Current Pharmaceutical Design - Volume 9, Issue 27, 2003

In mammalian cells, eicosanoid biosynthesis is usually initiated by the activation of phospholipase A2 and the release of arachidonic acid from membrane phospholipids in response to the interaction of a stimulus with a receptor on the cell surface. Arachidonic acid is subsequently transformed by the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX) to prostaglandins (PGs) and thromboxane (TX). The COX pathway is of particular clinical relevance because it is the major target for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which are commonly used for relieving inflammation, pain and fever. In 1991, it was disclosed that COX exists in two distinct isozymes (COX-1 and COX-2), one of which, COX-2, is primarily responsible for inflammation but apparently not for gastrointestinal integrity or platelet aggregation. For this reason, in recent years, novel compounds that are selective for this isozyme, the so-called selective COX-2 inhibitors or COXIBs, which retain anti-inflammatory activity but minimize the risk of gastrointestinal toxicity and bleeding, have been developed. This review article provides an overview and an update on the progress achieved in the area of COX-2 and PG biosynthesis and describes the role of COX-2 in health and disease. It also discusses some unresolved issues related to the use of selective COX-2 inhibitors as a safe and promising therapeutic option not only for the treatment of inflammatory states but also for cancer.

Aspirin and non-aspirin NSAIDs injure the gastrointestinal tract principally as a result of their inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis. This is mediated via abrogation of the secretion of mucus and bicarbonate and by reduction in mucosal blood flow. Topical injury and inhibition of platelet thromboxane may also contribute respectively to damage and ulcer bleeding. Recognition of a second cyclooxygenase, COX-2, enabled drugs to be developed that selectively target this enzyme which is expressed in inflamed joints. These have proved to be effective treatments whilst causing little or no acute gastroduodenal injury and reduced ulcers and their complications. Future strategies may capitalise upon the phenomenon of substrate diversion of lipoxygenase products. Balanced cyclooxygenase / lipoxygenase inhibition maybe less harmful than cyclooxygenase inhibition. Also, nitric oxide can subserve many of the protective effects of prostaglandins and NO-donating NSAIDs are under evaluation.

Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) derived eicosanoids promote gastroprotective mucosal defenses and induce platelet aggregation. By sparing COX-1, COX-2 specific inhibitors provide effective anti-inflammatory and analgesic activity while substantially reducing the risk of peptic ulcer disease and GI bleeding compared to dual COX inhibitors (traditional NSAIDs). Clinical studies of the COX-2-selective inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy equivalent to nonselective NSAIDs with significantly lower rates of GI toxicity. The incidence of endoscopic ulcers in some studies with coxibs has approximated placebo. However, as the detection of endoscopic lesions is not always correlated with symptomatic ulcers and ulcer complications, outcome studies of GI safety were performed. The results of large outcome studies have evaluated rofecoxib and celecoxib in over 39,000 patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis. Results of these studies showed that patients taking a supratherapeutic dose of rofecoxib or celecoxib had significantly lower rates of GI-related adverse events than those taking a nonselective NSAID. The GI safety of coxibs for patients using low dose aspirin concomitantly with a coxib appears to be reduced, particularly with regard to ulcer complications. Such data provide support for the COX-2 hypothesis and demonstrate that coxibs provide effective treatment of pain and inflammation with a reduced risk of gastropathy.

The healing of gastric ulcer is a complicated process that involves the proliferation of epithelial and endothelial cells and the concerted actions of a wide range of growth factors. Prostaglandins play an important role in ulcer healing. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is markedly upregulated around the margins of gastric ulcers and its inhibition leads to a delay of ulcer healing. Several of the growth factors that promote ulcer healing may work in part through COX- 2-dependent mechanisms. Angiogenesis, which is crucial to ulcer healing, is tightly regulated by growth factors. Treatment with selective COX-2 inhibitors appears to alter the balance of serum levels of growth factors, favoring an inhibition of angiogenesis. Given the importance of COX-2 in regulating ulcer healing, caution should be taken in the use of selective inhibitors of COX-2 by patients at risk of ulcer disease.

Current data on the gastric safety of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors in the presence of H. pylori infection are largely derived from animal experiments and indirect clinical evidence. In animal models of H. pylori gastritis, COX-2 inhibitors suppressed prostaglandin synthesis and aggravated mucosal damage. In the human stomach, COX-1 appears to be the predominant source of prostaglandins despite the fact that COX-2 is upregulated in H. pylori gastritis. There are conflicting data on whether H. pylori alters the risk of ulcer in patients receiving COX-2 inhibitors. Among patients with H. pylori infection, rofecoxib reduced the risk of complicated gastric but not duodenal ulcers as compared to naproxen. The advantage of rofecoxib over naproxen also disappeared in patients with H. pylori infection and prior upper gastrointestinal events. In contrast, pooled data suggested that H. pylori increases the risk of ulcer in patients receiving nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs but not in patients receiving celecoxib. In rodent gastric ulcers, COX-2 was upregulated in the granulation tissue and ulcer margin. Inhibition of COX-2 delayed healing of experimental gastric ulcer. Limited data showed that COX-2 expression was also increased in human gastric ulcer regardless of the H. pylori status. The functional significance of COX-2 in human gastric ulcer is unknown.

Highly selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2i) were introduced to minimize peptic ulcers and their complications caused by dual COX inhibitors (COXi). Co-prescribing a (generally cheap) dual COXi with a gastroprotectant is an alternative strategy, proven to reduce the incidence of NSAID-associated endoscopic ulcers. This review compares the efficacies of these two strategies and makes some estimates of their relative cost-effectiveness. In standard risk patients, endoscopic ulcers are reduced to about the same extent (around 70-80%) by either co-prescribing omeprazole or lansoprazole with a dual COXi or preferring a COX-2i alone. COX-2i reduced ulcer complications by a weighted mean of around 60% in comparative studies with dual COXi. There is little information about the influence of PPI on this endpoint, although one study using H. pylori treatment as a possible surrogate for placebo intervention found 77% protection against recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding by co-administered omeprazole. One direct comparison of the two strategies in high-risk patients (recent ulcer bleed) found quite high rates of re-presentation with bleeding ulcer using either strategy, and the differences between them were not significant. Drug costs in four Western countries were compared for each strategy. In one, the costs were similar, but in the others the combination of a cheap dual COXi with omeprazole was usually more expensive than using a COX-2i. The safest strategy in highest risk patients may be to coprescribe a gastroprotectant with a COX-2i, with resulting higher drug costs but possibly offset by savings in other health costs. The efficacy and cost-benefit of this alternative approach warrants investigation.

Metabolites of arachidonic acid participate in normal growth responses and in aberrant cellular growth and proliferation, including carcinogenesis. The key step in the conversion of free arachidonic acid to prostaglandins is catalyzed by the cyclooxygenase enzyme (COX). There are two COX enzymes, COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is expressed constitutively and is part of normal cell metabolic functions. COX-2, on the other hand, is induced and expressed in neoplastic growths. The connection between COX expression and carcinogenesis was first implicated in studies that demonstrated the efficacy of aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to reduce the relative risk of colon cancer and also promote tumor regression in both humans and animal models of colon cancer. Investigation of the molecular basis of these observations showed that high levels of COX-2 protein were present in both human and animal colorectal tumors. A variety of evidence gathered from epidemiological, whole animal, and cellular studies indicate that unregulated COX-2 expression is a rate-limiting step in tumorigenesis and also that the loss of regulation occurs early in carcinogenesis. The interest in the COX-2 enzyme is that specific inhibition of COX-2 could theoretically avoid the gastrointestinal and other complications observed with the use of nonspecific COX inhibitors (most NSAIDs) or COX-1 inhibitors. The mechanisms by which COX-2 inhibitors lead to decreased colon carcinogenesis are not fully understood but they involve an increase not only in COX-2 dependent but also in COX-2 independent mechanisms.

Side effects of the distal gastrointestinal tract after NSAID use are common and more frequent than previously recognized. Increased mucosal permeability and mucosal inflammation are often silent but appear after NSAID treatment with most dual COX inhibitors. Other clinical manifestations include: anemia, occult blood loss, malabsorption, proteinloss, ileal dysfunction, diarrhea, mucosal ulceration and strictures due to diaphragm disease. More common complications are lower gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation, which represent at least one third of all gastrointestinal complications observed with NSAID use. Studies with selective COX-2 inhibitors have shown that, in the short term, these agents do not increase mucosal permeability or induce anemia due to occult bleeding and that, when compared to dual COX inhibitors, lower gastrointestinal complications may be reduced by 50%. In order to minimize the impact of these side effects, it is important to increase the current standards of suspicion by physicians who treat these patients, since drug discontinuation may further reduce damage, and clinical experience with agents that may prevent or treat distal tract damage is very limited. From this perspective, selective COX-2 inhibitors may be the drugs of choice in the high-risk patient that needs NSAIDs. Another important area of uncertainty is the impact of NSAID use in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Data from different animal models of inflammatory bowel disease suggest that inhibition of both COX-1 and COX-2 derived prostaglandins affects the severity of the mucosal inflammation. However, current epidemiological and clinical data are contradictory. Since many patients with inflammatory bowel diseases need NSAID treatment, clinicians should be aware of the problem and try to minimize or reduce NSAID exposure. Further studies are needed to define the effect of both non-selective NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors in these patients.

There is extensive evidence that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) plays a significant role in the process of carcinogenesis in different tumors. Although most of these evidences derive from studies in colorectal cancer, data obtained from recent studies strongly suggest that COX-2 might play an important role in the neoplastic transformation of esophageal epithelium. NSAIDs use is associated with a reduction of the risk of developing esophageal cancer, including adenocarcinoma. Up-regulation of COX-2 has been reported in different stages of the carcinogenic sequence leading to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Treatment with selective COX-2 inhibitors has been shown to reduce the damage induced by acid and pepsin in the esophageal mucosa of rabbits, the incidence of tumors in an animal model of esophageal adenocarcinoma and to decrease proliferation and induce apoptosis in both Barrett's epithelial and adenocarcinoma cells. The first clinical study has shown that selective inhibition of COX-2 is followed by a significant decrease of cell proliferation in human Barrett's metaplasia. Clinical trials have begun in order to assess the efficacy of selective COX-2 inhibitors to prevent the progression of Barrett's esophagus to adenocarcinoma. Bile salts and acid are likely to early induce COX-2 in this sequence, although other factors, such as proinflammatory cytokines, inducible nitric oxide synthase and growth factors such as TGF-beta, are potential COX-2 inducers in the esophagus. Further studies are necessary in order to better understand factors involved in COX-2 up-regulation and mechanisms of COX-2 associated tumorigenesis in the esophagus.

Epidemiological evidences suggest that chronic use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) might be associated with a reduced risk of gastrointestinal cancers, including gastric cancer. The pre-cancerous gastric lesions and gastric cancers over-expressed cyclooxygenase (COX)-2. This overexpression not only is associated with Helicobacter pylori infection, but also maybe due to exposure to carcinogens. Targeted inhibition of COX, especially the COX-2 isoform, can lead to growth inhibition and apoptosis of gastric cancer in vitro. Various mechanisms, including COX-dependent and COX-independent pathways, have been identified and will be discussed in this article. Animal xenograft models have confirmed the tumor suppressing effects of COX-2 inhibitors. Human studies are underway to examine the use of COX-2 inhibitor in the treatment of pre-cancerous lesions. COX-2 inhibitors have a promising role in the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer.