Skip to content
2000
Volume 25, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1871-5265
  • E-ISSN: 2212-3989

Abstract

Introduction

Cervical cancer is among the most common types of cancer in women and is associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The association between cervical cancer and high-risk HPV infection has been well documented. However, the effect of simultaneous infection with high- and low-risk HPV or low-risk HPV alone on the risk of developing cervical malignancy remains unanswered in guidelines.

Methods

We investigated the association of high and low-risk HPVs (HR or LR) genotypes with cervical carcinoma risk and pathological and cytological information in cases recruited from a population-based cohort study of 790 patients. Correlation matrix and t-test were used for analysis.

Results

The percentage of HR+LR and HR-HPV16/18 were 9.30% and 11.20% in class II, 7.15% and 7.10% in class IV, and 7.15% and 5.80% in As-CUS smears.

Interestingly, concurrent infection with HR-HPV and LR-HPV types led to a significant reduction in the risk of developing malignancy compared to the high-risk group (OR=0.3 (0.098-0.925), -value=0.04). The percentage of individuals with cervical malignancy was 10.2% and 28.2% within the co-infected and the HR-HPV participants.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that simultaneous infection with high- and low-risk HPV may reduce the risk of cervical malignancy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/iddt/10.2174/0118715265307980240826060516
2024-09-20
2025-10-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BrayF. FerlayJ. SoerjomataramI. SiegelR.L. TorreL.A. JemalA. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J. Clin.201868639442410.3322/caac.21492 30207593
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DorsainvilM.A. Increasing cervical cancer screening in underserved populations.J. Christ. Nurs.201734315215810.1097/CNJ.0000000000000405
    [Google Scholar]
  3. SmallW.Jr BaconM.A. BajajA. Cervical cancer: A global health crisis.Cancer2017123132404241210.1002/cncr.30667 28464289
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ZagouriF. KorakitiA.M. ZakopoulouR. Taxanes during pregnancy in cervical cancer: A systematic review and pooled analysis.Cancer Treat. Rev.20197910188510.1016/j.ctrv.2019.08.001 31442939
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CordeiroC.N. GemignaniM.L. Gynecologic malignancies in pregnancy: Balancing fetal risks with oncologic safety.Obstet. Gynecol. Surv.201772318419310.1097/OGX.0000000000000407 28304416
    [Google Scholar]
  6. OuhY.T. LeeJ.K. Proposal for cervical cancer screening in the era of HPV vaccination.Obstet. Gynecol. Sci.201861329830810.5468/ogs.2018.61.3.298 29780771
    [Google Scholar]
  7. HasanzadehM. RejaliM. MehramizM. The interaction of high and low‐risk human papillomavirus genotypes increases the risk of developing genital warts: A population‐based cohort study.J. Cell. Biochem.20191208128701287410.1002/jcb.28557 30868650
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MusaJ. AchenbachC.J. O’DwyerL.C. Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One2017129e018392410.1371/journal.pone.0183924 28873092
    [Google Scholar]
  9. YeeG.P. de SouzaP. KhachigianL.M. Current and potential treatments for cervical cancer.Curr. Cancer Drug Targets201313220522010.2174/1568009611313020009 23259831
    [Google Scholar]
  10. KesslerT.A. Cervical cancer: Prevention and early detection.Semin. Oncol. Nurs.201733217218310.1016/j.soncn.2017.02.005 28343836
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SenkomagoV. HenleyS.J. ThomasC.C. MixJ.M. MarkowitzL.E. SaraiyaM. Human papillomavirus–attributable cancers — United States, 2012–2016.MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.2019683372472810.15585/mmwr.mm6833a3 31437140
    [Google Scholar]
  12. LuckettR. FeldmanS. Impact of 2-, 4- and 9-valent HPV vaccines on morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer.Hum. Vaccin. Immunother.20161261332134210.1080/21645515.2015.1108500 26588179
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HeydariN. OskoueeM.A. VaeziT. Type‐specific human papillomavirus prevalence in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer in Iran.J. Med. Virol.201890117217610.1002/jmv.24908 28786495
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LuostarinenT af GeijersstamV BjørgeT No excess risk of cervical carcinoma among women seropositive for both HPV16 and HPV6/11.Int. J. Cancer1999806818822 10074912
    [Google Scholar]
  15. JamdarF. FarzanehF. NavidpourF. Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection among Iranian women using COBAS HPV DNA testing.Infect. Agent. Cancer2018131610.1186/s13027‑018‑0178‑5 29416557
    [Google Scholar]
  16. GoodmanA. HPV testing as a screen for cervical cancer.BMJ2015350h237210.1136/bmj.h2372 26126623
    [Google Scholar]
  17. CoN.N. ChuL.O. ChowJ.K. TamJ.W. NgE.K. HPV prevalence and detection of rare hpv genotypes in Hong Kong women from Southern China with cytological abnormalities.ISRN Virology201320131-210.5402/2013/312706
    [Google Scholar]
  18. AdebamowoS.N. OlawandeO. FamootoA. DarengE.O. OffiongR. AdebamowoC.A. Persistent low-risk and high-risk human papillomavirus infections of the uterine cervix in HIV-negative and HIV-Positive women.Front. Public Health2017517810.3389/fpubh.2017.00178 28785554
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/iddt/10.2174/0118715265307980240826060516
Loading
/content/journals/iddt/10.2174/0118715265307980240826060516
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test