Biotechnological Advances in Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Fermentation for Edible Insects: Functionality, Acceptability and Safety

References

1. ProspectsU.N. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights.2019Available From: https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_10KeyFindings.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
2. GuinéR.P.F. FlorençaS.G. AnjosO. BoustaniN.M. Chuck-HernándezC. SarićM.M. FerreiraM. CostaC.A. BartkieneE. CardosoA.P. TarceaM. CorreiaP.M.R. CamposS. PapageorgiouM. CaminoD.A. KorzeniowskaM. Černelič-BizjakM. KrumaZ. DamarliE. FerreiraV. DjekicI. Are Consumers Aware of Sustainability Aspects Related to Edible Insects? Results from a Study Involving 14 Countries.Sustainability (Basel)202214211412510.3390/su142114125
   [Google Scholar]
3. KimT.K. YongH.I. KangM.C. JungS. JangH.W. ChoiY.S. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on technical functional properties of edible insect protein.Food Sci. Anim. Resour.202141218519510.5851/kosfa.2020.e85 33987542
   [Google Scholar]
4. ZhangZ.Q. ChenS.C. XiaoJ.H. HuangD.W. State-of-the-art review of edible insect: From bioactives, pretreatment to enrichment.Food Biosci.20245910387910.1016/j.fbio.2024.103879
   [Google Scholar]
5. de MatosF.M. RaseraG.B. de CastroR.J. Insects as a sustainable source of emerging proteins and their processing to obtain bioactive compounds: An updated review.Sustainable Food Technol.20242193110.1039/D3FB00097D
   [Google Scholar]
6. KhampakoolA. SoisungwanS. YouS. ParkS.H. Infrared assisted freeze-drying (IRAFD) to produce shelf-stable insect food from Protaetia brevitarsis (white-spotted flower chafer) larva.Food Sci. Anim. Resour.202040581383010.5851/kosfa.2020.e60 32968732
   [Google Scholar]
7. KimT.K. YongH.I. KimY.B. KimH.W. ChoiY.S. Edible insects as a protein source: A review of public perception, processing technology, and research trends.Food Sci. Anim. Resour.201939452154010.5851/kosfa.2019.e53 31508584
   [Google Scholar]
8. KwakK.W. KimS.Y. AnK.S. KimY.S. ParkK. KimE. HwangJ.S. KimM.A. RyuH.Y. YoonH.J. Subacute oral toxicity evaluation of freeze-dried powder of Locusta migratoria.Food Sci. Anim. Resour.202040579581210.5851/kosfa.2020.e55 32968731
   [Google Scholar]
9. Jantzen da Silva LucasA. Menegon de OliveiraL. da RochaM. PrenticeC. Edible insects: An alternative of nutritional, functional and bioactive compounds.Food Chem.202031112602210.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126022 31869637
   [Google Scholar]
10. Melgar-LalanneG. Hernández-ÁlvarezA.J. Salinas-CastroA. Edible insects processing: Traditional and innovative technologies.Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.20191841166119110.1111/1541‑4337.12463 33336989
    [Google Scholar]
11. MyersG. PettigrewS. A qualitative exploration of the factors underlying seniors’ receptiveness to entomophagy.Food Res. Int.201810316316910.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.032 29389602
    [Google Scholar]
12. SosaD.A. FoglianoV. Potential of insect-derived ingredients for food applications. Insect Physiology and Ecology.LondonIntechOpen Ltd.201710.5772/67318
    [Google Scholar]
13. Castro-LópezC. Santiago-LópezL. Vallejo-CordobaB. González-CórdovaA.F. LiceagaA.M. GarcíaH.S. Hernández-MendozaA. An insight to fermented edible insects: A global perspective and prospective.Food Res. Int.202013710975010.1016/j.foodres.2020.109750 33233312
    [Google Scholar]
14. ManfrediniP.G. CavanhiV.A.F. CostaJ.A.V. CollaL.M. Bioactive peptides and proteases: Characteristics, applications and the simultaneous production in solid-state fermentation.Biocatal. Biotransform.202139536037710.1080/10242422.2020.1849151
    [Google Scholar]
15. RizwanD. MasoodiF.A. WaniS.M. MirS.A. Bioactive peptides from fermented foods and their relevance in COVID-19 mitigation. Food Production.Processing and Nutrition2023515310.1186/s43014‑023‑00165‑w
    [Google Scholar]
16. SousaP. BorgesS. PintadoM. Enzymatic hydrolysis of insect Alphitobius diaperinus towards the development of bioactive peptide hydrolysates.Food Funct.20201143539354810.1039/D0FO00188K 32255460
    [Google Scholar]
17. MajumderK. WuJ. Purification and characterisation of angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides derived from enzymatic hydrolysate of ovotransferrin.Food Chem.201112641614161910.1016/j.foodchem.2010.12.039 25213935
    [Google Scholar]
18. LiuJ. YuZ. ZhaoW. LinS. WangE. ZhangY. HaoH. WangZ. ChenF. Isolation and identification of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides from egg white protein hydrolysates.Food Chem.201012241159116310.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.108
    [Google Scholar]
19. ChenJ. LiuS. YeR. CaiG. JiB. WuY. Angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory tripeptides from rice protein hydrolysate: Purification and characterization.J. Funct. Foods2013541684169210.1016/j.jff.2013.07.013
    [Google Scholar]
20. HimayaS.W.A. NgoD.H. RyuB. KimS.K. An active peptide purified from gastrointestinal enzyme hydrolysate of Pacific cod skin gelatin attenuates angiotensin-1 converting enzyme (ACE) activity and cellular oxidative stress.Food Chem.201213241872188210.1016/j.foodchem.2011.12.020
    [Google Scholar]
21. VercruysseL. SmaggheG. HerregodsG. Van CampJ. ACE inhibitory activity in enzymatic hydrolysates of insect protein.J. Agric. Food Chem.200553135207521110.1021/jf050337q 15969498
    [Google Scholar]
22. HallF. LiceagaA. Effect of microwave-assisted enzymatic hydrolysis of cricket (Gryllodes sigillatus) protein on ACE and DPP-IV inhibition and tropomyosin-IgG binding.J. Funct. Foods20206410363410.1016/j.jff.2019.103634
    [Google Scholar]
23. CohenP. GoedertM. GSK3 inhibitors: Development and therapeutic potential.Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.20043647948710.1038/nrd1415 15173837
    [Google Scholar]
24. HallF. JohnsonP.E. LiceagaA. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on bioactive properties and allergenicity of cricket (Gryllodes sigillatus) protein.Food Chem.2018262394710.1016/j.foodchem.2018.04.058 29751919
    [Google Scholar]
25. D’AntonioV. BattistaN. SacchettiG. Di MattiaC. SerafiniM. Functional properties of edible insects: A systematic review.Nutr. Res. Rev.20233619811910.1017/S0954422421000366 34819193
    [Google Scholar]
26. MittalR.K. MishraR. SharmaV. PurohitP. Bioactive exploration in functional foods: Unlocking nature’s treasures.Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol.2024 38031768
    [Google Scholar]
27. SchiemerC. HalloranA. JespersenK. KaukuaP. Marketing insects: Superfood or solution-food?Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems.ChamSpringer2018
    [Google Scholar]
28. SinghM.P. SoniK. BhamraR. MittalR.K. Superfood: Value and need.Curr. Nutr. Food Sci.2022181656810.2174/1573401317666210420123013
    [Google Scholar]
29. De MarchiL. WangorschA. ZoccatelliG. Allergens from edible insects: Cross-reactivity and effects of processing.Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep.20212153510.1007/s11882‑021‑01012‑z 34056688
    [Google Scholar]
30. ToldráF. ReigM. AristoyM.C. MoraL. Generation of bioactive peptides during food processing.Food Chem.201826739540410.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.119 29934183
    [Google Scholar]
31. YangR. ZhaoX. KuangZ. YeM. LuoG. XiaoG. LiaoS. LiL. XiongZ. Optimization of antioxidant peptide production in the hydrolysis of silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) pupa protein using response surface methodology.J. Food Agric. Environ.2013111952956
    [Google Scholar]
32. YoonS. WongN.A.K. ChaeM. AuhJ.H. Comparative characterization of protein hydrolysates from three edible insects: Mealworm larvae, adult crickets, and silkworm pupae.Foods201981156310.3390/foods8110563 31717478
    [Google Scholar]
33. DaroitD.J. BrandelliA. In vivo bioactivities of food protein-derived peptides – a current review.Curr. Opin. Food Sci.20213912012910.1016/j.cofs.2021.01.002
    [Google Scholar]
34. SinghK.P. JayasomuR.S. Bombyx mori – A Review of its Potential as a Medicinal Insect.Pharm. Biol.2002401283210.1076/phbi.40.1.28.5857
    [Google Scholar]
35. ChourasiaR. PhukonL.C. SinghS.P. RaiA.K. SahooD. Role of enzymatic bioprocesses for the production of functional food and nutraceuticals.Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals.AmsterdamElsevier202010.1016/B978‑0‑12‑819820‑9.00015‑6
    [Google Scholar]
36. PurschkeB. MeinlschmidtP. HornC. RiederO. JägerH. Improvement of techno-functional properties of edible insect protein from migratory locust by enzymatic hydrolysis.Eur. Food Res. Technol.20182446999101310.1007/s00217‑017‑3017‑9
    [Google Scholar]
37. DeviW.D. BonysanaR. KapesaK. RaiA.K. MukherjeeP.K. RajashekarY. Potential of edible insects as source of functional foods: Biotechnological approaches for improving functionality.Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing20222346147210.1007/s43393‑022‑00089‑5
    [Google Scholar]
38. Can KaracaA. NickersonM. CaggiaC. RandazzoC.L. BalangeA.K. CarrilloC. GallegoM. Sharifi-RadJ. KamilogluS. CapanogluE. Nutritional and functional properties of novel protein sources.Food Rev. Int.20233996045607710.1080/87559129.2022.2067174
    [Google Scholar]
39. Real HernandezL.M. Gonzalez de MejiaE. Enzymatic production, bioactivity, and bitterness of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) peptides.Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.20191861913194610.1111/1541‑4337.12504 33336957
    [Google Scholar]
40. GhoshS. Meyer-RochowV.B. JungC. Processing of edible insects for protein production.Insects as Food and Food Ingredients.Cambridge, MassachusettsAcademic Press202410.1016/B978‑0‑323‑95594‑2.00010‑0
    [Google Scholar]
41. VercruysseL. SmaggheG. BeckersT. CampJ.V. Antioxidative and ACE inhibitory activities in enzymatic hydrolysates of the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis.Food Chem.20091141384310.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.011
    [Google Scholar]
42. TeixeiraC.S.S. VillaC. CostaJ. FerreiraI.M.P.L.V.O. MafraI. Edible insects as a novel source of bioactive peptides: A systematic review.Foods20231210202610.3390/foods12102026 37238844
    [Google Scholar]
43. SarkarP. ValacchiG. DuaryR.K. Proteome composition and profiling of bioactive peptides of edible Antheraea assamensis pupae by sequential enzymatic digestion and kinetic modeling of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion.Eur. Food Res. Technol.20212021123
    [Google Scholar]
44. VercruysseL. SmaggheG. MatsuiT. Van CampJ. Purification and identification of an angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide from the gastrointestinal hydrolysate of the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis.Process Biochem.200843890090410.1016/j.procbio.2008.04.014
    [Google Scholar]
45. NongoniermaA.B. FitzGeraldR.J. Unlocking the biological potential of proteins from edible insects through enzymatic hydrolysis: A review.Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol.20174323925210.1016/j.ifset.2017.08.014
    [Google Scholar]
46. LiceagaA.M. Aguilar-ToaláJ.E. Vallejo-CordobaB. González-CórdovaA.F. Hernández-MendozaA. Insects as an alternative protein source.Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol.2022131193410.1146/annurev‑food‑052720‑112443 34699254
    [Google Scholar]
47. ZielińskaE. KaraśM. JakubczykA. Antioxidant activity of predigested protein obtained from a range of farmed edible insects.Int. J. Food Sci. Technol.201752230631210.1111/ijfs.13282
    [Google Scholar]
48. ZielińskaE. BaraniakB. KaraśM. RybczyńskaK. JakubczykA. Selected species of edible insects as a source of nutrient composition.Food Res. Int.20157746046610.1016/j.foodres.2015.09.008
    [Google Scholar]
49. WuQ.Y. JiaJ.Q. TanG.X. XuJ.L. GuiZ.Z. Physicochemical properties of silkworm larvae protein isolate and gastrointestinal hydrolysate bioactivities.Afr. J. Biotechnol.2011103261456153
    [Google Scholar]
50. WuQ. JiaJ. YanH. DuJ. GuiZ. A novel angiotensin-І converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide from gastrointestinal protease hydrolysate of silkworm pupa (Bombyx mori) protein: Biochemical characterization and molecular docking study.Peptides201568172410.1016/j.peptides.2014.07.026 25111373
    [Google Scholar]
51. JiaJ. WuQ. YanH. GuiZ. Purification and molecular docking study of a novel angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide from alcalase hydrolysate of ultrasonic-pretreated silkworm pupa (Bombyx mori) protein.Process Biochem.201550587688310.1016/j.procbio.2014.12.030
    [Google Scholar]
52. DaiC. MaH. LuoL. YinX. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide derived from Tenebrio molitor (L.) larva protein hydrolysate.Eur. Food Res. Technol.2013236468168910.1007/s00217‑013‑1923‑z
    [Google Scholar]
53. HallF.G. JonesO.G. O’HaireM.E. LiceagaA.M. Functional properties of tropical banded cricket (Gryllodes sigillatus) protein hydrolysates.Food Chem.201722441442210.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.138 28159288
    [Google Scholar]
54. KumariR. SanjuktaS. SahooD. RaiA.K. Functional peptides in Asian protein rich fermented foods: Production and health benefits.Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing20222111310.1007/s43393‑021‑00040‑0
    [Google Scholar]
55. AdeboO.A. Gabriela Medina-MezaI. Impact of fermentation on the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of whole cereal grains: A mini review.Molecules202025492710.3390/molecules25040927 32093014
    [Google Scholar]
56. AdeboO.A. African sorghum-based fermented foods: Past, current and future prospects.Nutrients2020124111110.3390/nu12041111 32316319
    [Google Scholar]
57. KlunderH.C. Wolkers-RooijackersJ. KorpelaJ.M. NoutM.J.R. Microbiological aspects of processing and storage of edible insects.Food Control201226262863110.1016/j.foodcont.2012.02.013
    [Google Scholar]
58. BorremansA. LenaertsS. CrauwelsS. LievensB. Van CampenhoutL. Marination and fermentation of yellow mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor).Food Control201892475210.1016/j.foodcont.2018.04.036
    [Google Scholar]
59. MouritsenO.G. DuelundL. CallejaG. FrøstM.B. Flavour of fermented fish, insect, game, and pea sauces: Garum revisited.Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci.20179162810.1016/j.ijgfs.2017.05.002
    [Google Scholar]
60. De SmetJ. LenaertsS. BorremansA. ScholliersJ. Van Der BorghtM. Van CampenhoutL. Stability assessment and laboratory scale fermentation of pastes produced on a pilot scale from mealworms (Tenebrio molitor).Lebensm. Wiss. Technol.201910211312110.1016/j.lwt.2018.12.017
    [Google Scholar]
61. KewuyemiY.O. KesaH. ChinmaC.E. AdeboO.A. Fermented edible insects for promoting food security in Africa.Insects202011528310.3390/insects11050283 32380684
    [Google Scholar]
62. BorremansA. SmetsR. Van CampenhoutL. Fermentation versus meat preservatives to extend the shelf life of mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) paste for feed and food applications.Front. Microbiol.202011151010.3389/fmicb.2020.01510 32760364
    [Google Scholar]
63. ChoJ.H. ZhaoH.L. KimJ.S. KimS.H. ChungC.H. Characteristics of fermented seasoning sauces using Tenebrio molitor larvae.Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol.20184518619510.1016/j.ifset.2017.10.010
    [Google Scholar]
64. RoncoliniA. MilanovićV. CardinaliF. OsimaniA. GarofaloC. SabbatiniR. ClementiF. PasquiniM. MozzonM. FoligniR. RaffaelliN. ZamporliniF. MinazzatoG. TrombettaM.F. Van BuitenenA. Van CampenhoutL. AquilantiL. Protein fortification with mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) powder: Effect on textural, microbiological, nutritional and sensory features of bread.PLoS One2019142e021174710.1371/journal.pone.0211747 30707742
    [Google Scholar]
65. da Rosa MachadoC. ThysR.C.S. Cricket powder (Gryllus assimilis) as a new alternative protein source for gluten-free breads.Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol.20195610218010.1016/j.ifset.2019.102180
    [Google Scholar]
66. ChoH.D. MinH.J. WonY.S. AhnH.Y. ChoY.S. SeoK.I. Solid state fermentation process with Aspergillus kawachii enhances the cancer-suppressive potential of silkworm larva in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.BMC Complement. Altern. Med.201919124110.1186/s12906‑019‑2649‑7 31488109
    [Google Scholar]
67. UlugS.K. JahandidehF. WuJ. Novel technologies for the production of bioactive peptides.Trends Food Sci. Technol.2021108273910.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.002
    [Google Scholar]
68. de CastroR.J.S. SatoH.H. Biologically active peptides: Processes for their generation, purification and identification and applications as natural additives in the food and pharmaceutical industries.Food Res. Int.20157418519810.1016/j.foodres.2015.05.013 28411983
    [Google Scholar]
69. Cruz-CasasD.E. AguilarC.N. Ascacio-ValdésJ.A. Rodríguez-HerreraR. Chávez-GonzálezM.L. Flores-GallegosA.C. Enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation: The most favorable biotechnological methods for the release of bioactive peptides.Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences2021310004710.1016/j.fochms.2021.100047 35415659
    [Google Scholar]
70. MatosF.M. CastroR.J. Edible insects as potential sources of proteins for obtaining bioactive peptides.Braz. J. Food. Technol.202124e202004410.1590/1981‑6723.04420
    [Google Scholar]
71. MintahB.K. HeR. DabbourM. XiangJ. AgyekumA.A. MaH. Techno-functional attribute and antioxidative capacity of edible insect protein preparations and hydrolysates thereof: Effect of multiple mode sonochemical action.Ultrason. Sonochem.20195810467610.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104676 31450306
    [Google Scholar]
72. Rivero-PinoF. Espejo-CarpioF.J. Pérez-GálvezR. GuadixA. GuadixE.M. Effect of ultrasound pretreatment and sequential hydrolysis on the production of Tenebrio molitor antidiabetic peptides.Food Bioprod. Process.202012321722410.1016/j.fbp.2020.07.003
    [Google Scholar]
73. AllenzaP. EldridgeR. High-throughput screening and insect genomics for new insecticide leads. Insecticides Design Using Advanced Technologies.Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer2007678610.1007/978‑3‑540‑46907‑0_3
    [Google Scholar]
74. FaumanE.B. HopkinsA.L. GroomC.R. Structural bioinformatics in drug discovery. Structural Bioinformatics.Hoboken, New JerseyWiley20034410.1002/0471721204.ch23
    [Google Scholar]
75. SmaggheG. Insect cell lines as tools in insecticide mode of action research. Insecticides design using advanced technologies.Berlin, GermanySpringer200744
    [Google Scholar]
76. de CarvalhoN.M. MadureiraA.R. PintadoM.E. The potential of insects as food sources – a review.Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.202060213642365210.1080/10408398.2019.1703170 31868531
    [Google Scholar]
77. OrsiL. VoegeL.L. StranieriS. Eating edible insects as sustainable food? Exploring the determinants of consumer acceptance in Germany.Food Res. Int.201912510857310.1016/j.foodres.2019.108573 31554134
    [Google Scholar]
78. DupontJ. FiebelkornF. Attitudes and acceptance of young people toward the consumption of insects and cultured meat in Germany.Food Qual. Prefer.20208510398310.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103983
    [Google Scholar]
79. SogariG. MenozziD. MoraC. Exploring young foodies'; knowledge and attitude regarding entomophagy: A qualitative study in Italy.Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci.20177161910.1016/j.ijgfs.2016.12.002
    [Google Scholar]
80. SchäufeleI. Barrera AlboresE. HammU. The role of species for the acceptance of edible insects: Evidence from a consumer survey.Br. Food J.201912192190220410.1108/BFJ‑01‑2019‑0017
    [Google Scholar]
81. SogariG. Entomophagy and Italian consumers: An exploratory analysis.Prog. Nutr.2015174311316
    [Google Scholar]
82. BergerS. ChristandlF. BitterlinD. WyssA.M. The social insectivore: Peer and expert influence affect consumer evaluations of insects as food.Appetite201914110433810.1016/j.appet.2019.104338 31260707
    [Google Scholar]
83. JensenN.H. LieberothA. We will eat disgusting foods together – Evidence of the normative basis of Western entomophagy-disgust from an insect tasting.Food Qual. Prefer.20197210911510.1016/j.foodqual.2018.08.012
    [Google Scholar]
84. SchlupY. BrunnerT. Prospects for insects as food in Switzerland: A tobit regression.Food Qual. Prefer.201864374610.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.010
    [Google Scholar]
85. VerbekeW. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society.Food Qual. Prefer.20153914715510.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008
    [Google Scholar]
86. LammersP. UllmannL.M. FiebelkornF. Acceptance of insects as food in Germany: Is it about sensation seeking, sustainability consciousness, or food disgust?Food Qual. Prefer.201977788810.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.010
    [Google Scholar]
87. PalmieriN. PeritoM.A. MacrìM.C. LupiC. Exploring consumers’ willingness to eat insects in Italy.Br. Food J.2019121112937295010.1108/BFJ‑03‑2019‑0170
    [Google Scholar]
88. van HuisA. Insects as food and feed, a new emerging agricultural sector: A review.J. Insects Food Feed202061274410.3920/JIFF2019.0017
    [Google Scholar]
89. PowellP.A. JonesC.R. ConsedineN.S. It’s not queasy being green: The role of disgust in willingness-to-pay for more sustainable product alternatives.Food Qual. Prefer.20197810373710.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103737
    [Google Scholar]
90. DagevosH. A literature review of consumer research on edible insects: Recent evidence and new vistas from 2019 studies.J. Insects Food Feed20217324925910.3920/JIFF2020.0052
    [Google Scholar]
91. CicatielloC. VitaliA. LaceteraN. How does it taste? Appreciation of insect-based snacks and its determinants.Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci.20202110021110.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100211
    [Google Scholar]
92. HarmsE. PiroletN. Consumer acceptance of insect-based burgers.Appetite201813030610.1016/j.appet.2018.05.195
    [Google Scholar]
93. Caparros MegidoR. SablonL. GeuensM. BrostauxY. AlabiT. BleckerC. DrugmandD. HaubrugeÉ. FrancisF. Edible insects acceptance by B elgian consumers: Promising attitude for entomophagy development.J. Sens. Stud.2014291142010.1111/joss.12077
    [Google Scholar]
94. WilkinsonK. MuhlhauslerB. MotleyC. CrumpA. BrayH. AnkenyR. Australian consumers’ awareness and acceptance of insects as food.Insects2018924410.3390/insects9020044 29671798
    [Google Scholar]
95. BartkowiczJ. Babicz-ZielińskaE. Acceptance of bars with edible insects by a selected group of students from Tri-City, Poland.Czech J. Food Sci.202038319219710.17221/236/2019‑CJFS
    [Google Scholar]
96. ÇabukB. YılmazB. Fortification of traditional egg pasta (erişte) with edible insects: Nutritional quality, cooking properties and sensory characteristics evaluation.J. Food Sci. Technol.20205772750275710.1007/s13197‑020‑04315‑7 32549625
    [Google Scholar]
97. RibeiroJ.C. LimaR.C. MaiaM.R.G. AlmeidaA.A. FonsecaA.J.M. CabritaA.R.J. CunhaL.M. Impact of defatting freeze-dried edible crickets (Acheta domesticus and Gryllodes sigillatus) on the nutritive value, overall liking and sensory profile of cereal bars.Lebensm. Wiss. Technol.201911310833510.1016/j.lwt.2019.108335
    [Google Scholar]
98. LunaG.C. Martin-GonzalezF.S. MauerL.J. LiceagaA.M. Cricket (Acheta domesticus) protein hydrolysates’ impact on the physicochemical, structural and sensory properties of tortillas and tortilla chips.J. Insects Food Feed20217110912010.3920/JIFF2020.0010
    [Google Scholar]
99. ManciniS. MoruzzoR. RiccioliF. PaciG. European consumers’ readiness to adopt insects as food. A review.Food Res. Int.201912266167810.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.041 31229126
    [Google Scholar]
100. AwobusuyiT.D. PillayK. SiwelaM. Consumer acceptance of biscuits supplemented with a sorghum–insect meal.Nutrients202012489510.3390/nu12040895 32218250
     [Google Scholar]
101. TanH.S.G. FischerA.R.H. van TrijpH.C.M. StiegerM. Tasty but nasty? Exploring the role of sensory-liking and food appropriateness in the willingness to eat unusual novel foods like insects.Food Qual. Prefer.20164829330210.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.001
     [Google Scholar]
102. TanH.S.G. TibboelC.J. StiegerM. Why do unusual novel foods like insects lack sensory appeal? Investigating the underlying sensory perceptions.Food Qual. Prefer.201760485810.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.012
     [Google Scholar]
103. ModlinskaK. AdamczykD. GoncikowskaK. MaisonD. PisulaW. The effect of labelling and visual properties on the acceptance of foods containing insects.Nutrients2020129249810.3390/nu12092498 32824991
     [Google Scholar]
104. Gómez-LucianoC.A. de AguiarL.K. VriesekoopF. UrbanoB. Consumers’ willingness to purchase three alternatives to meat proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic.Food Qual. Prefer.20197810373210.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103732
     [Google Scholar]
105. LiuA.J. LiJ. GómezM.I. Factors influencing consumption of edible insects for Chinese consumers.Insects20191111010.3390/insects11010010 31861955
     [Google Scholar]
106. DelicatoC. SchoutetenJ.J. DewettinckK. GellynckX. Tzompa-SosaD.A. Consumers’ perception of bakery products with insect fat as partial butter replacement.Food Qual. Prefer.20207910375510.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103755
     [Google Scholar]
107. SidaliK.L. PizzoS. Garrido-PérezE.I. SchamelG. Between food delicacies and food taboos: A structural equation model to assess Western students’ acceptance of Amazonian insect food.Food Res. Int.2019115838910.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.027 30599985
     [Google Scholar]
108. BatatW. PeterP. The healthy and sustainable bugs appetite: Factors affecting entomophagy acceptance and adoption in Western food cultures.J. Consum. Mark.202037329130310.1108/JCM‑10‑2018‑2906
     [Google Scholar]
109. ClarksonC. MirosaM. BirchJ. Consumer acceptance of insects and ideal product attributes.Br. Food J.2018120122898291110.1108/BFJ‑11‑2017‑0645
     [Google Scholar]
110. VerneauF. La BarberaF. KolleS. AmatoM. Del GiudiceT. GrunertK. The effect of communication and implicit associations on consuming insects: An experiment in Denmark and Italy.Appetite2016106303610.1016/j.appet.2016.02.006 26855371
     [Google Scholar]
111. IannuzziE. SistoR. NigroC. The willingness to consume insect-based food: An empirical research on Italian consumers.Agric. Econ.20196510454462
     [Google Scholar]
112. NybergM. OlssonV. WendinK. ‘Would you like to eat an insect?’—Children’s perceptions of and thoughts about eating insects.Int. J. Consum. Stud.202145224825810.1111/ijcs.12616
     [Google Scholar]
113. MotokiK. IshikawaS. SpenceC. VelascoC. Contextual acceptance of insect-based foods.Food Qual. Prefer.20208510398210.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103982
     [Google Scholar]
114. SogariG. BoguevaD. MarinovaD. Australian consumers’ response to insects as food.Agriculture20199510810.3390/agriculture9050108
     [Google Scholar]
115. PamboK.O. MbecheR.M. OkelloJ.J. MoseG.N. KinyuruJ.N. Intentions to consume foods from edible insects and the prospects for transforming the ubiquitous biomass into food.Agric. Human Values201835488589810.1007/s10460‑018‑9881‑5
     [Google Scholar]
116. RubyM.B. RozinP. Disgust, sushi consumption, and other predictors of acceptance of insects as food by Americans and Indians.Food Qual. Prefer.20197415516210.1016/j.foodqual.2019.01.013
     [Google Scholar]
117. TuccilloF. MarinoM.G. TorriL. Italian consumers’ attitudes towards entomophagy: Influence of human factors and properties of insects and insect-based food.Food Res. Int.202013710961910.1016/j.foodres.2020.109619 33233207
     [Google Scholar]
118. DoddsW.B. MonroeK.B. The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective Product Evaluations. Metasearch for University of St.Gallen, Library.Adv. Consum. Res.1985128590
     [Google Scholar]
119. LensveltE.J.S. SteenbekkersL.P.A. Exploring consumer acceptance of entomophagy: A survey and experiment in Australia and the Netherlands.Ecol. Food Nutr.201453554356110.1080/03670244.2013.879865 25105864
     [Google Scholar]
120. BergerS. ChristandlF. SchmidtC. BaertschC. Price-based quality inferences for insects as food.Br. Food J.201812071615162710.1108/BFJ‑08‑2017‑0434
     [Google Scholar]
121. GedrovicaI. Insects as food-the opinion of Latvian consumers.American Journal of Entomology201933566010.11648/j.aje.20190303.11
     [Google Scholar]
122. WoolfE. ZhuY. EmoryK. ZhaoJ. LiuC. Willingness to consume insect-containing foods: A survey in the United States.Lebensm. Wiss. Technol.201910210010510.1016/j.lwt.2018.12.010
     [Google Scholar]
123. Zielińska, E.; Zieliński, D.; Karaś, M.; Jakubczyk, A. Exploration of consumer acceptance of insects as food in Poland.J. Insects Food Feed20206438339210.3920/JIFF2019.0055
     [Google Scholar]
124. ManciniS. SogariG. MenozziD. NuvoloniR. TorraccaB. MoruzzoR. PaciG. Factors predicting the intention of eating an insect-based product.Foods20198727010.3390/foods8070270 31331106
     [Google Scholar]
125. BartonA. RichardsonC.D. McSweeneyM.B. Consumer attitudes toward entomophagy before and after evaluating cricket (Acheta domesticus)‐based protein powders.J. Food Sci.202085378178810.1111/1750‑3841.15043 32017110
     [Google Scholar]
126. VerneauF. La BarberaF. AmatoM. RiversoR. GrunertK.G. Assessing the role of food related lifestyle in predicting intention towards edible insects.Insects2020111066010.3390/insects11100660 32992806
     [Google Scholar]
127. ChangH.P. MaC.C. ChenH.S. Climate change and consumer’s attitude toward insect food.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health2019169160610.3390/ijerph16091606 31071928
     [Google Scholar]
128. MenozziD. SogariG. VenezianiM. SimoniE. MoraC. Eating novel foods: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product.Food Qual. Prefer.201759273410.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.001
     [Google Scholar]
129. HouseJ. Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: Academic and commercial implications.Appetite2016107475810.1016/j.appet.2016.07.023 27444958
     [Google Scholar]
130. Van ThielenL. VermuytenS. StormsB. RumpoldB. Van CampenhoutL. Consumer acceptance of foods containing edible insects in Belgium two years after their introduction to the market.J. Insects Food Feed201951354410.3920/JIFF2017.0075
     [Google Scholar]
131. PascucciS. MagistrisT.D. Information bias condemning radical food innovators? The case of insect-based products in the Netherlands.Int. Food Agribus. Manage Rev.2013163116
     [Google Scholar]
132. RozinP. FallonA. The psychological categorization of foods and non-foods: A preliminary taxonomy of food rejections.Appetite19801319320110.1016/S0195‑6663(80)80027‑4
     [Google Scholar]
133. AlemuM.H. OlsenS.B. VedelS.E. PamboK.O. OwinoV.O. Combining product attributes with recommendation and shopping location attributes to assess consumer preferences for insect-based food products.Food Qual. Prefer.201755455710.1016/j.foodqual.2016.08.009
     [Google Scholar]
134. KhalilR. KallasZ. HaddarahA. El OmarF. PujolàM. Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on willingness to consume insect-based food products in Catalonia.Foods202110480510.3390/foods10040805 33917989
     [Google Scholar]
135. CollinsC.M. VaskouP. KountourisY. Insect food products in the western world: Assessing the potential of a new ‘green’market.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.2019112651852810.1093/aesa/saz015 31741488
     [Google Scholar]
136. StoopsJ. CrauwelsS. WaudM. ClaesJ. LievensB. Van CampenhoutL. Microbial community assessment of mealworm larvae ( Tenebrio molitor ) and grasshoppers ( Locusta migratoria migratorioides ) sold for human consumption.Food Microbiol.201653Pt B12212710.1016/j.fm.2015.09.010 26678139
     [Google Scholar]
137. NyenjeM.E. OdjadjareC.E. TanihN.F. GreenE. NdipR.N. Foodborne pathogens recovered from ready-to-eat foods from roadside cafeterias and retail outlets in Alice, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa: Public health implications.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health2012982608261910.3390/ijerph9082608 23066386
     [Google Scholar]
138. GarofaloC. OsimaniA. MilanovićV. TaccariM. CardinaliF. AquilantiL. RioloP. RuschioniS. IsidoroN. ClementiF. The microbiota of marketed processed edible insects as revealed by high-throughput sequencing.Food Microbiol.201762152210.1016/j.fm.2016.09.012 27889142
     [Google Scholar]
139. LiceagaA.M. Processing insects for use in the food and feed industry.Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.202148323610.1016/j.cois.2021.08.002 34455091
     [Google Scholar]
140. GemedeH.F. RattaN. Antinutritional factors in plant foods: Potential health benefits and adverse effects.Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci.20143428439
     [Google Scholar]
141. EkopE.A. UdohA.I. AkpanP.E. Proximate and anti-nutrient composition of four edible insects in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.World Journal of Applied Science and Technology.201022224231
     [Google Scholar]
142. MusundireR. ZvidzaiC.J. ChideweC. SamendeB.K. ManditseraF.A. Nutrient and anti-nutrient composition of Henicus whellani (Orthoptera: Stenopelmatidae), an edible ground cricket, in south-eastern Zimbabwe.Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci.201434422323110.1017/S1742758414000484
     [Google Scholar]
143. De PaepeE. WautersJ. Van Der BorghtM. ClaesJ. HuysmanS. CroubelsS. VanhaeckeL. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry for multi-residue screening of pesticides, (veterinary) drugs and mycotoxins in edible insects.Food Chem.201929318719610.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.082 31151600
     [Google Scholar]
144. PomaG. CuykxM. AmatoE. CalapriceC. FocantJ.F. CovaciA. Evaluation of hazardous chemicals in edible insects and insect-based food intended for human consumption.Food Chem. Toxicol.2017100707910.1016/j.fct.2016.12.006 28007452
     [Google Scholar]
145. BrühlC.A. BakanovN. KötheS. EichlerL. SorgM. HörrenT. MühlethalerR. MeinelG. LehmannG.U.C. Direct pesticide exposure of insects in nature conservation areas in Germany.Sci. Rep.20211112414410.1038/s41598‑021‑03366‑w 34916546
     [Google Scholar]
146. Calatayud-VernichP. CalatayudF. SimóE. PicóY. Pesticide residues in honey bees, pollen and beeswax: Assessing beehive exposure.Environ. Pollut.201824110611410.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.062 29803024
     [Google Scholar]
147. CharltonA.J. DickinsonM. WakefieldM.E. FitchesE. KenisM. HanR. ZhuF. KoneN. GrantM. DevicE. BruggemanG. PriorR. SmithR. Exploring the chemical safety of fly larvae as a source of protein for animal feed.J. Insects Food Feed20151171610.3920/JIFF2014.0020
     [Google Scholar]
148. GreenfieldR. AkalaN. van der Bank, F.H. Heavy metal concentrations in two populations of Mopane worms (Imbrasia belina) in the Kruger National Park pose a potential human health risk.Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.201493331632110.1007/s00128‑014‑1324‑4 24974173
     [Google Scholar]
149. BanjoA.D. LawalO.A. FasunwonB.T. AlimiG.O. Alkali and heavy metal contaminants of some selected edible arthropods in South Western Nigeria. Am.-.Eurasian J. Toxicol. Sci.201022529
     [Google Scholar]
150. ZhangZ.S. LuX.G. WangQ.C. ZhengD.M. Mercury, cadmium and lead biogeochemistry in the soil-plant-insect system in Huludao City.Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.200983225525910.1007/s00128‑009‑9688‑6 19280090
     [Google Scholar]
151. HyunS.H. KwonK.H. ParkK.H. JeongH.C. KwonO. TindwaH. HanY.S. Evaluation of nutritional status of an edible grasshopper,O xya C hinensis F ormosana.Entomol. Res.201242528429010.1111/j.1748‑5967.2012.00469.x
     [Google Scholar]
152. MusundireR. OsugaI.M. ChesetoX. IrunguJ. TortoB. Aflatoxin contamination detected in nutrient and anti-oxidant rich edible stink bug stored in recycled grain containers.PLoS One2016111e014591410.1371/journal.pone.0145914 26731419
     [Google Scholar]
153. van der Fels-KlerxH.J. CamenzuliL. BellucoS. MeijerN. RicciA. Food safety issues related to uses of insects for feeds and foods.Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.20181751172118310.1111/1541‑4337.12385 33350154
     [Google Scholar]
154. DiGiacomoK. LeuryB.J. Review: Insect meal: A future source of protein feed for pigs?Animal201913123022303010.1017/S1751731119001873 31414653
     [Google Scholar]
155. Premrov BajukB. ZrimšekP. KotnikT. LeonardiA. KrižajI. Jakovac StrajnB. Insect protein-based diet as potential risk of allergy in dogs.Animals (Basel)2021117194210.3390/ani11071942 34209808
     [Google Scholar]
156. JanczewskaD. Jakościowy aspekt logistycznych decyzji zaopatrzeniowych w przedsiębiorstwach w branży cukierniczej. Zarządzanie Innow. Gospod.Bizn.201526174
     [Google Scholar]
157. van HuisA. RumpoldB.A. van der Fels-KlerxH.J. TomberlinJ.K. Advancing edible insects as food and feed in a circular economy.J. Insects Food Feed20217593594810.3920/JIFF2021.x005
     [Google Scholar]
158. HanboonsongY. JamjanyaT. DurstP.B. Six-legged livestock: Edible insect farming, collection and marketing in Thailand.BangkokRAP Publication2013
     [Google Scholar]
159. MariodA.A. The legislative status of edible insects in the World.African Edible Insects as Alternative Source of Food, Oil, Protein and Bioactive Components.Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer202014114810.1007/978‑3‑030‑32952‑5_9
     [Google Scholar]
160. van HuisA. Edible crickets, but which species?J. Insects Food Feed202062919410.3920/JIFF2020.x001
     [Google Scholar]
161. HalloranA. VantommeP. HanboonsongY. EkesiS. Regulating edible insects: The challenge of addressing food security, nature conservation, and the erosion of traditional food culture.Food Secur.20157373974610.1007/s12571‑015‑0463‑8
     [Google Scholar]
162. Lähteenmäki-UutelaA. Hénault-EthierL. MarimuthuS.B. TalibovS. AllenR.N. NemaneV. VandenbergG.W. JózefiakD. The impact of the insect regulatory system on the insect marketing system.J. Insects Food Feed20184318719810.3920/JIFF2017.0073
     [Google Scholar]
163. GrabowskiN.T. TchibozoS. AbdulmawjoodA. AcheukF. M’Saad GuerfaliM. SayedW.A.A. PlötzM. Edible insects in Africa in terms of food, wildlife resource, and pest management legislation.Foods20209450210.3390/foods9040502 32316132
     [Google Scholar]
164. PatilS.R. CatesS. MoralesR. Consumer food safety knowledge, practices, and demographic differences: Findings from a meta-analysis.J. Food Prot.20056891884189410.4315/0362‑028X‑68.9.1884 16161688
     [Google Scholar]
165. KwiatekK BakułaT SieradzkiZ OsińskiZ KowalczykE Guidelines for good hygienic practice in the production of insects for feed and food purposes.2021
     [Google Scholar]
166. WilderspinD.E. HalloranA. The effects of regulation, legislation and policy on consumption of edible insects in the global south. Edible Insects.Sustainable Food Systems.Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer2018
     [Google Scholar]