Current Radiopharmaceuticals - Volume 12, Issue 2, 2019

Background: Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (P-NETs) are a challenge in terms of both diagnosis and therapy; morphological studies need to be frequently implemented with nonstandard techniques such as Endoscopic Ultrasounds, Dynamic CT, and functional Magnetic Resonance. Discussion: The role of nuclear medicine, being scarcely sensitive F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose, is mainly based on the over-expression of Somatostatin Receptors (SSTR) on neuroendocrine tumor cells surface. Therefore, SSTR can be used as a target for both diagnosis, using radiotracers labeled with gamma or positron emitters, and therapy. SSTRs subtypes are capable of homo and heterodimerization in specific combinations that alter both the response to ligand activation and receptor internalization. Conclusion: Although agonists usually provide efficient internalization, also somatostatin antagonists (SS-ANTs) could be used for imaging and therapy. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) represents the most successful option for targeted therapy. The theranostic model based on SSTR does not work in insulinoma, in which different radiotracers such as F-18 FluoroDOPA or tracers for the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor have to be preferred.

Background: Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) are relatively rare tumors, mainly originating from the digestive system, that tend to grow slowly and are often diagnosed when metastasised. Surgery is the sole curative option but is feasible only in a minority of patients. Among them, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pancreatic NETs or pNETs) account for less than 5% of all pancreatic tumors. Viable therapeutic options include medical treatments such as biotherapies and more recently Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapies (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogues. Molecular imaging, with main reference to PET/CT, has a major role in patients with pNETs. Objective: The overexpression of specific membrane receptors, as well as the ability of cells to take up amine precursors in NET, have been exploited for the development of specific targeting imaging agents. Methods: SPECT/CT and PET/CT with specific isotopes such as [68Ga]-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacyclododecane- N,N’,N’’,N’’’-tetra-acetic acid (DOTA)-somatostatin analogs, [18F]-FDG and [18F]-fluorodopa have been clinically explored. Results: To overcome the limitations of SSTR imaging, interesting improvements are connected with the availability of new radiotracers, activating with different mechanisms compared to somatostatin analogues, such as glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1 R) agonists or antagonists. Conclusion: This paper shows an overview of the RPs used so far in the imaging of pNETs with insight on potential new radiopharmaceuticals currently under clinical evaluation.

Background: The incidence of pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (pNETs) has increased considerably in the last few decades. The characteristic features of this tumour and the development of new investigative and therapeutic methods had a great impact on its management. Objective: The aim of this review is to investigate the outcome of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Methods: A comprehensive literature search strategy was used based on two databases (SCOPUS, and PubMed). We considered all studies published in English, evaluating the use of PRRT (177Luteciuim- DOTA-conjugated peptides and 90Yetrium- DOTA- conjugated peptides) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours as a standalone entity or as a subgroup within the wider category of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEP NETs). Results: PRRT was found to be an effective treatment modality as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in the treatment of non-operable and metastatic pNETs where other options are limited. Complete response was reported to be between 2-6% while partial response was achieved in up to 60% of cases. Survival analysis was also impressive. Progression Free Survival (PFS) reached a mean of 34 months and Overall Survival (OS) of 53 months. PRRT also proved to improve patients’ Quality of Life (QoL). Acute and sub-acute side effects like nephrotoxicity and haematotoxicity are usually mild and reversible. Conclusion: PRRT is well tolerated and effective treatment option for non-operable and/or metastatic pNETs. Side effects are usually mild and reversible. Larger randomized controlled trails need to be done to compare PRRT with other treatment modalities and to provide more detailed guidelines regarding patient selections, the choice of PRRT, follow up and response assessment to maximum potential benefit.

Introduction: Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (p-NETs) are an important disease entity and comprise of peptide-secreting tumours often with a functional syndrome. Accounting for a small percentage of all pancreatic tumours, they have a good overall survival rate when diagnosed early, with surgery being curative. The role of nuclear medicine in the diagnosis and treatment of these tumours is evident. However, the vast majority of patients will require extensive imaging in the form of conventional radiological techniques. It is important for clinicians to have a fundamental understanding of the p-NET appearances to aid prompt identification and to help direct management through neoplastic staging. Methods: This article will review the advantages and disadvantages of conventional radiological techniques in the context of p-NETs and highlight features that these tumours exhibit. Conclusion: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours are a unique collection of neoplasms that have markedly disparate clinical features but similar imaging characteristics. Most p-NETs are small and welldefined with homogenous enhancement following contrast administration, although larger and less welldifferentiated tumours can demonstrate areas of necrosis and cystic architecture with heterogeneous enhancement characteristics. Prognosis is generally favourable for these tumours with various treatment options available. However, conventional radiological techniques will remain the foundation for the initial diagnosis and staging of these tumours, and a grasp of these modalities is extremely important for physicians.

Background: Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs) are rare neoplasms, sporadic or familial, even being part of a syndrome. Their diagnosis is based on symptoms, hormonal disorders or may be fortuitous. The role of Nuclear Medicine is important, mainly because of the possibility of a theranostic strategy. This approach is allowed by the availability of biochemical agents, which may be labeled with radionuclides suitable for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, showing almost identical pharmacokinetics. The major role for radiopharmaceuticals is connected with radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues (SSA), since somatostatin receptors are highly expressed on some of the neoplastic cell types. Discussion: Nowadays, in the category of radiolabeled SSA, although 111In-pentetreotide, firstly commercially proposed, is still used, the best choice for diagnosis is related to the so called DOTAPET radiotracers labeled with 68-Gallium (Ga), such as 68Ga-DOTATATE, 68Ga-DOTANOC, and 68Ga-DOTATOC. More recently, labeling with 64-Copper (Cu) (64Cu-DOTATATE) has also been proposed. In this review, we discuss the clinical interest of a SAA (Tektrotyd©) radiolabeled with 99mTc, a gamma emitter with better characteristics, with respect to 111Indium, radiolabeling Octreoscan ©. By comparing both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Octreoscan©, Tektrotyd© and PET DOTA-peptides, on the basis of literature data and of our own experience, we tried to highlight these topics to stimulate further studies, individuating actual clinical indications for all of these radiotracers. Conclusion: In our opinion, Tektrotyd© could already find its applicative dimension in the daily practice of NETs, either pancreatic or not, at least in centers without a PET/CT or a 68Ga generator. Because of wider availability, a lower cost, and a longer decay, compared with respect to peptides labeled with 68Ga, it could be also proposed, in a theranostic context, for a dosimetry evaluation of patients undergoing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT), and for non-oncologic indications of radiolabelled SSA. In this direction, and for a more rigorous cost/effective evaluation, more precisely individuating its clinical role, further studies are needed.