12903‑024‑04147‑3 38532397
    [Google Scholar]
  66. WernerN. HeckK. WalterE. ErnC. BummC.V. FolwacznyM. Probing pocket depth reduction after non‐surgical periodontal therapy: Tooth‐related factors.J. Periodontol.2024951293910.1002/JPER.23‑0285 37436696
    [Google Scholar]
  67. GönderA. PolatS. KılıçarslanM.A. OcakM. TamamE. How can excess residual cement be reduced in implant‐supported restorations?: An in vitro study.Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.202325580781410.1111/cid.13229 37232125
    [Google Scholar]
  68. IrfanN.I. Mohd ZubirA.Z. SuwandiA. HarisM.S. JaswirI. LestariW. Gelatin-based hemostatic agents for medical and dental application at a glance: A narrative literature review.Saudi Dent. J.202234869970710.1016/j.sdentj.2022.11.007 36570577
    [Google Scholar]
  69. SzávaDT SzávaI VlaseS SzávaA Experimental investigations of the dental filling materials: Establishing elastic Moduli and Poisson's Ratios. Materials202319345610.3390/ma16093456
    [Google Scholar]
  70. GambhirR.S. BhatN. SinghA. Assessment of satisfaction levels of patients during dental outreach programs in rural part of Udaipur, India.Niger. Postgrad. Med. J.201623422723110.4103/1117‑1936.196266 28000645
    [Google Scholar]
  71. RileyJ.L. GordanV.V. RindalD.B. Components of patient satisfaction with a dental restorative visit.J. Am. Dent. Assoc.201214391002101010.14219/jada.archive.2012.0329 22942147
    [Google Scholar]
  72. LeeJ.M. KimJ.H. KwonE.Y. Comparative study on the results of non-surgical periodontal treatment according to the location of the affected site.J. Periodontal Implant Sci.2011412929710.5051/jpis.2011.41.2.92 21556260
    [Google Scholar]
  73. NairS.C. AnoopK.R. Intraperiodontal pocket: An ideal route for local antimicrobial drug delivery.J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res.20123191510.4103/2231‑4040.93558
    [Google Scholar]
  74. RomaM. HegdeS. Implications of graphene-based materials in dentistry: Present and future.Front Chem.202411February130894810.3389/fchem.2023.1308948 38495056
    [Google Scholar]
  75. ThalibB. HamrunN. UtamaM.D. The analysis of accelerator concentration effect on setting time and morphology surface impression materials made of brown algae Sargassum sp.Medicina Clínica Práctica2020310010510.1016/j.mcpsp.2020.100105
    [Google Scholar]
  76. IndraniD.J. MatramN. Changes in setting time of alginate impression material with different water temperature.Dental J Majalah Kedokteran Gigi2013461510.20473/j.djmkg.v46.i1.p5‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  77. HessT.A. A technique to eliminate subgingival cement adhesion to implant abutments by using polytetrafluoroethylene tape.J. Prosthet. Dent.2014112236536810.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.026 24529837
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Al-AzzawiH.M.A. PaoliniR. CelentanoA. Is hydrogel an appropriate bioadhesive material for sutureless oral wound closure?Health Sci. Reports2024712e7024910.1002/hsr2.70249
    [Google Scholar]
  79. GutmannJ.L. ReganJ.D. Surgical endodontics.In: Harty’s Endodontics in Clinical Practice.6th edElsevier201015919510.1016/B978‑0‑7020‑3156‑4.00013‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  80. SahniJ.K. TalegaonkarS. TariqM. Treatment modalities and evaluation models for periodontitis.Int. J. Pharm. Investig.20122310612210.4103/2230‑973X.104394 23373002
    [Google Scholar]
  81. LiangJ. PengX. ZhouX. ZouJ. ChengL. Emerging applications of drug delivery systems in oral infectious diseases prevention and treatment.Molecules202025351610.3390/molecules25030516
    [Google Scholar]
  82. WeiY. DengY. MaS. Local drug delivery systems as therapeutic strategies against periodontitis: A systematic review.J. Control. Release2021333226928210.1016/j.jconrel.2021.03.041 33798664
    [Google Scholar]
  83. OfridamF. TarhiniM. LebazN. GagnièreÉ. ManginD. ElaissariA. pH‐sensitive polymers: Classification and some fine potential applications.Polym. Adv. Technol.20213241455148410.1002/pat.5230
    [Google Scholar]
  84. KurniawansyahI.S. RusdianaT. SopyanI. Desy AryaI.F. WahabH.A. NurzanahD. Comparative study of in situ gel formulation based on the physico-chemical aspect: Systematic review.Gels20239864510.3390/gels9080645
    [Google Scholar]
  85. AbdulkareemA.A. Al-TaweelF.B. Al-SharqiA.J.B. GulS.S. ShaA. ChappleI.L.C. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of periodontitis: From symbiosis to dysbiosis.J. Oral Microbiol.2023151219777910.1080/20002297.2023.2197779 37025387
    [Google Scholar]
  86. ShiM. WeiY. HuW. NieY. WuX. LuR. The subgingival microbiome of periodontal pockets with different probing depths in chronic and aggressive periodontitis: A pilot study.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.20188MAY12410.3389/fcimb.2018.00124 29765908
    [Google Scholar]
  87. DoM.P. NeutC. DelcourtE. Seixas CertoT. SiepmannJ. SiepmannF. In situ forming implants for periodontitis treatment with improved adhesive properties.Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.201488234235010.1016/j.ejpb.2014.05.006 24833006
    [Google Scholar]
  88. XuH.H.K. WangP. WangL. BaoC. ChenQ. WeirM.D. Calcium phosphate cements for bone engineering and their biological properties.Bone Res.201751705610.1038/boneres.2017.56
    [Google Scholar]
  89. KumarK. DhawanN. SharmaH. VaidyaS. VaidyaB. Bioadhesive polymers: Novel tool for drug delivery.Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol.201442427428310.3109/21691401.2013.815194 23859698
    [Google Scholar]
  90. MarkovicD. PetrovicB. JokanovicV. PericT. ColovicB. KaradzicI. Nanomaterials as scaffolds in bone tissue engineering in dental medicine.In: Nanobiomaterials in Hard Tissue Engineering: Applications of Nanobiomaterials.Elsevier Inc.201641344210.1016/B978‑0‑323‑42862‑0.00014‑6
    [Google Scholar]
  91. ZhangX. ZhangQ. MengX. Rheological and mechanical properties of resin-based materials applied in dental restorations.Polymers20211317297510.3390/polym13172975 34503014
    [Google Scholar]
  92. FoscaM. RauJ.V. UskokovićV. Factors influencing the drug release from calcium phosphate cements.Bioact. Mater.2022734136310.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.05.032 34466737
    [Google Scholar]
  93. AlaviS.E. RazaA. GholamiM. GilesM. Al-SammakR. IbrahimA. Advanced drug delivery platforms for the treatment of oral pathogens.Pharmaceutics20221411229310.3390/pharmaceutics14112293
    [Google Scholar]
  94. LyapinaM.G. TzekovaM. DenchevaM. KrastevaA. Yaneva-DeliverskaM. KisselovaA. Nano-glass-ionomer cements in modern dentistry.J IMAB20162221160116510.5272/jimab.2016222.1160
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Lakkasetter ChandrashekarB. BiguettiC.C. ArteagaA. MiramontesA.J. RiosE. RodriguesD.C. A microtomographic and histopathological evaluation of dental cements as late-stage peri-implant complication in a rat model.Sci. Rep.20241411644110.1038/s41598‑024‑66353‑x 39013937
    [Google Scholar]
  96. OwensG.J. SinghR.K. ForoutanF. AlqaysiM. HanC.M. MahapatraC. Sol-gel based materials for biomedical applications.Prog. Mater. Sci.20167717910.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.12.001
    [Google Scholar]
  97. KamalyN. YameenB. WuJ. FarokhzadO.C. Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: Mechanisms of controlling drug release.Chem. Rev.20161164260210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346
    [Google Scholar]
  98. YoshidaT. LaiT.C. KwonG.S. SakoK. pH- and ion-sensitive polymers for drug delivery.Expert Opin. Drug Deliv.201310111497151310.1517/17425247.2013.821978 23930949
    [Google Scholar]
  99. FakhriE. EslamiH. MaroufiP. Chitosan biomaterials application in dentistry.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.202016295697410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.211 32599234
    [Google Scholar]
  100. AndersenO.Z. BellónB. LamkaouchiM. Determining primary stability for adhesively stabilized dental implants.Clin. Oral Investig.20232773741374810.1007/s00784‑023‑04990‑8 37269339
    [Google Scholar]
  101. YadavR. KanwarI.L. HaiderT. PandeyV. GourV. SoniV. In situ gel drug delivery system for periodontitis: An insight review.Future J. Pharm. Sci.2020613310.1186/s43094‑020‑00053‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  102. WingoK. A review of dental cements.J. Vet. Dent.2018351182710.1177/0898756418755339 29486681
    [Google Scholar]
  103. PasqualJ.A.R. FreislebenL.C. ColpoJ.C. EgeaJ.R.J. dos SantosL.A.L. de SousaV.C. In situ drug release measuring in α-TCP cement by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med.20213243810.1007/s10856‑021‑06507‑9 33792786
    [Google Scholar]
  104. HaiderM. ElsayedI. AhmedI.S. FaresA.R. In situ forming microparticles for controlled release of rivastigmine: In vitro optimization and in vivo evaluation.Pharmaceuticals20211416610.3390/ph14010066 33466880
    [Google Scholar]
  105. MadanM BajajA In situ forming polymeric drug delivery systems.Indian J Pharm Sci200971324210.4103/0250‑474X.56015.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. CaoS. ZhaoY. HuY. ZouL. ChenJ. New perspectives: In-situ tissue engineering for bone repair scaffold.Composites Part B: Eng.202020210844510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108445
    [Google Scholar]
  107. SpałekJ OciepaP DeptułaP PiktelE DanilukT KrólG Biocompatible materials in otorhinolaryngology and their antibacterial properties. Int J Mol Sci2022235257510.3390/ijms23052575
    [Google Scholar]
  108. DengR XieY ChanU XuT HuangY Biomaterials and biotechnology for periodontal tissue regeneration: Recent advances and perspectives. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects20221611010.34172/joddd.2022.001
    [Google Scholar]
  109. ZongC. BronckaersA. WillemsG. HeH. Cadenas de Llano-PérulaM. Nanomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration: Progress, challenges and future perspectives.J. Funct. Biomater.20231429010.3390/jfb14060290
    [Google Scholar]
  110. GadH.A. El-NabarawiM.A. Abd El-HadyS.S. Formulation and evaluation of PLA and PLGA in situ implants containing secnidazole and/or doxycycline for treatment of periodontitis.AAPS PharmSciTech20089387888410.1208/s12249‑008‑9126‑9 18654864
    [Google Scholar]
  111. StaněkJ. Elia AzarB. FichtelT. Cement-based materials in dentistry.In: Reinforced Concrete Structures - Innovations in Materials.Design and Analysis. IntechOpen202310.5772/intechopen.106466
    [Google Scholar]
  112. LeungG.K.H. WongA.W.Y. ChuC.H. YuO.Y. Update on dental luting materials.Dent. J.2022101120810.3390/dj10110208
    [Google Scholar]
  113. OlegárioI.C. MalagranaA.P.V.F.P. KimS.S.H. HesseD. TedescoT.K. CalvoA.F.B. Mechanical properties of high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and nanoparticle glass carbomer.J. Nanomaterial2015201547240110.1155/2015/472401
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Karagözoğluİ. AkselL. Bonding performance of different types of expired and unexpired composite resin cements.Int Dental Res2023132545910.5577/idr.2023.vol13.no2.2
    [Google Scholar]
  115. ChiM. QiM.A.L. Novel bioactive and therapeutic dental polymeric materials to inhibit periodontal pathogens and biofilms.Int. J. Mol. Sci.201920227810.3390/ijms20020278 30641958
    [Google Scholar]
  116. JiaB. ZhangB. LiJ. QinJ. HuangY. HuangM. Emerging polymeric materials for treatment of oral diseases: Design strategy towards a unique oral environment.Chem. Soc. Rev.2024533273330110.1039/D3CS01039B
    [Google Scholar]
  117. GuptaH. SinghR.M. SinghG.N. KaushikD. SharmaA. pH-Induced in situ gel for periodontal anesthesia.Indian J. Pharm. Sci.200870677677810.4103/0250‑474X.49120 21369439
    [Google Scholar]
  118. QinY. YuanM. LiL. LiW. XueJ. Formulation and evaluation of in situ forming PLA implant containing tinidazole for the treatment of periodontitis.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater.2012100B82197220210.1002/jbm.b.32788 22887609
    [Google Scholar]
  119. MahadlekJ CharoenteeraboonJ PhaechamudT Benzoyl peroxide in situ forming antimicrobial gel for periodontitis treatment.Key Engineering Materials. Trans Tech citations Ltd2013638
    [Google Scholar]
  120. AgossaK. LizambardM. RongthongT. Delcourt-DebruyneE. SiepmannJ. SiepmannF. Physical key properties of antibiotic-free, PLGA/HPMC-based in-situ forming implants for local periodontitis treatment.Int. J. Pharm.20175211-228229310.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.02.039 28223246
    [Google Scholar]
  121. RaoS.R. RajendranS. KumarK.S. RameshS. Thermoreversible in situ gel for subgingival delivery of simvastatin for treatment of periodontal disease.Int. J. Pharm. Investig.20177210110610.4103/jphi.JPHI_26_17 28929053
    [Google Scholar]
  122. IbrahimM.A. Meera PriyadarshiniB. NeoJ. FawzyA.S. Characterization of Chitosan/TiO2 nano‐powder modified glass‐ionomer cement for restorative dental applications.J. Esthet. Restor. Dent.201729214615610.1111/jerd.12282 28190299
    [Google Scholar]
  123. PhaechamudT. JantadeeT. MahadlekJ. CharoensuksaiP. PichayakornW. Characterization of antimicrobial agent loaded eudragit rs solvent exchange-induced in situ forming gels for periodontitis treatment.AAPS PharmSciTech201718249450810.1208/s12249‑016‑0534‑y 27116203
    [Google Scholar]
  124. BansalM. MittalN. YadavS.K. Periodontal thermoresponsive, mucoadhesive dual antimicrobial loaded in-situ gel for the treatment of periodontal disease: Preparation, in-vitro characterization and antimicrobial study.J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res.20188212613310.1016/j.jobcr.2017.12.005 29892535
    [Google Scholar]
  125. WangN. HuangZ. WangS. LangM. ZhangX. Minocycline hydrochloride loaded mPEG-PCLA membranes: Preparation and in vitro evaluation for periodontitis therapy.J. Bioact. Compat. Polym.202136321222410.1177/0883911521992795
    [Google Scholar]
  126. WadiN.M.A. AhujaA. PehK.K. Healing enhancement assessment of thermosensitive in situ gelling formulation containing metronidazole and diclofenac potassium for ligature-induced periodontitis in rats.Oman Med. J.2022373e38110.5001/omj.2022.66 35722242
    [Google Scholar]
  127. SenaratS. PichayakornW. PhaechamudT. TuntarawongsaS. Antisolvent Eudragit® polymers based in situ forming gel for periodontal controlled drug delivery.J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.20238210436110.1016/j.jddst.2023.104361
    [Google Scholar]
  128. SaeidiZ. GitiR. EmamiA. RostamiM. MohammadiF. Thermosensitive and mucoadhesive gels containing solid lipid nanoparticles loaded with fluconazole and niosomes loaded with clindamycin for the treatment of periodontal diseases: A laboratory experiment.BMC Oral Health202424155110.1186/s12903‑024‑04322‑6 38734599
    [Google Scholar]
  129. LiJ. StachowskiM. ZhangZ. Application of responsive polymers in implantable medical devices and biosensors.In: Switchable and Responsive Surfaces and Materials for Biomedical Applications.Elsevier Inc.201525929810.1016/B978‑0‑85709‑713‑2.00011‑0
    [Google Scholar]
  130. PaquéP.N. ÖzcanM. A review on biocompatibility of dental restorative and reconstruction materials.Curr. Oral Health Rep.202411687710.1007/s40496‑023‑00358‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  131. HuzumB. PuhaB. NecoaraR. Biocompatibility assessment of biomaterials used in orthopedic devices: An overview.(Review).Exp. Ther. Med.2021225131510.3892/etm.2021.10750 34630669
    [Google Scholar]
  132. MoharamzadehK. BrookiI.M. Van NoortrR. Biocompatibility of resin-based dental materials.Materials2009251410.3390/ma2020514
    [Google Scholar]
  133. GuptaS SaxenaP PantV PantA Release and toxicity of dental resin composite.Toxicol Int201219322510.4103/0971‑6580.103652
    [Google Scholar]
  134. KunertM. Rozpedek-KaminskaW. GalitaG. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioactive dental materials.Cells20221120323810.3390/cells11203238 36291107
    [Google Scholar]
  135. KwonJ.S. PiaoY.Z. ChoS.A. Biocompatibility evaluation of dental luting cements using cytokine released from human oral fibroblasts and keratinocytes.Materials20158117269727710.3390/ma8115372 28793637
    [Google Scholar]
  136. MousavinasabS.M. Biocompatibility of composite resins.Dent. Res. J. (Isfahan)20118Suppl. 1S21S29 23372592
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Biocompatibility of dental materials seminar by Dipesh. 2024. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/biocompatibility-of-dental-materials-seminar-by-dipeshpptx/265765657
  138. SyedM. ChopraR. SachdevV. Allergic reactions to dental materials: A systematic review.J. Clin. Diagn. Res.2015910ZE04ZE0910.7860/JCDR/2015/15640.6589 26557634
    [Google Scholar]
  139. ObayashiN. ShintaniT. KamegashiraA. A case report of allergic reaction with acute facial swelling: A rare complication of dental acrylic resin.J. Int. Med. Res.20235170300060523118781910.1177/03000605231187819 37480276
    [Google Scholar]
  140. MehtaD. ShettyR.M. BhatS. SrivatsaG. ShettyY.B. Comparative analysis of postcementation hypersensitivity with glass ionomer cement and a resin cement: An in vivo study.J. Contemp. Dent. Pract.201213332733110.5005/jp‑journals‑10024‑1146 22918005
    [Google Scholar]
  141. AndersonJ.M. SchoenF.J. In vivo assessment of tissue compatibility.Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials.3rd edElsevier201360961710.1016/B978‑0‑08‑087780‑8.00054‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  142. XuH. ZhuL. TianF. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of injectable strontium-modified calcium phosphate cement for bone defect repair in rats.Int. J. Mol. Sci.202224156810.3390/ijms24010568 36614010
    [Google Scholar]
  143. NabeelM. Abu-SeidaA.M. ElgendyA.A. TawfikH.M. Biocompatibility of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as root-end filling materials: An in vivo study.Sci. Rep.2024141356810.1038/s41598‑024‑53872‑w 38347030
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Ethide laboratories - What is in-vivo implantation cytotoxicity testing for medical devices and drugs? 2024. Available from: https://ethidelabs.com/what-is-in-vivo-implantation-cytotoxicity-testing-for-medical-devices-and-drugs/
  145. LohbauerU. Dental glass ionomer cements as permanent filling materials? -Properties, limitations and future trends.Materials200931769610.3390/ma3010076
    [Google Scholar]
  146. SamchenkoS.V. KozlovaI.V. KorshunovA.V. Optimization of the composition of cement pastes using combined additives of alumoferrites and gypsum in order to increase the durability of concrete.Buildings202313256510.3390/buildings13020565
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Abdul-WahabS.A. Al-DhamriH. RamG. ChatterjeeV.P. An overview of alternative raw materials used in cement and clinker manufacturing.Int. J. Sustain. Eng.202114474376010.1080/19397038.2020.1822949
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Banche-NiclotF. CorvagliaI. CavaleraC. Optimization of an injectable, resorbable, bioactive cement able to release the anti-osteoclastogenic biomolecule ICOS-Fc for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Biomolecules20231319410.3390/biom13010094 36671479
    [Google Scholar]
  149. LiuR. DurhamS.A. RensK.L. RamaswamiA. Optimization of cementitious material content for sustainable concrete mixtures.J. Mater. Civ. Eng.201224674575310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943‑5533.0000444
    [Google Scholar]
  150. XieX. LiuX. LiuR. Optimization formulation of low carbon MSWIFA cement-based composites modified by nano SiO2.J. Build. Eng.20238010804310.1016/j.jobe.2023.108043
    [Google Scholar]
  151. ShekarianM. GhodsiS. AghamohseniM.M. ArzaniS. RasaeipourS. Cement selection criteria for different types of intracanal posts.Dent. Res. J. (Isfahan)20221915110.4103/1735‑3327.351339 36159063
    [Google Scholar]
  152. JariwalaS. TohJ. ShumM. The association between asthma-related emergency department visits and pollen and mold spore concentrations in the Bronx, 2001–2008.J. Asthma2014511798310.3109/02770903.2013.853779 24131032
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Rodríguez-FarreE. TestaiE. BruzellE. The safety of dental amalgam and alternative dental restoration materials for patients and users.Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.20167910810910.1016/j.yrtph.2015.12.015 26796567
    [Google Scholar]
  154. ChoK. RajanG. FarrarP. PrenticeL. PrustyB.G. Dental resin composites: A review on materials to product realizations.Compos., Part B Eng.202223010949510.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109495
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cddt/10.2174/0115701638353043250613185624
Loading
/content/journals/cddt/10.2174/0115701638353043250613185624
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test