Current Protein and Peptide Science - Volume 2, Issue 1, 2001
Volume 2, Issue 1, 2001
-
-
Structural Biology of the Cell Adhesion Protein CD2 Alternatively Folded States and Structure-function Relation
Authors: J.J. Yang, Y. Ye, A. Carroll, W. Yang and H-w. LeeCluster of differentiation 2 (CD2) is a cell surface glycoprotein expressed on most human T cells and natural killer (NK) cells and plays an important role in mediating cell adhesion in both T-lymphocytes and in signal transduction. The understanding of the biochemical basis of molecular recognition by the cell adhesion molecule CD2 has been advanced greatly through the determination of structures and the dynamic properties of the complexes and their individual components and through site-directed mutagenesis. A number of general principles can be derived from the structural and functional studies of the extracellular domains of CD2 and CD58 and their complex. Significant electrostatic interactions within the protein-protein interfaces contribute directly to the formation of macromolecular complexes of CD2 and CD58. Also, residues located on the protein-protein interface demonstrate a certain degree of conformational change upon the formation of a complex. Structural analysis of CD2 has revealed that this adhesion molecule exhibits strong conformational flexibility with a partial non-native helical conformation at high temperatures and in the presence of an organic solvent. In addition, it can be converted into a domain swapped dimer, or trimer and tetramer through hinge deletion. Thus, the conformational status of the adhesive proteins contributes to the regulation of cell adhesion and the folding of CD2.
-
-
-
Proteinn-X, Pancreatic Stone-, Pancreatic Thread-, reg-Protein, P19, Lithostathine, and Now What
More LessReg protein was first found in pancreatic stones. It was named Pancreatic Stone Protein and later renamed lithostathine, as it was assumed to prevent stone formation. The 144 amino acid protein is O-glycosylated on Thr-5. The glycan chain is variable in length and in charge. Lithostathine 3-D organization is of the C-lectin type, even though it is unlikely to have any functional calcium-binding site. The Arg11-Ile12 bond is readily cleaved by trypsin the resulting C-terminal polypeptide precipitates at physiological pH and tends to form fibrils. The protein was more recently found in the regenerating endocrine pancreas and it was named Reg (for regenerating) protein. Numerous proteins related to Reg have been identified successively in several mammalian species. They constitute the Reg superfamily. Reg genes show the same organization and are located in the same chromosome region. These genes are therefore likely to derive from a common ancestor gene by duplication. In the course of evolution, they may have diverged in tissue-related expression and function. In the endocrine pancreas, Reg protein stimulates islet beta-cell growth and reduces experimental diabetes via the activation of a high affinity receptor. The role of the protein produced by the exocrine pancreas, however, is controversial. Not only is Reg(slash)lithostathine unlikely to be a physiologically relevant pancreatic stone inhibitor, but it may contribute to stone formation. We suggest that it might help prevent the harmful activation of protease precursors in the pancreatic juice. The protein provides a useful model for examining the conformational changes associated with globular to fibril transformation.
-
-
-
Structure and Function of Complement Activating Enzyme Complexes C1 and MBL-MASPs
More LessThe complement system is a major effector arm of the immune defense contributing to the destruction of invading pathogens. There are three possible routes of complement cascade activation the classical, the alternative and the lectin pathways. The activation of the classical and lectin pathways is initiated by supramolecular complexes, which resemble each other. Each complex has a recognition subunit (C1q in the classical and mannose-binding lectin (MBL) in the lectin pathway), which associates with serine protease zymogens (C1q with C1r and C1s, and MBL with MBL-associated serine proteases MASP-1, MASP-2) to form the C1 and MBL-MASPs complexes, respectively. As the recognition subunits bind to activator structures, subsequent activation of the serine protease zymogens occurs. The precise structure of the complexes and the exact mechanism of their activation have not been solved, yet. In this review we summarize the recent advances about the structure and function of the individual subcomponents of both complexes achieved by genetic engineering, molecular modeling, physico-chemical and functional studies. Special emphasis will be laid on the serine proteases the role of the individual domains in the assembly of the C1s-C1r-C1r-C1s tetramer and in the control of the protease activity will be discussed. We will then focus on recent functional models of the supramolecular complexes. The question of how a non-enzymatic signal (the binding of C1q or MBL to activators) can be converted into enzymatic events (activation of serine protease zymogens) will be addressed. The similarities and differences between C1 and MBL-MASPs will also be discussed.
-
-
-
Protein Thiol Modification of Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate Dehydrogenase and Caspase-3 by Nitric Oxide
More LessThe regulation of enzyme activity function is a major factor in the cellular response to a changing environment. One mechanism of enzyme activity regulation includes post-translational protein thiol modification by nitric oxide (NO) or its redox species. Major routs used by NO to modify cysteine residues of proteins include S-nitrosation, oxidation, mixed disulfide formation with glutathione, and the covalent attachment of nucleotide cofactors, i.e NAD NADH. Critical thiol centers serve as recognition sites for NO, thus channeling the NO signal through post-translational modifications and oxidation into cellular functions. Here, we summarize current knowledge on active site thiol modification of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and caspase-3 by nitric oxide. Although very different in their cellular function, both enzymes contain highly reactive cysteines which represent sensitive targets for NO. Our studies are supportive of a potential role of S-nitrosation and mixed disulfide formation as a general signaling mechanism that allows sensing of nitrosative stress. At the same time, modification of GAPDH and caspase-3 by NO show the diversity of mechanisms (S-nitrosation versus oxidations) that we are confronted with as a result of NO delivery, especially comparing in vitro studies with cellular systems. In the future it will be challenging to dissect how nitrosative and oxidative signaling mechanisms overlap and how intracellular communication systems allow their activation in a selective way.
-
-
-
Concepts and Misconcepts in the Analysis of Simple Kinetics of Protein Folding
More LessUnusually simple two-state kinetics characterizes the folding of a number of small proteins possessing a variety secondary structures. This limits dramatically the number of experimentally resolvable parameters that may characterize this process and also suggests the possibility to describe it based on simple theories borrowed from the field of ordinary chemical reactions. An attempt is made to critically evaluate the basic concepts, which are in the background of this approach. We demonstrate their limitations, which may cast doubt on the interpretation of experimental data. It is shown also that, in contrast to provisions of transition state theory, the simple kinetics of protein folding does not correlate with folded state stability or with the size of the folding unit. Moreover, the folding kinetics exhibits anomalous dependence on temperature and pressure and surprisingly strong dependence on solvent viscosity. The possible role in folding of fluctuations, relaxations and gradient dynamics is discussed. Being overlooked or underestimated, these mechanisms may determine the rate and specificity of the process.
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 26 (2025)
-
Volume (2025)
-
Volume 25 (2024)
-
Volume 24 (2023)
-
Volume 23 (2022)
-
Volume 22 (2021)
-
Volume 21 (2020)
-
Volume 20 (2019)
-
Volume 19 (2018)
-
Volume 18 (2017)
-
Volume 17 (2016)
-
Volume 16 (2015)
-
Volume 15 (2014)
-
Volume 14 (2013)
-
Volume 13 (2012)
-
Volume 12 (2011)
-
Volume 11 (2010)
-
Volume 10 (2009)
-
Volume 9 (2008)
-
Volume 8 (2007)
-
Volume 7 (2006)
-
Volume 6 (2005)
-
Volume 5 (2004)
-
Volume 4 (2003)
-
Volume 3 (2002)
-
Volume 2 (2001)
-
Volume 1 (2000)
Most Read This Month
