Skip to content
2000
image of Controlled Release Ultrasonic-Coated Drug-Eluting Stent with Multilayers of Chitosan and Curcumin

Abstract

Introduction

In clinical practice, several commercial drug-eluting stent products have limitations during the early drug-release phase due to the phenomenon of initial burst release (IBR), which may increase the risk of restenosis. This experimental study utilized a multilayer strategy with genipin-crosslinked chitosan as the polymer and curcumin as the drug to address these limitations.

Methods

Based on the forward speed of the rotary drive (7, 8, and 9 mm/s), ultrasonic coating was used to create uniform layers, followed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a release study. Validation of the analytical method confirmed the reliability of the UV-Vis spectrophotometric technique.

Results

The release data modeled with the Korsmeyer-Peppas model show Super Case II transport relaxation/erosion. The Peppas-Sahlin model indicates that Fickian diffusion dominated the first 6–7 days, after which polymer relaxation became dominant. At 9 mm/s, Fickian diffusion persisted for up to seven days, whereas at 7 and 8 mm/s, it was limited to the first six days.

Discussion

The multilayer system maintains matrix integrity during drug release, preventing initial burst release. Once the mechanism shifts from diffusion to relaxation, no burst is observed. The zero-order model fit confirms that the design reflects a controlled-release profile.

Conclusion

The strategy demonstrates controlled release without initial burst.

This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/raddf/10.2174/0126673878409943251202182512
2026-01-21
2026-02-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/raddf/10.2174/0126673878409943251202182512/BMS-RADDF-2025-113.html?itemId=/content/journals/raddf/10.2174/0126673878409943251202182512&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kamaly N. Yameen B. Wu J. Farokhzad O.C. Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: Mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem. Rev. 2016 116 4 2602 2663 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346 26854975
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Costa P. Sousa Lobo J.M. Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001 13 2 123 133 10.1016/S0928‑0987(01)00095‑1 11297896
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Belu A. Mahoney C. Wormuth K. Chemical imaging of drug eluting coatings: Combining surface analysis and confocal Raman microscopy. J. Control. Release 2008 126 2 111 121 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.11.015 18201791
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fredenberg S. Wahlgren M. Reslow M. Axelsson A. Pore formation and pore closure in poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) films. J. Control. Release 2011 150 2 142 149 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.020 21094192
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Avvaru B. Patil M.N. Gogate P.R. Pandit A.B. Ultrasonic atomization: Effect of liquid phase properties. Ultrasonics 2006 44 2 146 158 10.1016/j.ultras.2005.09.003 16321416
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Asadi A. Alarifi I.M. Effects of ultrasonication time on stability, dynamic viscosity, and pumping power management of MWCNT-water nanofluid: An experimental study. Sci. Rep. 2020 10 1 15182 10.1038/s41598‑020‑71978‑9 32939001
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Guidances | Drugs. 2025 Available from:https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/guidances-drugs
  8. Zhang Y. Huo M. Zhou J. DDSolver: An add-in program for modeling and comparison of drug dissolution profiles. AAPS J. 2010 12 3 263 271 10.1208/s12248‑010‑9185‑1 20373062
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Paarakh M.P. Jose P.A. Setty C.M. Peterchristoper G.V. Release kinetics–concepts and applications. Int J Pharm Res Technol 2019 8 1 12 20 10.31838/ijprt/08.01.02
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Asadi M. Salehi Z. Akrami M. Hosseinpour M. Jockenhövel S. Ghazanfari S. 3D printed pH-responsive tablets containing N-acetylglucosamine-loaded methylcellulose hydrogel for colon drug delivery applications. Int. J. Pharm. 2023 645 123366 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123366 37669729
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Alfrey T. Gurnee E.F. Lloyd W.G. Diffusion in glassy polymers. J Polym Sci C Polym Symp 2007 12 1 249 261 10.1002/polc.5070120119
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Peppas N.A. Sahlin J.J. A simple equation for the description of solute release. III. Coupling of diffusion and relaxation. Int. J. Pharm. 1989 57 2 169 172 10.1016/0378‑5173(89)90306‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cox P.J. Khan K.A. Munday D.L. Sujja-areevath J. Development and evaluation of a multiple-unit oral sustained release dosage form for S(+)-ibuprofen: Preparation and release kinetics. Int. J. Pharm. 1999 193 1 73 84 10.1016/S0378‑5173(99)00320‑8 10581424
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fauzi M.A.R.D. Hendradi E. Pudjiastuti P. Widodo R.T. Analysis of dissolution of salicylamide from carrageenan based hard-shell capsules: A study of the drug-matrix interaction. Indones J Chem 2020 21 1 148 156 10.22146/ijc.55047
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldstein J.I. Newbury D.E. Michael J.R. Ritchie N.W. Scott J.H. Joy D.C. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. New York Springer 2017 10.1007/978‑1‑4939‑6676‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Naat JN Tjahjanto RT Masruroh M Effect of angular velocity on crystal structure, thickness, and morphology of thin film of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) by spin coater method. Chimica et Natura Acta 2014 2 2 10.24198/cna.v2.n2.9153
  17. Korsmeyer R.W. Gurny R. Doelker E. Buri P. Peppas N.A. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 1983 15 1 25 35 10.1016/0378‑5173(83)90064‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ritger P.L. Peppas N.A. A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J. Control. Release 1987 5 1 23 36 10.1016/0168‑3659(87)90034‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Unagolla J.M. Jayasuriya A.C. Drug transport mechanisms and in vitro release kinetics of vancomycin encapsulated chitosan-alginate polyelectrolyte microparticles as a controlled drug delivery system. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018 114 199 209 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.12.012 29269322
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rodrigues de Azevedo C. von Stosch M. Costa M.S. Modeling of the burst release from PLGA micro- and nanoparticles as function of physicochemical parameters and formulation characteristics. Int. J. Pharm. 2017 532 1 229 240 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.118 28867450
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoo J. Won Y.Y. Phenomenology of the initial burst release of drugs from PLGA microparticles. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020 6 11 6053 6062 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01228 33449671
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhao J. Wang L. Fan C. Development of near zero-order release PLGA-based microspheres of a novel antipsychotic. Int. J. Pharm. 2017 516 1-2 32 38 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.11.007 27825865
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bose S. Keller S.S. Alstrøm T.S. Boisen A. Almdal K. Process optimization of ultrasonic spray coating of polymer films. Langmuir 2013 29 23 6911 6919 10.1021/la4010246 23631433
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim C.K. Lee E.J. The controlled release of blue dextran from alginate beads. Int. J. Pharm. 1992 79 1-3 11 19 10.1016/0378‑5173(92)90088‑J
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Park T.G. Cohen S. Langer R. Poly(L-lactic acid)/Pluronic blends: Characterization of phase separation behavior, degradation, and morphology and use as protein-releasing matrixes. Macromolecules 1992 25 1 116 122 10.1021/ma00027a019
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rajagopal K.R. Diffusion through polymeric solids undergoing large deformations. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2003 19 9 1175 1180 10.1179/026708303225004729
    [Google Scholar]
  27. El Afif A. Grmela M. Non-Fickian mass transport in polymers. J. Rheol. 2002 46 3 591 628 10.1122/1.1470520
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu S. Jing Y. Liu G. A systematic investigation of the kinetic models applied to the transport behaviors of aromatic solvents in unfilled hydrogenated nitrile rubber/ethylene propylene diene monomer composites. Polymers 2024 16 7 892 10.3390/polym16070892 38611151
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Engineer C. Parikh J. Raval A. Review on hydrolytic degradation behavior of biodegradable polymers from controlled drug delivery system. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs 2011 25 2
    [Google Scholar]
  30. N’Guessan-Gnaman K.C. Tuo-Kouassi N.A. Dally I. Encapsulation methods and releasing mechanisms of encapsulated active drug. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2024 14 1 155 168 10.22270/jddt.v14i1.6356
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jacques C.H. Hopfenberg H.B. Stannett V. Super case II transport of organic vapors in glassy polymers. Permeability of Plastic Films and Coatings. Boston, MA Springer 1974 73 86 10.1007/978‑1‑4684‑2877‑3_6
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu Q. Wang X. De Kee D. Mass transport through swelling membranes. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2005 43 19-20 1464 1470 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2005.05.010
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Siepmann J Siegel RA Rathbone MJ Fundamentals and applications of controlled release drug delivery. New York: Springer 2011 33 4 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑0881‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sanopoulou M. Papadokostaki K.G. Controlled drug release systems: Mechanisms and kinetics. Biomedical Membranes and (Bio). Artificial Organs. World Scientific Connect 2018 1 33 10.1142/9789813223974_0001
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mahmood A. Mahmood A. Sarfraz R.M. Chitosan-based intelligent polymeric networks for site-specific colon medication delivery: A comprehensive study on controlled release of diloxanide furoate and network formation dynamics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024 255 128089 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128089 37979746
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang S. Wu Z.H. Yang W. Yang M.B. Thermal and mechanical properties of chemical crosslinked polylactide (PLA). Polym. Test. 2008 27 8 957 963 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.08.009
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rahmitasari F. Sularsih S. Crosslink agent in making biomimetic scaffold as bone tissue engineering material. J Dent Mater 2019 8 2 65 71 10.32793/jmkg.v8i2.344
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Reddy N. Reddy R. Jiang Q. Crosslinking biopolymers for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2015 33 6 362 369 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.008 25887334
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Abdelwahd A. Abdul Rasool B.K. Optimizing and Evaluating the Transdermal Permeation of Hydrocortisone Transfersomes Formulation Based on Digital Analysis of the In Vitro Drug Release and Ex Vivo Studies. Recent Adv Drug Deliv Formul 2022 16 2 122 144 10.2174/2667387816666220608115605 35676851
    [Google Scholar]
  40. e Silva GLG e Silva GLG, de Bustamante MSD, de Abreu Garófalo D, et al. Nanofibers containing vancomycin for the treatment of bone infections: Development, characterization, efficacy and safety tests in cell cultures. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2023 87 104780 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104780
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Maheshwari J. Gupta A. Dwivedi P. Nadda A.K. Agrawal R. Biomass-derived hydrogels for sustained-release herbicides. In: Biomass for Environmental Remediation. Amsterdam Elsevier 2025 189 212 10.1016/B978‑0‑443‑33014‑8.00010‑7
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/raddf/10.2174/0126673878409943251202182512
Loading
/content/journals/raddf/10.2174/0126673878409943251202182512
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test