Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry - Volume 23, Issue 22, 2023

Pyrazole is considered an important active scaffold that possesses various types of pharmacological activities. The overwhelming literature reported earlier reflects the immense biological potential of pyrazole derivatives. The presence of this moiety in various FDA-approved drugs, including celecoxib (anti-inflammatory), apixaban (anticoagulant), rimonabant (anti-obesity), difenamizole (analgesic), and sildenafil (for erectile dysfunction), has proved its pharmacological potential. Owing to its diversity in the biological field, this nucleus has attracted the attention of many researchers to study its skeleton chemically and biologically. This review highlights the literature supporting the research of the past 10 years related to the structures of pyrazole derivatives with their corresponding biological activities. The findings of this review may open new avenues for an upcoming scientific breakthrough.

Fragment-based drug discovery is one of the most powerful paradigms in the recent context of medicinal chemistry and is being widely practiced by academic and industrial researchers. Currently, azaindoles are among the most exploited molecular fragments in pharmaceutical innovation projects inspired by fragment-to-lead strategies. The 7-azaindole is the most prominent representative within this remarkable family of pyrrolopyridine fragments, as it is present in the chemical structure of several approved antitumor drugs and also of numerous therapeutic candidates. In this paper, a brief overview on existing proofs of concept in the literature will be presented, as well as some recent works that corroborate 7-azaindole as a privileged and pharmacologically versatile molecular fragment.

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in developed countries, with an increasing incidence in developing countries. Despite the advances in cardiology, there are yet many unanswered questions about the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis. However, it has not been fully explained why some coronary artery plaques remain quiescent over time, whereas others evolve to a high-risk, “vulnerable” plaque with a predisposition to destabilize and induce a cardiac event. Furthermore, approximately half of the patients with acute coronary syndromes demonstrate no prior symptoms of ischemia or angiographically evident disease. Recent findings have indicated that apart from cardiovascular risk factors, genetics, and other unknown factors, local hemodynamic forces, such as endothelial shear stress, blood flow patterns, and endothelial dysfunction of the epicardial and microvascular coronary arteries, are associated with the progression of coronary plaque and the development of cardiovascular complications with complex interactions. In this review article, we summarize the mechanisms that affect coronary artery plaque progression, indicating the importance of endothelial shear stress, endothelial dysfunction of epicardial and microvascular vessels, inflammation, and their complex associations, underlying in parallel the clinical perspectives of these findings.

Oxidative stress plays a central role in atherogenesis, implicated in endothelial dysfunction, coronary plaque formation, and destabilization. Therefore, identifying oxidative stress in the vascular wall by reliable biomarkers could aid in early diagnosis and better coronary artery disease (CAD) prognostication. Because of the short half-life of reactive oxygen species, the current approach is to measure stable products generated by the oxidation of macromolecules in plasma or urine. Most popular oxidative stress biomarkers are oxidized low-density lipoprotein, myeloperoxidase and lipid peroxidation biomarkers, such as malondialdehyde and F2-isoprostanes. Oxidative protein modification biomarkers and oxidized phospholipids have also been studied and discussed in the present review. Most of these biomarkers are associated with the presence and extent of CAD, are elevated in patients with acute coronary syndromes, and may predict outcomes independent of traditional CAD risk factors. However, further standardization of measurement methods and assessment in large randomized clinical trials are required to integrate these biomarkers into clinical practice. In addition, evidence that these biomarkers detect oxidative stress in the vascular wall lacks and more specific biomarkers should be developed to identify vascular oxidative stress. Consequently, several oxidative stress biomarkers have been developed, most of which can be associated with the presence and extent of CAD and event prognosis. However, they still have significant limitations that hinder their integration into clinical practice.

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a cytokine centrally involved in several immune responses and it has been recognized as a driver of enhanced atherothrombotic risk. Immunity and inflammation are intrinsically involved in atherosclerosis progression. This generated ‘inflammation hypothesis’, which is now validated in large-scale clinical trials. Abundant evidence supports the distinctive role of IL-6 in coronary artery disease. The focus on this cytokine stems from epidemiological studies linking high plasma concentrations of IL-6 with greater risk for adverse cardiovascular events, genetic studies which implicate a causative role of IL-6 in atherosclerosis and murine data which support the involvement of IL-6 in various pathophysiological cascades of atherothrombosis. The fact that high IL-6 levels are equivalent to increased cardiovascular risk created an unmet need to address those who are at ‘residual inflammatory risk’. Moreover, the opposing effects of IL-6 underlined the importance of deciphering specific signaling cascades, which may be responsible for different effects. Finally, murine data and some small clinical trials highlighted the possibility of reversing the pro-atherogenic effects of IL-6 by directly targeting it. While IL-1 blockage was proved effective, it is reasonable to examine if moving more downstream in the inflammation cascade could be more selective and effective than other anti-inflammatory therapies. In the present review, we examine the role of IL-6 as a biomarker of ‘residual inflammatory risk’, its vital role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis progression and the possibility of targeting it to stall coronary artery disease progression.