Skip to content
2000
Volume 15, Issue 5
  • ISSN: 2468-1873
  • E-ISSN: 2468-1881

Abstract

Introduction

Poor drug solubility and permeability, particularly in BCS Class IV drugs, hamper their pharmacokinetics and targeted action. This study aims to address this by utilizing starch nanoparticles as a novel carrier for enhanced delivery and improved bioavailability. Formulation and evaluation of the QLSS nanoparticles as a drug delivery system.

Objective

Formulation of the QLSS nanoparticles and their % drug entrapment, drug loading, average particle size, surface morphological examination, drug release study, and cytotoxicity activity using an MTT assay against the A549 cancer cell line.

Methods

QLSS nanoparticles were prepared by the nanoprecipitation technique with some modifications, &assessment, including surface morphological analysis, drug loading, drug entrapment percentage, average particle size, drug release study, and cytotoxicity activity.

Results

The average particle size and surface morphology of prepared optimized QLSS nanoparticles (QLSS 3) were found to be approximately 43.24-113.51 nm and spherical in shape with a 292.1nm Z-average size. The percentage yield was found to be 80 ± 2.0% of QLSS-3. Loading capacity and the percentages of drug encapsulation efficiency were found to be 42.5 ± 1.2% and 68 ± 2.2%, respectively. The results of the drug's release were found to be 96.12 ± 1.8% within 12 hours. 10µg/ml of QLSS 3 inhibited 66.31 ± 1.4% of A549 cancer cells.

Conclusion

In this research study, sago starch was used for the first time as a drug carrier for quercetin. The results of the studies confirmed the improvement in pharmacokinetic parameters of the BCS-IV class drug.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cnanom/10.2174/0124681873299675240628125625
2024-07-23
2025-10-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BeginesB. OrtizT. Pérez-ArandaM. MartínezG. MerineroM. Argüelles-AriasF. AlcudiaA. Polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery: Recent developments and future prospects.Nanomaterials2020107140310.3390/nano1007140332707641
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BolhassaniA. JavanzadS. SalehT. HashemiM. AghasadeghiM.R. SadatS.M. Polymeric nanoparticles.Hum. Vaccin. Immunother.201410232133210.4161/hv.2679624128651
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KumarD. Nanoparticulate system for cancer therapy: an updated review.J. Nanomed. Res.201874262275
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DharmendraK. RishabhaM. PramodS.K. AkankshaS. VineetB. Advancement in Nano Pharmaceutical Formulations and their Biomedical Use.Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Asia2021113
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ShiA. LiD. WangL. LiB. AdhikariB. Preparation of starch-based nanoparticles through high-pressure homogenization and miniemulsion cross-linking: Influence of various process parameters on particle size and stability.Carbohydr. Polym.20118341604161010.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.011
    [Google Scholar]
  6. RaoJ.P. GeckelerK.E. Polymer nanoparticles: Preparation techniques and size-control parameters.Prog. Polym. Sci.201136788791310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.01.001
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MaryamA.K. NovelinaE. Preparation and characterization of sago (metroxylon sp.) Starch nanoparticles using hydrolysis-precipitation method.J. Phys. Conf. Series20201481012021
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GarciaM.A.V.T. GarciaC.F. AndreA.G.F. Pharmaceutical and biomedical applications of native and modified starch: a review.Starch - Starke2020727-81900270
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MartinezM.M. LiC. OkoniewskaM. MukherjeeI. VellucciD. HamakerB. Slowly digestible starch in fully gelatinized material is structurally driven by molecular size and A and B1 chain lengths.Carbohydr. Polym.201819753153910.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.02130007644
    [Google Scholar]
  10. ZhuF. Barley starch: Composition, structures, properties, and modifications.Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.201716455857910.1111/1541‑4337.1226533371568
    [Google Scholar]
  11. UthumpornU. WahidahN. KarimA.A. Physicochemical properties of starch from sago (Metroxylon sagu) palm grown in mineral soil at different growth stages.IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng.20146201202610.1088/1757‑899X/62/1/012026
    [Google Scholar]
  12. KarimA.A. TieA.P.L. MananD.M.A. ZaidulI.S.M. Starch from the sago (Metroxylon sagu) palm tree properties, prospects, and challenges as a new industrial source for food and other uses.Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf.20087321522810.1111/j.1541‑4337.2008.00042.x33467803
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KumarD. SharmaP.K. Formulation and evaluation of quercetin-loaded banana starch nanoparticles.Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Asia2023134e24052321729110.2174/2210681213666230524145559
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ParamasivamS. SaravananA. Narayanan S. ShivaK.N. RaviI. MayilvagananM. Exploring differences in the physicochemical, functional, structural, and pasting properties of banana starches from dessert, cooking, and plantain cultivars (Musa spp.).Int. J. Biol. Macromol.20211913010561067
    [Google Scholar]
  15. JiangF. DuC. ZhaoN. JiangW. YuX. DuS. Preparation and characterization of quinoa starch nanoparticles as quercetin carriers.Food Chem.202236913089510.1016/j.foodchem.2021.13089534438343
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BhatiaM. RohillaS. Formulation and optimization of quinoa starch nanoparticles: Quality by design approach for solubility enhancement of piroxicam.Saudi Pharm. J.202028892793510.1016/j.jsps.2020.06.01332792837
    [Google Scholar]
  17. DuC. JiangF. JiangW. GeW. DuS. Physicochemical and structural properties of sago starch.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.20201641785179310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.31032791280
    [Google Scholar]
  18. FarragY. IdeW. MonteroB. RicoM. Rodríguez-LlamazaresS. BarralL. BouzaR. Preparation of starch nanoparticles loaded with quercetin using nanoprecipitation technique.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.201811442643310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.13429580996
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AndrésA. RosésM. RàfolsC. BoschE. EspinosaS. SegarraV. HuertaJ.M. Setup and validation of shake-flask procedures for the determination of partition coefficients (logD) from low drug amounts.Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.2015763018119110.1016/j.ejps.2015.05.00825968358
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Khalid AnwerMd. MohammedA. Development and evaluation of PLGA polymer based nanoparticles of quercetin.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.201692November213219
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ErsozM. ErdemirA. DermanS. ArasogluT. MansurogluB. Quercetin-loaded nanoparticles enhance cytotoxicity and antioxidant activity on C6 glioma cells.Pharm. Dev. Technol.202025675776610.1080/10837450.2020.174093332192406
    [Google Scholar]
  22. SamyM. Abd El-AlimS.H. RabiaA.e.g. AminA. AyoubM.M.H. Formulation, characterization and in vitro release study of 5-fluorouracil loaded chitosan nanoparticles.Int. J. Biol. Macromol.202015678379110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.11232320805
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ElmowafyE. El-DeranyM.O. BiondoF. TiboniM. CasettariL. SolimanM.E. Quercetin loaded monolaurate sugar esters-based niosomes: Sustained release and mutual antioxidant—hepatoprotective interplay.Pharmaceutics202012214310.3390/pharmaceutics1202014332050489
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ChanchalT. ArjunS. DharmendraK. Comprehensive characterization and in vitro evaluation of a novel poqcl drug delivery system.Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Asia2023202313
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cnanom/10.2174/0124681873299675240628125625
Loading
/content/journals/cnanom/10.2174/0124681873299675240628125625
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material is available on the publisher’s website along with the published article.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test