Skip to content
2000
Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2210-3279
  • E-ISSN: 2210-3287

Abstract

Aim

This research aims to explore and evaluate various strategies for improving energy efficiency within wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Specifically, the study focuses on the critical challenge of extending network lifespan through energy conservation by establishing balanced clusters within the WSN architecture.

Background

In wireless sensor networks (WSNs), ensuring prolonged network operation while conserving energy resources is a significant concern. One promising approach to address this challenge is the implementation of equalized clusters, which requires an effective selection of cluster heads (CHs). However, this task presents considerable complexity and demands innovative solutions to overcome.

Objective

The primary objective of this study is to develop and assess a novel methodology for selecting precise cluster heads (CHs) within WSNs. This methodology is based on the utilization of Bluetooth low energy (BLE) sensors deployed in a randomly distributed manner across the study area. By employing an enhanced artificial neural network and greedy approach (EANN-GA), the proposed technique seeks to identify CHs with optimal proximity to the cluster center and substantial remaining energy reserves.

Methods

The proposed methodology involves the deployment of BLE sensors distributed randomly throughout the study region, which are then organized into clusters. Using the enhanced artificial neural network and greedy approach (EANN-GA), the sensor node nearest to the cluster center with the highest remaining energy is selected as the cluster head (CH). Additionally, a mobile sink (MS) is introduced to harness the power of CHs, and the number of paths utilized by the MS is estimated through a genetic approach. Based on this path information, the MS enters each cluster to initiate the data-gathering process.

Results

Performance analysis of the presented methodology demonstrates significant improvements in energy efficiency and the extension of network lifetime. By employing the proposed EANN-GA technique for CH selection and optimizing MS path utilization, the study showcases enhanced operational effectiveness within WSNs.

Conclusion

The findings of this research underscore the effectiveness of the proposed methodology in enhancing energy efficiency and prolonging the lifespan of wireless sensor networks. Through the innovative integration of BLE sensors, EANN-GA CH selection, and genetic-based MS path estimation, the study contributes valuable insights toward addressing the critical challenges of energy conservation in WSNs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279296251240529105359
2024-06-24
2025-10-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BholaJ. SoniS. CheemaG.K. Genetic algorithm based optimized leach protocol for energy efficient wireless sensor networks.J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.20201131281128810.1007/s12652‑019‑01382‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  2. KandrisD. NakasC. VomvasD. KoulourasG. Applications of wireless sensor networks: An up-to-date survey.Applied System Innovation2020311410.3390/asi3010014
    [Google Scholar]
  3. SharmaR. VashishtV. SinghU. eeTMFO/GA: A secure and energy efficient cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks.Telecomm. Syst.202074325326810.1007/s11235‑020‑00654‑0
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LinD. GaoL. MinW. A social welfare theory-based energy-efficient cluster head election scheme for WSNs.IEEE Syst. J.20211534492450210.1109/JSYST.2020.3010868
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ShyjithM.B. MaheswaranC.P. ReshmaV.K. Optimized and dynamic selection of cluster head using energy efficient routing protocol in WSN.Wirel. Pers. Commun.2021116157759910.1007/s11277‑020‑07729‑w
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SumathiJ. VelusamyR.L. A review on distributed cluster based routing approaches in mobile wireless sensor networks.J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.202112183584910.1007/s12652‑020‑02088‑7
    [Google Scholar]
  7. KaurG. ChanakP. BhattacharyaM. Memetic algorithm-based data gathering scheme for IoT-enabled wireless sensor networks.IEEE Sens. J.20202019117251173410.1109/JSEN.2020.2998828
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar DwivediA. Kumar SharmaA. Singh MehraP. Energy efficient sensor node deployment scheme for two stage routing protocol of wireless sensor networks assisted iot.ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications202018215816910.37936/ecti‑eec.2020182.240541
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DenizF. BagciH. KorpeogluI. YazıcıA. Energy-efficient and fault-tolerant drone-BS placement in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks.Wirel. Netw.202127182583810.1007/s11276‑020‑02494‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ChauhanV. SoniS. Mobile sink-based energy efficient cluster head selection strategy for wireless sensor networks.J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.202011114453446610.1007/s12652‑019‑01509‑6
    [Google Scholar]
  11. VaiyapuriT. ParvathyV.S. ManikandanV. KrishnarajN. GuptaD. ShankarK. “A novel hybrid optimization for cluster‐based routing protocol in information-centric wireless sensor networks for IoT based mobile edge computing.”.Wirel. Pers. Commun.2021127124
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GuptaP. TripathiS. SinghS. Energy-efficient routing protocols for cluster-based heterogeneous wireless sensor network (HetWSN)—strategies and challenges: A review.In: Data Analytics and Management202185387810.1007/978‑981‑15‑8335‑3_65
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SrinivasuluM. A comprehensive review of energy-based routing strategies for internet of things.Information Technology In Industry2021921031104410.17762/itii.v9i2.449
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KayargaT. KumarS.A. A study on various technologies to solve the routing problem in Internet of Vehicles (IoV).Wirel. Pers. Commun.2021119145948710.1007/s11277‑021‑08220‑w
    [Google Scholar]
  15. AmuthaJ. SharmaS. SharmaS.K. Strategies based on various aspects of clustering in wireless sensor networks using classical, optimization and machine learning techniques: Review, taxonomy, research findings, challenges and future directions.Comput. Sci. Rev.20214010037610.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100376
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DhanareR. NagwanshiK.K. VarmaS. A study to enhance the route optimization algorithm for the internet of vehicle.Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput.2022202212010.1155/2022/1453187
    [Google Scholar]
  17. AjmiN. HelaliA. LorenzP. MghaiethR. MWCSGA—multi weight chicken swarm based genetic algorithm for energy efficient clustered wireless sensor network.Sensors202121379110.3390/s2103079133504006
    [Google Scholar]
  18. DevikaG. RameshD. Swarm intelligence–based energy‐efficient clustering algorithms for WSN: overview of algorithms, analysis, and applications.In: Swarm intelligence optimization: algorithms and applications (2020)2020207261
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KathiroliPanimalar SelvaduraiKanmani Energy efficient cluster head selection using improved sparrow search algorithm in wireless sensor networks.J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci.2021341085648575
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MohantyS.N. LydiaE.L. ElhosenyM. Al OtaibiM.M.G. ShankarK. Deep learning with LSTM based distributed data mining model for energy efficient wireless sensor networks.Phys. Commun.20204010109710.1016/j.phycom.2020.101097
    [Google Scholar]
  21. SharmaD. TomarG.S. Energy efficient multitier random DEC routing protocols for WSN: In agricultural.Wirel. Pers. Commun.2021120172774710.1007/s11277‑021‑08486‑0
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SadrishojaeiM. NavimipourN.J. ReshadiM. HosseinzadehM. A new clustering-based routing method in the mobile internet of things using a krill herd algorithm.Cluster Comput.202225135136110.1007/s10586‑021‑03394‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SharmaS. VermaV.K. An integrated exploration on internet of things and wireless sensor networks.Wirel. Pers. Commun.202212432735277010.1007/s11277‑022‑09487‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  24. AadilF. AhsanW. RehmanZ.U. ShahP.A. RhoS. MehmoodI. Clustering algorithm for internet of vehicles (IoV) based on dragonfly optimizer (CAVDO).J. Supercomput.20187494542456710.1007/s11227‑018‑2305‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  25. JoshiP. RaghuvanshiA.S. Hybrid approaches to address various challenges in wireless sensor network for IoT applications: Opportunities and open problems.International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications20218315118710.22247/ijcna/2021/209186
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SudhaM. SundararajanJ. Biologically inspired clustering algorithms in mobile wireless sensor networks: A survey.Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences201711976104
    [Google Scholar]
  27. OsamyW. KhedrA.M. SalimA. El-SawyA.A. AlreshoodiM. AlsukaytiI. Recent advances and future prospects of using ai solutions for security, fault tolerance, and QoS challenges in WSNs.Electronics20221124412210.3390/electronics11244122
    [Google Scholar]
  28. RathoreR.S. SangwanS. KaiwartyaO. AggarwalG. Green communication for next-generation wireless systems: Optimization strategies, challenges, solutions, and future aspects.Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput.2021202113810.1155/2021/5528584
    [Google Scholar]
  29. PrimeauN. FalconR. AbielmonaR. PetriuE.M. A review of computational intelligence techniques in wireless sensor and actuator networks.IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.20182042822285410.1109/COMST.2018.2850220
    [Google Scholar]
  30. MekaS. FonsecaB.Jr Improving route selections in ZigBee wireless sensor networks.Sensors201920116410.3390/s2001016431888077
    [Google Scholar]
  31. SinghM.K. AminS.I. ChoudharyA. A survey on the characterization parameters and lifetime improvement techniques of wireless sensor network.Frequenz (Bern)2021759-1043144810.1515/freq‑2020‑0163
    [Google Scholar]
  32. SajithaM. KavithaD. ReddyP.C. An optimized whale based replication node prediction in wireless sensor network.Wirel. Netw.20222841587160310.1007/s11276‑022‑02928‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  33. GopiS.P. MagariniM. Reinforcement learning aided uav base station location optimization for rate maximization.Electronics20211023295310.3390/electronics10232953
    [Google Scholar]
  34. KıranM.S. GündüzM. A recombination-based hybridization of particle swarm optimization and artificial bee colony algorithm for continuous optimization problems.Appl. Soft Comput.20131342188220310.1016/j.asoc.2012.12.007
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Babu MV. KumarC.N.S.V. ParthibanS. PadmavathiU. RahmanM.Z.U. AE-LEACH: An incremental clustering approach for reducing the energy consumption in WSN.Microprocess. Microsyst.20229310460210.1016/j.micpro.2022.104602
    [Google Scholar]
  36. AriA.A.A. YenkeB.O. LabraouiN. DamakoaI. GuerouiA. A power efficient cluster-based routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks: Honeybees swarm intelligence based approach.J. Netw. Comput. Appl.201669779710.1016/j.jnca.2016.04.020
    [Google Scholar]
  37. TianW. ZhaoY. HouR. DongM. OtaK. ZengD. ZhangJ. A centralized control-based clustering scheme for energy efficiency in underwater acoustic sensor networks.IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw.20237266867910.1109/TGCN.2023.3249208
    [Google Scholar]
  38. HouR. FuJ. DongM. OtaK. ZengD. An unequal clustering method based on particle swarm optimization in underwater acoustic sensor networks.IEEE Internet Things J.2022924250272503610.1109/JIOT.2022.3195223
    [Google Scholar]
  39. XingG. ChenY. HouR. DongM. ZengD. LuoJ. MaM. Game-theory-based clustering scheme for energy balancing in underwater acoustic sensor networks.IEEE Internet Things J.20218119005901310.1109/JIOT.2021.3055857
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279296251240529105359
Loading
/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279296251240529105359
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): ANN; BLE sensors; clustering; Energy efficiency; routing; WSN
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test