Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 2352-0965
  • E-ISSN: 2352-0973

Abstract

Background

Dynamic state estimation can provide detailed information about power systems. However, there is no clear, dynamic equation for the state transition of bus voltages in power systems. Currently, smoothing methods based on historical data are commonly used, but they cannot ensure accurate state prediction in power systems with a large amount of renewable energy. Moreover, the fast sampling rate of phasor measurement units generates a vast amount of real-time data for the dispatch center, making it challenging for centralized state estimation to meet real-time demands.

Objective

This paper proposes a distributed power system state estimation considering dynamic state constraints to address the above issues.

Methods

By incorporating the constraints between the dynamic states of the system dynamic components and the bus voltage phasors, the state transition equations for bus voltage phasors are constructed based on the predicted dynamic states and the nodal injection power equations. This allows taking the dynamic model constraints into account when predicting bus voltage phasors. Then, based on the principle of hierarchical coordination and distributed state estimation, the method of estimation-coordination-correction is adopted to acquire system state information quickly and accurately.

Results

Furthermore, an IEEE 9-bus system and an IEEE 39-bus system are used to validate the proposed method. The proposed method is compared with other algorithms to prove its superiority.

Conclusion

The simulation results show that the proposed method can effectively improve the accuracy of the state estimation results of power systems under dynamic conditions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965269387231120120044
2025-06-01
2025-11-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ZhaoJ. QiJ. HuangZ. MeliopoulosA.P.S. Gomez-ExpositoA. NettoM. MiliL. AburA. TerzijaV. KamwaI. PalB. SinghA.K. Power system dynamic state estimation: Motivations, definitions, methodologies, and future work.IEEE Trans. Power Syst.20193443188319810.1109/TPWRS.2019.2894769
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AburA. Gomez-expositoA. Power system state estimation: theory and application.New York, USAMarcel Dekker200410.1201/9780203913673
    [Google Scholar]
  3. YuE. WangS. XiangN. Power system state estimation.Beijing, ChinaChina Water Power Press1985
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ZwergerT. MercorelliP. Combining SMC and MTPA using an EKF to estimate parameters and states of an interior PMSM2019 20th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC)201926-29 May 2019, Krakow-Wieliczka, Poland10.1109/CarpathianCC.2019.8766063
    [Google Scholar]
  5. NadeemM. NugrohoS.A. TahaA.F. Dynamic state estimation of nonlinear differential algebraic equation models of power networks.IEEE Trans. Power Syst.20233832539255210.1109/TPWRS.2022.3184190
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ZhaoJ. NettoM. HuangZ. YuS.S. Gomez-ExpositoA. WangS. KamwaI. AkhlaghiS. MiliL. TerzijaV. MeliopoulosA.P.S. PalB. SinghA.K. AburA. BiT. RouhaniA. Roles of dynamic state estimation in power system modeling, monitoring and operation.IEEE Trans. Power Syst.20213632462247210.1109/TPWRS.2020.3028047
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De La ReeJ. CentenoV. ThorpJ.S. PhadkeA.G. Synchronized phasor measurement applications in power systems.IEEE Trans. Smart Grid201011202710.1109/TSG.2010.2044815
    [Google Scholar]
  8. TerzijaV. ValverdeG. CaiDeyu RegulskiP. MadaniV. FitchJ. SkokS. BegovicM.M. PhadkeA. Wide area monitoring, protection and control of future electric power networks.Proc. IEEE2011991809310.1109/JPROC.2010.2060450
    [Google Scholar]
  9. YuS. FernandoT. Ching IuH.H. EmamiK. Realization of state-estimation-based DFIG wind turbine control design in hybrid power systems using stochastic filtering approaches.IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform.20161231084109210.1109/TII.2016.2549940
    [Google Scholar]
  10. RostamiM. LotfifardS. Distributed dynamic state estimation of power systems.IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform.20181483395340410.1109/TII.2017.2777495
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ZwergerT. MercorelliP. Using a bivariate polynomial in an ekf for state and inductance estimations in the presence of saturation effects to adaptively control a PMSM.IEEE Access20221011154511155310.1109/ACCESS.2022.3215511
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MandalJ. SinhaA.K. Hierarchical dynamic state estimation incorporating measurement function non-linearities.Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.1997191576710.1016/S0142‑0615(96)00029‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ZhaoJ. NettoM. MiliL. A robust iterated extended Kalman filter for power system dynamic state estimation.IEEE Trans. Power Syst.20173243205321610.1109/TPWRS.2016.2628344
    [Google Scholar]
  14. GhahremaniE. KamwaI. Online state estimation of a synchronous generator using unscented Kalman filter from phasor measurements units.IEEE Trans. Energ. Convers.20112641099110810.1109/TEC.2011.2168225
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SharmaA. SrivastavaS.C. ChakrabartiS. A cubature Kalman filter based power system dynamic state estimator.IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.20176682036204510.1109/TIM.2017.2677698
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ZhangB. WangS. XiangN. Estimation and forecasting of real-time power system operation statesZ Hongguo DI Anji gong Chen GX UE bag1991116874
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jeu-MinL. Shyh-JierH. Kuang-RongS. Application of sliding surface-enhanced fuzzy control for dynamic state estimation of a power system.IEEE Trans. Power Syst.200318257057710.1109/TPWRS.2003.810894
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MaP. ShenC. ChenY. Distributed state estimation based on the pseudo-measurement coordination variables.Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao2014341931703177
    [Google Scholar]
  19. QingX. KarimiH.R. NiuY. WangX. Decentralized unscented Kalman filter based on a consensus algorithm for multi-area dynamic state estimation in power systems.Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.201565263310.1016/j.ijepes.2014.09.024
    [Google Scholar]
  20. WangX. SongY. IrvingM. Modern power system analysis theory.New York, USASpringer2010
    [Google Scholar]
  21. KundurP. Definition and classification of power system stability IEEE/CIGRE joint task force on stability terms and definitions.IEEE Trans. Power Syst.20041931387140110.1109/TPWRS.2004.825981
    [Google Scholar]
  22. WangL. HeX. PuZ. Voltage step point detection and parameter identification of general dynamic load model.Power System Technology201438924792483
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SimonD. Kalman filtering with state constraints: A survey of linear and nonlinear algorithms.IET Control Theory Appl.2010481303131810.1049/iet‑cta.2009.0032
    [Google Scholar]
  24. General Administration of Quality SupervisionInspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, China National Standardization Management Committee, GB/T 26862—2011 Test specification for synchrophasor measurement unit for power systems.BeijingStandards Press of China2011
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965269387231120120044
Loading
/content/journals/raeeng/10.2174/0123520965269387231120120044
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test