Skip to content
2000
Volume 26, Issue 13
  • ISSN: 1389-2010
  • E-ISSN: 1873-4316

Abstract

Background

Bibliometrics has been applied to the study of tumor image segmentation, which can indicate the current research hotspots and trends.

Methods

In this study, bibliometric analyses were performed on data retrieved from the Web of Science database. A total of 3,377 articles on the application of tumor image segmentation from January 1, 2003, to October 9, 2024, were analyzed for the characteristics of the articles, including the number of yearly publications, country/region, institution, journal, author, keywords, and references. Visualising co-authorship, co-citation, and co-occurrence analysis with VOSviewer.

Results

The annual publication volume of tumor image segmentation literature shows that from the first time of more than 100 articles in 2016, the publication volume of literature in this field has surged, reaching 576 articles by 2023. Mainland China is ranked first in terms of publication volume (n=1,356). Saudi Arabia ranks first in average publication year (n=2021.96). IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging was the journal with the highest average number of citations. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (n=78) was the most prolific institution, while Harvard University was the most prestigious, with a total number of citations and an average number of citations of 3,190 and 213, respectively. In terms of keywords, co-occurrence analysis of 107 keywords with a frequency of more than 30 times produced four clusters: (1) methods of image segmentation, (2) applications of image segmentation, (3) image segmentation modelled on CT, (4) image segmentation modelled on MRI. Transformer, Attention Mechanism, and U-Net are the latest keywords. The analysis of keywords helps scholars understand and identify the current research hotspots and research directions.

Conclusion

Within the last 20 years, the number of articles on the application of tumor image segmentation has increased steadily. From U-Net to MAMBA, many methods for tumor image segmentation have been proposed, and the limitations of models and algorithms are becoming increasingly smaller, which demonstrates the importance of advances in tumor image segmentation technology for disease prevention and monitoring. It presents a strong connection between countries/regions and authors, which reflects the global interest and support for the development of this field. This study shows global trends, research hotspots, and emerging topics in this field and reviews some of the knowledge about tumor image segmentation applications from past studies. And it will provide good research guidelines for researchers in this field.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cpb/10.2174/0113892010325620250312082433
2025-03-19
2025-12-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cpb/10.2174/0113892010325620250312082433
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. JiangH. DiaoZ. YaoY.D. Deep learning techniques for tumor segmentation: A review.J. Supercomput.20227821807185110.1007/s11227‑021‑03901‑6
     [Google Scholar]
  2. NarayanV. FaizM. MallP.K. SrivastavaS. A comprehensive review of various approach for medical image segmentation and disease prediction.Wirel. Pers. Commun.202313231819184810.1007/s11277‑023‑10682‑z
     [Google Scholar]
  3. LiuX. LiK.W. YangR. GengL.S. Review of deep learning based automatic segmentation for lung cancer radiotherapy.Front. Oncol.20211171703910.3389/fonc.2021.717039
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ShenY. DongW. GulatiR. RyserM.D. EtzioniR. Estimating the frequency of indolent breast cancer in screening trials.Stat. Methods Med. Res.20192841261127110.1177/0962280217754232
     [Google Scholar]
  5. LeeA. MavaddatN. WilcoxA.N. CunninghamA.P. CarverT. HartleyS. Babb de VilliersC. IzquierdoA. SimardJ. SchmidtM.K. WalterF.M. ChatterjeeN. Garcia-ClosasM. TischkowitzM. PharoahP. EastonD.F. AntoniouA.C. BOADICEA: A comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and nongenetic risk factors.Genet. Med.20192181708171810.1038/s41436‑018‑0406‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  6. HesamianM.H. JiaW. HeX. KennedyP. Deep learning techniques for medical image segmentation: Achievements and challenges.J. Digit. Imaging201932458259610.1007/s10278‑019‑00227‑x
     [Google Scholar]
  7. MoeskopsP. ViergeverM.A. MendrikA.M. de VriesL.S. BendersM.J.N.L. IsgumI. Automatic segmentation of MR brain images with a convolutional neural network.IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging20163551252126110.1109/TMI.2016.2548501
     [Google Scholar]
  8. HusseinS. KandelP. BolanC.W. WallaceM.B. BagciU. Lung and pancreatic tumor characterization in the deep learning era: Novel supervised and unsupervised learning approaches.IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging20193881777178710.1109/TMI.2019.2894349
     [Google Scholar]
  9. SinghR.P. GuptaS. AcharyaU.R. Segmentation of prostate contours for automated diagnosis using ultrasound images: A survey.J. Comput. Sci.20172122323110.1016/j.jocs.2017.04.016
     [Google Scholar]
  10. RanjbarzadehR. Bagherian KasgariA. Jafarzadeh GhoushchiS. AnariS. NaseriM. BendechacheM. Brain tumor segmentation based on deep learning and an attention mechanism using MRI multi-modalities brain images.Sci. Rep.20211111093010.1038/s41598‑021‑90428‑8
     [Google Scholar]
  11. RameshK.K. XuK.M. TrivediA.G. HuangV. SharghiV.K. KleinbergL.R. MellonE.A. ShuH.K.G. ShimH. WeinbergB.D. A fully automated post-surgical brain tumor segmentation model for radiation treatment planning and longitudinal tracking.Cancers20231515395610.3390/cancers15153956
     [Google Scholar]
  12. GarfieldE. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.Science1972178406047147910.1126/science.178.4060.471
     [Google Scholar]
  13. MoedH.F. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation.Springer2005
     [Google Scholar]
  14. BornmannL. DanielH.D. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior.J. Doc.2008641458010.1108/00220410810844150
     [Google Scholar]
  15. MehoL.I. YangK. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar.J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol.200758132105212510.1002/asi.20677
     [Google Scholar]
  16. LiuW. The data source of this study is web of science core collection? Not enough.Scientometrics2019121318151824[10.1007/s11192-019-03238-1].10.1007/s11192‑019‑03238‑1
     [Google Scholar]
  17. LyuP. WangY. MengQ.X. FanP. MaK. XiaoS. CaoX. LinG.X. DongS. Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots in the application of artificial intelligence in cancer: A bibliometric analysis.Front. Oncol.20221295566810.3389/fonc.2022.955668
     [Google Scholar]
  18. WangJ. LiS. Applications of rare earth elements in cancer: Evidence mapping and scientometric analysis.Front. Med.2022994610010.3389/fmed.2022.946100
     [Google Scholar]
  19. LiuX. ZhouQ. YangY. ChenE. Application of hydrogels in cancer immunotherapy: A bibliometric analysis.Front. Immunol.202415143305010.3389/fimmu.2024.1433050
     [Google Scholar]
  20. WaltmanL. van EckN.J. NoyonsE.C.M. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks.J. Informetrics20104462963510.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
     [Google Scholar]
  21. van EckN.J. WaltmanL. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.Scientometrics201084252353810.1007/s11192‑009‑0146‑3
     [Google Scholar]
  22. BoyackK.W. KlavansR. Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol.201061122389240410.1002/asi.21419
     [Google Scholar]
  23. CallonM. CourtialJ.P. TurnerW.A. BauinS. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis.Soc. Sci. Inf.198322219123510.1177/053901883022002003
     [Google Scholar]
  24. RonnebergerO. FischerP. BroxT. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation.MICCAI 2015. MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(). NavabN. HorneggerJ. WellsW. FrangiA. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention9351ChamSpringer201510.1007/978‑3‑319‑24574‑4_28
     [Google Scholar]
  25. OtsuN. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms.IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.197991626610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
     [Google Scholar]
  26. CenekM. HuM. YorkG. DahlS. Survey of image processing techniques for brain pathology diagnosis: Challenges and opportunities.Front. Robot. AI2018512010.3389/frobt.2018.00120
     [Google Scholar]
  27. BalasubramanianP.K. LaiW.C. SengG.H. CK. SelvarajJ. APESTNet with mask R-CNN for liver tumor segmentation and classification.Cancers2023152330[10.3390/cancers15020330].10.3390/cancers15020330
     [Google Scholar]
  28. GhulamR. FatimaS. AliT. ZafarN.A. AsiriA.A. A U-Net-based CNN model for detection and segmentation of brain tumor.Comput. Mater. Continua20237411333134910.32604/cmc.2023.031695
     [Google Scholar]
  29. MaJ. YuanG. GuoC. GangX. ZhengM. SW-UNet: A U-Net fusing sliding window transformer block with CNN for segmentation of lung nodules.Front. Med.202310127344110.3389/fmed.2023.1273441
     [Google Scholar]
  30. FonollàR. van der ZanderQ.E.W. SchreuderR.M. MascleeA.A.M. SchoonE.J. van der SommenF. de WithP.H.N. A CNN CADx system for multimodal classification of colorectal polyps combining WL, BLI, and LCI modalities.Appl. Sci.202010155040[10.3390/app10155040].10.3390/app10155040
     [Google Scholar]
  31. HavaeiM. DavyA. Warde-FarleyD. BiardA. CourvilleA. BengioY. PalC. JodoinP-M. LarochelleH. Brain tumor segmentation with deep neural networks.Med. Image Anal.201735183110.1016/j.media.2016.05.004
     [Google Scholar]
  32. ZhouZ. SiddiqueeM.M.R. TajbakhshN. LiangJ. UNet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation.Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis and Multimodal Learning for Clinical Decision Support. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. SpringerCham201810.1007/978‑3‑030‑00889‑5_1
     [Google Scholar]
  33. DiakogiannisF.I. WaldnerF. CaccettaP. WuC. ResUNet-a: A deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed data.ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens.20201629411410.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.013
     [Google Scholar]
  34. ZhouY. ChangH. LuX. LuY. DenseUNet: Improved image classification method using standard convolution and dense transposed convolution.Knowl. Base. Syst.202225410965810.1016/j.knosys.2022.109658
     [Google Scholar]
  35. MilletariF. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation.2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV)Oct. 2016.10.1109/3DV.2016.79
     [Google Scholar]
  36. ÖzgünC. 3D U-Net: Learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation.Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2016: 19th International ConferenceAthens, Greece, October 17-21, 2016, pp. 424–432.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. WangC. GuoY. ChenW. YuZ. Fully automatic intervertebral disc segmentation using multimodal 3D U-Net.Proceedings of the IEEE 43rd Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)United States (USA), 2019, pp. 730-739.10.1109/COMPSAC.2019.00109
     [Google Scholar]
  38. LiuP. DouQ. WangQ. HengP.A. An encoder-decoder neural network with 3D squeeze-and-excitation and deep supervision for brain tumor segmentation.IEEE Access20208340293403710.1109/ACCESS.2020.2973707
     [Google Scholar]
  39. DodiaS. BasavaA. Padukudru AnandM. A novel receptive field‐regularized V‐net and nodule classification network for lung nodule detection.Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol.20223218810110.1002/ima.22636
     [Google Scholar]
  40. ZhaoC. HanJ. JiaY. GouF. Lung nodule detection via 3D U-Net and contextual convolutional neural network.Proceedings of the International Conference on Network and Network Applications (NaNA)October 2018, pp. 356-361.10.1109/NANA.2018.8648753
     [Google Scholar]
  41. OwlerJ. IrvingB. RidgewayG. Comparison of multi-atlas segmentation and U-Net approaches for automated 3D liver delineation in MRI.Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Medical Image Understanding and AnalysisJanuary 2020, pp. 478-488.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. YuW. FangB. LiuY. GaoM. ZhengS. WangY. Liver vessels segmentation based on 3d residual U-Net.Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)September 2019, pp. 250-254.10.1109/ICIP.2019.8802951
     [Google Scholar]
  43. SenthilvelanJ. JamshidiN. A pipeline for automated deep learning liver segmentation (PADLLS) from contrast enhanced CT exams.Sci. Rep.20221211579410.1038/s41598‑022‑20108‑8
     [Google Scholar]
  44. HanT. IvoR.F. RodriguesD.A. PeixotoS.A. de AlbuquerqueV.H.C. Rebouças FilhoP.P. Cascaded volumetric fully convolutional networks for whole-heart and great vessel 3D segmentation.Future Gener. Comput. Syst.202010819820910.1016/j.future.2020.02.055
     [Google Scholar]
  45. LiJ. ChenH. ZhuF. Automatic pulmonary vein and left atrium segmentation for TAPVC preoperative evaluation using V-net with grouped attention. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc.202020201207121010.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175907
     [Google Scholar]
  46. WangC. MacGillivrayT. MacnaughtG. YangG. NewbyD. A two-stage U-Net model for 3D multi-class segmentation on full-resolution cardiac data.Proceedings of the International Workshop on Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the HeartSpringer, Cham, 14 February 2019, pp 191–199.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. RavichandranS.R. NatarajB. HuangS. 3D inception U-Net for aorta segmentation using computed tomography cardiac angiography.Proceedings of the IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical & Health Informatics (BHI)2019, pp. 1-4.10.1109/BHI.2019.8834582
     [Google Scholar]
  48. WuJ. ZhangY. TangX. Simultaneous tissue classification and lateral ventricle segmentation via a 2D U-Net driven by a 3D fully convolutional neural network.Proceedings of the 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC)July 2019, pp. 5928-5931.10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856668
     [Google Scholar]
  49. TürkF. LüyM. BarışçıN. Kidney and renal tumor segmentation using a hybrid V-Net-based model.Mathematics2020810177210.3390/math8101772
     [Google Scholar]
  50. KarimiD. Deep learning with attention to detail: Automated segmentation of organ anatomy and pathology in medical images.Med. Image Anal.202165101794
     [Google Scholar]
  51. ChenL.C. TransUNet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation.arXiv preprint :2102.04306.2021
     [Google Scholar]
  52. XiaoH. RanZ. MabuS. LiY. LiL. SAUNet++: An automatic segmentation model of COVID-19 lesion from CT slices.Vis. Comput.20233962291230410.1007/s00371‑022‑02414‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  53. ChangY. HuM. ZhaiG. ZhangX. Transclaw U-Net: Claw U-net with transformers for medical image segmentation.2022 5th International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP)July 2021, pp. 280-284.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. SchlemperJ. OktayO. SchaapM. HeinrichM. KainzB. GlockerB. RueckertD. Attention gated networks: Learning to leverage salient regions in medical images.Med. Image Anal.20195319720710.1016/j.media.2019.01.012
     [Google Scholar]
  55. JiangH. ShiT. BaiZ. HuangL. AHCNet: An application of attention mechanism and hybrid connection for liver tumor segmentation in CT volumes.IEEE Access20197248982490910.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899608
     [Google Scholar]
  56. XuH. XieH. LiuY. ChengC. NiuC. ZhangY. Deep cascaded attention network for multi-task brain tumor segmentation.Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAISpringerCham201942042810.1007/978‑3‑030‑32248‑9_47
     [Google Scholar]
  57. SabarinathanD BehamMP RoomiSMMM Hyper vision net: Kidney tumor segmentation using coordinate convolutional layer and attention unit.Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing, and Graphics.SpringerSingapore2019609618
     [Google Scholar]
  58. ChenT. KornblithS. NorouziM. HintonG. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations.arXiv2020
     [Google Scholar]
  59. HeK. FanH. WuY. XieS. GirshickR. Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning.arXiv202010.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00975
     [Google Scholar]
  60. HanK. ShengV.S. SongY. LiuY. QiuC. MaS. LiuZ. Deep semi-supervised learning for medical image segmentation: A review.Expert Syst. Appl.202424512305210.1016/j.eswa.2023.123052
     [Google Scholar]
  61. ShiZ. JiangM. LiY. WeiB. WangZ. WuY. TanT. YangG. MLC: Multi-level consistency learning for semi-supervised left atrium segmentation.Expert Syst. Appl.202424412290310.1016/j.eswa.2023.122903
     [Google Scholar]
  62. XieY. ZhangJ. XiaY. Semi-supervised adversarial model for benign–malignant lung nodule classification on chest CT.Med. Image Anal.20195723724810.1016/j.media.2019.07.004
     [Google Scholar]
  63. GeC. GuI.Y.H. JakolaA.S. YangJ. Deep semi-supervised learning for brain tumor classification.BMC Med. Imaging20202018710.1186/s12880‑020‑00485‑0
     [Google Scholar]
  64. LiuY. MuF. ShiY. ChenX. SF-Net: A multi-task model for brain tumor segmentation in multimodal MRI via image fusion.IEEE Signal Process. Lett.2022291799180310.1109/LSP.2022.3198594
     [Google Scholar]
  65. YangA. XuL. QinN. HuangD. LiuZ. ShuJ. MFU-Net: A deep multimodal fusion network for breast cancer segmentation with dual-layer spectral detector CT.Appl. Intell.20245453808382410.1007/s10489‑023‑05090‑6
     [Google Scholar]
  66. GuA. DaoT. Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces.arXiv preprint :2312.007522023
     [Google Scholar]
  67. ZhuL. LiaoB. ZhangQ. WangX. LiuW. WangX. Vision Mamba: Efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model.arXiv preprint :2401.094172024
     [Google Scholar]
  68. WangZ. ZhengJ.Q. ZhangY. CuiG. LiL. Mamba-UNet: UNet-like pure visual Mamba for medical image segmentation.arXiv preprint :2402.050792024
     [Google Scholar]
  69. RuanJ. XiangS. VM-UNet: Vision mamba unet for medical image segmentation.arXiv preprint :2402.024912024
     [Google Scholar]
  70. XingZ. YeT. YangY. LiuG. ZhuL. SegMamba: Long-range sequential modeling Mamba for 3D medical image segmentation.International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted InterventionCham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, October, pp. 578-588.10.1007/978‑3‑031‑72111‑3_54
     [Google Scholar]
  71. MehtaR. ArbelT. 3D U-Net for brain tumor segmentation.Proceedings of the International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop2018:254-266.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. LiuH. ShenX. ShangF. GeF. WangF. CU-Net: Cascaded U-Net with loss weighted sampling for brain tumor segmentation.Multimodal Brain Image Analysis and Mathematical Foundations of Computational Anatomy.ChamSpringer201910211110.1007/978‑3‑030‑33226‑6_12
     [Google Scholar]
  73. KermiA. MahmoudiI. KhadirM.T. Deep convolutional neural networks using U-Net for automatic brain tumor segmentation in multimodal MRI volumes.Proceedings of the International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop2018, pp. 37-48.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. PiantadosiG. MarroneS. GalliA. SansoneM. SansoneC. DCE-MRI breast lesions segmentation with a 3TP U-Net deep convolutional neural network.Proceedings of the IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)201962863310.1109/CBMS.2019.00130
     [Google Scholar]
  75. WangY. SongY. WangF. SunJ. GaoX. HanZ. ShiL. ShaoG. FanM. YangG. A two-step automated quality assessment for liver MR images based on convolutional neural network.Eur. J. Radiol.202012410882210.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108822
     [Google Scholar]
  76. ZhangR. HuangL. XiaW. ZhangB. QiuB. GaoX. Multiple supervised residual network for osteosarcoma segmentation in CT images.Comput. Med. Imaging Graph.2018631810.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.01.006
     [Google Scholar]
  77. AzadR. Asadi-AghbolaghiM. FathyM. EscaleraS. Bi-directional ConvLSTM U-Net with densley connected convolutions.Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW)2019, pp. 1-10.10.1109/ICCVW.2019.00052
     [Google Scholar]
  78. ZhangZ. FuH. DaiH. ET-Net: A generic edge-attention guidance network for medical image segmentation.Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2019, pp. 442-450.10.1007/978‑3‑030‑32239‑7_49
     [Google Scholar]
  79. TanW. LiuY. LiuH. YangJ. YinX. ZhangY. A segmentation method of lung parenchyma from chest CT images based on dual U-Net.Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)2019, pp. 1649-1656.10.1109/BIBM47256.2019.8983381
     [Google Scholar]
  80. ShaziyaH. ShyamalaK. ZaheerR. Automatic lung segmentation on thoracic CT scans using U-Net convolutional network.Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP)2018, pp. 643-647.10.1109/ICCSP.2018.8524484
     [Google Scholar]
  81. PaingMay Phu Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules using three-dimensional chain coding and optimized random forest.Appl. Sci.2020107234610.3390/app10072346
     [Google Scholar]
  82. SaidY. AlsheikhyA.A. ShawlyT. LahzaH. Medical images segmentation for lung cancer diagnosis based on deep learning architectures.Diagnostics202313354610.3390/diagnostics13030546
     [Google Scholar]
  83. LiS. TsoG.K.F. HeK. Bottleneck feature supervised U-Net for pixel-wise liver and tumor segmentation.Expert Syst. Appl.202014511313110.1016/j.eswa.2019.113131
     [Google Scholar]
  84. ZhangL. XuL. An automatic liver segmentation algorithm for CT images U-Net with separated paths of feature extraction.Proceedings of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC)2018, pp. 294-298.10.1109/ICIVC.2018.8492721
     [Google Scholar]
  85. LiuZ. SongY.Q. ShengV.S. WangL. JiangR. ZhangX. YuanD. Liver CT sequence segmentation based with improved U-Net and graph cut.Expert Syst. Appl.2019126546310.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.055
     [Google Scholar]
  86. SuT-Y. FangY-H. Automatic liver and spleen segmentation with CT images using multi-channel U-Net deep learning approach.Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics2019, pp. 33-41.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. HuY. GuoY. WangY. YuJ. LiJ. ZhouS. ChangC. Automatic tumor segmentation in breast ultrasound images using a dilated fully convolutional network combined with an active contour model.Med. Phys.201946121522810.1002/mp.13268
     [Google Scholar]
  88. LiangY. HeR. LiY. WangZ. Simultaneous segmentation and classification of breast lesions from ultrasound images using mask R-CNN.2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)2019, pp. 1470-1472.10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8926185
     [Google Scholar]
  89. JiangJ. GuoY. BiZ. HuangZ. YuG. WangJ. Segmentation of prostate ultrasound images: The state of the art and the future directions of segmentation algorithms.Artif. Intell. Rev.202356161565110.1007/s10462‑022‑10179‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  90. VasanthselvakumarR. BalasubramanianM. SathiyaS. Automatic detection and classification of chronic kidney diseases using CNN architecture.Data Engineering and Communication Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. RajuK.S. SenkerikR. LankaS.P. RajagopalV. SingaporeSpringer2020107910.1007/978‑981‑15‑1097‑7_62
     [Google Scholar]
  91. GuoZ. LiX. HuangH. GuoN. LiQ. Deep learning-based image segmentation on multimodal medical imaging.IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci.20193216216910.1109/TRPMS.2018.2890359
     [Google Scholar]
  92. WuZ. LiX. ZuoJ. RAD-UNet: Research on an improved lung nodule semantic segmentation algorithm based on deep learning.Front. Oncol.202313108409610.3389/fonc.2023.1084096
     [Google Scholar]
  93. IqbalA. SharifM. BTS-ST: Swin transformer network for segmentation and classification of multimodality breast cancer images.Knowl-Based Syst202326711039310.1016/j.knosys.2023.110393
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cpb/10.2174/0113892010325620250312082433
Loading
Tumor Image Segmentation: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2003 to 2024
Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 26, 1987 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892010325620250312082433
/content/journals/cpb/10.2174/0113892010325620250312082433
/content/journals/cpb/10.2174/0113892010325620250312082433
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): bibliometrics; image segmentation; MAMBA; Tumor image; U-net; VOSviewer

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test