Skip to content
2000
Volume 25, Issue 20
  • ISSN: 1389-5575
  • E-ISSN: 1875-5607

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a transformative technology that has significantly influenced multiple sectors, including aviation, defence, architecture, and, more recently, healthcare and pharmaceuticals. Despite its growing adoption, there remain gaps in consolidated knowledge regarding its material versatility, regulatory considerations, and real-world implementation in clinical and pharmaceutical settings. Challenges related to biocompatibility, scalability, and the standardization of printed products hinder its full integration into medical practice. Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive understanding of the technological foundation, materials, and evolving applications of 3D printing in medicine. This review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of current advances, limitations, and prospects of 3D printing in healthcare. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, focusing on peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2024. The review highlights key fabrication techniques, material innovations, clinical applications, and integration with emerging technologies, addressing critical challenges and opportunities for advancing personalized medicine.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575381660250930170819
2025-10-16
2026-02-28

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575381660250930170819
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. TrenfieldS.J. AwadA. GoyanesA. GaisfordS. BasitA.W. 3D printing pharmaceuticals: Drug development to frontline care.Trends Pharmacol. Sci.201839544045110.1016/j.tips.2018.02.006 29534837
     [Google Scholar]
  2. JavaidM. HaleemA. SinghR.P. SumanR. 3D printing applications for healthcare research and development.Glob. Health J.20226421722610.1016/j.glohj.2022.11.001
     [Google Scholar]
  3. SenbekovM. SalievT. BukeyevaZ. AlmabayevaA. ZhanaliyevaM. AitenovaN. ToishibekovY. FakhradiyevI. The recent progress and applications of digital technologies in healthcare: A review.Int. J. Telemed. Appl.20202020883020010.1155/2020/883020033343657PMC7732404
     [Google Scholar]
  4. PrendergastM.E. BurdickJ.A. Recent advances in enabling technologies in 3D printing for precision medicine.Adv. Mater.20203213190251610.1002/adma.201902516 31512289
     [Google Scholar]
  5. LiN. KhanS.B. ChenS. AiyitiW. ZhouJ. LuB. Promising new horizons in medicine: Medical advancements with nanocomposite manufacturing via 3D printing.Polymers20231520412210.3390/polym15204122 37896366
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ChengQ.J. Grand challenges and perspectives in biomedical analysis and diagnostics.Front. Anal. Sci.2021170038610.3389/frans.2021.700386
     [Google Scholar]
  7. GhoshU. NingS. WangY. KongY.L. Addressing unmet clinical needs with 3D printing technologies.Adv. Healthc. Mater.2018717180041710.1002/adhm.201800417 30004185
     [Google Scholar]
  8. KalaskarD.M. 3D Printing in Medicine.Woodhead Publishing2022
     [Google Scholar]
  9. RamarajuH. AkmanR.E. SafranskiD.L. HollisterS.J. Designing biodegradable shape memory polymers for tissue repair.Adv. Funct. Mater.20203044200201410.1002/adfm.202002014
     [Google Scholar]
  10. ShididD.P. Design and manufacture of patient specific orthopaedic implants using selective laser melting (SLM) technology. Doctoral Philosphy, school of aerospace mechanical and manufacturing engineering college of science engineering and health RMIT university2016
  11. AbdollahiyanP. OroojalianF. MokhtarzadehA. de la GuardiaM. Hydrogel‐based 3d bioprinting for bone and cartilage tissue engineering.Biotechnol. J.20201512200009510.1002/biot.202000095 32869529
     [Google Scholar]
  12. FatimiA. OkoroO.V. PodstawczykD. Siminska-StannyJ. ShavandiA. Natural hydrogel-based bio-inks for 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: A review.Gels20228317910.3390/gels8030179 35323292
     [Google Scholar]
  13. WangY. LiJ. LiY. YangB. Biomimetic bioinks of nanofibrillar polymeric hydrogels for 3D bioprinting.Nano Today20213910118010.1016/j.nantod.2021.101180
     [Google Scholar]
  14. ZubK. HoeppenerS. SchubertU.S. Inkjet printing and 3D printing strategies for biosensing, analytical, and diagnostic applications.Adv. Mater.20223431210501510.1002/adma.202105015 35338719
     [Google Scholar]
  15. PuglieseL. MarconiS. NegrelloE. MauriV. PeriA. GalloV. AuricchioF. PietrabissaA. The clinical use of 3D printing in surgery.Updates Surg.201870338138810.1007/s13304‑018‑0586‑5 30167991
     [Google Scholar]
  16. AlzoubiL. AljabaliA.A.A. TambuwalaM.M. Empowering precision medicine: The impact of 3D printing on personalized therapeutic.AAPS PharmSciTech202324822810.1208/s12249‑023‑02682‑w 37964180
     [Google Scholar]
  17. KarakurtI. LinL. 3D printing technologies: Techniques, materials, and post-processing.Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng.20202813414310.1016/j.coche.2020.04.001
     [Google Scholar]
  18. BozkurtY. KarayelE. 3D printing technology; methods, biomedical applications, future opportunities and trends.J. Mater. Res. Technol.2021141430145010.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.050
     [Google Scholar]
  19. AkhtarN. WaniA.K. JanM. SinhaS. DevkotaH.P. LiZ. Amin-Ul MannanM. PrakashA. Lactoferrin and activated protein C: Potential role in prevention of cancer progression and recurrence.Int. J. Mol. Cell. Med.2023121869910.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.12.1.86 37942258
     [Google Scholar]
  20. El-ZahabyS.A. KaurL. SharmaA. PrasadA.G. WaniA.K. SinghR. ZakariaM.Y. Lipoplexes’ structure, preparation, and role in managing different diseases.AAPS PharmSciTech202425513110.1208/s12249‑024‑02850‑6 38849687
     [Google Scholar]
  21. MishraA. SrivastavaV. Biomaterials and 3D printing techniques used in the medical field.J. Med. Eng. Technol.202145429030210.1080/03091902.2021.1893845 33929285
     [Google Scholar]
  22. FanD. LiY. WangX. ZhuT. WangQ. CaiH. LiW. TianY. LiuZ. Progressive 3D printing technology and its application in medical materials.Front. Pharmacol.20201112210.3389/fphar.2020.00122 32265689
     [Google Scholar]
  23. SahaR. SarkarM. ChoudhuryS.S. KumarH. BhattG. BhattacharyaS. Evolution of 3D printing technology in fabrication of microfluidic devices and biological applications: A comprehensive review.J. Micromanufacturing20247111014010.1177/25165984241237357
     [Google Scholar]
  24. ShaikhS. History and evolution of 3D printing. In: 3D Printing in Prosthetics and Orthotics Biomedical Materials for Multi-functional Applications.SingaporeSpringer202410.1007/978‑981‑97‑4913‑3_1
     [Google Scholar]
  25. LiawC.Y. GuvendirenM. Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in medicine.Biofabrication20179202410210.1088/1758‑5090/aa7279 28589921
     [Google Scholar]
  26. BecconiM. De ZioS. FalcianiF. SantamariaM. MalferrariM. RapinoS. Nano-electrochemical characterization of a 3D bioprinted cervical tumor model.Cancers 2023154132710.3390/cancers15041327 36831668
     [Google Scholar]
  27. SawhneyG. BhardwajA.R. SanuK. BhattacharyaD. SinghM. DhanjalD.S. AyubA. WaniA.K. SumanS. SinghR. ChopraC. Chapter 20 - Nanotechnology at the forefront of liver cancer diagnosis.In: Nanophototherapy. ManivasaganP. VenkatesanJ. JangE.S. Elsevier202557559310.1016/B978‑0‑443‑13937‑6.00004‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  28. WaniA.K. SinghR. AkhtarN. PrakashA. NepovimovaE. OleksakP. ChrienovaZ. AlomarS. ChopraC. KucaK. Targeted inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling axis: Potential for sarcoma therapy.Mini Rev. Med. Chem.202424161496152010.2174/0113895575270904231129062137 38265369
     [Google Scholar]
  29. SrinivasanD. MeignanamoorthyM. RavichandranM. MohanavelV. AlagarsamyS.V. ChanakyanC. SakthiveluS. KarthickA. PrabhuT.R. RajkumarS. 3D printing manufacturing techniques, materials, and applications: An overview.Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng.202120211575656310.1155/2021/5756563
     [Google Scholar]
  30. AimarA. PalermoA. InnocentiB. 3D printing in medicine.Woodhead2019
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Müller-HeuptL.K. Wiesmann-ImilowskiN. SchröderS. GroßJ. ZiskovenP.C. BaniP. KämmererP.W. SchiegnitzE. EckeltA. EckeltJ. RitzU. OpatzT. Al-NawasB. SynatschkeC.V. DeschnerJ. Oxygen-releasing hyaluronic acid-based dispersion with controlled oxygen delivery for enhanced periodontal tissue engineering.Int. J. Mol. Sci.2023246593610.3390/ijms24065936 36983008
     [Google Scholar]
  32. EspinozaS.M. PatilH.I. San Martin-MartinezE. PimentelR.C. IgeP.P. Poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL), a promising polymer for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications: Focus on nanomedicine in cancer.Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater20196928512610.1080/00914037.2018.1539990
     [Google Scholar]
  33. KirillovaA. YeazelT.R. AsheghaliD. PetersenS.R. DortS. GallK. BeckerM.L. Fabrication of biomedical scaffolds using biodegradable polymers.Chem. Rev.202112118112381130410.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01200 33856196
     [Google Scholar]
  34. BajpaiP. BajpaiM. Development of a high performance hybrid epoxy silicone resin for coatings.Pigm. Resin Technol.20103929610010.1108/03699421011028680
     [Google Scholar]
  35. HaleemA. JavaidM. 3D scanning applications in medical field: A literature-based review.Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health20197219921010.1016/j.cegh.2018.05.006
     [Google Scholar]
  36. JinY. LiX. CampbellR.I. JiS. Visualizing the hotspots and emerging trends of 3D printing through scientometrics.Rapid Prototyping J.201824580181210.1108/RPJ‑05‑2017‑0100
     [Google Scholar]
  37. PaulS.C. van ZijlG.P.A.G. TanM.J. GibsonI. A review of 3D concrete printing systems and materials properties: Current status and future research prospects.Rapid Prototyping J.201824478479810.1108/RPJ‑09‑2016‑0154
     [Google Scholar]
  38. RyderG. IonB. GreenG. HarrisonD. WoodB. WoodB. Rapid design and manufacture tools in architecture.Autom. Construct.200211327929010.1016/S0926‑5805(00)00111‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  39. DwivediG. SrivastavaS.K. SrivastavaR.K. Analysis of barriers to implement additive manufacturing technology in the indian automotive sector.Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag.2017471097299110.1108/IJPDLM‑07‑2017‑0222
     [Google Scholar]
  40. BuswellR.A. SoarR.C. GibbA.G.F. ThorpeA. Freeform construction: Mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction.Autom. Construct.200716222423110.1016/j.autcon.2006.05.002
     [Google Scholar]
  41. KoyrattyB.N.S. AumjaudB. Amnee NeeliahS. Food additive control: A survey among selected consumers and manufacturers.Br. Food J.2014116235337210.1108/BFJ‑05‑2012‑0125
     [Google Scholar]
  42. LiuF. XieS. WangY. YuJ. MengQ. Preparation of the polymerizable titania oriented to 3D printing and the laser-induced crystallization.Rapid Prototyping J.20182491421142710.1108/RPJ‑03‑2017‑0041
     [Google Scholar]
  43. SkawińskiI. Goetzendorf-GrabowskiT. FDM 3D printing method utility assessment in small RC aircraft design.Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol.201991686587210.1108/AEAT‑07‑2018‑0189
     [Google Scholar]
  44. NsengimanaJ. Van der WaltJ. PeiE. MiahM. Effect of post-processing on the dimensional accuracy of small plastic additive manufactured parts.Rapid Prototyping J.201925111210.1108/RPJ‑09‑2016‑0153
     [Google Scholar]
  45. TiwariS.K. PandeS. AgrawalS. BobadeS.M. Selection of selective laser sintering materials for different applications.Rapid Prototyping J.201521663064810.1108/RPJ‑03‑2013‑0027
     [Google Scholar]
  46. AwasthiS. VermaT. AgarwalM. SinghJ.V. SrivastavaN.M. NichterM. Developing effective health communication messages for community acquired pneumonia in children under five years of age: A rural North Indian qualitative study.Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health20175310711610.1016/j.cegh.2017.01.001
     [Google Scholar]
  47. BistolfiA. GiustraF. BoscoF. SabatiniL. ApratoA. BraccoP. BellareA. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for hip and knee arthroplasty: The present and the future.J. Orthop.2021259810610.1016/j.jor.2021.04.004 33994706
     [Google Scholar]
  48. PeiE. ShenJ. WatlingJ. Direct 3D printing of polymers onto textiles: Experimental studies and applications.Rapid Prototyping J.201521555657110.1108/RPJ‑09‑2014‑0126
     [Google Scholar]
  49. SayedS. GamilM. Fath El-BabA. NakamuraK. TsuchiyaT. TabataO. Abd El-MoneimA. Graphene film development on flexible substrate using a new technique: Temperature dependency of gauge factor for graphene-based strain sensors.Sens. Rev.201636214014710.1108/SR‑07‑2015‑0114
     [Google Scholar]
  50. DrummerD. Cifuentes-CuéllarS. RietzelD. Suitability of PLA/TCP for fused deposition modeling.Rapid Prototyping J.201218650050710.1108/13552541211272045
     [Google Scholar]
  51. GrassoM. AzzouzL. Ruiz-HincapieP. ZarrelliM. RenG. Effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed PLA tensile specimens.Rapid Prototyping J.20182481337134610.1108/RPJ‑04‑2017‑0055
     [Google Scholar]
  52. HamadK. KaseemM. YangH.W. DeriF. KoY.G. Properties and medical applications of polylactic acid: A review.Express Polym. Lett.20159543545510.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.42
     [Google Scholar]
  53. LeeK. ChaC. Advanced polymer-based bioink technology for printing soft biomaterials.Macromol. Res.202028868970210.1007/s13233‑020‑8134‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  54. ChimeneD. LennoxK.K. KaunasR.R. GaharwarA.K. Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: A materials science perspective.Ann. Biomed. Eng.20164462090210210.1007/s10439‑016‑1638‑y 27184494
     [Google Scholar]
  55. PradeepP.V. PaulL. Review on novel biomaterials and innovative 3D printing techniques in biomedical applications.Mater. Today Proc.2022589610310.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.072
     [Google Scholar]
  56. MorganF.L.C. MoroniL. BakerM.B. Dynamic bioinks to advance bioprinting.Adv. Health. Mater.2020915190179810.1002/adhm.201901798 32100963
     [Google Scholar]
  57. DaminaboS.C. GoelS. GrammatikosS.A. NezhadH.Y. ThakurV.K. Fused deposition modeling-based additive manufacturing (3D printing): Techniques for polymer material systems.Mater. Today Chem.20201610024810.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100248
     [Google Scholar]
  58. KapetaniouC. RiepleA. PilkingtonA. FrandsenT. PisanoP. Building the layers of a new manufacturing taxonomy: How 3D printing is creating a new landscape of production eco-systems and competitive dynamics.Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change2018128223510.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.011
     [Google Scholar]
  59. GaoW. ZhangY. RamanujanD. RamaniK. ChenY. WilliamsC.B. WangC.C.L. ShinY.C. ZhangS. ZavattieriP.D. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering.Comput. Aided Des.201569658910.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001
     [Google Scholar]
  60. TopN. Şahinİ. GökçeH. GökçeH. Computer-aided design and additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds for tissue engineering: State of the art.J. Mater. Res.202136193725374510.1557/s43578‑021‑00156‑y
     [Google Scholar]
  61. NgO.L. ChanT. Learning as making: Using 3D computer‐aided design to enhance the learning of shape and space in STEM‐integrated ways.Br. J. Educ. Technol.201950129430810.1111/bjet.12643
     [Google Scholar]
  62. AyubA. WaniA.K. ChopraC. SharmaD.K. AminO. WaniA.W. SinghA. ManzoorS. SinghR. Advancing dye degradation: integrating microbial metabolism, photocatalysis, and nanotechnology for eco-friendly solutions.Bacteria2025411510.3390/bacteria4010015
     [Google Scholar]
  63. MustaphaK.B. MetwalliK.M. A review of fused deposition modelling for 3D printing of smart polymeric materials and composites.Eur. Polym. J.202115611059110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110591
     [Google Scholar]
  64. HuC. QinQ.H. Advances in fused deposition modeling of discontinuous fiber/polymer composites.Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.202024510086710.1016/j.cossms.2020.100867
     [Google Scholar]
  65. StewartS. Domínguez-RoblesJ. McIlorumV. MancusoE. LamprouD. DonnellyR. LarrañetaE. Development of a biodegradable subcutaneous implant for prolonged drug delivery using 3D printing.Pharmaceutics202012210510.3390/pharmaceutics12020105 32013052
     [Google Scholar]
  66. GiriS. TrewynB.G. StellmakerM.P. LinV.S.Y. Stimuli-responsive controlled-release delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanorods capped with magnetic nanoparticles.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.200544325038504410.1002/anie.200501819 16038000
     [Google Scholar]
  67. HealyA.V. FuenmayorE. DoranP. GeeverL.M. HigginbothamC.L. LyonsJ.G. Additive manufacturing of personalized pharmaceutical dosage forms via stereolithography.Pharmaceutics2019111264510.3390/pharmaceutics11120645 31816898
     [Google Scholar]
  68. FinaF. GoyanesA. MadlaC.M. AwadA. TrenfieldS.J. KuekJ.M. PatelP. GaisfordS. BasitA.W. 3D printing of drug-loaded gyroid lattices using selective laser sintering.Int. J. Pharm.20185471-2445210.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.05.044 29787894
     [Google Scholar]
  69. WalczakR. AdamskiK. Inkjet 3D printing of microfluidic structures—on the selection of the printer towards printing your own microfluidic chips.J. Micromech. Microeng.201525808501310.1088/0960‑1317/25/8/085013
     [Google Scholar]
  70. KondiahP.J. KondiahP.P.D. ChoonaraY.E. MarimuthuT. PillayV. A 3D bioprinted pseudo-bone drug delivery scaffold for bone tissue engineering.Pharmaceutics202012216610.3390/pharmaceutics12020166 32079221
     [Google Scholar]
  71. WaniA.K. RahayuF. Ben AmorI. QuadirM. MurianingrumM. ParnidiP. AyubA. SupriyadiS. SakirohS. SaefudinS. KumarA. LatifahE. Environmental resilience through artificial intelligence: Innovations in monitoring and management.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20243112183791839510.1007/s11356‑024‑32404‑z 38358626
     [Google Scholar]
  72. BakhtiarS.M. ButtH.A. ZebS. QuddusiD.M. GulS. DilshadE. 3D printing technologies and their applications in biomedical science.In: Omics technologies and bio-engineering.Elsevier201816718910.1016/B978‑0‑12‑804659‑3.00010‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  73. AyubA. RahayuF. KhamidahA. AntarlinaS.S. IswariK. SupriyadiK. MufidahE. SinghA. ChopraC. WaniA.K. Harnessing microalgae as a bioresource for nutraceuticals: Advancing bioactive compound exploration and shaping the future of health and functional food innovation.Disc. Appl. Sci.20257538910.1007/s42452‑025‑06916‑3
     [Google Scholar]
  74. SunZ. Insights into 3D printing in medical applications.Quant. Imaging Med. Surg.2019911510.21037/qims.2019.01.03 30788241
     [Google Scholar]
  75. AyubA. WaniA.K. SinghR. SinghA. Américo-PinheiroJ.H.P. MuzamilS. DarM.A. RahayuF. Application of computational and in silico strategies for sustainable future biofuels and bioenergy.In: Recent Trends in Lignocellulosic Biofuels and Bioenergy. DarM.A. ZabedH.M. ShahnawazM. SingaporeSpringer202510.1007/978‑981‑96‑4636‑4_14
     [Google Scholar]
  76. HannS.Y. CuiH. EsworthyT. MiaoS. ZhouX. LeeS. FisherJ.P. ZhangL.G. Recent advances in 3D printing: Vascular network for tissue and organ regeneration.Transl. Res.2019211466310.1016/j.trsl.2019.04.002 31004563
     [Google Scholar]
  77. DoA.V. KhorsandB. GearyS.M. SalemA.K. 3D printing of scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications.Adv. Health Mater.20154121742176210.1002/adhm.201500168 26097108
     [Google Scholar]
  78. ShenH. FanC. YouZ. XiaoZ. ZhaoY. DaiJ. Advances in biomaterial‐based spinal cord injury repair.Adv. Funct. Mater.20223213211062810.1002/adfm.202110628
     [Google Scholar]
  79. BoutenC.V.C. ChengC. VermueI.M. GawlittaD. PassierR. Cardiovascular tissue engineering and regeneration: A plead for further knowledge convergence.Tissue Eng. Part A20222811-1252554110.1089/ten.tea.2021.0231 35382591
     [Google Scholar]
  80. FuchsS. ErnstA.U. WangL.H. ShariatiK. WangX. LiuQ. MaM. Hydrogels in emerging technologies for type 1 diabetes.Chem. Rev.202112118114581152610.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01062 33370102
     [Google Scholar]
  81. BhatAA. AyubA. WaniAK. Bioactive compounds in active food packaging (ACP): Health and safety considerations.In: Green Materials for Active Food. Packaging; Islam, Su. ShahidM. SingaporeSpringer202510.1007/978‑981‑96‑0369‑5_10
     [Google Scholar]
  82. ZhangY. 3D printing for cancer diagnosis: What unique advantages are gained?ACS Materials Au20233662063510.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c00046 38089653
     [Google Scholar]
  83. SerranoD.R. TerresM.C. LalatsaA. Applications of 3D printing in cancerJ. 3D Print Med20182115127
     [Google Scholar]
  84. BhuskuteH. ShendeP. PrabhakarB. 3D printed personalized medicine for cancer: Applications for betterment of diagnosis, prognosis and treatment.AAPS PharmSciTech2021231810.1208/s12249‑021‑02153‑0 34853934
     [Google Scholar]
  85. HughesA.M. KolbA.D. ShuppA.B. ShineK.M. BussardK.M. Printing the pathway forward in bone metastatic cancer research: Applications of 3D engineered models and bioprinted scaffolds to recapitulate the bone–tumor niche.Cancers202113350710.3390/cancers13030507 33572757
     [Google Scholar]
  86. WanL. NeumannC.A. LeDucP.R. Tumor-on-a-chip for integrating a 3D tumor microenvironment: Chemical and mechanical factors.Lab Chip202020587388810.1039/C9LC00550A 32025687
     [Google Scholar]
  87. WaniA.K. PrakashA. SenaS. AkhtarN. SinghR. ChopraC. AriyantiE.E. MudianaD. YuliaN.D. RahayuF. Unraveling molecular signatures in rare bone tumors and navigating the cancer pathway landscapes for targeted therapeutics.Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.202419610429110.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104291 38346462
     [Google Scholar]
  88. WaniA.K. AkhtarN. MirT.G. SinghR. JhaP.K. MallikS.K. SinhaS. TripathiS.K. JainA. JhaA. DevkotaH.P. PrakashA. Targeting apoptotic pathway of cancer cells with phytochemicals and plant-based nanomaterials.Biomolecules202313219410.3390/biom13020194 36830564
     [Google Scholar]
  89. ShuklaP. YeleswarapuS. HeinrichM.A. PrakashJ. PatiF. Mimicking tumor microenvironment by 3D bioprinting: 3D cancer modeling.Biofabrication202214303200210.1088/1758‑5090/ac6d11 35512666
     [Google Scholar]
  90. SaberianE. JenčaA. PetrášováA. Zare-ZardiniH. EbrahimifarM. Application of scaffold-based drug delivery in oral cancer treatment: A novel approach.Pharmaceutics202416680210.3390/pharmaceutics16060802 38931923
     [Google Scholar]
  91. De SouzaR. ZahediP. AllenC.J. Piquette-MillerM. Polymeric drug delivery systems for localized cancer chemotherapy.Drug Deliv.201017636537510.3109/10717541003762854 20429844
     [Google Scholar]
  92. AugustineR. KalvaS.N. AhmadR. ZahidA.A. HasanS. NayeemA. McClementsL. HasanA. 3D Bioprinted cancer models: Revolutionizing personalized cancer therapy.Transl. Oncol.202114410101510.1016/j.tranon.2021.101015 33493799
     [Google Scholar]
  93. GermainN. DhayerM. DekioukS. MarchettiP. Current advances in 3D bioprinting for cancer modeling and personalized medicine.Int. J. Mol. Sci.2022237343210.3390/ijms23073432 35408789
     [Google Scholar]
  94. StanciuJ. Tariman, JD Liquid biopsy: A tool for the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of cancers.Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs.2020241192110.1188/20.CJON.19‑21 31961840
     [Google Scholar]
  95. SodaN. ClackK. ShiddikyM.J.A. Recent advances in liquid biopsy technologies for cancer biomarker detection.Sens. Diagn.20221334337510.1039/D2SD00010E
     [Google Scholar]
  96. SinghH. ChopraC. SinghH. MalgotraV. Khurshid WaniA. Singh DhanjalD. SharmaI. NepovimovaE. AlomarS. SinghR. SharmaV. KucaK. Gut-brain axis and Alzheimer’s disease: Therapeutic interventions and strategies.J. Funct. Foods202411210591510.1016/j.jff.2023.105915
     [Google Scholar]
  97. El-ZahabyS.A. WaniA.K. AkhtarN. SharmaA. Fighting carcinogenesis with plant metabolites by weakening proliferative signaling and disabling replicative immortality networks of rapidly dividing and invading cancerous cells.Curr. Drug Deliv.202320437138610.2174/1567201819666220414085606 35422214
     [Google Scholar]
  98. ZhangR. AkhtarN. WaniA.K. RazaK. KaushikV. Discovering deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms of human AKT1 oncogene: An in silico study.Life2023137153210.3390/life13071532 37511907
     [Google Scholar]
  99. LiY. LiuJ. XuS. WangJ. 3D Bioprinting: An important tool for tumor microenvironment research.Int. J. Nanomedicine202318188039805710.2147/IJN.S435845 38164264
     [Google Scholar]
  100. ZouS. YeJ. WeiY. XuJ. Characterization of 3D-bioprinted in vitro lung cancer models using RNA-sequencing techniques.Bioengineering202310666710.3390/bioengineering10060667 37370598
     [Google Scholar]
  101. DaiX. ShaoY. TianX. CaoX. YeL. GaoP. ChengH. WangX. Fusion between glioma stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells promotes malignant progression in 3D-bioprinted models.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces20221431353443535610.1021/acsami.2c06658 35881920
     [Google Scholar]
  102. ZhaoY. YaoR. OuyangL. DingH. ZhangT. ZhangK. ChengS. SunW. Three-dimensional printing of Hela cells for cervical tumor model in vitro.Biofabrication20146303500110.1088/1758‑5082/6/3/035001 24722236
     [Google Scholar]
  103. WangP. SunL. LiC. JinB. YangH. WuB. MaoY. Study on drug screening multicellular model for colorectal cancer constructed by three-dimensional bioprinting technology.Int. J. Bioprint20239369410.18063/ijb.694 37273979PMC10236483
     [Google Scholar]
  104. ChenH. ChengY. WangX. WangJ. ShiX. LiX. TanW. TanZ. 3D printed in vitro tumor tissue model of colorectal cancer.Theranostics20201026121271214310.7150/thno.52450 33204333
     [Google Scholar]
  105. WangJ. JinX. Strategies for decellularization, re-cellularIzation and crosslinking in liver bioengineering.Int. J. Artif. Organs202447312913910.1177/03913988231218566 38253541
     [Google Scholar]
  106. LiuY. Exosome: Important cancer actors and potential treatment method.Proc SPIE 12924, Third International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science (ICBioMed2023); 129240G202410.1117/12.3012947
     [Google Scholar]
  107. XuJ. YangS. SuY. HuX. XiY. ChengY.Y. KangY. NieY. PanB. SongK.A. 3D bioprinted tumor model fabricated with gelatin/sodium alginate/decellularized extracellular matrix bioink.Int. J. Bioprint20229163010.18063/ijb.v9i1.63036844237PMC9947382
     [Google Scholar]
  108. ChoongY.Y.C. TanH.W. PatelD.C. ChoongW.T.N. ChenC.H. LowH.Y. TanM.J. PatelC.D. ChuaC.K. The global rise of 3D printing during the COVID-19 pandemic.Nat. Rev. Mater.20205963763910.1038/s41578‑020‑00234‑3 35194517
     [Google Scholar]
  109. ProfiliJ. BrunetR. DuboisÉ.L. GroenhuisV. HofL.A. Use of 3D printed connectors to redesign full face snorkeling masks in the COVID-19 era: A preliminary technical case-studyAnn. 3D Print Med.2021310002310.1016/j.stlm.2021.100023 38620734
  110. WilloxM. MetherallP. Jeays-WardK. McCarthyA.D. BarkerN. ReedH. ElphickH.E. Custom-made 3D printed masks for children using non-invasive ventilation: A feasibility study of production method and testing of outcomes in adult volunteers.J. Med. Eng. Technol.202044521322310.1080/03091902.2020.1769759 32597695
     [Google Scholar]
  111. LonghitanoG.A. NunesG.B. CandidoG. da SilvaJ.V.L. The role of 3D printing during COVID-19 pandemic: A review.Prog. Addit. Manuf.202161193710.1007/s40964‑020‑00159‑x 38624444
     [Google Scholar]
  112. SmaldoneR.A. BrownK.A. GuG.X. KeC. Using 3D printing as a research tool for materials discovery.Device20231110001410.1016/j.device.2023.100014
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Pavan KalyanB.G. KumarL. 3D Printing: Applications in tissue engineering, medical devices, and drug delivery.AAPS PharmSciTech20222349210.1208/s12249‑022‑02242‑8 35301602
     [Google Scholar]
  114. PaloM. HolländerJ. SuominenJ. YliruusiJ. SandlerN. 3D printed drug delivery devices: Perspectives and technical challenges.Expert Rev. Med. Devices201714968569610.1080/17434440.2017.1363647 28774216
     [Google Scholar]
  115. VentolaC.L. Medical applications for 3D printing: Current and projected uses.P&T20143910704711 25336867
     [Google Scholar]
  116. HaleemA. JavaidM. VaishyaR. 3D printing applications for the treatment of cancer.Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health2020841072107610.1016/j.cegh.2020.03.022
     [Google Scholar]
  117. RaiK. PradhanU.U. Empowering advances in medical devices with 3D-printing technology3D printing technology and its diverse applications.Apple Academic Press2021155188
     [Google Scholar]
  118. RamzanM. SabirM. SinghS. DebnathA. Three-dimensional hydrogel bioprinting technology as a scaffold of novel drug delivery and biomedical devices: A comprehensive review.BIO Web of Conferences20248650101310.1051/bioconf/20248601013
     [Google Scholar]
  119. ParhiR. A review of three-dimensional printing for pharmaceutical applications: Quality control, risk assessment and future perspectives.J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.20216410257110.1016/j.jddst.2021.102571
     [Google Scholar]
  120. TaoJ. ZhangJ. HuY. YangY. GouZ. DuT. MaoJ. GouM. A conformal hydrogel nanocomposite for local delivery of paclitaxel.J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.201728110711810.1080/09205063.2016.1250344 27765001
     [Google Scholar]
  121. GoyanesA. ChangH. SedoughD. HattonG.B. WangJ. BuanzA. GaisfordS. BasitA.W. Fabrication of controlled-release budesonide tablets via desktop (FDM) 3D printing.Int. J. Pharm.2015496241442010.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.039 26481468
     [Google Scholar]
  122. EhtezaziT. AlgellayM. IslamY. RobertsM. DempsterN.M. SarkerS.D. The application of 3D printing in the formulation of multilayered fast dissolving oral films.J. Pharm. Sci.201810741076108510.1016/j.xphs.2017.11.019 29208374
     [Google Scholar]
  123. MartinezP.R. GoyanesA. BasitA.W. GaisfordS. Fabrication of drug-loaded hydrogels with stereolithographic 3D printing.Int. J. Pharm.2017532131331710.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.003 28888978
     [Google Scholar]
  124. KhaledS.A. BurleyJ.C. AlexanderM.R. RobertsC.J. Desktop 3D printing of controlled release pharmaceutical bilayer tablets.Int. J. Pharm.20144611-210511110.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.021 24280018
     [Google Scholar]
  125. GeninaN. BoetkerJ.P. ColomboS. HarmankayaN. RantanenJ. BohrA. Anti-tuberculosis drug combination for controlled oral delivery using 3D printed compartmental dosage forms: From drug product design to in vivo testing.J. Control. Release2017268404810.1016/j.jconrel.2017.10.003 28993169
     [Google Scholar]
  126. MaroniA. MelocchiA. PariettiF. FoppoliA. ZemaL. GazzanigaA. 3D printed multi-compartment capsular devices for two-pulse oral drug delivery.J. Control. Release2017268101810.1016/j.jconrel.2017.10.008 29030223
     [Google Scholar]
  127. BeckR.C.R. ChavesP.S. GoyanesA. VukosavljevicB. BuanzA. WindbergsM. BasitA.W. GaisfordS. 3D printed tablets loaded with polymeric nanocapsules: An innovative approach to produce customized drug delivery systems.Int. J. Pharm.20175281-226827910.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.074 28583328
     [Google Scholar]
  128. SadiaM. ArafatB. AhmedW. ForbesR.T. AlhnanM.A. Channelled tablets: An innovative approach to accelerating drug release from 3D printed tablets.J. Control. Release201826935536310.1016/j.jconrel.2017.11.022 29146240
     [Google Scholar]
  129. VakiliH. KolakovicR. GeninaN. MarmionM. SaloH. IhalainenP. PeltonenJ. SandlerN. Hyperspectral imaging in quality control of inkjet printed personalised dosage forms.Int. J. Pharm.20154831-224424910.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.034 25527212
     [Google Scholar]
  130. PereC.P.P. EconomidouS.N. LallG. ZiraudC. BoatengJ.S. AlexanderB.D. LamprouD.A. DouroumisD. 3D printed microneedles for insulin skin delivery.Int. J. Pharm.2018544242543210.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.03.031 29555437
     [Google Scholar]
  131. PaxtonN.C. NightingaleR.C. WoodruffM.A. Capturing patient anatomy for designing and manufacturing personalized prostheses.Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.20227328228910.1016/j.copbio.2021.09.004 34601260
     [Google Scholar]
  132. KuhlJ. DingA. NgoN.T. BraschkatA. FiehlerJ. KrauseD. Design of personalized devices—the tradeoff between individual value and personalization workload.Appl. Sci.202011124110.3390/app11010241
     [Google Scholar]
  133. NaminA.T. JalaliM.S. VahdatV. BedairH.S. O’ConnorM.I. KamarthiS. IsaacsJ.A. Adoption of new medical technologies: The case of customized individually made knee implants.Value Health201922442343010.1016/j.jval.2019.01.008 30975393
     [Google Scholar]
  134. JinZ. HeC. FuJ. HanQ. HeY. Balancing the customization and standardization: Exploration and layout surrounding the regulation of the growing field of 3D-printed medical devices in china.Biodes. Manuf.20225358060610.1007/s42242‑022‑00187‑2 35194519
     [Google Scholar]
  135. PravinS. SudhirA. Integration of 3D printing with dosage forms: A new perspective for modern healthcare.Biomed. Pharmacother.201810714615410.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.167 30086461
     [Google Scholar]
  136. MelnykL.A. OyewumiM.O. Integration of 3D printing technology in pharmaceutical compounding: Progress, prospects, and challengesAnn 3D Print Med20214100035
     [Google Scholar]
  137. ChongS. PanG.T. ChinJ. ShowP.L. YangT.C.K. HuangC.M. Integration of 3D printing and industry 4.0 into engineering teaching.Sustainability20181011396010.3390/su10113960
     [Google Scholar]
  138. WeiQ. LiH. LiuG. HeY. WangY. TanY.E. WangD. PengX. YangG. TsubakiN. Metal 3D printing technology for functional integration of catalytic system.Nat. Commun.2020111409810.1038/s41467‑020‑17941‑8 32796863
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Rodríguez-EspíndolaO. ChowdhuryS. BeltaguiA. AlboresP. The potential of emergent disruptive technologies for humanitarian supply chains: The integration of blockchain, artificial intelligence and 3D printing.Int. J. Prod. Res.202058154610463010.1080/00207543.2020.1761565
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Akpa-InyangF. RocherA. O’ConnorM. MaraisL. Ethical and regulatory issues in the application of 3D printing in orthopaedics: A scoping review.J. Orthop. Reps.202542 Suppl.10061010.1016/j.jorep.2025.100610
     [Google Scholar]
  141. LevineH.R. Anticipating regulatory reform: The implications of machine-learning technology on the us food and drug administration’s regulatory approval process for medical devices.Seton Hall Rev.201950805
     [Google Scholar]
  142. PugliesiR.A. Ethical considerations in the advent of 3D printing technology in healthcare.Contemp. Issues Behav. Soc. Sci.202041429
     [Google Scholar]
  143. ReisM.E. BettencourtA. RibeiroH.M. The regulatory challenges of innovative customized combination products.Front. Med.2022982109410.3389/fmed.2022.821094 35935795
     [Google Scholar]
  144. QiJ. WeiS. The impact of medical devices regulations on notified bodies and additive manufacturing.2020Available from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1446126/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  145. OrganizationW.H. Western Pacific Regional Action Agenda on Regulatory Strengthening.Convergence and cooperation for medicines and the health workforce2020Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789290618942
    [Google Scholar]
  146. VallaV. TzelepiK. CharitouP. LewisA. PolatidisB. KoukouraA. KarapatsiaA. AntonopoulouK. ProdromidouK. PapadakiE. VassiliadisE. Use of real-world evidence for international regulatory decision making in medical devices.Int. J. Dig. Health202331110.29337/ijdh.50
     [Google Scholar]
  147. DudalaS. GoelS. 3D printing: Challenges and future opportunities. In: 3D printed smart sensors and energy harvesting devices: Concepts, fabrication and applications.UKIOP Publishing Bristol2024141
     [Google Scholar]
  148. GautamK. GogoiD. KongnyuiT.D. DeviS. KumarC. KumarM. A comprehensive review on surface modifications of polymer‐based 3D‐printed structures: Metal coating prospects and challenges.Polym. Adv. Technol.2024354e636910.1002/pat.6369
     [Google Scholar]
  149. GhilanA. ChiriacA.P. NitaL.E. RusuA.G. NeamtuI. ChiriacV.M. Trends in 3D printing processes for biomedical field: Opportunities and challenges.J. Polym. Environ.20202851345136710.1007/s10924‑020‑01722‑x 32435165
     [Google Scholar]
  150. WaseemM. TahirA.U. MajeedY. Printing the future of food: The physics perspective on 3D food printing.Food Physics2024110000310.1016/j.foodp.2023.100003
     [Google Scholar]
  151. DananjayaV. MarimuthuS. YangR.C. GraceA.N. AbeykoonC. Synthesis, properties, applications, 3D printing and machine learning of graphene quantum dots in polymer nanocomposites.Prog. Mater. Sci.202414410128210.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101282
     [Google Scholar]
  152. de SouzaE.A. BorgesP.H.R. StengelT. NematollahiB. BosF.P. 3D printed sustainable low-cost materials for construction of affordable social housing in Brazil: Potential, challenges, and research needs.J. Build. Eng.20248710898510.1016/j.jobe.2024.108985
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575381660250930170819
Loading
The Role of 3D Printing in Revolutionizing Pharmaceuticals and Medicine
Mini Rev Med Chem 25, 1539 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0113895575381660250930170819
/content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575381660250930170819
/content/journals/mrmc/10.2174/0113895575381660250930170819
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): 3D printing; drug delivery; fabricating materials; medicine; tissue engineering; titanium

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test