Skip to content
2000
Volume 22, Issue 7
  • ISSN: 1570-1786
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6255

Abstract

Wound healing is a natural phenomenon that allows tissue to repair itself after any injury. To minimize any complexity associated with wounds, they are managed with medications. Nowadays, there is growing interest in alternative sources of medication. Scientists are contemplating finding more potential in plant compounds that are promising drug targets in blood coagulation, inflammation, and wound healing research. Although there are well-established pharmaceutical products on the market for blood clotting, identifying the plant-based lead compound is challenging in hemostats and wound care. The phenomenon by which these plant compounds trigger the healing mechanism is still unknown. The current investigation aims to screen the bioactive compounds in that are responsible for hemostasis activity. Gas chromatography Mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to perform chemical profiling of leaf extracts in different solvents. Molecular docking was performed by using AutoDock Vina to screen the identified bioactive molecules against twenty-one target proteins found in the blood coagulation pathway. To confirm the overall structural stability of protein-ligand interactions, 100 ns molecular dynamics simulations were performed with only the A1 domain of the Von Willebrand Factor (1 AUQ), calculating RMSD (Root mean square deviation), C-alpha fluctuations, and RMSF (Root mean square fluctuations) values. Furthermore, binding energies were validated using Mechanics Poisson Boltzmann (MMPBSA) software. These ligands can be used as potential blood coagulants and wound healers after extensive investigations to assess their potential toxicological activities.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786334548241226094122
2025-01-17
2025-09-08

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786334548241226094122
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. RheeP. BrownC. MartinM. SalimA. PluradD. GreenD. ChambersL. DemetriadesD. VelmahosG. AlamH. J. Trauma20086441093109910.1097/TA.0b013e31812f6dbc 18404080
     [Google Scholar]
  2. YangX. LiuW. LiN. WangM. LiangB. UllahI. Luis NeveA. FengY. ChenH. ShiC. Biomater. Sci.20175122357236810.1039/C7BM00554G 29019480
     [Google Scholar]
  3. MandelbaumS.H. Di SantisÉ.P. MandelbaumM.H.S.A. An. Bras. Dermatol.200378439340810.1590/S0365‑05962003000400002
     [Google Scholar]
  4. SenC.K. GordilloG.M. RoyS. KirsnerR. LambertL. HuntT.K. GottrupF. GurtnerG.C. LongakerM.T. Wound Repair Regen.200917676377110.1111/j.1524‑475X.2009.00543.x 19903300
     [Google Scholar]
  5. MannK.G. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res.19992361111111310.1016/S0140‑6736(00)02225‑X
     [Google Scholar]
  6. van DieijenG. TansG. RosingJ. HemkerH.C. J. Biol. Chem.198125673433344210.1016/S0021‑9258(19)69627‑4 6782101
     [Google Scholar]
  7. AnanyevaN.M. KouiavskaiaD.V. ShimaM. SaenkoE.L. Blood200299124475448510.1182/blood‑2001‑11‑0140 12036878
     [Google Scholar]
  8. SigeristH.E. A history of medicine.Oxford University Press198710.4324/9780429019883
     [Google Scholar]
  9. AchneckH.E. SileshiB. JamiolkowskiR.M. AlbalaD.M. ShapiroM.L. LawsonJ.H. Ann. Surg.2010251221722810.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c3bcca 20010084
     [Google Scholar]
  10. KitazawaT. IgawaT. SampeiZ. MutoA. KojimaT. SoedaT. YoshihashiK. Okuyama-NishidaY. SaitoH. TsunodaH. SuzukiT. AdachiH. MiyazakiT. IshiiS. Kamata-SakuraiM. IidaT. HaradaA. EsakiK. FunakiM. MoriyamaC. TanakaE. KikuchiY. WakabayashiT. WadaM. GotoM. ToyodaT. UeyamaA. SuzukiS. HarayaK. TachibanaT. KawabeY. ShimaM. YoshiokaA. HattoriK. Nat. Med.201218101570157410.1038/nm.2942 23023498
     [Google Scholar]
  11. EbrahimiF. TorbatiM. MahmoudiJ. ValizadehH. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.2020231102310.18433/jpps30446 32027817
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Al-SnafiA.E. Int. J. Pharmacol.201557681
     [Google Scholar]
  13. ChukwumahY. WalkerL. VoglerB. VergheseM. J. Agric. Food Chem.200755229266927310.1021/jf071877l 17924703
     [Google Scholar]
  14. AnsariS. JainP. TyagiR. JoshiB. BararF. Herba Pol.1983299396
     [Google Scholar]
  15. RaiL. SharmaE. Medicinal plants of the Sikkim Himalaya: Status, usage and potential.Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh1994
     [Google Scholar]
  16. SharmaO.P. DawraR.K. KuradeN.P. SharmaP.D. Nat. Toxins19986111410.1002/(SICI)1522‑7189(199802)6:1<1:AID‑NT3>3.0.CO;2‑E 9851506
     [Google Scholar]
  17. NegiA. SharmaN. SinghM.F. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem.20121112117
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ChuysinuanP. ChimnoiN. Reuk-NgamN. KhlaychanP. MakarasenA. WetprasitN. DechtriratD. SupapholP. TechasakulS. Polym. Bull.201976270172410.1007/s00289‑018‑2395‑x
     [Google Scholar]
  19. KumarN. SinghA. SharmaD. KishoreK. Rob. Int. J. Pharma Res. Health Sci.201751873187610.21276/ijprhs.2017.05.10
     [Google Scholar]
  20. KouranovA. XieL. de la CruzJ. ChenL. WestbrookJ. BourneP.E. BermanH.M. Nucleic Acids Res.20063490001D302D30510.1093/nar/gkj120 16381872
     [Google Scholar]
  21. HandcockM.S. HunterD.R. ButtsC.T. GoodreauS.M. MorrisM. J. Stat. Softw.20082411548766010.18637/jss.v024.i01 18618019
     [Google Scholar]
  22. TrottO. OlsonA.J. J. Comput. Chem.201031245546110.1002/jcc.21334 19499576
     [Google Scholar]
  23. KumarB. ParasuramanP. MurthyT.P.K. MurahariM. ChandramohanV. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.202240177796781410.1080/07391102.2021.1902394 33759690
     [Google Scholar]
  24. AryaH. SyedS.B. SinghS.S. AmpasalaD.R. CoumarM.S. Interdiscip. Sci.201810479280410.1007/s12539‑017‑0243‑6 28623462
     [Google Scholar]
  25. RajuB. VermaH. NarendraG. SapraB. SilakariO. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.202240177975799010.1080/07391102.2021.1905552 33769194
     [Google Scholar]
  26. SamreenS. QaisF.A. AhmadI. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.20174162189220110.1080/07391102.2022.2029564
     [Google Scholar]
  27. HuangJ. RauscherS. NawrockiG. RanT. FeigM. de GrootB.L. GrubmüllerH. MacKerellA.D.Jr Nat. Methods2017141717310.1038/nmeth.4067 27819658
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Der SpoelD. LindahlE. HessB. GroenhofG. MarkA.E. BerendsenH.J.C. J. Comput. Chem.200526161701171810.1002/jcc.20291 16211538
     [Google Scholar]
  29. SchüttelkopfA.W. van AaltenD.M.F. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr.20046081355136310.1107/S0907444904011679 15272157
     [Google Scholar]
  30. DardenT. YorkD. PedersenL. J. Chem. Phys.19939812100891009210.1063/1.464397
     [Google Scholar]
  31. HessB. BekkerH. BerendsenH.J.C. FraaijeJ.G.E.M. J. Comput. Chem.199718121463147210.1002/(SICI)1096‑987X(199709)18:12<1463:AID‑JCC4>3.0.CO;2‑H
     [Google Scholar]
  32. KumariR. KumarR. LynnA. LynnA. J. Chem. Inf. Model.20145471951196210.1021/ci500020m 24850022
     [Google Scholar]
  33. PrzybylakK.R. MaddenJ.C. Covey-CrumpE. GibsonL. BarberC. PatelM. CroninM.T.D. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol.201814216918110.1080/17425255.2017.1316449 28375027
     [Google Scholar]
  34. KarplusM. McCammon.J.A. Nat. Struct. Biol.20029964665210.1038/nsb0902‑646 12198485
     [Google Scholar]
  35. BorhaniD.W. ShawD.E. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des.2012261152610.1007/s10822‑011‑9517‑y 22183577
     [Google Scholar]
  36. LiuK. WatanabeE. KokuboH. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des.201731220121110.1007/s10822‑016‑0005‑2 28074360
     [Google Scholar]
  37. SawantS. PatilR. KhawateM. ZambreV. ShilimkarV. JagtapS. In Silico Pharmacol.2021914410.1007/s40203‑021‑00107‑9 34306960
     [Google Scholar]
  38. NiranjanV. RaoA. JanakiB. UttarkarA. SetlurA.S. K, C.; M, U.Curr. Genomics202122860761910.2174/1389202923666211222161006 35386188
     [Google Scholar]
  39. AshrafR. BhattiH.N. Stigmasterol. A Centum of Valuable Plant Bioactives.Elsevier202110.1016/B978‑0‑12‑822923‑1.00019‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  40. ZhangH. LiS. SiY. XuH. Eur. J. Med. Chem.202122411371010.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113710 34315039
     [Google Scholar]
  41. SaleemM. Cancer Lett.2009285210911510.1016/j.canlet.2009.04.033 19464787
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Zouari BouassidaK. BardaaS. KhimiriM. RebaiiT. TounsiS. JlaielL. TriguiM. BioMed Res. Int.2017201711010.1155/2017/1047523 29201895
     [Google Scholar]
  43. DasS. VasudevaN. SharmaS. Org. Med. Chem. Lett.2014411310.1186/s13588‑014‑0013‑y 26548989
     [Google Scholar]
  44. NedaG. RabetaM.S. OngM.T. Int. Food Res. J.201320
     [Google Scholar]
  45. ScortichiniM. RossiM.P. J. Appl. Bacteriol.199171210911210.1111/j.1365‑2672.1991.tb02963.x
     [Google Scholar]
  46. MahatoS.B. SenS. Phytochemistry19974471185123610.1016/S0031‑9422(96)00639‑5 9115695
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Teuku HusniT.R. DarmawiD. AzwarA. JamilK.F. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res.2023141293310.4103/japtr.japtr_520_22 36950458
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Ramya DeviD. Sowmiya LakshnaS. Veena ParvathiS. Vedha HariB.N. S. Afr. J. Bot.201811940040910.1016/j.sajb.2018.10.005
     [Google Scholar]
  49. WangP. HuM. WangL. QuJ. LiuY. LiC. LiuZ. MaC. KangW.J. Future Foods20233215516210.1016/j.jfutfo.2022.12.006
     [Google Scholar]
  50. OhkuraN. YokouchiH. MimuraM. NakamuraR. AtsumiG. J. Intercult. Ethnopharmacol.201541192310.5455/jice.20141128032845 26401379
     [Google Scholar]
  51. EmsleyJ. CruzM. HandinR. LiddingtonR. J. Biol. Chem.199827317103961040110.1074/jbc.273.17.10396 9553097
     [Google Scholar]
  52. RanaG. PathakR.K. ShuklaR. BaunthiyalM. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.202038112413610.1080/07391102.2019.1568303 30676281
     [Google Scholar]
  53. SaleemU. KhalidS. ZaibS. AnwarF. AkhtarM.F. HussainL. SaleemA. AhmadB. BioMed Res. Int.2022202211610.1155/2022/1373160 36467883
     [Google Scholar]
  54. MokhtarN.A. TapF.M. TalibS.Z.A. KhairudinN.A. IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng.20211051101207810.1088/1757‑899X/1051/1/012078
     [Google Scholar]
  55. BalachandranA. ChoiS.B. BeataM.M. MałgorzataJ. FroemmingG.R.A. LavillaC.A.Jr BillacuraM.P. SiyumbwaS.N. OkechukwuP.N. Molecules2023283104310.3390/molecules28031043 36770709
     [Google Scholar]
  56. PandithH. ZhangX. LiggettJ. MinK.W. GritsanapanW. BaekS.J. ISRN Dermatol.201320131810.1155/2013/168269 23984087
     [Google Scholar]
  57. ShafaieS. AndalibS. ShafaeiH. MontaseriA. TavakolizadehM. Int. J. Mol. Cell. Med.20209323424610.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.9.3.234 33274186
     [Google Scholar]
  58. DuansakD. SomboonwongJ. PatumrajS. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc.2003293-4239246 14724347
     [Google Scholar]
  59. TakzareeN. HadjiakhondiA. HassanzadehG. RouiniM.R. ManayiA. ZolbinM.M. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.201694121285129010.1139/cjpp‑2015‑0460 27660884
     [Google Scholar]
  60. GalehdariH. NegahdariS. KesmatiM. RezaieA. ShariatiG. Int. J. Prev. Med.2017811810.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_338_16 28382194
     [Google Scholar]
  61. MoghadamS.E. Moridi FarimaniM. SorouryS. EbrahimiS.N. JabbarzadehE. Molecules20192410202210.3390/molecules24102022 31137844
     [Google Scholar]
  62. LiN. YangX. LiuW. XiG. WangM. LiangB. MaZ. FengY. ChenH. ShiC. Macromol. Biosci.20181811180020910.1002/mabi.201800209 30238611
     [Google Scholar]
  63. TamerT.M. AlsehliM.H. OmerA.M. AfifiT.H. SabetM.M. Mohy-EldinM.S. HassanM.A. Int. J. Mol. Sci.202122231305010.3390/ijms222313050 34884855
     [Google Scholar]
  64. SubramanianS. DuraipandianC. AlsayariA. RamachawolranG. WongL.S. SekarM. GanS.H. SubramaniyanV. SeethalakshmiS. JeyabalanS. DhanasekaranS. ChinniS.V. Mat RaniN.N.I. WahabS. Front. Pharmacol.202314109690510.3389/fphar.2023.1096905 36817128
     [Google Scholar]
  65. EkambaramR. SugumarM. KaruppasamyS. PrasadP. DharmalingamS.J. Drug Del.Sci. Tech.20227110328610.1016/j.jddst.2022.103286
     [Google Scholar]
  66. ChenJ. ChenD. ChenJ. ShenT. JinT. ZengB. LiL. YangC. MuZ. DengH. CaiX. Acta Biomater.2022146496510.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.043 35500813
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Pérez-RafaelS. IvanovaK. StefanovI. PuiggalíJ. del ValleL.J. TodorovaK. DimitrovP. Hinojosa-CaballeroD. TzanovT. Acta Biomater.202113413114310.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.020 34271166
     [Google Scholar]
  68. ChenG. HeL. ZhangP. ZhangJ. MeiX. WangD. ZhangY. RenX. ChenZ. Mater. Sci. Eng. C.202011011068610.1016/j.msec.2020.110686 32204114
     [Google Scholar]
  69. LiuJ. QuM. WangC. XueY. HuangH. ChenQ. SunW. ZhouX. XuG. JiangX. Small20221817210617210.1002/smll.202106172 35319815
     [Google Scholar]
  70. WangT. LiaoQ. WuY. WangX. FuC. GengF. QuY. ZhangJ. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.20201643846385710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.156 32841667
     [Google Scholar]
  71. El-SalamouniN.S. GowayedM.A. SeiffeinN.L. Abdel-MoneimR.A. KamelM.A. LabibG.S. Int. J. Pharm.202159212009110.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120091 33197564
     [Google Scholar]
  72. SultanaT. HossainM. RahamanS. KimY.S. GwonJ.G. LeeB.T. Carbohydr. Polym.202127211848210.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118482 34420741
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786334548241226094122
Loading
Computational Screening of Phytochemicals in Eupatorium adenophorum Extracts for Modulating Blood Coagulation: A Pharmacoinformatics Study
Lett. Org. Chem. 22, 532 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701786334548241226094122
/content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786334548241226094122
/content/journals/loc/10.2174/0115701786334548241226094122
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

file format download Download

  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Eupatorium adenophorum; GC-MS; hemostasis; molecular docking; molecular dynamics; wound healing

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test