Skip to content
2000
Volume 15, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2210-3279
  • E-ISSN: 2210-3287

Abstract

Introduction

A regional WSN of independent SNs collects environmental and physical data. Sensors for specific applications measure light, pressure, temperature, humidity, . WSNs can transmit real-time data without infrastructure radio frequencies. Smart cities, agriculture, industrial automation, environmental monitoring, and healthcare use WSN data. Many SNs monitor the network architecture's physical environment.

Methods

This design lets SNs talk to neighbors and base stations. Due to power limits, WSNs must prioritise energy efficiency. ML enhances data processing, energy efficiency, and WSN performance. WSN sensors assist ML in predicting events. Machine learning improves data compression, anomaly detection, adaptive network management, WSN predictive modelling, industrial WSN performance, energy efficiency, data analysis, . In this work, the dataset, which has parameters such as SN’s positions, energy, distance from cluster head, and SN lifetime is provided as an input to the following ML models Linear Regression, Random Forest, SVM, Naive Bayes, PCA, K Nearest Neighbour, XG Boost, and NN.

Results and Discussion

The result showed that the Linear Regression, Random Forest, SVM, Naive Bayes Classifier, PCA, K Nearest Neighbour, and XG Boost were all examined on the training and testing data.

Conclusion

The training data accuracies are as follows: Linear Regression (46.64%), Random Forest (99.67%), XG Boost (99.99%), SVM (32.10%), K Nearest Neighbor (98.56%), Naïve Bayes Classifier (96.45%), Principle Component Analysis (97.88%) and NN (34.86%). The testing data accuracies are as follows: Linear Regression (22.00%), Random Forest (97.18%), XG Boost (96.94%), SVM (21.75%), K Nearest Neighbor (97.66%), Naïve Bayes Classifier(64.49%), PCA(99.38%) and NN(28.94%). Linear Regression, Random Forest, SVM, Naive Bayes Classifier, PCA, K Nearest Neighbour, and XG Boost were all examined. Results revealed that

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279328716240819080916
2025-09-01
2025-12-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. DeepakS. JyotiA. MeenuS. AnkitaT. A DMA-WSN Based Routing Strategy to Maximize Efficiency and Reliability in a Ship to Communicate Data on Coronavirus.Recent Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng.2023202316
    [Google Scholar]
  2. MeenuS. DeepakS. LoveneeshB. KushalM. KunalU. MitulS. Patient Monitoring System Using Blockchain and IoT Technology.Recent Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng.2023164
    [Google Scholar]
  3. AnandJ. KhandelwalJ. SethiD. ChoudharyS. An Analysis to Empower IoT Devices through FOG Computing.2021 10th International Conference on Internet of Everything, Microwave Engineering, Communication and Networks (IEMECON)01-02 December 2021, Jaipur, India, 2021, pp. 01-04.10.1109/IEMECON53809.2021.9689125
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SethiDeepak An approach to optimize homogeneous and heterogeneous routing protocols in wsn using sink mobility.MAPAN202035241250
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SethiD. AnandJ. Big data and WBAN: prediction and analysis of the patient health condition in a remote area.Engin Appl Sci Res2019463248255
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SethiD. BhattacharyaP.P. A Comparative Analysis of Various Mobile Sink Routing Protocols and Performance Comparison of Clustered Routing Protocols in Mobile Sink Scenario.Majlesi J Elect Engin20181231122
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SethiD. BhattacharyaP.P. Performance Analysis of Various Routing Protocols in 3D Body Architecture using Qualnet in WBSN.IPTEK J Technol Sci2019292495510.12962/j20882033.v29i2.3372
    [Google Scholar]
  8. AnandJ. SethiD. Comparative analysis of energy efficient routing in WBAN.2017 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technology (CICT)09-10 February 2017, Ghaziabad, India, 2017, pp. 1-6.10.1109/CIACT.2017.7977373
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SethiD. BhattacharyaP.P. Artificial neural network based base station localization for energy efficient routing in WSN.Rec. Pat. Comput. Sci.201693248259
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SethiD. Pratim BhattacharyaP. Revised multi-chain PEGASIS for wireless sensor networks.Int. J. Sensors Wirel. Commun. Control201661121710.2174/2210327905666150914225227
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SethiD. BhattacharyaP.P. A Study on Energy Efficient and Reliable Data Transfer (EERDT) Protocol for WBAN2016 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence Communication Technology (CICT)12-13 February 2016, Ghaziabad, pp. 254-258.10.1109/CICT.2016.57
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MishraD SethiD BhattacharyaPP Modeling and simulation of a clustered WSN for precision agriculture.IJCSITCE201631/21010.5121/ijcsitce.2016.3203
    [Google Scholar]
  13. AlsheikhM.A. LinS. NiyatoD. TanH.P. ML in wireless sensor networks: Algorithms, strategies, and applications.IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.20141641996201810.1109/COMST.2014.2320099
    [Google Scholar]
  14. PrajapatiJ. JainS.C. ML techniques and challenges in wireless sensor networks.2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT)20-21 April 2018, Coimbatore, India, 2018, pp. 233-238.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. BhanderiM. ShahH. MLfor wireless sensor network: a review, challenges and applications.Adv Electron Electr Eng20144475486
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Praveen KumarD. AmgothT. AnnavarapuC.S.R. Machine learning algorithms for wireless sensor networks: A survey.Inf. Fusion20194912510.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.013
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BaraneetharanE. Role of ML algorithms intrusion detection in WSNs: a survey.J. Inf. Technol.2020203161173
    [Google Scholar]
  18. BhattiG. ML based localization in large-scale wireless sensor networks.Sensors (Basel)20181812417910.3390/s18124179 30487457
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AlruhailyN.M. M D. A multi-layer machine learning-based intrusion detection system for wireless sensor networks.Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl.202112428128810.14569/IJACSA.2021.0120437
    [Google Scholar]
  20. DwivediR.K. PandeyS. KumarR. A Study on Machine Learning Approaches for Outlier Detection in Wireless Sensor Network.2018 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science and Engineering (Confluence)11-12 January 2018, Noida, India, 2018, pp. 189-192.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. GuptaS. MittalM. PadhaA. Predictive analytics of sensor data based on supervised MLalgorithms.2017 International Conference on Next Generation Computing and Information Systems (ICNGCIS)11-12 December 2017, Jammu, India, 2017, pp. 171-176.10.1109/ICNGCIS.2017.12
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KaurR. SandhuJ.K. SapraL. ML technique for wireless sensor networks.2020 Sixth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)06-08 November 2020, Waknaghat, India, 2020, pp. 332-335.10.1109/PDGC50313.2020.9315775
    [Google Scholar]
  23. RashidS. AkramU. QaisarS. KhanS.A. FelembanE. WSN for distributed event detection based on machine learning.2014 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings), and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom).01-03 September 2014, Taipei, Taiwan, 2014, pp. 540-545.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PintoA.R. CamadaM. DantasM.A. MontezC. PortugalP. VasquesF. Genetic ML algorithms in the optimization of communication efficiency in wireless sensor networks.2009 35th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics03-05 November 2009, Porto, Portugal, 2009, pp. 2448-2453.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. RajJ.S. ML based resourceful clustering with load optimization for wireless sensor networks.J Ubiquitous Comput Commun Technol2020201293810.36548/jucct.2020.1.004
    [Google Scholar]
  26. RandhawaS. JainS. Performance analysis of LEACH with ML algorithms in wireless sensor networks.Int. J. Comput. Appl.2016147271210.5120/ijca2016910988
    [Google Scholar]
  27. RandhawaS. JainS. Data aggregation in wireless sensor networks: Previous research, current status and future directions.Wirel. Pers. Commun.20179733355342510.1007/s11277‑017‑4674‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  28. AliS. AshrafA. QaisarS.B. SimpliMote: A WSN monitoring platform for oil and gas pipelines.IEEE Syst. J.201612177878910.1109/JSYST.2016.2597171
    [Google Scholar]
  29. AlhmiedatT. Fingerprint-based localization approach for WSN using ML models.Appl. Sci. (Basel)2023135303710.3390/app13053037
    [Google Scholar]
  30. DebasisK. SharmaL.D. BohatV. BhadoriaR.S. An EECA for maximizing lifetime of wireless sensor networks using machine learning.Mob. Netw. Appl.202328285386710.1007/s11036‑023‑02109‑7
    [Google Scholar]
  31. EgwucheO.S. SinghA. EzugwuA.E. GreeffJ. OlusanyaM.O. AbualigahL. MLfor coverage optimization in wireless sensor networks: a comprehensive review.Ann. Oper. Res.20232023167
    [Google Scholar]
  32. BholaA. SrivastavaS. NooniaA. SharmaB. NarangS.K. A Status Quo of Machine Learning Algorithms in Smart Agricultural Systems Employing IoT-Based WSN.In: Machine Intelligence, Big Data Analytics, and IoT in Image Processing.Wiley2023177195
    [Google Scholar]
  33. YadavP. SharmaS.C. An EOLT for WSN Using Hybrid ML Algorithms.Wirel. Pers. Commun.20242024139
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Al-QuayedF AhmadZ HumayunM. A situation based predictive approach for cybersecurity intrusion detection and prevention using ML and deep learning algorithms in wireless sensor networks of industry 4.0.IEEE Access 202412: 34800-19.10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3372187
    [Google Scholar]
  35. KarthikeyanM. ManimegalaiD. RajaGopal K. Firefly algorithm based WSN-IoT security enhancement with machine learning for intrusion detection.Sci. Rep.202414123110.1038/s41598‑023‑50554‑x 38168562
    [Google Scholar]
  36. NjimaW BazziA ChafiiM. DNN-Based Indoor Localization Under Limited Dataset Using GANs and Semi-Supervised Learning.IEEE Access 202210: 69896-909.10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3187837
    [Google Scholar]
  37. NaoumiS. BazziA. BomfinR. ChafiiM. Complex neural network based joint AoA and AoD estimation for bistatic ISAC.IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process.202411510.1109/JSTSP.2024.3387299
    [Google Scholar]
  38. DelamouM. Deep Learning-based Estimation for Multitarget Radar Detection.2023 IEEE 97th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2023-Spring)20-23 June 2023, Florence, Italy, 2023, pp. 1-5.10.1109/VTC2023‑Spring57618.2023.10200157
    [Google Scholar]
  39. NaoumiS. Deep Learning-Enabled Angle Estimation in Bistatic ISAC Systems"2023 IEEE Globecom Workshops.Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: GC Wkshps 2023; pp. 854-9.10.1109/GCWkshps58843.2023.10464930
    [Google Scholar]
  40. BazziA. ChafiiM. On outage-based beamforming design for dual-functional radar-communication 6g systems.IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.20232285598561210.1109/TWC.2023.3235617
    [Google Scholar]
  41. BazziA. ChafiiM. On integrated sensing and communication waveforms with tunable PAPR.IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.202322117345736010.1109/TWC.2023.3250263
    [Google Scholar]
  42. BazziA. ChafiiM. Secure full duplex integrated sensing and communications.IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security2024192082209710.1109/TIFS.2023.3346696
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279328716240819080916
Loading
/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279328716240819080916
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): efficient clustering; KNN; linear regression; ML algorithm; Naive Bayes classifier; PCA; SVM; XGBOOST
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test