Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 1573-403X
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6557

Abstract

Background

Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) is a common condition in premature infants requiring intervention to avoid problems. Despite improvements in lowering radiation exposure and employing better contrast agents, fluoroscopy is still the most widely employed technique, which exposes interventional echocardiographers to radiation risks. Techniques, such as Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)-guided procedures or Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)-guided procedures, provide radiation-free options. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of fluoroscopy-guided versus non-fluoroscopy-guided PDA closure techniques with respect to the reduction in procedural risks and improved clinical decision-making when treating hemodynamically severe PDAs in premature newborns. As there is no specific age or cutoff for this procedure, it is crucial to perform it as early as possible to prevent complications, especially if symptoms are already present.

Methods

This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO with registration number CRD42024516321. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar) have been reviewed up to February 2024 to search the literature. The main outcome has been the procedural success rate. The additional outcomes have included procedural-related complications rate. We have performed a proportional meta-analysis using the random-effects model and the DerSimonian-Laird method. The risk of bias in all included studies has been evaluated using the STROBE guideline.

Results

A total of 85 (78 fluoroscopy and 7 zero-fluoroscopy) studies have been included in this study. Percutaneous PDA closure success rate has been significantly higher in zero-fluoroscopy group compared to fluoroscopy guidance [99.4% (95%CI: 98.1-100%) and 94.6% (95%CI: 92.3-97%, test for subgroup differences < 0.01), respectively]. The complication rate has been similar in both groups [4% (95%CI: 0-10%) in zero-fluoroscopy and 8.9% (95%CI: 6.5-11.3%) in fluoroscopy group, test for subgroup differences; = 0.14]. Device embolization has been the most common complication reported in the fluoroscopy group [1.7% patients (95%CI: 1.1-2.3%)]. Meanwhile, the residual leak has been the only complication reported in the zero-fluoroscopy group [15.6% patients (95%CI: 0-37.5%)].

Conclusion

Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) is common in preemies and requires intervention. While fluoroscopy is widely used with lower radiation and better contrast agents, it still carries radiation risks. Thus, this review has evaluated the safety and effectiveness of fluoroscopy versus zero-fluoroscopy-guided PDA closures, aiming to reduce procedural risks and enhance clinical decisions for treating PDA.

Zero fluoroscopy techniques for percutaneous PDA closure have been found to yield comparable success rates and procedural outcomes to fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Considering its reduced side effects, zero-fluoroscopy is safe and can be the preferred method to guide closures. However, future randomized controlled trials are necessary to better understand the exact role of interventional echocardiography in PDA closures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/ccr/10.2174/011573403X338573241101092849
2025-01-31
2025-09-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. PicanoE. PiccalugaE. PadovaniR. TrainoC.A. AndreassiM.G. GuagliumiG. Risks related to fluoroscopy radiation associated with electrophysiology procedures.J Atr Fibrillation.2014721044
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SiagianS.N. PrakosoR. PutraB.E. KurniawatiY. LelyaO. SembiringA.A. AtmosudigdoI.S. RoebionoP.S. RahajoeA.U. HarimurtiG.M. MendelB. ChristiantoC. SetiawanM. LilyasariO. Echocardiography-guided percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure: 1-year single center experience in Indonesia.Front. Cardiovasc. Med.2022988514010.3389/fcvm.2022.88514035677684
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WangG. WuY. PanZ. WuC. LiY. LiH. WangQ. LiuB. DaiJ. Transesophageal echocardiography-guided percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure without fluoroscopy.J. Cardiothorac. Surg.202318114210.1186/s13019‑023‑02248‑837060014
    [Google Scholar]
  4. VanzantD. MukhdomiJ. Safety of Fluoroscopy in Patient, Operator, and Technician.In: StatPearlsTreasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing2024
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BaruteauA.E. FraisseA. ButeraG. Bautista-RodriguezC. The transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low-birth-weight infants: Technique and results.J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis.2023101247610.3390/jcdd1012047638132644
    [Google Scholar]
  6. PanX.B. OuyangW.B. WangS.Z. LiuY. ZhangD.W. ZhangF.W. PangK.J. ZhangZ. HuS.S. Transthoracic echocardiography‐guided percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus occlusion: A new strategy for interventional treatment.Echocardiography20163371040104510.1111/echo.1320727038152
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PageM.J. McKenzieJ.E. BossuytP.M. BoutronI. HoffmannT.C. MulrowC.D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ.2021372n71
    [Google Scholar]
  8. von ElmE. AltmanD.G. EggerM. PocockS.J. GøtzscheP.C. VandenbrouckeJ.P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies.Lancet200737095961453145710.1016/S0140‑6736(07)61602‑X18064739
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BackesC.H. HillK.D. SheltonE.L. SlaughterJ.L. LewisT.R. WeiszD.E. Patent ductus arteriosus: A contemporary perspective for the pediatric and adult cardiac care provider.J Am Heart Assoc.20221117e025784
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BarcroftM. McKeeC. BermanD.P. TaylorR.A. RiveraB.K. SmithC.V. SlaughterJ.L. El-KhuffashA. BackesC.H. Percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus.Clin. Perinatol.202249114916610.1016/j.clp.2021.11.00935209997
    [Google Scholar]
  11. BaumgartnerH. de BackerJ. Babu-NarayanS.V. BudtsW. ChessaM. DillerG.P. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease.Eur Heart J.2021426563645
    [Google Scholar]
  12. StoutK.K. DanielsC.J. AboulhosnJ.A. BozkurtB. BrobergC.S. ColmanJ.M. CrumbS.R. DearaniJ.A. FullerS. GurvitzM. KhairyP. LandzbergM.J. SaidiA. ValenteA.M. Van HareG.F. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines.Circulation201913914e698e80030586767
    [Google Scholar]
  13. QianA. JiangS. GuX. LiS. LeiX. ShiW. ZhouJ. HuL. XiaoT. ZhuY. CaoY. DuL. ZhouW. LeeS.K. ChengR. YinR. Treatment of patent ductus arteriosus and short-term outcomes among extremely preterm infants: A multicentre cohort study.EClinicalMedicine20246710235610.1016/j.eclinm.2023.10235638125962
    [Google Scholar]
  14. BayssonH. NkoumazokB. BarnaouiS. RéhelJ.L. GirodonB. MilaniG. BoudjemlineY. BonnetD. LaurierD. BernierM.O. Follow-up of children exposed to ionising radiation from cardiac catheterisation: the Coccinelle study: Table 1.Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry20151651-4131610.1093/rpd/ncv03925833897
    [Google Scholar]
  15. PrakosoR. ArianiR. MendelB. LilyasariO. Transoesophageal echocardiography-guided balloon-assisted percutaneous closure of a large secundum atrial septal defect in a pregnant woman: a case report.Eur. Heart J. Case Rep.202381ytae01410.1093/ehjcr/ytae01438274706
    [Google Scholar]
  16. VillemainO. Malekzadeh-MilaniS. SitefaneF. Mostefa-KaraM. BoudjemlineY. Radiation exposure in transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure: time to tune?Cardiol. Young201828565366010.1017/S104795111700283929347998
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ChenG. WangY. ProiettiR. WangX. OuyangF. MaC.S. YuR.H. ZhaoC. MaK. QiuJ. LiuQ. WangD.W. Zero-fluoroscopy approach for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia using the Ensite NavX system: A multicenter experience.BMC Cardiovasc. Disord.20202014810.1186/s12872‑020‑01344‑032013865
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MendelB. Faris AminB. PrakosoR. Potency of non-fluoroscopy guided patent ductus arteriosus closure: A case report.SN Compr. Clin. Med.20213122665267210.1007/s42399‑021‑01062‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  19. HolzerR.J. BergersenL. ThomsonJ. AboulhosnJ. AggarwalV. AkagiT. AlwiM. ArmstrongA.K. BachaE. BensonL. BökenkampR. CarminatiM. DalviB. DiNardoJ. FaganT. FetterlyK. IngF.F. KennyD. KimD. KishE. O’ByrneM. O’DonnellC. PanX. PaolilloJ. PedraC. PeironeA. SinghH.S. SøndergaardL. HijaziZ.M. PICS/AEPC/APPCS/CSANZ/SCAI/SOLACI: Expert consensus statement on cardiac catheterization for pediatric patients and adults with congenital heart disease.JACC Cardiovasc. Interv.202417211521610.1016/j.jcin.2023.11.00138099915
    [Google Scholar]
  20. VenneriL. RossiF. BottoN. AndreassiM.G. SalconeN. EmadA. LazzeriM. GoriC. VanoE. PicanoE. Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: Insights from the National Research Council’s Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report.Am. Heart J.2009157111812410.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.00919081407
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McNamaraD.A. ChopraR. DeckerJ.M. McNamaraM.W. VanOosterhoutS.M. BerkompasD.C. DahuM.I. KenaanM.A. JawadW.I. MerhiW.M. ParkerJ.L. MadderR.D. Comparison of radiation exposure among interventional echocardiographers, interventional cardiologists, and sonographers during percutaneous structural heart interventions.JAMA Netw. Open202257e222059710.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2059735797046
    [Google Scholar]
  22. StahlC.M. MeisingerQ.C. AndreM.P. KinneyT.B. NewtonI.G. Radiation risk to the fluoroscopy operator and staff.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.2016207473774410.2214/AJR.16.1655528829623
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MettlerF.A.Jr KoenigT.R. WagnerL.K. KelseyC.A. Radiation injuries after fluoroscopic procedures.Semin. Ultrasound CT MR200223542844210.1016/S0887‑2171(02)90014‑412509113
    [Google Scholar]
  24. DerazS. TawfikM. KotitS. ElafifiA. Transcatheter device closure of patent ductus arteriosus by exclusive venous access under echocardiographic guidance without angiography.Cardiol. Young2022321555910.1017/S104795112100158X33896438
    [Google Scholar]
  25. WangC ZhangF OuyangW ZhaoG LuW ZouM Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus under echocardiography guidance: A randomized controlled noninferiority trial.J Interv Cardiol.202020204357017
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SiagianS.N. PrakosoR. MendelB. HazamiZ. PutriV.Y.S. Zulfahmi SaktiD.D.A. KuncoroA.S. Transesophageal echocardiography-guided percutaneous closure of multiple muscular ventricular septal defects with pulmonary hypertension using single device: A case report.Front. Cardiovasc. Med.202310109356310.3389/fcvm.2023.109356337034333
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Raja ShariffR.E. SoesantoA.M. ScaliaG.M. EweS.H. IzumoM. LiuL. Echocardiographic Imaging in Transcatheter Structural Intervention: An AAE Review Paper.JACC Asia.202334556579
    [Google Scholar]
  28. BarkerT.H. MigliavacaC.B. SteinC. ColpaniV. FalavignaM. AromatarisE. MunnZ. Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: A guide for synthesisers of evidence.BMC Med. Res. Methodol.202121118910.1186/s12874‑021‑01381‑z34544368
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/ccr/10.2174/011573403X338573241101092849
Loading
/content/journals/ccr/10.2174/011573403X338573241101092849
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

PRISMA checklist and supplementary material are available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Echocardiography; PDA; percutaneous; TEE; TTE; zero-fluoroscopy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test