Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2405-5204
  • E-ISSN: 2405-5212

Abstract

Introduction

The use of bioreactors at sewage treatment plants solves an environmental problem at water utilities in the Udmurt Republic, as sludge beds are overflowing due to the fact that tens of tons of sewage sludge have been stored on sludge beds every day since the 1980s and amount to hectares of land.

Objective

The results of experimental studies on the processing of wastewater sludge in the Biotechnology laboratory were analyzed to improve the efficiency of the technological process for the disposal of organic waste using a biogas plant and a process activator.

Methods

The methodology for preparing a biogas plant for entering the operating mode and further operation is presented. An algorithm for experimental studies using a biogas plant and obtaining biogas from organic waste is presented.

Results

The article presents an analysis of the results of experimental studies of sewage sludge treatment under periodic psychrophilic and, subsequently mesophilic operating conditions of the bioreactor in relation to the climatic conditions of the Udmurt Republic. The results of experimental studies in the article are presented in the form of graphical dependencies of the volume of produced biogas on the temperature and duration of the process.

The article presents the dynamics of changes in the volume of produced biogas depending on the increase in temperature and duration of the process under the mesophilic operating mode of the bioreactor. On the first day of the experiment under the mesophilic mode in the bioreactor, the volume of produced biogas was 2.15% (7.41 g) at a temperature of 32°C; with increasing temperature, the volume of produced biogas increased. The maximum biogas production was observed on the fifth day of the experiment under the mesophilic mode and amounted to 7.66%, which corresponds to 26.41 g.

Conclusion

The recommended loading volume of biomass into the bioreactor is 80 liters. In accordance with the actual conditions of the sewage treatment facilities, the volume of biogas produced will be 26.000 m3 of methane daily during the period of anaerobic fermentation in the bioreactor. To solve the environmental problem, it is necessary to install a complex of bioreactors at the water utilities of the Udmurt Republic.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204314461250102085430
2025-01-28
2025-09-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. RyltsevaY. GOST R 59748-2021. Technical principles of sewage sludge treatment.Bio Web Conf2024840101610.1051/bioconf/20248401016
    [Google Scholar]
  2. GOST R 59417-2021. Determination of the biogas potential of municipal solid waste landfills with biogas pumping from vertical wells and disposal at a fecal plant. Russ Gost Code Datab1983116
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GOST R 59057-2020. Environmental protection. Earth. General requirements for reclamation of disturbed lands. Russ Gost Code Datab1983116
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GOST 27784-88. Soils. Method for determining the ash content of peat and peat soil horizons. Russ Gost Code Datab1988116
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GOST 17.4.3.01-2017. Protection of Nature. Soils. General requirements for sampling. Russ Gost Code Datab2018116
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AlekseevL.S. Water quality control.2nd edNew York, U.S.McGraw-Hill Education2022159
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KopylovA.S. LavyginV.M. OchkovV.F. Water treatment in the energy sector.Moscow, RussiaMPEI House2016310
    [Google Scholar]
  8. AbramovaA.A. BatuevaA.M. VasilievA.V. DyagelevM.Yu. NaumkinaE.D. ChursinI.O. Assessment of the contamination of urban wastewater with antibiotic drugs of the cephalosporin group and the possibility of their determination by the spectrophotometric method. Bulletin of PNIPU.Appl Eco Urban202125365
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BlagorasumovaA.M. Treatment and dewatering of urban wastewater sludge.New York, U.S.McGraw-Hill Education2020188
    [Google Scholar]
  10. TurovskyI.S. Treatment of sewage sludge.MoscowStroyizdat1988256
    [Google Scholar]
  11. AbramovaA.A. IsakovV.G. NepogodinA.M. Green technologies in the treatment of surface and waste water of housing and communal services.Separations20191460465
    [Google Scholar]
  12. VoronovYuV. YakovlevS.V. Water disposal and wastewater treatment Textbook for universities.Cheyenne, WYAssociation of Construction Universities200616
    [Google Scholar]
  13. MousaviS.B. HerisS.Z. Experimental comparison of ZnO and MoS2 nanoparticles as additives to improve the performance of diesel nanolubricant.Sci. Rep.202010111710.1038/s41598‑020‑62830‑1 31913322
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Naghash-HamedS. ArsalaniN. MousaviS.B. Catalytic reduction of nitroanilines using synthesized CuFe2O4 nanoparticles in aqueous media.ChemistryOpen20221111e20220015610.1002/open.202200156 36328769
    [Google Scholar]
  15. AshrafiwalaM. MousaviS.B. HerisS.Z. HeydariM. MohammadpourfardM. AslaniH. Study on advanced H2O2/UV oxidation process by coliform removal rate from industrial effluents: a pilot scale study.Int. J. Hydrogen Energy20224778335303354010.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.231
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BoteM.E. Studies on electrode combination for COD removal from domestic wastewater using electrocoagulation.Heliyon2021712e0861410.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08614 34977420
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MahtabMS FarooquiIH KhurshidA Optimization of Fenton process for simultaneous COD removal and sludge reduction: process intensification and influence of reagent dosing regime. J Environ Lead202231511520710.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115207.35525036
    [Google Scholar]
  18. HefniH.H. NagyM. AzabM.M. HusseinM.H. O-acylation of chitosan with L-arginine for removal of heavy metals and total organic carbon (TOC) from wastewater.Egypt J Technol20202913138
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HeydariM TahmasebpourM MousaviSB PevidaS CO2 capture activity of a new CaO adsorbent stabilized (ZrO2+ Al2O3+ CeO2) based additive under mild and realistic calcium cycle conditions. J CO2 Util20215310174710.1016/j.jcou.2021.101747
  20. HeW. JinW. WangQ. FengY. Electron flow assisted COD removal in wastewater under continuous flow conditions using microbial electrochemical system.Sci. Total Environ.202177614597810.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145978
    [Google Scholar]
  21. BaranovskyIN SmirnovaTI Method for preparing compost from sewage sludge (variants) of the Russian Federation. RU Patent 2513558C1, 2014
    [Google Scholar]
  22. NidheeshP.V. GandhimathiR. Trends in electro-Fenton process for water and wastewater treatment: An overview.Desalination201229911510.1016/j.desal.2012.05.011
    [Google Scholar]
  23. PankhwarA. FaryalK. KhandroA. Use of treated industrial wastewater and accumulation of heavy metals in soil and vegetable okra.Environ Probl2022610044710.1016/j.envc.2022.100447
    [Google Scholar]
  24. RazdorazumovaA.M. Treatment and dewatering of urban wastewater sludge.MoscowStroyizdat2014208
    [Google Scholar]
  25. TsybinaA.V. DyakovM.S. State and prospects for treatment and disposal of sewage sludge.Ecol Indus Russ2013125661
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KaraevaY.V. VarlavovaI.A. Efficiency of hydraulic mixing in a digester with partitions.Ener Savi Water Treat201711052732
    [Google Scholar]
  27. VendinS.V. MamontovA.Y. Automation of mechanical and thermal processes in a multi-chamber biogas reactor of continuous loading of raw materials.Bulle Fede Sta Educ Inst Hig Profess Educ Mos Sta Agroenginee Univer20167445560
    [Google Scholar]
  28. VolkovaA.A. ShishkunovV.G. System analysis and modeling of processes in the technosphere.EkaterinburgUral Publishing House2019244
    [Google Scholar]
  29. DehboudehM. AzariA. AbbasiM. Experimental study on petrochemical industrial wastewater treatment by combination of integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) and electro-Fenton method.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.20208610453710.1016/j.jece.2020.104537
    [Google Scholar]
  30. CaoT-N-D. ChenS-S. RayS-S. LeH-Q. ChangH-M. Application of microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment and simultaneous bioelectricity generation. Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies.ChamSpringer201950155210.1007/978‑981‑13‑3259‑3_23
    [Google Scholar]
  31. BorisovB.N. RybakovV.A. Use of digester gas.Pridnepr Scient Bull201733741
    [Google Scholar]
  32. VasilievF.A. TakhanovM.P. Creation of disturbances in the digester.Bull IrGS201780143148
    [Google Scholar]
  33. DidenkoV.N. IsaevA.V. UzakovN.D. Method for comparative assessment of heat losses of bioreactors at the preliminary design stage of a biogas plant.Sci Tech J Ener Savi Water Treat201951216165
    [Google Scholar]
  34. KolosovaN.V. MonkS.I. Mathematical model of heat and mass transfer when producing biogas in a digester.Mod Indus Civ Enginee201926774
    [Google Scholar]
  35. MikryukovaE.M. ParshikovaM.V. VasilyevaY.V. On the issue of technological management of biological wastewater treatment.In: Effective technologies in the field of water treatment and purification in water supply and wastewater systems. Materials of the III All-Russian Student Scientific and Practical Conference; 2023; Volgograd, Russia.4750
    [Google Scholar]
  36. MikryukovaE.M. VasilyevaY.V. ParshikovaM.V. Calculation of the consumption of required air oxygen for aeration.In: Safety Materials of the XXVIII All-Russian Student Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation2023Volgograd, Russia28990
    [Google Scholar]
  37. MikryukovaE.M. VasyutkinaM.N. TaskaevM.V. Review of the main methods for treating wastewater from oil products.In: Collection of Reports of the XVI International Scientific and Technical Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences2021Moscow, Russia4247
    [Google Scholar]
  38. SuvorovaE.V. MikryukovaE.M. Overcoming the problems of wastewater treatment from dense emulsions in the oil refining industry.In: Advances in Construction and Development.SingaporeSpringer202041542210.1007/978‑981‑16‑6593‑6_34
    [Google Scholar]
  39. MishustinE.N. EmtsevV.T. Microbiology.3rd edHoboken, New JerseyJohn Wiley & Sons2020368
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Perdigon-MelonH. CarbajoJ. PetreA. RosalR. García-CalvoE. Coagulation-Fenton for reducing ecotoxicity in highly contaminated industrial wastewater.J. Hazard. Mater.20101811-312713210.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.104 20537462
    [Google Scholar]
  41. LurieYu. Analytical chemistry of industrial waste water: textbook M.MoscowStroyizdat2017168
    [Google Scholar]
  42. OkovitayaK.O. Effective technologies in the field of water treatment and purification in water supply and wastewater systems.Incr Effici Digest202115456
    [Google Scholar]
  43. BezborodovaO.E. Complex recycling of waste water from enterprises.Mauritius, Europe: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing2019124
    [Google Scholar]
  44. ProvotorovaA.A. Comparative analysis of the use of aeration tanks and methane tanks in wastewater treatment. Modern science and its resource provision: Innovative paradigm. Collection of articles based on the materials of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow, Prechistenka,202197102
    [Google Scholar]
  45. SvalovaM.V. BelousovR.S. GalimyanovR.G. Application of the principle of self-sufficiency in energy saving at enterprises of Udmurtia. Problems of regional ecology and geography.Geography201916668
    [Google Scholar]
  46. SmirnovaA.R. Ways to increase the efficiency of digesters.Scientific forum: technical and physical and mathematical sciences. Collection of articles based on the materials of the XXXI International Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow, Prechistenka,20202330
    [Google Scholar]
  47. YukhinD.P. On the issue of increasing the efficiency of the functioning of the digester of a biogas plant.Science of the young - innovative development of the agro-industrial complex. Materials of the XII National Scientific and Practical Conference of Young Scientists. Moscow, Prechistenka,2019168172
    [Google Scholar]
  48. ThomallaM. NeubertI. Low-temperature drying of sewage sludge.Produc Ecol200747579
    [Google Scholar]
  49. UvarovR.A. BryukhanovA.Y.u Promising technologies for biofermentation of manure/litter for the North-West of Russia.Sci. Rev. (Singap.)2015162631
    [Google Scholar]
  50. MalekiA. MohammadM. EmdadiZ. AsimN. AziziM. SafaeiJ. Geopolymer paste based adsorbent materials for dye removal from aqueous solutions.Arab. J. Chem.20201313017302510.1016/j.arabjc.2018.08.011
    [Google Scholar]
  51. MalekiA. HajizadehZ. SharifiV. EmdadiZ. Green, porous and environmentally friendly magnetic geopolymer adsorbent for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions.J Clean Cont201921512331245
    [Google Scholar]
  52. SoltaninejadV. MalekiA. Green and eco-friendly bionanocomposite film (poly(vinyl alcohol)/TiO2/chitosan/chlorophyll) for photocatalytic abilities and antibacterial activity when exposed to visible light.J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem.202140411290610.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112906
    [Google Scholar]
  53. SeyediS.S. ShabgardM.R. MousaviS.B. ZeinaliH.S. The impact of SiC, Al2O3, and B2O3 abrasive particles and temperature on wear characteristics of 18Ni (300) maraging steel in abrasive flow machining (AFM).Int. J. Hydrogen Energy20214668339913400110.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.051
    [Google Scholar]
  54. SvalovaMV BurlakovaFM KasatkinVV Bigas plant of the Russian Federation. RU Patent 2404240C2,2010
    [Google Scholar]
  55. EbrathahanM. NaghashH.M. ZareiM. JafarizadM. RostamizadehM. Neutral red dye removal using electro-Fenton process: methodologies for audio signal modeling.Electrocatalysis202112557959410.1007/s12678‑021‑00640‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  56. AhmadiM. HaghighifardN.J. SoltaniR.D.C. TobeishiM. JorfiS. Treatment of a saline petrochemical wastewater containing recalcitrant organics using Electro-Fenton process: persulfate and ultrasonic intensification.Desalination Water Treat.201916924125010.5004/dwt.2019.24682
    [Google Scholar]
  57. BahadoriA. Waste management in the chemical and petroleum industries.Hoboken, New JerseyJohn Wiley and Sons2020440
    [Google Scholar]
  58. LiH. QuanH. ShenH. ZhuJ. Comparative electrochemical oxidation of secondary petrochemical wastewater by electro-Fenton and anodic oxidation by auxiliary electrolytes.Surround Technol2022433431442 32633671
    [Google Scholar]
  59. RitaA. RodriguezS. SantosM. SanchezS. MadeiraL. Comparison of different treatment strategies for complex waste alkaline refinery effluents.Separ. Purif. Tech.202025311748210.1016/j.seppur.2020.117482
    [Google Scholar]
  60. SandhwarV.K. SaxenaD. VermaS. GargK.K. PrasadB. Comparison of COD removal from petrochemical wastewater by electro-Fenton and electro oxidation processes: optimization and kinetic analysis.Sep. Sci. Technol.202156132300230910.1080/01496395.2020.1823414
    [Google Scholar]
  61. SvalovaM.V. MikryukovaE.M. DanilovaE.V. Method of level analysis of glycol content in wastewater from industrial enterprises using gas chromatography.Intell Syst Prod20222023040
    [Google Scholar]
  62. SokovninaO.V. MikryukovaE.M. Possible schemes for the treatment and disposal of mine and drainage wastewater, a design scheme for the treatment and disposal of mine wastewater.Society20203181620
    [Google Scholar]
  63. AlipourZ. AzariA. COD removal from industrial spent caustic wastewater: A review.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.20208310367810.1016/j.jece.2020.103678
    [Google Scholar]
  64. CanO.T. GengecE. KobyaM. Removal of TOC and COD from soluble coffee and coffee products production wastewater by electrooxidation using chemical coagulation.J Wat Process2019282835
    [Google Scholar]
  65. GilmundinovV.M. TagaevaT.O. BoxlerA.I. Analysis and forecasting of waste management processes in the Russian Federation.Forecast Probl20201178126134
    [Google Scholar]
  66. UgryumovEP Digital circuit technology. Petersburg, Russian: BHV-Petersburg2010235
    [Google Scholar]
  67. FatehbaS. AliasgariS. BazarganA. MovahedS.M. Sulfide removal from spent alkaline petrochemical wastewater using Fenton electrical treatment.J Appl Water Eng Res20219431532310.1080/23249676.2021.1947401
    [Google Scholar]
  68. RahimiJ. Taheri-LedariR. NiksefatM. MalekiA. Enhanced reduction of nitrobenzene derivatives: Effective strategy executed by Fe3O4/PVA-10%Ag as a versatile hybrid nanocatalyst.Catal. Commun.202013410585010.1016/j.catcom.2019.105850
    [Google Scholar]
  69. KhanovaE.L. SakharovaA.A. GerashchenkoA.A. A method for intensifying the operation of digesters with separation of fermentation phases. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series.Const Archit20191747279
    [Google Scholar]
  70. ShankarR. SinghL. MondalL. ChandS. Removal of COD, TOC and dye from pulp and paper industry wastewater using electrocoagulation.DESALIN20145240-4277117722
    [Google Scholar]
  71. GrigorievV.S. KovalevA.A. System for preliminary preparation of digester substrates in a vortex layer apparatus with heat recovery.Elect Technolog Electr Equip Agro-Indust Comp2020239813
    [Google Scholar]
  72. KaoT.N-D. ChenS-S. RayS.S. LeH-C. ChangH-M. Application of microbial fuel cells in wastewater treatment and simultaneous bioelectricity generation. Water and wastewater treatment technologies.ChamSpringer2019501526
    [Google Scholar]
  73. SongG. DuX. ZhengY. SuY. TangY. ZhouM. New electro-Fenton process coupled with sulfite: improved Fe3+ reduction and OC removal.J. Hazard. Mater.202242212688810.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126888 34416701
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204314461250102085430
Loading
/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204314461250102085430
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test