Current Pharmaceutical Design - Volume 9, Issue 28, 2003

Cilostazol (CLZ) was originally developed as a selective inhibitor of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3). PDE3 inhibition in platelets and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) was expected to provide an antiplatelet effect and vasodilation. Recent preclinical studies have demonstrated that CLZ also possesses the ability to inhibit adenosine uptake by various cells, a property that distinguishes CLZ from other PDE3 inhibitors, such as milrinone. After extensive preclinical and clinical studies, CLZ has been shown to have unique antithrombotic and vasodilatory properties based upon these novel mechanisms of action. CLZ was approved in 1988 for the treatment of symptoms related to peripheral arterial occlusive disease in Japan (Pletaal®) and in 1999 in the U.S. and in 2001 in the U.K. (Pletal®) for the treatment of intermittent claudication symptoms. Despite its remarkable antiplatelet properties, CLZ is not generally considered an antithrombotic agent in Western countries, perhaps due to the bulk of its antithrombotic preclinical and clinical development being conducted in Japan. In this review, the unique properties of CLZ are reviewed with the focus on CLZ as a unique antiplatelet agent targeting platelets and VSMC, demonstrating synergy with endogenous mediators and showing lowered risk of bleeding risk compared to other antiplatelet drugs.

Platelet P2 receptors-P2Y1, P2Y12, and P2X1-constitute the means by which adenine nucleotides can activate platelets. Coactivation of the Gαq-coupled P2Y1 and Gαi2-coupled P2Y12 receptors is necessary for ADPmediated platelet activation, which forms the basis of using P2 antagonists as antithrombotic drugs. P2Y1 receptor antagonists inhibit platelet activation, while P2Y1 knockout mice show longer bleeding times than normal mice but few other problems; however, its ubiquitous expression in other tissues renders P2Y1 questionable as an antithrombotic target. The P2Y12 receptor is expressed nearly exclusively in platelets and brain, making it an attractive antithrombotic target. Antagonists for the P2Y12 receptor have been developed that either require metabolic activation to covalently inhibit P2Y12 and are irreversible, or simply are competitive in nature and thus reversible. Ticlopidine and clopidogrel are irreversible P2Y12 antagonists and have been repeatedly proven as clinical antithrombotic agents. In addition, a recently reported P2Y12 antagonist, CS-747, shows promise as a future antithrombotic drug. The AR-C series of compounds represent reversible P2Y12 antagonists and have been used extensively to characterize the function of P2Y12 in platelets. Clinical studies show that AR-C69931MX is as effective as clopidogrel; furthermore, the combination of AR-C69931MX (cangrelor) and clopidogrel confers greater antagonism of P2Y12 than either antagonist alone. The P2X1 receptor is a calcium channel that functions to potentiate agonist-induced platelet shape change, and its inhibition or loss has little if any effect on hemostasis. A combination of P2Y1 and P2Y12 antagonists may represent an additional course of antithrombotic treatment.

Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases continue to be leading causes of death throughout the world. Blood platelets play a pivotal role not only in haemostasis but also in the pathogenesis of thrombosis and atherosclerosis, platelet aggregation being an essential step in the formation of either an effective haemostatic plug or an intravascular thrombus. The benefits of various antiplatelet therapies ranging from aspirin, ticlopidine, Clopidogrel, and intravenous platelet GPIIb / IIIa antagonists in various thromboembolic disorders are well documented. Despite of the success of intravenous acute GPIIb / IIIa blockade when given in conjunction with heparin, chronic oral GPIIb / IIIa antagonists with or without aspirin failed in various cardiovascular settings. This review highlights the role of the various antiplatelet therapies in thrombotic disorders as well as future directions.

Heparin and low molecular weight heparins are major clinical anticoagulants and the drugs of choice for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. The discovery of an antithrombin binding domain in heparin focused interest on understanding the mechanism of heparin's antithrombotic / anticoagulant activity. Various heparin-mimetic oligosaccharides have been prepared in an effort to replace polydisperse heparin and low molecular weight heparins with a structurally-defined anticoagulant. The goal of attaining a heparin-mimetic with no unwanted side-effects has also provided motivation for these efforts. This article reviews structure-activity relationship (SAR) of structurally-defined heparin-mimetic oligosaccharides.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States. Currently, there are approximately 12 million Americans with CHD, which is most frequently caused by atherosclerosis. The thrombotic complications of atherosclerosis, such as acute coronary syndrome and ischemic stroke, can be fatal and those who survive such events have a far greater risk of future cardiovascular events. This huge medical need cries out for improved novel anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and profibrinolytic agents. These agents will successfully respond to the medical need by providing safe, effective, and easily administered treatments that have little, if any, drug and food interactions and that require minimal monitoring. The currently approved antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, has satisfied some of these requirements and has played a large role in expanding the antithrombotic market over the past few years. New antithrombotics approaching the marketplace, such as the prodrug thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, have promise in expanding the antithrombotic market further. Over the past two decades, the pharmaceutical industry has mounted a huge effort to develop antithrombotics that function by inhibiting key enzymes positioned at “higher” levels of the coagulation system. Direct inhibitors of factor Xa, which may provide a better safety and efficacy profile than currently available agents, appear to be the next major class of antithrombotic agents poised to take the pharmaceutical industry one step closer to delivering the ideal antithrombotic agent. This review focuses on recent innovations in the discovery and development of potent parenteral and oral direct factor Xa inhibitors.

Thrombin, a plasma serine protease, plays a key role not only in coagulation and hemostasis but in thrombosis, restenosis and atherosclerosis. Thrombin activates platelets, endothelium, inflammatory cells and smooth muscle cells. The cellular action of thrombin is mediated by specific G-protein coupled thrombin receptors called proteinase-activated receptors (protease-activated receptor or PARs). Among the three thrombin receptors, PAR1 is the primary thrombin receptor in human and animal cells with an exception of non-primate platelets. An increased thrombin generation and PAR1 expression are observed on cells within atherosclerotic plaque and thrombus and following vascular injury. Animal studies with PAR1 deficient mice and small molecule antagonists indicate an important role of PAR1 in thrombosis and restenosis and thus the therapeutic potential of a PAR1 antagonist in treating these diseases. Development of a thrombin receptor tethered ligand analog binding assay led to the discovery of several different series of potent, nonpeptide small molecular antagonists of PAR1. These antagonists are PAR1 selective and inhibit most of the cellular effects of thrombin. A PAR1 antagonist has an advantage over a direct thrombin inhibitor since it does not inhibit enzymatic action of thrombin in the coagulation cascade with the consequent minimal bleeding side-effects, unlike a direct thrombin inhibitor. In addition, the emerging evidence for the role of PAR1 in various inflammatory diseases suggests as yet unexplored therapeutic potentials of PAR1 antagonists in various inflammatory diseases.

Thrombosis is the collective term for diseases caused by the localized accumulation of circulating blood elements within the vasculature that result in vessel occlusion. Conventional antithrombotic drugs can inhibit thrombus growth by targeting coagulation pathways (e.g., heparin, warfarin) or platelet-dependent mechanisms (e.g., aspirin, clopidogrel). Thrombolytic agents (e.g., streptokinase) are used to degrade thrombi in situ, thereby restoring the blood flow. Despite advances, the search for new strategies continues because existing treatments impair hemostasis, and must be administered at dose levels that do not achieve maximum efficacy. Only a few drugs are used at markedly efficacious doses, for short periods of time in closely watched clinical situations, such as interventional cardiology and surgery. Ideally, new targets for therapy would lead to the development of agents that are specific for thrombus-forming mechanisms without affecting hemostasis. In the absence of such agents, new products should preferentially inhibit the thrombotic process at doses that are relatively safe. The symptomatology of naturally occurring or experimentally-induced alterations of relevant hemostatic pathways can serve as basis for target selection. Hemostatic disorders that are compatible with life, do not pose a significantly increased risk of bleeding, but potentially protect against thrombosis provide guidance for rational design strategies. Theoretical considerations and recent experimental data suggest that: 1) inhibition of intrinsic coagulation pathway activity, 2) reduction of circulating platelet count, or 3) activation or enhancement of endogenous protein C or thrombolytic pathways could improve antithrombotic therapy.