Skip to content
2000
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2666-6499
  • E-ISSN: 2666-6502

Abstract

Background

Social housing changes are associated with diarrhea in macaques, presumably due to stress.

Objective

Since probiotics are utilized in humans for diarrhea, we tested the effectiveness of a species-specific probiotic, SDPro™ (composition: ~2 billion CFU each of live and ), to prevent relocation-associated diarrhea. Assessments of the gut-microbiome and diarrhea severity were made. Behavioral observations and cortisol levels were examined after relocation to test the effects of the probiotic treatment.

Methods

The probiotic was administered to 60 juvenile macaques of both sexes (Probiotic +) and outcomes were compared to 60 control (Probiotic -) macaques. The effects on gut microbiome composition were analyzed 16s microbiome analysis in half the animals from both groups. Social behaviors were monitored twice-weekly in the morning and afternoon for five weeks following 10-days of SDPro™ administration in 56 subjects and hair cortisol was assayed.

Results

Probiotic administration altered beta, but not alpha, diversity, and caused changes in taxa abundance at the phylum, genus, and species levels. The Probiotic + group was enriched in and diminished in (’s < 0.05) compared to controls. Although SDPro™ did not alter diarrhea incidence following relocation, it reduced diarrhea severity in males only. Males also exhibited higher cortisol levels than females but there was no probiotic effect. Probiotic treatment had minor behavioral effects; the typical reduction in locomotion seen in the afternoon was eliminated.

Conclusion

The results suggest that SDPro™ may be a viable tool to prevent relocation-induced diarrhea in juvenile male macaques.

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/probiot/10.2174/0126666499295593240916060605
2024-09-23
2025-12-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/probiot/10.2174/0126666499295593240916060605
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. HowellS. WhiteD. IngramS. JacksonR. LarinJ. MoralesP. GarciaA.P. HicksC. HopperK. WagnerJ. A bio-behavioral study of chronic idiopathic colitis in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta).Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.20121373-420822010.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.003
     [Google Scholar]
  2. YangS. LiuY. YangN. LanY. LanW. FengJ. YueB. HeM. ZhangL. ZhangA. PriceM. LiJ. FanZ. The gut microbiome and antibiotic resistome of chronic diarrhea rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and its similarity to the human gut microbiome.Microbiome20221012910.1186/s40168‑021‑01218‑335139923
     [Google Scholar]
  3. HirdD.W. AndersonJ.H. BielitzkiJ.T. Diarrhea in nonhuman primates: a survey of primate colonies for incidence rates and clinical opinion.Lab. Anim. Sci.19843454654706513506
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BroadhurstM.J. ArdeshirA. KanwarB. MirpuriJ. GundraU.M. LeungJ.M. WiensK.E. Vujkovic-CvijinI. KimC.C. YarovinskyF. LercheN.W. McCuneJ.M. LokeP. Therapeutic helminth infection of macaques with idiopathic chronic diarrhea alters the inflammatory signature and mucosal microbiota of the colon.PLoS Pathog.2012811e100300010.1371/journal.ppat.100300023166490
     [Google Scholar]
  5. DelwartE. TiszaM.J. AltanE. LiY. DengX. Hartigan-O’ConnorD.J. ArdeshirA. Idiopathic Chronic Diarrhea in Rhesus Macaques Is Not Associated with Enteric Viral Infections.Viruses20211312250310.3390/v1312250334960771
     [Google Scholar]
  6. KapusinszkyB. ArdeshirA. MulvaneyU. DengX. DelwartE. Case-control comparison of enteric viromes in captive rhesus macaques with acute or idiopathic chronic diarrhea.J. Virol.20179118e00952-1710.1128/JVI.00952‑1728659484
     [Google Scholar]
  7. ChamanzaR. MarxfeldH.A. BlancoA.I. NaylorS.W. BradleyA.E. Incidences and range of spontaneous findings in control cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) used in toxicity studies.Toxicol. Pathol.201038464265710.1177/019262331036898120448082
     [Google Scholar]
  8. JohnsonA.L. KeeslerR.I. LewisA.D. ReaderJ.R. LaingS.T. Common and not-so-common pathologic findings of the gastrointestinal tract of rhesus and cynomolgus macaques.Toxicol. Pathol.202250563865910.1177/0192623322108463435363082
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Salian-MehtaS. PolingJ. BirkebakJ. RensingS. CarosinoC. SantosR. Non-human primate husbandry and impact on non-human primates health: Outcomes from an IQ DruSafe/3RS industrial benchmark survey.Int. J. Toxicol.202220221091581822114652336543758
     [Google Scholar]
  10. FerrecchiaC.E. HobbsT.R. Efficacy of oral fecal bacteriotherapy in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with chronic diarrhea.Comp. Med.2013631717523561941
     [Google Scholar]
  11. VandeleestJ.J. BeisnerB.A. HannibalD.L. NathmanA.C. CapitanioJ.P. HsiehF. AtwillE.R. McCowanB. Decoupling social status and status certainty effects on health in macaques: a network approach.PeerJ20164e239410.7717/peerj.239427672495
     [Google Scholar]
  12. HerbertM. Bugs, Bowels, and Behavior: The Groundbreaking Story of the Gut-Brain Connection.Simon and Schuster2013
     [Google Scholar]
  13. SassoJ.M. AmmarR.M. TenchovR. LemmelS. KelberO. GrieswelleM. ZhouQ.A. Gut microbiome–brain alliance: a landscape view into mental and gastrointestinal health and disorders.ACS Chem. Neurosci.202314101717176310.1021/acschemneuro.3c0012737156006
     [Google Scholar]
  14. LeeJ. KwaW.T. SundarajooS. TohK.Y. Application of emerging technologies for gut microbiome research.Singapore Med. J.2023641455210.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ‑2021‑43236722516
     [Google Scholar]
  15. MartinS.E. KraftC.S. ZieglerT.R. MillsonE.C. RishishwarL. MartinG.S. The Role of Diet on the Gut Microbiome, Mood and Happiness.medRxiv 23287442202310.1101/2023.03.18.23287442
     [Google Scholar]
  16. SudoN. ChidaY. AibaY. SonodaJ. OyamaN. YuX.N. KuboC. KogaY. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal system for stress response in mice.J. Physiol.2004558126327510.1113/jphysiol.2004.06338815133062
     [Google Scholar]
  17. RuschJ.A. LaydenB.T. DugasL.R. Signalling cognition: the gut microbiota and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.Front. Endocrinol.202314113068910.3389/fendo.2023.113068937404311
     [Google Scholar]
  18. MaranoG. MazzaM. LisciF.M. CilibertoM. TraversiG. KotzalidisG.D. De BerardisD. LaterzaL. SaniG. GasbarriniA. GaetaniE. The Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis: Psychoneuroimmunological Insights.Nutrients2023156149610.3390/nu1506149636986226
     [Google Scholar]
  19. MartinsE.M.S. Nascimento da SilvaL.C. CarmoM.S. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in childhood diarrhea.Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res.202457e1320510.1590/1414‑431x2024e1320538656071
     [Google Scholar]
  20. LiQ. ZhengT. DingH. ChenJ. LiB. ZhangQ. YangS. ZhangS. GuanW. Exploring the benefits of probiotics in gut inflammation and diarrhea—From an antioxidant perspective.Antioxidants2023127134210.3390/antiox1207134237507882
     [Google Scholar]
  21. YangQ. HuZ. LeiY. LiX. XuC. ZhangJ. LiuH. DuX. Overview of systematic reviews of probiotics in the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in children.Front. Pharmacol.202314115307010.3389/fphar.2023.115307037564180
     [Google Scholar]
  22. IshaqueS.M. KhosruzzamanS.M. AhmedD.S. SahM.P. A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of a multi-strain probiotic formulation (Bio-Kult®) in the management of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.BMC Gastroenterol.20181817110.1186/s12876‑018‑0788‑929801486
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ZhaoH. ZhangW. ChengD. YouL. HuangY. LuY. Investigating dysbiosis and microbial treatment strategies in inflammatory bowel disease based on two modified Koch’s postulates.Front. Med.20229102389610.3389/fmed.2022.102389636438062
     [Google Scholar]
  24. WinterS.E. BäumlerA.J. Gut dysbiosis: Ecological causes and causative effects on human disease.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA202312050e231657912010.1073/pnas.231657912038048456
     [Google Scholar]
  25. KooB.S. BaekS.H. KimG. HwangE. OhH. SonY. LimK.S. KangP. LeeH.Y. JeongK.J. KimY.H. VillingerF. HongJ.J. Idiopathic chronic diarrhea associated with dysbiosis in a captive cynomolgus macaque ( Macaca fascicularis ).J. Med. Primatol.2020491565910.1111/jmp.1244731642533
     [Google Scholar]
  26. ClaytonJ.B. DanzeisenJ.L. TrentA.M. MurphyT. JohnsonT.J. Longitudinal characterization of Escherichia coli in healthy captive non-human primates.Front. Vet. Sci.201412410.3389/fvets.2014.0002426664923
     [Google Scholar]
  27. AnandN. GorantlaV.R. ChidambaramS.B. The role of gut dysbiosis in the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders.Cells20221215410.3390/cells1201005436611848
     [Google Scholar]
  28. TiffanyC.R. BäumlerA.J. Dysbiosis: from fiction to function.Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.20193175G602G60810.1152/ajpgi.00230.201931509433
     [Google Scholar]
  29. DahiyaD. NigamP.S. Antibiotic-therapy-induced gut dysbiosis affecting gut microbiota—brain axis and cognition: restoration by intake of probiotics and synbiotics.Int. J. Mol. Sci.2023244307410.3390/ijms2404307436834485
     [Google Scholar]
  30. WuY. WangL. LuoR. ChenH. NieC. NiuJ. ChenC. XuY. LiX. ZhangW. Effect of a multispecies probiotic mixture on the growth and incidence of diarrhea, immune function, and fecal microbiota of pre-weaning dairy calves.Front. Microbiol.20211268101410.3389/fmicb.2021.68101434335503
     [Google Scholar]
  31. IancuM.A. ProfirM. RoşuO.A. IonescuR.F. CretoiuS.M. GasparB.S. Revisiting the intestinal microbiome and its role in diarrhea and constipation.Microorganisms2023119217710.3390/microorganisms1109217737764021
     [Google Scholar]
  32. KullarR. GoldsteinE.J.C. JohnsonS. McFarlandL.V. Lactobacillus bacteremia and probiotics: a review.Microorganisms202311489610.3390/microorganisms1104089637110319
     [Google Scholar]
  33. MackosA.R. Infectious Colitis is Exacerbated by Prolonged Stressor Exposure: Implications for Probiotic Intervention.Thesis, The Ohio State University, 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. BaiJ. XuD. XieD. WangM. LiZ. GuoX. Effects of antibacterial peptide-producing Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, aerobic stability, and microbial community of alfalfa silage.Bioresour. Technol.202031512388110.1016/j.biortech.2020.12388132731157
     [Google Scholar]
  35. LeckerJ.L. Froberg-FejkoK. PrimiOtic™ and PrimiOtic Plus™: novel probiotic for primates suffering from idiopathic chronic diarrhea.Lab Anim. (NY)2015441041441510.1038/laban.84426398619
     [Google Scholar]
  36. MeyerJ. NovakM. HamelA. RosenbergK. Extraction and analysis of cortisol from human and monkey hair.J. Visualized Exper. JoVE.201483
     [Google Scholar]
  37. LebeerS. VanderleydenJ. De KeersmaeckerS.C.J. Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.200872472876410.1128/MMBR.00017‑0819052326
     [Google Scholar]
  38. WolfeW. XiangZ. YuX. LiP. ChenH. YaoM. FeiY. HuangY. YinY. XiaoH. The challenge of applications of probiotics in gastrointestinal diseases.Advanced. Gut Microbiome Res.20232023111010.1155/2023/1984200
     [Google Scholar]
  39. KediaS. AhujaV. Human gut microbiome: A primer for the clinician.JGH Open20237533735010.1002/jgh3.1290237265934
     [Google Scholar]
  40. PolakK. Bergler-CzopB. SzczepanekM. WojciechowskaK. FrątczakA. KissN. Psoriasis and gut microbiome—current state of art.Int. J. Mol. Sci.2021229452910.3390/ijms2209452933926088
     [Google Scholar]
  41. MackosA.R. GalleyJ.D. EubankT.D. EasterlingR.S. ParryN.M. FoxJ.G. LyteM. BaileyM.T. Social stress-enhanced severity of Citrobacter rodentium-induced colitis is CCL2-dependent and attenuated by probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri.Mucosal Immunol.20169251552610.1038/mi.2015.8126422754
     [Google Scholar]
  42. BuffingtonS.A. Di PriscoG.V. AuchtungT.A. AjamiN.J. PetrosinoJ.F. Costa-MattioliM. Microbial Reconstitution Reverses Maternal Diet-Induced Social and Synaptic Deficits in Offspring.Cell201616571762177510.1016/j.cell.2016.06.00127315483
     [Google Scholar]
  43. GrendaT. GrendaA. DomaradzkiP. KrawczykP. KwiatekK. Probiotic Potential of Clostridium spp.—Advantages and Doubts.Curr. Issues Mol. Biol.20224473118313010.3390/cimb4407021535877439
     [Google Scholar]
  44. SamulD. WorsztynowiczP. LejaK. GrajekW. Beneficial and harmful roles of bacteria from the Clostridium genus.Acta Biochim. Pol.201360451552124432307
     [Google Scholar]
  45. StanleyD. HughesR.J. GeierM.S. MooreR.J. Bacteria within the gastrointestinal tract microbiota correlated with improved growth and feed conversion: challenges presented for the identification of performance enhancing probiotic bacteria.Front. Microbiol.2016718710.3389/fmicb.2016.0018726925052
     [Google Scholar]
  46. LiddicoatC. SydnorH. Cando-DumancelaC. DreskenR. LiuJ. GellieN.J.C. MillsJ.G. YoungJ.M. WeyrichL.S. HutchinsonM.R. WeinsteinP. BreedM.F. Naturally-diverse airborne environmental microbial exposures modulate the gut microbiome and may provide anxiolytic benefits in mice.Sci. Total Environ.202070113468410.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13468431704402
     [Google Scholar]
  47. AmatS. LantzH. MunyakaP.M. WillingB.P. Prevotella in Pigs: The Positive and Negative Associations with Production and Health.Microorganisms2020810158410.3390/microorganisms810158433066697
     [Google Scholar]
  48. AbdelsalamN.A. HegazyS.M. AzizR.K. The curious case of Prevotella copri.Gut Microbes2023152224915210.1080/19490976.2023.224915237655441
     [Google Scholar]
  49. GilchristC.A. PetriS.E. SchneiderB.N. ReichmanD.J. JiangN. BegumS. WatanabeK. JansenC.S. ElliottK.P. BurgessS.L. MaJ.Z. AlamM. KabirM. HaqueR. PetriW.A.Jr Role of the Gut Microbiota of Children in Diarrhea Due to the Protozoan Parasite Entamoeba histolytica.J. Infect. Dis.2016213101579158510.1093/infdis/jiv77226712950
     [Google Scholar]
  50. SuT. LiuR. LeeA. LongY. DuL. LaiS. ChenX. WangL. SiJ. OwyangC. ChenS. Altered intestinal microbiota with increased abundance of Prevotella is associated with high risk of diarrhea‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome.Gastroenterol. Res. Pract.2018201811910.1155/2018/696178329967640
     [Google Scholar]
  51. BaiH. LiuT. WangS. GongW. ShenL. ZhangS. WangZ. Identification of gut microbiome and metabolites associated with acute diarrhea in cats.Microbiol. Spectr.2023114e00590-2310.1128/spectrum.00590‑2337428087
     [Google Scholar]
  52. ShehA. ArtimS.C. BurnsM.A. Molina-MoraJ.A. LeeM.A. Dzink-FoxJ. MuthupalaniS. FoxJ.G. Analysis of gut microbiome profiles in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) in health and intestinal disease.Sci. Rep.2022121443010.1038/s41598‑022‑08255‑435292670
     [Google Scholar]
  53. YangQ. HuangX. WangP. YanZ. SunW. ZhaoS. GunS. Longitudinal development of the gut microbiota in healthy and diarrheic piglets induced by age‐related dietary changes.MicrobiologyOpen2019812e92310.1002/mbo3.92331496126
     [Google Scholar]
  54. McGrewK. The effects of social housing changes, temperament and social rank on the microbiome composition and diarrhea rates in a colony of mauritius-origin macaca fascicularis.Electronic thesis, University of Houston, 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. WooddellL.J. VandeleestJ.J. NathmanA.C. BeisnerB.A. McCowanB. Not all grooming is equal: differential effects of political vs affiliative grooming on cytokines and glucocorticoids in rhesus macaques.Preprints Peer J.20197e27961v1
     [Google Scholar]
  56. SterckE.H.M. WattsD.P. van SchaikC.P. The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.199741529130910.1007/s002650050390
     [Google Scholar]
  57. TaylorS.E. KleinL.C. LewisB.P. GruenewaldT.L. GurungR.A.R. UpdegraffJ.A. Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight.Psychol. Rev.2000107341142910.1037/0033‑295X.107.3.41110941275
     [Google Scholar]
  58. VandeleestJ.J. WinklerS.L. BeisnerB.A. HannibalD.L. AtwillE.R. McCowanB. Sex differences in the impact of social status on hair cortisol concentrations in rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta ).Am. J. Primatol.2020821e2308610.1002/ajp.2308631876328
     [Google Scholar]
  59. ZhangZ. HyunJ.E. ThiesenA. ParkH. HotteN. WatanabeH. HigashiyamaT. MadsenK.L. Sex-specific differences in the gut microbiome in response to dietary fiber supplementation in IL-10-deficient mice.Nutrients2020127208810.3390/nu1207208832679670
     [Google Scholar]
  60. KimY.S. UnnoT. KimB.Y. ParkM.S. Sex differences in gut microbiota.World J. Mens Health2020381486010.5534/wjmh.19000930929328
     [Google Scholar]
  61. HasesL. StepanauskaiteL. BirgerssonM. BrusselaersN. Schuppe-KoistinenI. ArcherA. EngstrandL. WilliamsC. High-fat diet and estrogen modulate the gut microbiota in a sex-dependent manner in mice.Commun. Biol.2023612010.1038/s42003‑022‑04406‑536624306
     [Google Scholar]
  62. García-SantosJ.A. Nieto-RuizA. García-RicobarazaM. CerdóT. CampoyC. Impact of probiotics on the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in the pediatric population.Int. J. Mol. Sci.20232411942710.3390/ijms2411942737298377
     [Google Scholar]
  63. LeeZ.Y. LewC.C.H. Ortiz-ReyesA. PatelJ.J. WongY.J. LohC.T.I. MartindaleR.G. HeylandD.K. Benefits and harm of probiotics and synbiotics in adult critically ill patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.Clin. Nutr.202342451953110.1016/j.clnu.2023.01.01936857961
     [Google Scholar]
  64. SuezJ. ZmoraN. Zilberman-SchapiraG. MorU. Dori-BachashM. BashiardesS. ZurM. Regev-LehaviD. Ben-Zeev BrikR. FedericiS. HornM. CohenY. MoorA.E. ZeeviD. KoremT. KotlerE. HarmelinA. ItzkovitzS. MaharshakN. ShiboletO. Pevsner-FischerM. ShapiroH. SharonI. HalpernZ. SegalE. ElinavE. Post-Antibiotic Gut Mucosal Microbiome Reconstitution Is Impaired by Probiotics and Improved by Autologous FMT.Cell2018174614061423.e1610.1016/j.cell.2018.08.04730193113
     [Google Scholar]
  65. ZmoraN. Zilberman-SchapiraG. SuezJ. MorU. Dori-BachashM. BashiardesS. KotlerE. ZurM. Regev-LehaviD. BrikR.B.Z. FedericiS. CohenY. LinevskyR. RothschildD. MoorA.E. Ben-MosheS. HarmelinA. ItzkovitzS. MaharshakN. ShiboletO. ShapiroH. Pevsner-FischerM. SharonI. HalpernZ. SegalE. ElinavE. Personalized Gut Mucosal Colonization Resistance to Empiric Probiotics Is Associated with Unique Host and Microbiome Features.Cell2018174613881405.e2110.1016/j.cell.2018.08.04130193112
     [Google Scholar]
  66. GibsonG.R. RoberfroidM.B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics.J. Nutr.199512561401141210.1093/jn/125.6.14017782892
     [Google Scholar]
  67. ElfenbeinH.A. RossoL.D. McCowanB. CapitanioJ.P. Effect of Indoor Compared with Outdoor Location during Gestation on the Incidence of Diarrhea in Indoor-Reared Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci.201655327729027177560
     [Google Scholar]
  68. SawaswongV. ChanchaemP. KemthongT. WaritS. ChaiprasertA. MalaivijitnondS. PayungpornS. Alteration of gut microbiota in wild-borne long-tailed macaques after 1-year being housed in hygienic captivity.Sci. Rep.2023131584210.1038/s41598‑023‑33163‑637037869
     [Google Scholar]
  69. MessaoudiM. LalondeR. ViolleN. JavelotH. DesorD. NejdiA. BissonJ.F. RougeotC. PichelinM. CazaubielM. CazaubielJ.M. Assessment of psychotropic-like properties of a probiotic formulation ( Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in rats and human subjects.Br. J. Nutr.2011105575576410.1017/S000711451000431920974015
     [Google Scholar]
  70. TianP. GaoJ. LiangL. CuiB. HuQ. ZhouW. LiB. LiuY. ChenT. RaoJ. WeiH. Fecal microbiota transplantation could improve chronic diarrhea in cynomolgus monkey by alleviating inflammation and modulating gut microbiota.Biomedicines20221012301610.3390/biomedicines1012301636551772
     [Google Scholar]
  71. SonnenburgJ. SonnenburgE. The good gut: taking control of your weight, your mood, and your long-term health.Penguin Books2016
     [Google Scholar]
  72. ChoiY. HosseindoustA. HaS.H. KimJ. MinY. JeongY. MunJ. SaS. KimJ. Effects of dietary supplementation of bacteriophage cocktail on health status of weanling pigs in a non-sanitary environment.J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.20231416410.1186/s40104‑023‑00869‑637150809
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Piovezani RamosG. CamilleriM. Current and future therapeutic options for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea.Dig. Dis. Sci.20236851677169010.1007/s10620‑022‑07700‑836376576
     [Google Scholar]
  74. RhoadesN.S. CincoI.R. HendricksonS.M. ProngayK. HaertelA.J. FloresG.E. SlifkaM.K. MessaoudiI. Infant diarrheal disease in rhesus macaques impedes microbiome maturation and is linked to uncultured Campylobacter species.Commun. Biol.2024713710.1038/s42003‑023‑05695‑038182754
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/probiot/10.2174/0126666499295593240916060605
Loading
Evaluating the Effect of a Probiotic on Prevention of Diarrhea, Stress Response, and Social Interactions in a Colony of Macaca fascicularis
Curr. Probiotics 1, E26666499295593 (2024); https://doi.org/10.2174/0126666499295593240916060605
/content/journals/probiot/10.2174/0126666499295593240916060605
/content/journals/probiot/10.2174/0126666499295593240916060605
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): diarrhea; Lactobacillus; Macaca fascicularis; Microbiota; primates; relocation stress

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test