Skip to content
2000
Volume 24, Issue 7
  • ISSN: 1871-5273
  • E-ISSN: 1996-3181

Abstract

Background

Botulinum Toxin type A (BonTA) is the preferred treatment for Cervical Dystonia (CD). However, the success rate is often suboptimal. One of the reasons for treatment failure is the inaccuracy of injections. Some physicians rely on Anatomical Landmarks (AL) for injections, while others use either Ultrasound (US) or Electromyography guidance (EMGg) to improve accuracy.

Methods

This retrospective two-center study compared the therapeutic outcomes of AL-based and EMGg injections with USg injections. Demographic and clinical assessments of previous visits and current visits were recorded between 2019 and 2023.

Results

Fifty-one patients were included. Six patients were injected using AL, 14 patients under EMGg, and 31 patients received USg injections. Pain relief was significantly lower for the AL group (40.0% ± 22.4%) compared to both USg and EMGg (81.2% ± 34.0% and 82.2% ± 10.3%, respectively; = 0.001). Dysphagia was reported in 7.1% of EMGg and 16% of the USg group and none of those treated with AL ( > 0.05).

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrated that the clinical outcomes of USg and EMGg BonTA injections are comparable and both techniques are superior to AL. The main side effect observed was dysphagia, which was more common in the USg group, although without reaching statistical significance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/0118715273304250241226051604
2025-01-20
2025-09-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. MedinaA. NillesC. MartinoD. PelletierC. PringsheimT. The prevalence of idiopathic or inherited isolated dystonia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis.Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract.20229786086810.1002/mdc3.13524 36247920
    [Google Scholar]
  2. JostW.H. TatuL. PandeyS. Frequency of different subtypes of cervical dystonia: A prospective multicenter study according to Col-Cap concept.J. Neural Transm.20201271455010.1007/s00702‑019‑02116‑7 31828512
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MaioneR. FormicaC. QuartaroneA. Lo BuonoV. The impact of non-motor symptoms on quality of life in cervical dystonia.J. Clin. Med.202312144663
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BentivoglioA.R. FasanoA. IalongoT. SoletiF. Lo FermoS. AlbaneseA. Outcome predictors, efficacy and safety of Botox and Dysport in the long‐term treatment of hemifacial spasm.Eur. J. Neurol.200916339239810.1111/j.1468‑1331.2008.02507.x 19364366
    [Google Scholar]
  5. YahalomG. Fay-KarmonT. LivnehV. Israeli-KornS. EphratyL. Hassin-BaerS. Botulinum injections for idiopathic cervical dystonia: A longitudinal study.Neurotox. Res.20213941352135910.1007/s12640‑021‑00378‑2 34050898
    [Google Scholar]
  6. TruongD. BrodskyM. LewM. Global dysport cervical dystonia study group.Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.20101631632310.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.03.002 20359934
    [Google Scholar]
  7. PetraccaM. Lo MonacoM.R. IalongoT. Efficacy and safety of long-term botulinum toxin treatment for acquired cervical dystonia: A 25-year follow-up.J. Neurol.2023270134034710.1007/s00415‑022‑11343‑0 36068376
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MohammadiB. BuhrN. BigalkeH. KrampflK. DenglerR. KolleweK. A long-term follow-up of botulinum toxin A in cervical dystonia.Neurol. Res.200931546346610.1179/174313209X405137 19278576
    [Google Scholar]
  9. YahalomG. AtlanE. JanahA. The downside of botulinum injections for anterocollis: A case series and a review of the literature.Clin. Neuropharmacol.20234638994
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DubinskyR.M. GrayC.S. Vetere-OverfieldB. RollerW.C. Electromyographic guidance of botulinum toxin treatment in cervical dystonia.Clin. Neuropharmacol.199114326226710.1097/00002826‑199106000‑00011 2070367
    [Google Scholar]
  11. WuC. XueF. ChangW. Botulinum toxin type A with or without needle electromyographic guidance in patients with cervical dystonia.Springerplus201651129210.1186/s40064‑016‑2967‑x 27547666
    [Google Scholar]
  12. NijmeijerS.W.R. KoelmanJ.H.T.M. StandaarT.S.M. PostmaM. TijssenM.A.J. Cervical dystonia: Improved treatment response to botulinum toxin after referral to a tertiary centre and the use of polymyography.Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.201319553353810.1016/j.parkreldis.2013.01.018 23466060
    [Google Scholar]
  13. SzabóM. KiemD.O. Genetic screening of a hungarian cohort with focal dystonia identified several novel putative pathogenic gene variants.IJMS2023763745 36892297
    [Google Scholar]
  14. TyślerowiczM. DulskiJ. GawrylukJ. SławekJ. Does ultrasound guidance improve the effectiveness of neurotoxin injections in patients with cervical dystonia? (a prospective, partially-blinded, clinical study).Toxins2022141067410.3390/toxins14100674 36287943
    [Google Scholar]
  15. KreislerA. DjeladS. SimoninC. Does ultrasound-guidance improve the outcome of botulinum toxin injections in cervical dystonia?Rev. Neurol.2022178659160210.1016/j.neurol.2021.11.005 34916042
    [Google Scholar]
  16. ReichelG. StennerA. JahnA. The phenomenology of cervical dystonia.Fortschr. Neurol. Psychiatr.200977527227710.1055/s‑0028‑1109416 19418385
    [Google Scholar]
  17. SchrammA. HuberD. MöbiusC. MünchauA. KohlZ. BäumerT. Involvement of obliquus capitis inferior muscle in dystonic head tremor.Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.20174411912310.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.07.034 28802760
    [Google Scholar]
  18. TyślerowiczM. JostW.H. Injection into the longus colli muscle via the thyroid gland.Tremor Other Hyperkinet. Mov.20199
    [Google Scholar]
  19. FujimotoH. MezakiT. YokoeM. MochizukiH. Sonographic guidance provides a low‐risk approach to the longus colli muscle.Mov. Disord.201227792892910.1002/mds.25024 22648450
    [Google Scholar]
  20. HongJ.S. SatheG.G. NiyonkuruC. MuninM.C. Elimination of dysphagia using ultrasound guidance for botulinum toxin injections in cervical dystonia.Muscle Nerve201246453553910.1002/mus.23409 22987694
    [Google Scholar]
  21. JochimA. MeindlT. MantelT. Treatment of cervical dystonia with abo- and onabotulinumtoxinA: Long-term safety and efficacy in daily clinical practice.J. Neurol.201926681879188610.1007/s00415‑019‑09349‑2 31049731
    [Google Scholar]
  22. KutschenkoA. KlietzM. ParackaL. Dysphagia in cervical dystonia patients receiving optimised botulinum toxin therapy: A single-center retrospective cohort study.J. Neural Transm.202012781161116510.1007/s00702‑020‑02220‑z 32588245
    [Google Scholar]
  23. MarionM.H. HicklinL.A. Botulinum toxin treatment of dystonic anterocollis: What to inject.Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.202188343910.1016/j.parkreldis.2021.05.024 34102419
    [Google Scholar]
  24. HertingB. WunderlichS. GlöcklerT. Computed tomographically‐controlled injection of botulinum toxin into the longus colli muscle in severe anterocollis.Mov. Disord.200419558859010.1002/mds.10704 15133827
    [Google Scholar]
  25. KoY.D. YunS.I. RyooD. ChungM.E. ParkJ. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided and non-guided botulinum toxin injection into neck muscles involved in cervical dystonia: A cadaveric study.Ann. Rehabil. Med.202044537037710.5535/arm.19211 32986942
    [Google Scholar]
  26. SchrammA. BäumerT. FietzekU. HeitmannS. WalterU. JostW.H. Relevance of sonography for botulinum toxin treatment of cervical dystonia: An expert statement.J. Neural Transm.2015122101457146310.1007/s00702‑014‑1356‑2 25547861
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/0118715273304250241226051604
Loading
/content/journals/cnsnddt/10.2174/0118715273304250241226051604
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Botulinum; dropout; dystonia; dystonic limb; efficacy; spastic limb; spasticity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test