Skip to content
2000
image of A Comparative Analysis between Lymphocytic Esophagitis and Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Abstract

Introduction

Lymphocytic Esophagitis (LyE) and Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) share many clinical and endoscopic features. However, their treatment outcomes and prognoses differ significantly. LyE, the least recognized form of esophagitis, requires further research. This study compares symptoms, risk factors, and endoscopic findings in LyE and EoE patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study reviewed medical records, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings, and biopsy data. Patients with gastrointestinal symptoms who underwent EGD-guided segmental esophageal biopsies between March 2018 and January 2024 were included. Demographic data, clinical features, risk factors, and EGD findings were compared between LyE, EoE, non-specific esophagitis (NSE), and normal esophageal histology (NEH) groups. The LyE and EoE groups were compared and statistically analyzed with a third comparison group formed jointly by NSE and NEH subgroups.

Results

The cohort included 11 LyE cases (1.25%), 79 EoE cases (8.96%), 447 NSE cases (50.68%), and 345 NEH cases (39.11%). LyE patients were older, with a mean age of 54.81 years, and 72.72% of them were female. In contrast, EoE patients were younger, with a mean age of 43.52 years, and had a male predominance. Cases of dysphagia, dyspepsia, and nausea or vomiting occurred in both groups. Food impaction was more frequent in EoE. Smoking, alcohol use, and autoimmune diseases (, hypothyroidism and rheumatoid arthritis) were significant risk factors for LyE. Atopic conditions such as asthma and allergies were linked to EoE. Endoscopic findings often overlapped in LyE and EoE. Esophagitis and strictures were more common in LyE, while rings and furrows were more frequent in EoE. All endoscopic findings, including normal mucosa, were significant in LyE and EoE compared to the comparison group. However, rings, linear furrows, and exudates were not significant when comparing LyE to the comparison group.

Discussion

This single-center study, limited by a small sample size and geographic scope, addresses the diagnostic challenges posed by overlapping features of Lymphocytic and Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Despite the lack of standardized definitions and variable diagnostic thresholds in previous literature, our use of uniform histopathological criteria (≥20 lymphocytes or eosinophils per HPF) and a large control group enhances the consistency and reliability of the findings.

Conclusion

LyE is a rare form of esophagitis with clinical and endoscopic features similar to EoE. Accurate histopathological diagnosis is essential for differentiation. LyE is more common in older females with autoimmune conditions, while EoE affects younger males with atopic conditions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/raiad/10.2174/0127722708341294250509063835
2025-05-19
2025-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dutta P. Shah-Riar P. Bushra S.S. Haque S.N. Rafa Z.I. Hawa F. Chakrabarty S. Dev Nath S. Afrin H. Shama N. Khair F. Maisha S. Kapuria P. Dam B. Recent trends in the management of eosinophilic esophagitis: A systematic review. Cureus 2023 15 8 e43221 10.7759/cureus.43221 37692685
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pittman M.E. Lymphocytic esophagitis: Current understanding and controversy. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2022 46 1 e55 e63 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001667
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Pasricha S. Gupta A. Reed C.C. Lymphocytic esophagitis: An emerging clinicopathologic disease associated with dysphagia. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2016 61 2935 2941 10.1007/s10620‑016‑4230‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Banks W.D. Cassar C. Cassar P. Lymphocytic esophagitis: Diagnosis and management in the emergency department vs initial suspicion of eosinophilic esophagitis. Cureus. 2022 14 10 e30300 10.7759/cureus.30300
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen S. Saxena A. Waljee A.K. Piraka C. Purdy J. Appelman H. McKenna B. Elmunzer B.J. Singal A.G. Lymphocytic esophagitis: A diagnosis of increasing frequency. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2012 46 10 828 832 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182500de8
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hussein M. Mitchison M. Sweis R. Lymphocytic oesophagitis: Diagnosis and management. Clin. Med. (Lond.) 2023 23 6 540 544 10.7861/clinmed.2023‑0440 38065611
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Patil D.T. Hammer S. Langer R. Yantiss R.K. Lymphocytic esophagitis: an update on histologic diagnosis, endoscopic findings, and natural history. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018 1434 1 185 191 10.1111/nyas.13710 29797752
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Muir A. Falk G.W. Eosinophilic esophagitis: A review. JAMA 2021 326 13 1310 1318 10.1001/jama.2021.14920
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar S. Choi S.S. Gupta S.K. Eosinophilic esophagitis: Current status and future directions. Pediatr. Res. 2020 88 3 345 347 10.1038/s41390‑020‑0770‑4 31962343
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Barni S. Arasi S. Mastrorilli C. Pecoraro L. Giovannini M. Mori F. Liotti L. Saretta F. Castagnoli R. Caminiti L. Cianferoni A. Novembre E. Pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis: A review for the clinician. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2021 47 1 230 10.1186/s13052‑021‑01178‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rouphael C. Gordon I.O. Thota P.N. Lymphocytic esophagitis: Still an enigma a decade later. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017 23 6 949 956
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Nguyen A.D. Dunbar K.B. How to approach lymphocytic esophagitis. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2017 19 6 24 10.1007/s11894‑017‑0564‑y 28429201
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rubio C.A. Sjödahl K. Lagergren J. Lymphocytic esophagitis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2006 125 3 432 437 10.1309/7LABLGY08UEM3H26 16613348
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Purdy J.K. Appelman H.D. Golembeski C.P. McKenna B.J. Lymphocytic esophagitis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2008 130 4 508 513 10.1309/D3PCF6D6YYMQRX9A 18794041
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Haque S. Genta R.M. Lymphocytic oesophagitis: Clinicopathological aspects of an emerging condition. Gut 2012 61 8 1108 1114 10.1136/gutjnl‑2011‑301014 22157333
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hendy P.J. Florin T.H.J. Florin T.H. Spontaneous oesophageal perforation: An unreported complication of lymphocytic oesophagitis. Gut 2013 62 11 1668 1669 10.1136/gutjnl‑2013‑305455 23850714
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sutton L.M. Heintz D.D. Patel A.S. Weinberg A.G. Lymphocytic esophagitis in children. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014 20 8 1324 1328 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000100 24983984
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Furuta G.T. Katzka D.A. Eosinophilic esophagitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015 373 17 1640 1648 10.1056/NEJMra1502863
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tanaka K. Rubio C.A. Dlugosz A. Truskaite K. Befrits R. Lindberg G. Schmidt P.T. Narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis/esophageal eosinophilia and lymphocytic esophagitis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013 78 4 659 664 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.025 23827349
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jideh B. Keegan A. Weltman M. Lymphocytic esophagitis: Report of three cases and review of the literature. World J. Clin. Cases. 2016 4 12 413 418 10.12998/wjcc.v4.i12.413.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Xue Y. Suriawinata A. Liu X. Li Z. Gabbard S. Rothstein R. Lacy B. Lisovsky M. Lymphocytic esophagitis with CD4 T-cell–predominant intraepithelial lymphocytes and primary esophageal motility abnormalities. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015 39 11 1558 1567 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000493 26379147
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dellon E.S. Epidemiology of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. 2014 43 2 201 218 10.1016/j.gtc.2014.02.002 24813510
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gupta M. Grinman M. Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis. CMAJ 2024 196 4 E121 E128 10.1503/cmaj.230378
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Islam S. Lee A. Lampe G. Lymphocytic esophagitis: An Australian (Queensland) case series of a newly recognized mimic of eosinophilic esophagitis. JGH Open. 2019 3 5 400 404 10.1002/jgh3.12175
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Visaggi P. Savarino E. Sciume G. Chio T.D. Bronzini F. Tolone S. Frazzoni M. Pugno C. Ghisa M. Bertani L. Bellini M. Savarino V. Peroni D. Marchi S. de Bortoli N. Eosinophilic esophagitis: Clinical, endoscopic, histologic and therapeutic differences and similarities between children and adults. Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2021 31 1756284820980860 10.1177/1756284820980860
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/raiad/10.2174/0127722708341294250509063835
Loading
/content/journals/raiad/10.2174/0127722708341294250509063835
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test