Skip to content
2000
Volume 32, Issue 27
  • ISSN: 0929-8673
  • E-ISSN: 1875-533X

Abstract

Drugs are commonly utilized to diagnose, cure, or prevent the occurrence of diseases, as well as to restore, alter, or change organic functions. Drug discovery is a time-consuming, costly, difficult, and inefficient process that yields very few medicinal breakthroughs. Drug research and design involves the capturing of structural information for biological targets and small molecules as well as various methods, such as molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation. This article proposes the idea of expediting computational drug development through a collaboration of scientists and universities, similar to the Human Genome Project using machine learning (ML) strategies. We envision an automated system where readily available or novel small molecules (chemical or plant-derived), as well as their biological targets, are uploaded to an online database, which is constantly updated. For this system to function, machine learning strategies have to be implemented, and high-quality datasets and high quality assurance of the ML models will be required. ML can be applied to all computational drug discovery fields, including hit discovery, target validation, lead optimization, drug repurposing, and data mining of small compounds and biomolecule structures. Researchers from various disciplines, such as bioengineers, bioinformaticians, geneticists, chemists, computer and software engineers, and pharmacists, are expected to collaborate to establish a solid workflow and certain parameters as well as constraints for a successful outcome. This automated system may help speed up the drug discovery process while also lowering the number of unsuccessful drug candidates. Additionally, this system will decrease the workload, especially in computational studies, and expedite the process of drug design. As a result, a drug may be manufactured in a relatively short time.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmc/10.2174/0109298673334173241003060139
2024-10-10
2025-10-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmc/32/27/CMC-32-27-02.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmc/10.2174/0109298673334173241003060139&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. ZhouS.F. ZhongW.Z. Drug design and discovery: Principles and applications.Molecules201722227910.3390/molecules22020279.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SoutheyM.W.Y. BrunavsM. Introduction to small molecule drug discovery and preclinical development.Front. Drug Discov. (Lausanne)20233131407710.3389/fddsv.2023.1314077
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MakurvetF.D. Biologics vs. small molecules: Drug costs and patient access.Med. Drug Discov.2021910007510.1016/j.medidd.2020.100075
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BeckH. HärterM. HaßB. SchmeckC. BaerfackerL. Small molecules and their impact in drug discovery: A perspective on the occasion of the 125th anniversary of the Bayer Chemical Research Laboratory.Drug Discov. Today20222761560157410.1016/j.drudis.2022.02.01535202802
    [Google Scholar]
  5. HouD. LinH. FengY. ZhouK. LiX. YangY. WangS. YangX. WangJ. ZhaoH. ZhangX. FanJ. LuS. WangD. ZhuL. JuD. ChenY.Z. ZengX. CMAUP database update 2024: Extended functional and association information of useful plants for biomedical research.Nucleic Acids Res.202452D1D1508D151810.1093/nar/gkad92137897343
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SorokinaM. MerseburgerP. RajanK. YirikM.A. SteinbeckC. COCONUT online: Collection of open natural products database.J. Cheminform.2021131210.1186/s13321‑020‑00478‑933423696
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SabeV.T. NtombelaT. JhambaL.A. MaguireG.E.M. GovenderT. NaickerT. KrugerH.G. Current trends in computer aided drug design and a highlight of drugs discovered via computational techniques: A review.Eur. J. Med. Chem.202122411370510.1016/j.ejmech.2021.11370534303871
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ZlohM. KirtonS.B. The benefits of in silico modeling to identify possible small-molecule drugs and their off-target interactions.Future Med. Chem.201810442343210.4155/fmc‑2017‑015129380627
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MuhammedM.T. Aki-YalcinE. Homology modeling in drug discovery: Overview, current applications, and future perspectives.Chem. Biol. Drug Des.2019931122010.1111/cbdd.1338830187647
    [Google Scholar]
  10. GiordanoD. BiancanielloC. ArgenioM.A. FacchianoA. Drug design by pharmacophore and virtual screening approach.Pharmaceuticals (Basel)202215564610.3390/ph1505064635631472
    [Google Scholar]
  11. StanzioneF. GiangrecoI. ColeJ.C. Use of molecular docking computational tools in drug discovery.Prog. Med. Chem.20216027334310.1016/bs.pmch.2021.01.00434147204
    [Google Scholar]
  12. AguP.C. AfiukwaC.A. OrjiO.U. EzehE.M. OfokeI.H. OgbuC.O. UgwujaE.I. AjaP.M. Molecular docking as a tool for the discovery of molecular targets of nutraceuticals in diseases management.Sci. Rep.20231311339810.1038/s41598‑023‑40160‑237592012
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HollingsworthS.A. DrorR.O. Molecular dynamics simulation for all.Neuron20189961129114310.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.01130236283
    [Google Scholar]
  14. PállS. ZhmurovA. BauerP. AbrahamM. LundborgM. GrayA. HessB. LindahlE. Heterogeneous parallelization and acceleration of molecular dynamics simulations in GROMACS.J. Chem. Phys.20201531313411010.1063/5.001851633032406
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ThompsonA.P. AktulgaH.M. BergerR. BolintineanuD.S. BrownW.M. CrozierP.S. in ’t VeldP.J. KohlmeyerA. MooreS.G. NguyenT.D. ShanR. StevensM.J. TranchidaJ. TrottC. PlimptonS.J. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales.Comput. Phys. Commun.202227110817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171
    [Google Scholar]
  16. PhillipsJ.C. HardyD.J. MaiaJ.D.C. StoneJ.E. RibeiroJ.V. BernardiR.C. BuchR. FiorinG. HéninJ. JiangW. McGreevyR. MeloM.C.R. RadakB.K. SkeelR.D. SingharoyA. WangY. RouxB. AksimentievA. Luthey-SchultenZ. KaléL.V. SchultenK. ChipotC. TajkhorshidE. Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD.J. Chem. Phys.2020153404413010.1063/5.001447532752662
    [Google Scholar]
  17. CaseD.A. CheathamT.E.III DardenT. GohlkeH. LuoR. MerzK.M.Jr OnufrievA. SimmerlingC. WangB. WoodsR.J. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs.J. Comput. Chem.200526161668168810.1002/jcc.2029016200636
    [Google Scholar]
  18. CaseD.A. AktulgaH.M. BelfonK. CeruttiD.S. CisnerosG.A. CruzeiroV.W.D. ForouzeshN. GieseT.J. GötzA.W. GohlkeH. IzadiS. KasavajhalaK. KaymakM.C. KingE. KurtzmanT. LeeT.S. LiP. LiuJ. LuchkoT. LuoR. ManathungaM. MachadoM.R. NguyenH.M. O’HearnK.A. OnufrievA.V. PanF. PantanoS. QiR. RahnamounA. RishehA. Schott-VerdugoS. ShajanA. SwailsJ. WangJ. WeiH. WuX. WuY. ZhangS. ZhaoS. ZhuQ. CheathamT.E.III RoeD.R. RoitbergA. SimmerlingC. YorkD.M. NaganM.C. MerzK.M.Jr. AmberTools.J. Chem. Inf. Model.202363206183619110.1021/acs.jcim.3c0115337805934
    [Google Scholar]
  19. DaraS. DhamercherlaS. JadavS.S. BabuC.H.M. AhsanM.J. Machine learning in drug discovery: A review.Artif. Intell. Rev.20225531947199910.1007/s10462‑021‑10058‑434393317
    [Google Scholar]
  20. AittokallioT. What are the current challenges for machine learning in drug discovery and repurposing?Expert Opin. Drug Discov.202217542342510.1080/17460441.2022.205069435255749
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmc/10.2174/0109298673334173241003060139
Loading
/content/journals/cmc/10.2174/0109298673334173241003060139
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test