Skip to content
2000
Volume 22, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6581

Abstract

Introduction

Social media has a significant capacity to influence healthcare delivery. The development of online communities is well documented for conditions including asthma and stroke. Less is known about social media use amongst those with endometriosis. This review explores internet groups as an under-recognised supplement to healthcare, prompting greater clinician engagement online.

Methods

This scoping review was conducted according to the methodology developed by Arksey & O’Malley. It is the first piece of work bringing together commentary on endometriosis-related social media use and existing frameworks used to analyse other online communities. Relevant studies were identified through searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE. As an exploratory piece, there were no predetermined exclusion criteria, provided articles were in English or translated into English. A total of 26 articles from 2004-2024 were included.

Results

The literature on social media posts about chronic conditions typically explores the accuracy of medical content or offers sociological commentary. Nine articles assessed the evidence base of endometriosis posts across various platforms. All raised concerns about the reliability of information shared and called for expert engagement in the dissemination of educational materials online.

Discussion

Three key themes emerged from the analysis of online communities. First, online groups are perceived as an antidote to unmet needs in endometriosis patients accessing traditional healthcare, including problem-solving and psychosocial support. Further, such groups cultivate a sense of kinship amongst affected individuals. The exchange of experiences and peer validation of symptoms contributes to a collective narrative. Finally, social media can facilitate open conversation around sensitive topics through anonymity within these communities.

Conclusion

Endometriosis is a condition with the potential for profound psychological and psychosexual impact. Social media communities create a space in which private suffering can become public and taboo subjects explored. Clinicians have a responsibility to engage both with factual content curation and in addressing unmet care needs expressed by patients online.

© 2026 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048376005250630124032
2025-07-16
2026-02-04

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048376005250630124032
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. SmailhodzicE. HooijsmaW. BoonstraA. LangleyD.J. Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals.BMC Health Serv. Res.201616144210.1186/s12913‑016‑1691‑0 27562728
     [Google Scholar]
  2. PatrickM. VenkateshR.D. StukusD.R. Social media and its impact on health care.Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol.2022128213914510.1016/j.anai.2021.09.014 34555532
     [Google Scholar]
  3. CarterM. How twitter may have helped Nigeria contain Ebola.BMJ2014349g694610.1136/bmj.g6946
     [Google Scholar]
  4. JoglekarS. SastryN. CoulsonN.S. TaylorS.J.C. PatelA. DuschinskyR. AnandA. Jameson EvansM. GriffithsC.J. SheikhA. PanzarasaP. De SimoniA. How online communities of people with long-term conditions function and evolve: Network analysis of the structure and dynamics of the Asthma UK and British Lung Foundation online communities.J. Med. Internet Res.2018207e23810.2196/jmir.9952 29997105
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ThomasK. GamlinC. De SimoniA. MullisR. MantJ. How is poststroke fatigue understood by stroke survivors and carers? A thematic analysis of an online discussion forum.BMJ Open201997e02895810.1136/bmjopen‑2019‑028958 31289087
     [Google Scholar]
  6. FaynM-G. des GaretsV. RivièreA. Collective empowerment of an online patient community: conceptualizing process dynamics using a multi-method qualitative approach.BMC Health Serv. Res.2021211958 34511115
     [Google Scholar]
  7. CulleyL. LawC. HudsonN. DennyE. MitchellH. BaumgartenM. Raine-FenningN. The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: A critical narrative review.Hum. Reprod. Update2013196625639 23884896
     [Google Scholar]
  8. RempertA.N. RempertT.H. LiuA. HernándezA. BlanckJ. SegarsJ. SinghB. A systematic review of the psychosocial impact of endometriosis before and after treatment.Reprod. Sci.20243171828186010.1007/s43032‑024‑01515‑w 38512699
     [Google Scholar]
  9. FacchinF. BarbaraG. SaitaE. MosconiP. RobertoA. FedeleL. VercelliniP. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and mental health: pelvic pain makes the difference.J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol201536413514110.3109/0167482X.2015.1074173 26328618
     [Google Scholar]
  10. OhayiS. OnyishiN. MbahS. Endometriosis in an indigenous African women population.Afr. Health Sci.2022221133138 36032462
     [Google Scholar]
  11. AjayiA.B. AfolabiB.M. AjayiV.D. OyetunjiI. SaanuO. AtibaA. AdeoyeA.T. EhichioyaJ. AyelehinI.I. Menstrual characteristics of sub-Sahara black African women with and without endometriosis.West Afr. J. Med.2021383246254 33765376
     [Google Scholar]
  12. BougieO. NwosuI. WarshafskyC. Revisiting the impact of race/ethnicity in endometriosis.Reprod. Fertil.202232R34R4110.1530/RAF‑21‑0106 35514542
     [Google Scholar]
  13. MetzlerJ.M. KalaitzopoulosD.R. BurlaL. SchaerG. ImeschP. Examining the influence on perceptions of endometriosis via analysis of social media posts: Cross-sectional study.JMIR Form Res.202263e3113510.2196/31135 35302501
     [Google Scholar]
  14. LeeK-N. TakH-J. ParkS-Y. ParkS.T. ParkS-H. YouTube as a source of information and education on endometriosis.Medicine (Baltimore)202210138e30639 36197187
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HaggE. DahintenV.S. CurrieL.M. The emerging use of social media for health-related purposes in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review.Int. J. Med. Inform.20181159210510.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.010 29779724
     [Google Scholar]
  16. ArkseyH. O’MalleyL. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework.Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol.2005811932
     [Google Scholar]
  17. HeimelM. JatH. BaschS. GutzwillerF.S. BiehlV. EckertJ.H. Social media use in COPD patients in Germany and Switzerland.Pneumologie202175858359110.1055/a‑1481‑0037 33962479
     [Google Scholar]
  18. van den HaspelK. ReddingtonC. HealeyM. LiR. DiorU. ChengC. The role of social media in management of individuals with endometriosis: A cross-sectional study.Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.2022625701706 35435253
     [Google Scholar]
  19. WuJ. GreeneM. BickettA. SongA.H. SwartzJ.J. Period pain is not normal: A content analysis of endometriosis‐related videos on the social media platform TikTok.BJOG2023130121555155610.1111/1471‑0528.17563 37271737
     [Google Scholar]
  20. TowneJ. SulimanY. RussellK.A. StuparichM.A. NahasS. BehbehaniS. Health information in the era of social media: An analysis of the nature and accuracy of posts made by public Facebook pages for patients with endometriosis.J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.20212891637164210.1016/j.jmig.2021.02.005 33582381
     [Google Scholar]
  21. HolowkaE.M. Mediating pain: Navigating endometriosis on social media.Front. Pain Res. (Lausanne)2022388999010.3389/fpain.2022.889990 35707051
     [Google Scholar]
  22. WilsonS. MoganS. KaurK. Understanding the role of Facebook to support women with endometriosis: A Malaysian perspective.Int. J. Nurs. Pract.2020264e1283310.1111/ijn.12833 32189457
     [Google Scholar]
  23. BatesB.R. RominaS. AhmedR. HopsonD. The effect of source credibility on consumers’ perceptions of the quality of health information on the Internet.Med. Inform. Internet Med.2006311455210.1080/14639230600552601 16754366
     [Google Scholar]
  24. AdlerH. LewisM. NgC.H.M. BrooksC. LeonardiM. Mikocka-WalusA. BushD. SempriniA. Wilkinson-TomeyJ. CondousG. PatravaliN. AbbottJ. ArmourM. Social media, endometriosis, and evidence-based information: An analysis of Instagram content.Health care202412112110.3390/healthcare12010121 38201027
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Le BusqueB. MellishS. Endometriosis awareness month on social media: A content analysis of images and captions on instagram.Women202331829410.3390/women3010007
     [Google Scholar]
  26. KunzeK.N. KrivicichL.M. VermaN.N. ChahlaJ. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for the meniscus: A YouTube-based quality-control study.Arthroscopy202036123323810.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033 31864582
     [Google Scholar]
  27. ArenaA. Degli EspostiE. OrsiniB. VerrelliL. RodondiG. LenziJ. CasadioP. SeracchioliR. The social media effect: The impact of fake news on women affected by endometriosis. A prospective observational study.Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.202227410110510.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.020 35640437
     [Google Scholar]
  28. GoelR. ModhukurV. TäärK. SalumetsA. SharmaR. PetersM. Users’ concerns about endometriosis on social media: Sentiment analysis and topic modeling study.J. Med. Internet Res.202325e4538110.2196/45381 37581905
     [Google Scholar]
  29. NealD.M. McKenzieP.J. Putting the pieces together: Endometriosis blogs, cognitive authority, and collaborative information behavior.J. Med. Libr. Assoc.201199212713410.3163/1536‑5050.99.2.004 21464850
     [Google Scholar]
  30. WhelanE. ‘No one agrees except for those of us who have it’: endometriosis patients as an epistemological community.Sociol. Health Illn.200729795798210.1111/j.1467‑9566.2007.01024.x 18092978
     [Google Scholar]
  31. LindgrenS. RichardsonL. Endometriosis pain and epistemic community: Mapping discourses in online discussions among sufferers.Soc. Sci. Med.202332611588911588910.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115889 37121071
     [Google Scholar]
  32. ZehrungR.F. ChenY. Self-expression and sharing around chronic illness on TikTok.AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc.202420231334134310.5812/ijem.16130 38222376
     [Google Scholar]
  33. BrondaS. OstrovskyM.G. JainS. MalacarneA. The role of social media for patients with temporomandibular disorders: A content analysis of Reddit.J. Oral Rehabil.20224911910.1111/joor.13264 34592005
     [Google Scholar]
  34. TruumeesD. DuncanA. MayerE.K. GeckM. SinghD. TruumeesE. Social media as a new source of medical information and support: analysis of scoliosis-specific information.Spine Deform.2021951241124510.1007/s43390‑021‑00331‑5 33826124
     [Google Scholar]
  35. DaudtH.M.L. van MosselC. ScottS.J. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework.BMC Med. Res. Methodol20131314810.1186/1471‑2288‑13‑48 23522333
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048376005250630124032
Loading
Welcome to the EndoHood: A Scoping Review of Social Media Spaces for those with Endometriosis
Curr Womens Health Rev. 22, E15734048376005 (2026); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734048376005250630124032
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048376005250630124032
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048376005250630124032
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

PRISMA checklist is available as supplementary material on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

file format download Download

  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): Endometriosis; online communities; open conversation; pelvic pain; psychosocial support; social media

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test