Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 1573-4013
  • E-ISSN: 2212-3881

Abstract

Introduction/Objective

Evidence has shown that consuming plant-based foods instead of animal-based foods has positive effects on human and planet health. The current study aimed to compare animal-based recipes (ABRs) and plant-based recipes (PBRs) nutritionally and environmentally.

Methods

Plant-based recipes (adapted from animal-based recipes) were obtained from the “Vegan Nutrition with Healthy and Delicious Recipes” book for inclusion in this study. Nutrient components, including energy content, energy density (ED), macro and micronutrient profiles, such as environmental metrics, which are greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), water footprint (WF), and land use (LU), were calculated and compared between animal-based and plant-based recipes.

Results

While dietary fiber and insoluble fiber were higher, protein, total fat, saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, vitamin B, and zinc contents were lower in PBRs, compared to ABRs. With exceptions (magnolia, muffins, and vegan souffle), medians GHGS, WF, and LU of PBRs were lower than those of ABRs. Plant-based hamburgers and meatballs, whose main ingredients were fresh vegetables, had the lowest environmental impact.

Conclusion

It is well known that human diet and food choices are among the main components that contribute to environmental impact. Although the ecological footprints of foods and recipes are essential in the diet, their nutrient densities should not be overlooked. Enriching the nutritional values of the foods used in PBRs may improve their dietary values. In addition, it should also be forgotten that using high amounts of non-nutritious foods, such as sugar, in PBRs due to their low ecological impact is incorrect.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cnf/10.2174/0115734013337642241219140015
2025-01-20
2025-09-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cnf/10.2174/0115734013337642241219140015
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ClarkM. TilmanD. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice.Environ. Res. Lett.201712606401610.1088/1748‑9326/aa6cd5
     [Google Scholar]
  2. DalinC. IturbeR.I. Environmental impacts of food trade via resource use and greenhouse gas emissions.Environ. Res. Lett.201611303501210.1088/1748‑9326/11/3/035012
     [Google Scholar]
  3. RitchieH. RosadoP. RoserM. Environmental impacts of food production. Our world in data.Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food 2022
  4. SalaS. AntonA. McLarenS.J. NotarnicolaB. SaouterE. SonessonU. In quest of reducing the environmental impacts of food production and consumption.J. Clean. Prod.201714038739810.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.054
     [Google Scholar]
  5. VermeulenS.J. CampbellB.M. IngramJ.S.I. Climate change and food systems.Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.201237119522210.1146/annurev‑environ‑020411‑130608
     [Google Scholar]
  6. CuiX. WangB. WuY. XieL. XunP. TangQ. CaiW. ShenX. Vegetarians have a lower fasting insulin level and higher insulin sensitivity than matched omnivores: A cross-sectional study.Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis.201929546747310.1016/j.numecd.2019.01.01230956029
     [Google Scholar]
  7. JoyceA DixonS ComfortJ HallettJ Reducing the environmental impact of dietary choice: Perspectives from a behavioural and social change approach.J. Envir. Public Heal.201220121978672
     [Google Scholar]
  8. ViroliG. KalmpourtzidouA. CenaH. Exploring benefits and barriers of plant-based diets: health, environmental impact, food accessibility and acceptability.Nutrients20231522472310.3390/nu1522472338004117
     [Google Scholar]
  9. WrightN WilsonL SmithM DuncanB McHughP. The BROAD study: A randomised controlled trial using a whole food plant-based diet in the community for obesity, ischaemic heart disease or diabetes.Nutr. Diab.201773e256e25610.1038/nutd.2017.3
     [Google Scholar]
  10. AlcortaA. PortaA. TárregaA. AlvarezM.D. VaqueroM.P. Foods for plant-based diets: Challenges and innovations.Foods202110229310.3390/foods1002029333535684
     [Google Scholar]
  11. GibbsJ. CappuccioF.P. Plant-based dietary patterns for human and planetary health.Nutrients2022148161410.3390/nu1408161435458176
     [Google Scholar]
  12. KentG. KehoeL. FlynnA. WaltonJ. Plant-based diets: A review of the definitions and nutritional role in the adult diet.Proc. Nutr. Soc.2022811627410.1017/S002966512100383935760588
     [Google Scholar]
  13. HargreavesS.M. RosenfeldD.L. MoreiraA.V.B. ZandonadiR.P. Plant-based and vegetarian diets: An overview and definition of these dietary patterns.Eur. J. Nutr.20236231109112110.1007/s00394‑023‑03086‑z36681744
     [Google Scholar]
  14. MelinaV. CraigW. LevinS. Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: Vegetarian diets.J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.2016116121970198010.1016/j.jand.2016.09.02527886704
     [Google Scholar]
  15. World Health OrganizationPlant-based diets and their impact on health, sustainability and the environment: A review of the evidence: WHO European office for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases.Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/349086/WHO-EURO-2021-4007-43766-61591-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 2021
  16. IngeA.V. AidooR. de la FuenteM.M. KwofieE.M. Plant-based dietary shift: Current trends, barriers, and carriers.Trends Food Sci. Technol.2023143104292
     [Google Scholar]
  17. CarewA.C. GreenR. StewartC. CookB. DangourA.D. ScheelbeekP.F.D. The role of plant-based alternative foods in sustainable and healthy food systems: Consumption trends in the UK.Sci. Total Environ.2022807Pt 315104110.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.15104134673070
     [Google Scholar]
  18. WalczakG.R. KopczyńskaK. KazimierczakR. StefanovicL. BieńkoM. OczkowskiM. Średnicka-ToberD. Environmental indicators of vegan and vegetarian diets: a pilot study in a group of young adult female consumers in Poland.Sustainability202316124910.3390/su16010249
     [Google Scholar]
  19. HendersonN. SampsonC.J. The impact of higher uptake of plant-based diets in England: Model-based estimates of health care resource use and health-related quality of life.medRxiv20232023.1210.1101/2023.12.26.23300536
     [Google Scholar]
  20. GoldsteinB. MosesR. SammonsN. BirkvedM. Potential to curb the environmental burdens of American beef consumption using a novel plant-based beef substitute.PLoS One20171212e018902910.1371/journal.pone.018902929211775
     [Google Scholar]
  21. LynchH. JohnstonC. WhartonC. Plant-based diets: Considerations for environmental impact, protein quality, and exercise performance.Nutrients20181012184110.3390/nu1012184130513704
     [Google Scholar]
  22. SabatéJ. SoretS. Sustainability of plant-based diets: Back to the future.Am. J. Clin. Nutr.2014100S1476S482S10.3945/ajcn.113.07152224898222
     [Google Scholar]
  23. VlietV.S. KronbergS.L. ProvenzaF.D. Plant-based meats, human health, and climate change.Front. Sustain. Food Syst.2020412810.3389/fsufs.2020.00128
     [Google Scholar]
  24. FerrariL. PanaiteS.A. BertazzoA. VisioliF. Animal-and plant-based protein sources: A scoping review of human health outcomes and environmental impact.Nutrients20221423511510.3390/nu1423511536501146
     [Google Scholar]
  25. HemlerE.C. HuF.B. Plant-based diets for personal, population, and planetary health.Adv. Nutr.201910S4S275S28310.1093/advances/nmy11731728495
     [Google Scholar]
  26. MarroneG. GuerrieroC. PalazzettiD. LidoP. MarollaA. DanieleD.F. NoceA. Vegan diet health benefits in metabolic syndrome.Nutrients202113381710.3390/nu1303081733801269
     [Google Scholar]
  27. CareyC.N. PaquetteM. PudaruthS.S. DadvarA. DinhD. KhodabandehlouK. LiangF. MishraE. SidhuM. BrownR. TandonS. WanyanJ. BazinetR.P. HanleyA.J. MalikV. SievenpiperJ.L. JenkinsD.J.A. The environmental sustainability of plant-based dietary patterns: A scoping review.J. Nutr.2023153385786910.1016/j.tjnut.2023.02.00136809853
     [Google Scholar]
  28. RoseD. HellerM.C. SmithW.A.M. MeyerR.J. Carbon footprint of self-selected US diets: Nutritional, demographic, and behavioral correlates.Am. J. Clin. Nutr.2019109352653410.1093/ajcn/nqy32730698631
     [Google Scholar]
  29. GümüşB.A. Vegan nutrition with healthy and delicious recipes.1st edAnkaraAnkara Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri2023
     [Google Scholar]
  30. KarabudakE. KızıltanG. AğagündüzT.D. BeyazK.E. The food guide with numbers.2nd Ed.Ankara Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri2022
     [Google Scholar]
  31. BakanlığıS.T.C. Türkiye nutrition guide.Available from: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/web-uygulamalarimiz/357.html 2022
  32. Food LabelsNational health service (NHS) food labels.Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/food-guidelines-and-food-labels/how-to-read-food-labels/ 2022
  33. SchusdziarraV. HausmannM. WiedemannC. HessJ. BarthC. WagenpfeilS. ErdmannJ. Successful weight loss and maintenance in everyday clinical practice with an individually tailored change of eating habits on the basis of food energy density.Eur. J. Nutr.201150535136110.1007/s00394‑010‑0143‑621120658
     [Google Scholar]
  34. TilmanD. BalzerC. HillJ. BefortB.L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.201110850202602026410.1073/pnas.111643710822106295
     [Google Scholar]
  35. SolomonS. QinD. ManningM. ChenZ. MarquisM. AverytK. IPCC fourth assessment report.IPCCGeneva20072007673044023
     [Google Scholar]
  36. HellerM.C. KeoleianG.A. Greenhouse gas emission estimates of US dietary choices and food loss.J. Ind. Ecol.201519339140110.1111/jiec.12174
     [Google Scholar]
  37. HoekstraAY ChapagainA AldayaM.M MekonnenM Water footprint manual: State of the art 2009.Netherlands20091131
     [Google Scholar]
  38. MekonnenM.M. HoekstraA.Y. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products.Ecosystems201215340141510.1007/s10021‑011‑9517‑8
     [Google Scholar]
  39. MekonnenM.M. HoekstraA.Y. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products.Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.20111551577160010.5194/hess‑15‑1577‑2011
     [Google Scholar]
  40. NijdamD. RoodT. WesthoekH. The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes.Food Policy201237676077010.1016/j.foodpol.2012.08.002
     [Google Scholar]
  41. PooreJ. NemecekT. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers.Science2018360639298799210.1126/science.aaq021629853680
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Our World in DataExplore data on the environmental impacts of food.Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/
  43. KonstantasA. JeswaniH.K. StamfordL. AzapagicA. Environmental impacts of chocolate production and consumption in the UK.Food Res. Int.20181061012102510.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.04229579893
     [Google Scholar]
  44. RodríguezO.O.O. GallardoV.R.A. MerinoN.C.A. CaceresG.R.G. galvísC.M.T. Carbon footprint of the colombian cocoa production.Eng. Agric.201636226027010.1590/1809‑4430‑Eng.Agric.v36n2p260‑270/2016
     [Google Scholar]
  45. SilvaD.S. AtapattuN. KumaraK. The water footprint of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) cultivation under small-scale polybag farming conditions in Sri Lanka.J. Agric. Sci.2023182172182
     [Google Scholar]
  46. SchoberP. BoerC. SchwarteL.A. Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation.Anesth. Analg.201812651763176810.1213/ANE.000000000000286429481436
     [Google Scholar]
  47. NoldenA.A. FordeC.G. The nutritional quality of plant-based foods.Sustainability2023154332410.3390/su15043324
     [Google Scholar]
  48. ŠvarcL.P. JensenM.B. LangwagenM. PoulsenA. TrolleE. JakobsenJ. Nutrient content in plant-based protein products intended for food composition databases.J. Food Compos. Anal.202210610433210.1016/j.jfca.2021.104332
     [Google Scholar]
  49. DhingraD. MichaelM. RajputH. PatilR.T. Dietary fibre in foods: A review.J. Food Sci. Technol.201249325526610.1007/s13197‑011‑0365‑523729846
     [Google Scholar]
  50. TimmM. OffringaL.C. KlinkenV.B.J.W. SlavinJ. Beyond insoluble dietary fiber: bioactive compounds in plant foods.Nutrients20231519413810.3390/nu1519413837836422
     [Google Scholar]
  51. DanielC.R. ParkY. ChowW.H. GraubardB.I. HollenbeckA.R. SinhaR. Intake of fiber and fiber-rich plant foods is associated with a lower risk of renal cell carcinoma in a large US cohort.Am. J. Clin. Nutr.20139751036104310.3945/ajcn.112.04535123515007
     [Google Scholar]
  52. KaczmarczykM.M. MillerM.J. FreundG.G. The health benefits of dietary fiber: Beyond the usual suspects of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and colon cancer.Metabolism20126181058106610.1016/j.metabol.2012.01.01722401879
     [Google Scholar]
  53. McRaeM.P. Dietary fiber is beneficial for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: An umbrella review of meta-analyses.J. Chiropr. Med.201716428929910.1016/j.jcm.2017.05.00529276461
     [Google Scholar]
  54. SnauwaertE. PaglialongaF. WalleV.J. WanM. DesloovereA. PoldermanN. TerhaerdtR.J. ShawV. ShroffR. The benefits of dietary fiber: The gastrointestinal tract and beyond.Pediatr. Nephrol.20233892929293810.1007/s00467‑022‑05837‑236471146
     [Google Scholar]
  55. WaddellI.S. OrfilaC. Dietary fiber in the prevention of obesity and obesity-related chronic diseases: From epidemiological evidence to potential molecular mechanisms.Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.202363278752876710.1080/10408398.2022.206190935471164
     [Google Scholar]
  56. WangJ. LiH. MengX. TongP. LiuX. Biosynthesis of c9,t11-conjugated linoleic acid and the effect on characteristics in fermented soy milk.Food Chem.202236813086610.1016/j.foodchem.2021.13086634438178
     [Google Scholar]
  57. RollsB.J. The relationship between dietary energy density and energy intake.Physiol. Behav.200997560961510.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.01119303887
     [Google Scholar]
  58. RollsB.J. DrewnowskiA. LedikweJ.H. Changing the energy density of the diet as a strategy for weight management.J. Am. Diet. Assoc.200510559810310.1016/j.jada.2005.02.03315867904
     [Google Scholar]
  59. StubbsJ. FerresS. HorganG. Energy density of foods: Effects on energy intake.Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.200040648151510.1080/1040869009118924811186237
     [Google Scholar]
  60. ChenH. WangX. JiJ.S. HuangL. QiY. WuY. HeP. LiY. BodirskyB.L. MüllerC. WillettW.C. YuanC. Plant-based and planetary-health diets, environmental burden, and risk of mortality: A prospective cohort study of middle-aged and older adults in China.Lancet Planet. Health202488e545e55310.1016/S2542‑5196(24)00143‑839122323
     [Google Scholar]
  61. MarrónE.A. AdamsK. SinnoL. AldanaC.A. TamezM. MarreroA. BhupathirajuS.N. MatteiJ. Environmental impact of animal-based food production and the feasibility of a shift toward sustainable plant-based diets in the United States.Front. Sustainab.2022384110610.3389/frsus.2022.841106
     [Google Scholar]
  62. ShahU.A. MerloG. Personal and planetary health—the connection with dietary choices.JAMA2023329211823182410.1001/jama.2023.611837155189
     [Google Scholar]
  63. BryantC.J. Plant-based animal product alternatives are healthier and more environmentally sustainable than animal products.Future Foods2022610017410.1016/j.fufo.2022.100174
     [Google Scholar]
  64. PragA. HenriksenC. Transition from animal-based to plant-based food production to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture—the case of Denmark.Sustainability20201219822810.3390/su12198228
     [Google Scholar]
  65. XuX. SharmaP. ShuS. LinT.S. CiaisP. TubielloF.N. SmithP. CampbellN. JainA.K. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods.Nat. Food20212972473210.1038/s43016‑021‑00358‑x37117472
     [Google Scholar]
  66. HarrisF. MossC. JoyE.J.M. QuinnR. ScheelbeekP.F.D. DangourA.D. GreenR. The water footprint of diets: A global systematic review and meta-analysis.Adv. Nutr.202011237538610.1093/advances/nmz09131756252
     [Google Scholar]
  67. LacourC. SecondaL. AllèsB. HercbergS. LangevinB. PointereauP. Environmental impacts of plant-based diets: How does organic food consumption contribute to environmental sustainability?Front. Nutr.20185307640
     [Google Scholar]
  68. LawH.G. MeyersF.J. BerglundL. EnkhmaaB. Lipoprotein(a) and diet—a challenge for a role of saturated fat in cardiovascular disease risk reduction?Am. J. Clin. Nutr.20231181232610.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.05.01737178716
     [Google Scholar]
  69. MakiK.C. DicklinM.R. KirkpatrickC.F. Saturated fats and cardiovascular health: Current evidence and controversies.J. Clin. Lipidol.202115676577210.1016/j.jacl.2021.09.04934649831
     [Google Scholar]
  70. RileyT.M. SappP.A. EthertonK.P.M. PetersenK.S. Effects of saturated fatty acid consumption on lipoprotein (a): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Am. J. Clin. Nutr.2024120361962910.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.06.01938964657
     [Google Scholar]
  71. LiY. HrubyA. BernsteinA.M. LeyS.H. WangD.D. ChiuveS.E. SampsonL. RexrodeK.M. RimmE.B. WillettW.C. HuF.B. Saturated fats compared with unsaturated fats and sources of carbohydrates in relation to risk of coronary heart disease: A prospective cohort study.J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.201566141538154810.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.05526429077
     [Google Scholar]
  72. SacksF.M. LichtensteinA.H. WuJ.H.Y. AppelL.J. CreagerM.A. EthertonK.P.M. MillerM. RimmE.B. RudelL.L. RobinsonJ.G. StoneN.J. HornV.L.V. Dietary fats and cardiovascular disease: A presidential advisory from the american heart association.Circulation20171363e1e2310.1161/CIR.000000000000051028620111
     [Google Scholar]
  73. LiS. XuL. QingJ. WuX. LiH. ChenH. LiuX. Multiple biological activities and biosynthesis mechanisms of specific conjugated linoleic acid isomers and analytical methods for prospective application.Food Chem.202340913525710.1016/j.foodchem.2022.13525736584529
     [Google Scholar]
  74. GarcíaG.S. LlorensE.X. MoreiraM.T. FeijooG. Carbon footprint and nutritional quality of different human dietary choices.Sci. Total Environ.2018644779410.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.33929981520
     [Google Scholar]
  75. DrewnowskiA. RehmC.D. MartinA. VergerE.O. VoinnessonM. ImbertP. Energy and nutrient density of foods in relation to their carbon footprint.Am. J. Clin. Nutr.2015101118419110.3945/ajcn.114.09248625527762
     [Google Scholar]
  76. VieuxF. DarmonN. TouaziD. SolerL.G. Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected individual diets in France: Changing the diet structure or consuming less?Ecol. Econ.2012759110110.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.003
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cnf/10.2174/0115734013337642241219140015
Loading
Environmental Metrics of World Cuisine Recipes' Plant-Based Substitutes: Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Water Footprint, and Land Use
Curr. Nutr. Food Sci. 21, 608 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734013337642241219140015
/content/journals/cnf/10.2174/0115734013337642241219140015
/content/journals/cnf/10.2174/0115734013337642241219140015
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Environmental impacts; nutrient density; planetary health; plant-based diets; sustainability; water use

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test