Skip to content
2000
Volume 32, Issue 10
  • ISSN: 0929-8665
  • E-ISSN: 1875-5305

Abstract

Holoproteomics is a state-of-the-art advancement in spatial proteomics, enabling comprehensive spatial analysis of proteins in tissue microenvironments by combining Digital Holographic Microscopy (DHM) imaging and high-precision laser capture microdissection (LCM) techniques. DHM is an advanced technology that utilizes optical interference principles for non-invasive imaging, providing high-resolution three-dimensional visualization of cells and macromolecules without requiring markers. In proteomics, DHM provides crucial technical support for investigating protein interactions and enables high-precision tracking and analysis of dynamic protein changes. In this review, we systematically survey peer-reviewed literature published in the past five years, with a focus on experimental and clinical studies applying DHM to proteomic analyses. Based on the significant advantages of this technology, we introduce the concept of “Holographic proteomics” as an emerging research field with promising future directions.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/ppl/10.2174/0109298665404512251021101809
2025-11-14
2026-03-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/ppl/10.2174/0109298665404512251021101809
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ThieleJ.C. PfitznerE. KukuraP. Single-protein optical holography.Nat. Photonics202418438839510.1038/s41566‑024‑01405‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  2. HutchinsonT.M. RighiG. CelliersP.M. AliS.J. McGuireC.P. PerezT. RasmusA.M. Interframe-tunable ultrafast differential-displacement holography.Rev. Sci. Instrum.202495909370410.1063/5.021590739292160
     [Google Scholar]
  3. MolaniA. PálhalmiJ. MihalikB. ClaassenP. LangerakE. MohammadianS. LindenB. WithaarT. MezőA. FerrariM. RahiP. BelaG. PennatiF. AlivertiA. Advancing bio-threat detection with digital holographic microscopy: The HoloZcan project.Optica Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional ImagingOptica Publishing Group202410.1364/DH.2024.Tu5A.3
     [Google Scholar]
  4. MunirajI. FalldorfC. Editorial: Advances in digital holographic microscopy and applications.Sec. Optic. Inform. Process. Holograph20245150204310.3389/fphot.2024.1502043
     [Google Scholar]
  5. LoperaM.J. TrusiakM. DoblasA. OttevaereH. TrujilloC. Mueller-gabor holographic microscopy.Opt. Lasers Eng.2023 178.10.2139/ssrn.4633474
     [Google Scholar]
  6. XiongZ. YuL. AnS. ZhengJ. MaY. MicóV. GaoP. Automatic identification and analysis of cells using digital holographic microscopy and Sobel segmentation.Front Photonics20245135959510.3389/fphot.2024.1359595
     [Google Scholar]
  7. ZhuangZ. BertheauP. Emmert-BuckM.R. LiottaL.A. GnarraJ. LinehanW.M. LubenskyI.A. A microdissection technique for archival DNA analysis of specific cell populations in lesions < 1 mm in size.Am. J. Pathol.199514636206257887444
     [Google Scholar]
  8. YunJ. Spatial proteomic analysis of single amyloid plaques in brain tissue using laser capture microdissection and mass spectrometry.Alzheimers Dement.202420S8e09567410.1002/alz.095674
     [Google Scholar]
  9. RizzoF. Optical immunoassays methods in protein analysis: An overview.Chemosensors202210832610.3390/chemosensors10080326
     [Google Scholar]
  10. BressanD. BattistoniG. HannonG.J. The dawn of spatial omics.Science20233816657eabq496410.1126/science.abq496437535749
     [Google Scholar]
  11. MarxV. Method of the Year: spatially resolved transcriptomics.Nat. Methods202118191410.1038/s41592‑020‑01033‑y33408395
     [Google Scholar]
  12. EisensteinM. Seven technologies to watch in 2022.Nature2022601789465866110.1038/d41586‑022‑00163‑x35079149
     [Google Scholar]
  13. HuB. ZhuJ. ZhaoF. The evolving landscape of spatial proteomics technologies in the AI age.Fundamental Res.2024In Press.10.1016/j.fmre.2024.11.023
     [Google Scholar]
  14. DauckeR. RiftC.V. BagerN.S. SaxenaK. KoffeldtP.R. WoessmannJ. PetrosiusV. Santoni-RugiuE. KristensenB.W. KlausenP. SchoofE.M. Refining spatial proteomics by mass spectrometry: An efficient workflow tailored for archival tissue.bioRxiv20252024.01.25.57726310.1101/2024.01.25.577263
     [Google Scholar]
  15. GaborD. A new microscopic principle.Nature1948161409877777810.1038/161777a018860291
     [Google Scholar]
  16. BraggW.L. Microscopy by reconstructed wave-fronts.Nature1950166421839940010.1038/166399b014775684
     [Google Scholar]
  17. LeithE.N. UpatnieksJ. Reconstructed wavefronts and communication theory.J. Opt. Soc. Am.1962521011231130
     [Google Scholar]
  18. GoodmanJ. LawrenceR. Digital image formation from electronically detected holograms.Appl. Phys. Lett.1967113777910.1063/1.1755043
     [Google Scholar]
  19. MakhmutA. QinD. HartlmayrD. SethA. CosciaF. An automated and fast sample preparation workflow for laser microdissection guided ultrasensitive proteomics.Mol. Cell. Proteomics202423510075010.1016/j.mcpro.2024.10075038513891
     [Google Scholar]
  20. SchäferF. TomarA. SatoS. TeperinoR. ImhofA. LahiriS. Enhanced in situ spatial proteomics by effective combination of MALDI imaging and LC-MS/MS.Mol. Cell. Proteomics202423810081110.1016/j.mcpro.2024.10081138996918
     [Google Scholar]
  21. RosenbergerF.A. ThielertM. StraussM.T. SchweizerL. AmmarC. MädlerS.C. MetousisA. SkowronekP. WahleM. MaddenK. Gote-SchnieringJ. SemenovaA. SchillerH.B. RodriguezE. NordmannT.M. MundA. MannM. Spatial single-cell mass spectrometry defines zonation of the hepatocyte proteome.Nat. Methods202320101530153610.1038/s41592‑023‑02007‑637783884
     [Google Scholar]
  22. KimH.W. ChoM. LeeM.C. Image processing techniques for improving quality of 3D profile in digital holographic microscopy using deep learning algorithm.Sensors2024246195010.3390/s2406195038544214
     [Google Scholar]
  23. JingS. LiuD. FengN. DongH. WangH. YanX. ChenX. QuM. LinP. YiB. FengF. ChenL. WangH. LiH. HeY. Spatial multiomics reveals a subpopulation of fibroblasts associated with cancer stemness in human hepatocellular carcinoma.Genome Med.20241619810.1186/s13073‑024‑01367‑839138551
     [Google Scholar]
  24. LyuP. GuX. WangF. SunH. ZhouQ. YangS. YuanW. Advances in targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts through single-cell spatial transcriptomic sequencing.Biomark. Res.20241217310.1186/s40364‑024‑00622‑939075612
     [Google Scholar]
  25. BakerA.S. DeitersA. Optical control of protein function through unnatural amino acid mutagenesis and other optogenetic approaches.ACS Chem. Biol.2014971398140710.1021/cb500176x24819585
     [Google Scholar]
  26. ChengY. ChenX. FengL. YangZ. XiaoL. XiangB. WangX. LiuD. LinP. ShiJ. SongG. QianW. ZhangB. XuY. GaoZ. ChenL. WuY. MaJ. LinY. ZhaoH. PengL. MaoX. LiuY. HouH. YangM. JiY. WangX. ZhouJ. XuX. LiuX. WeiW. ZhangX. GaoQ. ZhouH. SunY. WuK. FanJ. Stromal architecture and fibroblast subpopulations with opposing effects on outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cell Discov.2025111110.1038/s41421‑024‑00747‑z39870619
     [Google Scholar]
  27. DoblasA. Bogue-JimenezB. Obando-VasquezS. CastañedaR. TrujilloC. Overview of computational advances in quantitative phase imaging using digital holographic microscopy.ProcSPIE 2024, 13041. 10.1117/12.3011999
     [Google Scholar]
  28. LiS LuoJ LiuJ HeD Pan-cancer single cell and spatial transcriptomics analysis deciphers the molecular landscapes of senescence related cancer-associated fibroblasts and reveals its predictive value in neuroblastoma via integrated multi-omics analysis and machine learning.Front. Immunol.202415150625610.3389/fimmu.2024.1506256
     [Google Scholar]
  29. SunY.A.J. LiuZ. SunR. QianL. PayneS. BittremieuxW. RalserM. LiC. ChenY. DongZ. Perez-RiverolY. KhanA. SanderC. AebersoldR. VizcainoJ. KriegerJ. YaoJ. WenH. GuoT. Strategic priorities for transformative progress in advancing biology with proteomics and artificial intelligence.arXiv2025
     [Google Scholar]
  30. VickovicS. LötstedtB. KlughammerJ. MagesS. SegerstolpeÅ. Rozenblatt-RosenO. RegevA. SM-Omics is an automated platform for high-throughput spatial multi-omics.Nat. Commun.202213179510.1038/s41467‑022‑28445‑y35145087
     [Google Scholar]
  31. GholamiA. ShirmohammadiS. Advanced in protein-ligand interaction studies optical-based spectroscopic insights and simulation perspectives.J. Biomed. Res. Environ. Sci.20245661462910.37871/jbres1934
     [Google Scholar]
  32. LukerG.D. LukerK.E. Optical imaging: Current applications and future directions.J. Nucl. Med.20084911410.2967/jnumed.107.04579918077528
     [Google Scholar]
  33. KemperB. von BallyG. Digital holographic microscopy for live cell applications and technical inspection.Appl. Opt.2008474A52A6110.1364/AO.47.000A5218239699
     [Google Scholar]
  34. QuanX KatoD DariaV MatobaO WakeH Holographic microscope and its biological application.Neurosci. Res.2022179576410.1016/j.neures.2021.10.01234740727
     [Google Scholar]
  35. KimB.M. ParkS.J. KimE.S. Single-shot digital holographic microscopy with a modified lateral-shearing interferometer based on computational telecentricity.Opt. Express20172566151616810.1364/OE.25.00615128380970
     [Google Scholar]
  36. SchubertR. VollmerA. KetelhutS. KemperB. Enhanced quantitative phase imaging in self-interference digital holographic microscopy using an electrically focus tunable lens.Biomed. Opt. Express20145124213422210.1364/BOE.5.00421325574433
     [Google Scholar]
  37. MinegishiY. HagaY. UedaK. Emerging potential of immunopeptidomics by mass spectrometry in cancer immunotherapy.Cancer Sci.202411541048105910.1111/cas.1611838382459
     [Google Scholar]
  38. ChaudhariH. KulkarniR. KumarS.P. ThummerR.P. BhuyanM.K. Digital hologram reconstruction algorithm based on the fractional Fourier transform in non-telecentric digital holographic microscopy.Opt. Lett.202449218218510.1364/OL.50472338194523
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hoenisch GravelN. NeldeA. BauerJ. MühlenbruchL. SchroederS.M. NeidertM.C. ScheidJ. LemkeS. DubbelaarM.L. WackerM. DenglerA. KleinR. MauzP.S. LöwenheimH. Hauri-HohlM. MartinR. HennenlotterJ. StenzlA. HeitmannJ.S. SalihH.R. RammenseeH.G. WalzJ.S. TOFIMS mass spectrometry-based immunopeptidomics refines tumor antigen identification.Nat. Commun.2023141747210.1038/s41467‑023‑42692‑737978195
     [Google Scholar]
  40. FariaD. EugénioP. Contreiras SilvaM. BalbiL. BedranG. KallorA.A. NunesS. PalkowskiA. WaleronM. AlfaroJ.A. PesquitaC. The immunopeptidomics ontology (ImPO). Database (Oxford)20242024baae01410.1093/database/baae014
     [Google Scholar]
  41. FlenderD. VilenneF. AdamsC. BoonenK. ValkenborgD. BaggermanG. Exploring the dynamic landscape of immunopeptidomics: Unravelling posttranslational modifications and navigating bioinformatics terrain.Mass Spectrom. Rev.202410.1002/mas.2190539152539
     [Google Scholar]
  42. HuangX. GanZ. CuiH. LanT. LiuY. CaronE. ShaoW. The SysteMHC Atlas v2.0, an updated resource for mass spectrometry-based immunopeptidomics.Nucleic Acids Res.202452D1D1062D107110.1093/nar/gkad106838000392
     [Google Scholar]
  43. WeitzenM. ShahbazyM. KapoorS. CaronE. Deciphering the HLA-E immunopeptidome with mass spectrometry: An opportunity for universal mRNA vaccines and T-cell-directed immunotherapies.Front. Immunol.202415144278310.3389/fimmu.2024.144278339301027
     [Google Scholar]
  44. HornburgD. MuellerT. FoserS. Leveraging proteomics for precision cancer research, diagnosis, and treatment.Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. News2024449485010.1089/gen.44.09.17
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Bravo-FrankN. ZendeR. FengL. MesyngierN. PachputeA. HongJ. Realtime bacteria detection and analysis in sterile liquid products using deep learning holographic imaging.NPJ Biosensing20241810.1038/s44328‑024‑00008‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  46. MarquetP. DepeursingeC. MagistrettiP.J. Review of quantitative phase-digital holographic microscopy: promising novel imaging technique to resolve neuronal network activity and identify cellular biomarkers of psychiatric disorders.Neurophotonics20141202090110.1117/1.NPh.1.2.02090126157976
     [Google Scholar]
  47. ZhangJ. LiuY. CuiW. JiangZ. Fractional fourier-transform off-axis digital holographic imaging.Appl. Opt.202463143922392810.1364/AO.52008638856356
     [Google Scholar]
  48. ShamshiripourP. RahnamaM. NikoobakhtM HajiahmadiF. MoradiA.R. AhmadvandD. A dynamic study of VEGF-A siDOX-EVs trafficking through the in-vitro insert co-culture blood-brain barrier model by digital holographic microscopy.Front. Oncol.202414129208310.3389/fonc.2024.129208338529380
     [Google Scholar]
  49. BilalH. KhanM.N. KhanS. ShafiqM. FangW. KhanR.U. RahmanM.U. LiX. LvQ-L. XuB. The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in predicting and combating antimicrobial resistance.Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J.20252742343910.1016/j.csbj.2025.01.00639906157
     [Google Scholar]
  50. ZhangJ. SunJ. ChenQ. ZuoC. Resolution analysis in a lens-free on-chip digital holographic microscope.IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging2020669771010.1109/TCI.2020.2964247
     [Google Scholar]
  51. KieberR. FroehlyL. JacquotM. Physics-driven learning for digital holographic microscopy.EPJ Web Conf202430915005
     [Google Scholar]
  52. WuY. OzcanA. Lensless digital holographic microscopy and its applications in biomedicine and environmental monitoring.Methods201813641610.1016/j.ymeth.2017.08.01328864356
     [Google Scholar]
  53. GuanY. CuiZ. ZhouW. Reconstruction in off-axis digital holography based on hybrid clustering and the fractional Fourier transform.Opt. Laser Technol.202518611262210.1016/j.optlastec.2025.112622
     [Google Scholar]
  54. TakedaM. InaH. KobayashiS. Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry.J. Opt. Soc. Am.198272115616010.1364/JOSA.72.000156
     [Google Scholar]
  55. YamaguchiI. ZhangT. Phase-shifting digital holography.Opt. Lett.199722161268127010.1364/OL.22.00126818185816
     [Google Scholar]
  56. YuL. MohantyS. ZhangJ. GencS. KimM.K. BernsM.W. ChenZ. Digital holographic microscopy for quantitative cell dynamic evaluation during laser microsurgery.Opt. Express20091714120311203810.1364/OE.17.01203119582118
     [Google Scholar]
  57. ZhangT. YamaguchiI. Three-dimensional microscopy with phase-shifting digital holography.Opt. Lett.199823151221122310.1364/OL.23.00122118087480
     [Google Scholar]
  58. HughesJ.W. SisleyE.K. HaleO.J. CooperH.J. Laser capture microdissection and native mass spectrometry for spatially-resolved analysis of intact protein assemblies in tissue.Chem. Sci. (Camb.)202415155723572910.1039/D3SC04933G38638209
     [Google Scholar]
  59. DaviterT. FronzesR. Protein sample characterization.Methods Mol. Biol.20131008356210.1007/978‑1‑62703‑398‑5_223729248
     [Google Scholar]
  60. DepeursingeC.D. CucheE. ColombT. DahlgrenP. MarianA.M. MonfortF. MarquetP. MagistrettiP.J. Cells and tissue imaging with digital holographic microscopy.Novel Optic. Instrument. Biomed. Appl. 2003, 5143. 10.1117/12.500899
     [Google Scholar]
  61. KouS.S. SheppardC.J. Imaging in digital holographic microscopy.Opt. Express20071521136401364810.1364/OE.15.01364019550632
     [Google Scholar]
  62. DepeursingeC. MarianA. MontfortF. ColombT. CharrièreF. KühnJ. EtienneC. EmeryY. MarquetP. Digital Holographic Microscopy (DHM) applied to Optical Metrology: A resolution enhanced imaging technology applied to inspection of microscopic devices with subwavelength resolution.FringeSpringer200630831410.1007/3‑540‑29303‑5_41
     [Google Scholar]
  63. LeiY. ZhangQ. GuoY. PuM. ZouF. LiX. MaX. LuoX. Snapshot multi-dimensional computational imaging through a liquid crystal diffuser.Photon. Res.2023113B111B2410.1364/PRJ.476317
     [Google Scholar]
  64. TaharaT. QuanX. OtaniR. TakakiY. MatobaO. Digital holography and its multidimensional imaging applications: a review.Microscopy (Oxf.)2018672556710.1093/jmicro/dfy00729471371
     [Google Scholar]
  65. MarquetP. RappazB. MagistrettiP.J. CucheE. EmeryY. ColombT. DepeursingeC. Digital holographic microscopy: A noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy.Opt. Lett.200530546847010.1364/OL.30.00046815789705
     [Google Scholar]
  66. PopescuG. IkedaT. DasariR.R. FeldM.S. Diffraction phase microscopy for quantifying cell structure and dynamics.Opt. Lett.200631677577710.1364/OL.31.00077516544620
     [Google Scholar]
  67. RappazB. MarquetP. CucheE. EmeryY. DepeursingeC. MagistrettiP.J. Measurement of the integral refractive index and dynamic cell morphometry of living cells with digital holographic microscopy.Opt. Express200513239361937310.1364/OPEX.13.00936119503137
     [Google Scholar]
  68. ShakedN.T. Quantitative phase microscopy of biological samples using a portable interferometer.Opt. Lett.201237112016201810.1364/OL.37.00201622660106
     [Google Scholar]
  69. ColombT. CharrièreF. KühnJ. MarquetP. DepeursingeC. Advantages of digital holographic microscopy for real-time full field absolute phase imaging.Proc SPIE2008 6861.10.1117/12.763284
     [Google Scholar]
  70. ZhuL. WangY. WuX. WuG. ZhangG. LiuC. ZhangS. Protein design accelerates the development and application of optogenetic tools.Computat. Struct. Biotechnol.20252771710.1016/j.csbj.2025.02.014
     [Google Scholar]
  71. CharetteM. RosenblumC. ShadeO. DeitersA. Optogenetics with atomic precision: A comprehensive review of optical control of protein function through genetic code expansion.Chem. Rev.202512541663171710.1021/acs.chemrev.4c0022439928721
     [Google Scholar]
  72. CourtneyT. DeitersA. Recent advances in the optical control of protein function through genetic code expansion.Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.2018469910710.1016/j.cbpa.2018.07.01130056281
     [Google Scholar]
  73. AebersoldR. MannM. Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function.Nature2016537762034735510.1038/nature1994927629641
     [Google Scholar]
  74. LundbergE. BornerG.H.H. Spatial proteomics: A powerful discovery tool for cell biology.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.201920528530210.1038/s41580‑018‑0094‑y30659282
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Method of the Year 2024: Spatial proteomics.Nat. Methods202421122195219610.1038/s41592‑024‑02565‑339643689
     [Google Scholar]
  76. ThulP.J. ÅkessonL. WikingM. MahdessianD. GeladakiA. Ait BlalH. AlmT. AsplundA. BjörkL. BreckelsL.M. BäckströmA. DanielssonF. FagerbergL. FallJ. GattoL. GnannC. HoberS. HjelmareM. JohanssonF. LeeS. LindskogC. MulderJ. MulveyC.M. NilssonP. OksvoldP. RockbergJ. SchuttenR. SchwenkJ.M. SivertssonÅ. SjöstedtE. SkogsM. StadlerC. SullivanD.P. TegelH. WinsnesC. ZhangC. ZwahlenM. MardinogluA. PonténF. von FeilitzenK. LilleyK.S. UhlénM. LundbergE. A subcellular map of the human proteome.Science20173566340eaal332110.1126/science.aal332128495876
     [Google Scholar]
  77. UhlénM. FagerbergL. HallströmB.M. LindskogC. OksvoldP. MardinogluA. SivertssonÅ. KampfC. SjöstedtE. AsplundA. OlssonI. EdlundK. LundbergE. NavaniS. SzigyartoC.A.K. OdebergJ. DjureinovicD. TakanenJ.O. HoberS. AlmT. EdqvistP.H. BerlingH. TegelH. MulderJ. RockbergJ. NilssonP. SchwenkJ.M. HamstenM. von FeilitzenK. ForsbergM. PerssonL. JohanssonF. ZwahlenM. von HeijneG. NielsenJ. PonténF. Tissue-based map of the human proteome.Science20153476220126041910.1126/science.126041925613900
     [Google Scholar]
  78. MatthiesenR. JensenO.N. Analysis of mass spectrometry data in proteomics.Methods Mol. Biol.200845310512210.1007/978‑1‑60327‑429‑6_418712299
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Xiang-Wei. YangF. Research progress of JNK in neurological diseases.Chinese Bullet. Life Sci.202436510.13376/j.cbls/2024063
     [Google Scholar]
  80. HoebeR.A. Van OvenC.H. GadellaT.W.J.Jr DhonuksheP.B. Van NoordenC.J.F. MandersE.M.M. Controlled light-exposure microscopy reduces photobleaching and phototoxicity in fluorescence live-cell imaging.Nat. Biotechnol.200725224925310.1038/nbt127817237770
     [Google Scholar]
  81. CucheE. MarquetP. DepeursingeC. Spatial filtering for zero-order and twin-image elimination in digital off-axis holography.Appl. Opt.200039234070407510.1364/AO.39.00407018349988
     [Google Scholar]
  82. PopescuG. ParkY. LueN. Best-PopescuC. DefloresL. DasariR.R. FeldM.S. BadizadeganK. Optical imaging of cell mass and growth dynamics.Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.20082952C538C54410.1152/ajpcell.00121.200818562484
     [Google Scholar]
  83. BarerR. Interference microscopy and mass determination.Nature1952169429636636710.1038/169366b014919571
     [Google Scholar]
  84. PavillonN. BenkeA. BossD. MoratalC. KühnJ. JourdainP. DepeursingeC. MagistrettiP.J. MarquetP. Cell morphology and intracellular ionic homeostasis explored with a multimodal approach combining epifluorescence and digital holographic microscopy.J. Biophotonics20103743243610.1002/jbio.20100001820306502
     [Google Scholar]
  85. KühnJ. ShafferE. MenaJ. BretonB. ParentJ. RappazB. ChambonM. EmeryY. MagistrettiP. DepeursingeC. MarquetP. TurcattiG. Label-free cytotoxicity screening assay by digital holographic microscopy.Assay Drug Dev. Technol.201311210110710.1089/adt.2012.47623062077
     [Google Scholar]
  86. RappazB. BretonB. ShafferE. TurcattiG. Digital holographic microscopy: A quantitative label-free microscopy technique for phenotypic screening.Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen.2014171808810.2174/1386207311316666006224152227
     [Google Scholar]
  87. BettenworthD. LenzP. KrausewitzP. BrücknerM. KetelhutS. DomagkD. KemperB. Quantitative stain-free and continuous multimodal monitoring of wound healing in vitro with digital holographic microscopy.PLoS One201499e10731710.1371/journal.pone.010731725251440
     [Google Scholar]
  88. KemperB. BauwensA. VollmerA. KetelhutS. LangehanenbergP. MüthingJ. KarchH. von BallyG. Label-free quantitative cell division monitoring of endothelial cells by digital holographic microscopy.J. Biomed. Opt.2010153110.1117/1.343171220615011
     [Google Scholar]
  89. PavillonN. KühnJ. MoratalC. JourdainP. DepeursingeC. MagistrettiP.J. MarquetP. Early cell death detection with digital holographic microscopy.PLoS One201271e3091210.1371/journal.pone.003091222303471
     [Google Scholar]
  90. MoffatJ.G. RudolphJ. BaileyD. Phenotypic screening in cancer drug discovery — past, present and future.Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.201413858860210.1038/nrd436625033736
     [Google Scholar]
  91. GuangfengK. QianJ. HongZ. KaiY. YanxiaoJ. YingyingW. ZiyiC. JieJ. Application progress of Mass Spectrometry Imaging technology in marine biology research.Marine Sci. Bullet.202342221623110.11840/j.issn.1001‑6392.2023.02.011
     [Google Scholar]
  92. MarcusD.J. BruchasM.R. Optical approaches for investigating neuromodulation and G protein–coupled receptor signaling.Pharmacol. Rev.20237561119113910.1124/pharmrev.122.00058437429736
     [Google Scholar]
  93. van de VenS.M.W.Y. BemisK.D. LauK. AdusumilliR. KotaU. StolowitzM. VitekO. MallickP. GambhirS.S. Protein biomarkers on tissue as imaged via MALDI mass spectrometry: A systematic approach to study the limits of detection.Proteomics20161611-121660166910.1002/pmic.20150051526970438
     [Google Scholar]
  94. RappsilberJ. MannM. What does it mean to identify a protein in proteomics?Trends Biochem. Sci.2002272747810.1016/S0968‑0004(01)02021‑711852244
     [Google Scholar]
  95. AebersoldR. AgarJ.N. AmsterI.J. BakerM.S. BertozziC.R. BojaE.S. CostelloC.E. CravattB.F. FenselauC. GarciaB.A. GeY. GunawardenaJ. HendricksonR.C. HergenrotherP.J. HuberC.G. IvanovA.R. JensenO.N. JewettM.C. KelleherN.L. KiesslingL.L. KroganN.J. LarsenM.R. LooJ.A. Ogorzalek LooR.R. LundbergE. MacCossM.J. MallickP. MoothaV.K. MrksichM. MuirT.W. PatrieS.M. PesaventoJ.J. PitteriS.J. RodriguezH. SaghatelianA. SandovalW. SchlüterH. SechiS. SlavoffS.A. SmithL.M. SnyderM.P. ThomasP.M. UhlénM. Van EykJ.E. VidalM. WaltD.R. WhiteF.M. WilliamsE.R. WohlschlagerT. WysockiV.H. YatesN.A. YoungN.L. ZhangB. How many human proteoforms are there?Nat. Chem. Biol.201814320621410.1038/nchembio.257629443976
     [Google Scholar]
  96. LaranceM. LamondA.I. Multidimensional proteomics for cell biology.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.201516526928010.1038/nrm397025857810
     [Google Scholar]
  97. SavitskiM.M. ReinhardF.B.M. FrankenH. WernerT. SavitskiM.F. EberhardD. MolinaD.M. JafariR. DovegaR.B. KlaegerS. KusterB. NordlundP. BantscheffM. DrewesG. Tracking cancer drugs in living cells by thermal profiling of the proteome.Science20143466205125578410.1126/science.125578425278616
     [Google Scholar]
  98. SchubertO.T. RöstH.L. CollinsB.C. RosenbergerG. AebersoldR. Quantitative proteomics: Challenges and opportunities in basic and applied research.Nat. Protoc.20171271289129410.1038/nprot.2017.04028569762
     [Google Scholar]
  99. ThulP.J. LindskogC. The human protein atlas: A spatial map of the human proteome.Protein Sci.201827123324410.1002/pro.330728940711
     [Google Scholar]
  100. UhlenM. BandrowskiA. CarrS. EdwardsA. EllenbergJ. LundbergE. RimmD.L. RodriguezH. HiltkeT. SnyderM. YamamotoT. A proposal for validation of antibodies.Nat. Methods2016131082382710.1038/nmeth.399527595404
     [Google Scholar]
  101. ZhangB. WangJ. WangX. ZhuJ. LiuQ. ShiZ. ChambersM.C. ZimmermanL.J. ShaddoxK.F. KimS. DaviesS.R. WangS. WangP. KinsingerC.R. RiversR.C. RodriguezH. TownsendR.R. EllisM.J.C. CarrS.A. TabbD.L. CoffeyR.J. SlebosR.J.C. LieblerD.C. NCI CPTAC Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer.Nature2014513751838238710.1038/nature1343825043054
     [Google Scholar]
  102. KvernelandA.H. HarkingF. Vej-NielsenJ.M. HuusfeldtM. Bekker-JensenD.B. SvaneI.M. BacheN. OlsenJ.V. Fully automated workflow for integrated sample digestion and evotip loading enabling high-throughput clinical proteomics.Mol. Cell. Proteomics202423710079010.1016/j.mcpro.2024.10079038777088
     [Google Scholar]
  103. KimJ. LeeS.J. Digital in-line holographic microscopy for label-free identification and tracking of biological cells.Mil. Med. Res.20241113810.1186/s40779‑024‑00541‑838867274
     [Google Scholar]
  104. WuX. XuW. DengL. LiY. WangZ. SunL. GaoA. WangH. YangX. WuC. ZouY. YanK. LiuZ. ZhangL. DuG. YangL. LinD. YueJ. WangP. HanY. FuZ. DaiJ. CaoG. Spatial multi-omics at subcellular resolution via high-throughput in situ pairwise sequencing.Nat. Biomed. Eng.20248787288910.1038/s41551‑024‑01205‑738745110
     [Google Scholar]
  105. WeiJ. DaiS. YanY. LiS. YangP. ZhuR. HuangT. LiX. DuanY. WangZ. JiW. SiW. Spatiotemporal proteomic atlas of multiple brain regions across early fetal to neonatal stages in cynomolgus monkey.Nat. Commun.2023141391710.1038/s41467‑023‑39411‑737400444
     [Google Scholar]
  106. LiuY. HüttenhainR. CollinsB. AebersoldR. Mass spectrometric protein maps for biomarker discovery and clinical research.Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn.201313881182510.1586/14737159.2013.84508924138574
     [Google Scholar]
  107. BianY. ZhengR. BayerF.P. WongC. ChangY.C. MengC. ZolgD.P. ReineckeM. ZechaJ. WiechmannS. HeinzlmeirS. ScherrJ. HemmerB. BaynhamM. GingrasA.C. BoychenkoO. KusterB. Robust, reproducible and quantitative analysis of thousands of proteomes by micro-flow LC–MS/MS.Nat. Commun.202011115710.1038/s41467‑019‑13973‑x31919466
     [Google Scholar]
  108. ZubarevR.A. The challenge of the proteome dynamic range and its implications for in-depth proteomics.Proteomics201313572372610.1002/pmic.20120045123307342
     [Google Scholar]
  109. BrielS.C. FeuserN. MoldenhauerE.J. KabischJ. NeubauerP. JunneS. Digital holographic microscopy is suitable for lipid accumulation analysis in single cells of Yarrowia lipolytica.J. Biotechnol.2025397324310.1016/j.jbiotec.2024.11.01139551244
     [Google Scholar]
  110. NguyenT. BuiV. LamV. RaubC.B. ChangL.C. NehmetallahG. Automatic phase aberration compensation for digital holographic microscopy based on deep learning background detection.Opt. Express20172513150431505710.1364/OE.25.01504328788938
     [Google Scholar]
  111. ChenB. YinZ. NgB.W.L. WangD.M. TuanR.S. BiseR. KerD.F.E. Label-free live cell recognition and tracking for biological discoveries and translational applications.NPJ Imaging2024214110.1038/s44303‑024‑00046‑y40603709
     [Google Scholar]
  112. MengN. LamE.Y. TsiaK.K. SoH.K.H. Large-scale multi-class image-based cell classification with deep learning.IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform.20192352091209810.1109/JBHI.2018.287887830387753
     [Google Scholar]
  113. GuoW. HuY. QianJ. ZhuL. ChengJ. LiaoJ. FanX. Laser capture microdissection for biomedical research: towards high-throughput, multi-omics, and single-cell resolution.J. Genet. Genomics202350964165110.1016/j.jgg.2023.07.01137544594
     [Google Scholar]
  114. FengZ. ZhangW. XuJ. GauronC. DucosB. VrizS. VolovitchM. JullienL. WeissS. BensimonD. Optical control and study of biological processes at the single-cell level in a live organism.Rep. Prog. Phys.201376707260110.1088/0034‑4885/76/7/07260123764902
     [Google Scholar]
  115. WuM. TaoH. XuT. ZhengX. WenC. WangG. PengY. DaiY. Spatial proteomics: Unveiling the multidimensional landscape of protein localization in human diseases.Proteome Sci.2024221710.1186/s12953‑024‑00231‑239304896
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/ppl/10.2174/0109298665404512251021101809
Loading
Holographic Proteomics: A Review of Digital Holographic Microscopy Applications in Spatial Proteomics
PPL 32, 693 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0109298665404512251021101809
/content/journals/ppl/10.2174/0109298665404512251021101809
/content/journals/ppl/10.2174/0109298665404512251021101809
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

file format download Download

  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): Digital holographic microscopy (DHM); holographic proteomics; laser capture microdissection; optics; protein function and mechanism

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test