Skip to content
2000
image of Comparative Study on Nanoparticle Powders and Traditional Powders in Fingerprint Identification

Abstract

Fingerprint analysis has been the cornerstone of forensic science for over a century and has been an essential tool in criminal investigations. Traditional fingerprint powders are effective in most cases but have limitations with respect to sensitivity, background noise, and compatibility with various surfaces. Recent advancements in nanotechnology have led to the development of nanoparticle-based powders with higher sensitivity and contrast in challenging forensic environments. This comparative work assesses how well classic fingerprint powders and nano powder-based powders perform in terms of surface interaction across varying roughness, response to faint prints, and overall utility. The study also discusses and compares the advantages and limitations of using both varieties of powders, their cost, potential safety impacts, and their availability. Furthermore, real-world case studies and emerging use cases of nanoparticle powders have been discussed to highlight their increasing potential in forensic applications. Findings suggest that while the nanoparticle-based powder offers several advantages, traditional powder still has its place in appropriate situations. The study concluded with a discussion on how these technologies can be integrated in the near future and how the processes for fingerprint recovery are continuously evolving in forensic science.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cms/10.2174/0126661454375366250712140903
2025-08-04
2025-11-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Vadivel R. Nirmala M. Anbukumaran K. Commonly available, everyday materials as non-conventional powders for the visualization of latent fingerprints. Forensic Chem. 2021 24 100339 10.1016/j.forc.2021.100339
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggarwal B. A comparative analysis of traditional latent fingerprint visualization methods and innovative silica gel G powder approach J Forensic Sci Res 2024 8 1 040 6 10.29328/journal.jfsr.1001063
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rajan R. Zakaria Y. Shamsuddin S. Nik Hassan N.F. Fluorescent variant of silica nanoparticle powder synthesised from rice husk for latent fingerprint development. Egypt. J. Forensic Sci. 2019 9 1 1 9 10.1186/s41935‑019‑0155‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Prabakaran E. Pillay K. Nanomaterials for latent fingerprint detection: A review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021 12 1856 1885 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.110
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Prasad V. Lukose S. Agarwal P. Prasad L. Role of nanomaterials for forensic investigation and latent fingerprinting - A review. J. Forensic Sci. 2020 65 1 26 36 10.1111/1556‑4029.14172 31454084
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Singh A. Pandit P.P. Nagar V. Role of nanotechnology in latent fingerprint development.Friction Ridge Analysis: Applications of Nanoparticles for Latent Fingerprint Development. Singapore: Springer. Nature Singapore 2023 1 16 10.1007/978‑981‑99‑4028‑8_1
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Singh A. Prasad V. Lukose S. Kumar A. Silver and gold nanoparticles for the development of fingerprints.Friction Ridge Analysis: Applications of Nanoparticles for Latent Fingerprint Development. Singapore: Springer. Nat. Singap. 2023 47 75 10.1007/978‑981‑99‑4028‑8_4
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Verma R.K. Nagar V. Aseri V. Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles: Synthesis properties and their forensic applications in latent fingerprints development. Mater. Today Proc. 2022 69 36 41 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.074
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Prabakaran E. Pillay K. Synthesis and characterization of fluorescent N-CDs/ZnONPs nanocomposite for latent fingerprint detection by using powder brushing method. Arab. J. Chem. 2020 13 2 3817 3835 10.1016/j.arabjc.2019.01.004
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sharma V. Choudhary S. Mankotia P. Nanoparticles as fingermark sensors. Trends Analyt. Chem. 2021 143 116378 10.1016/j.trac.2021.116378
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Amin M.O. Madkour M. Al-Hetlani E. Metal oxide nanoparticles for latent fingerprint visualization and analysis of small drug molecules using surface-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018 410 20 4815 4827 10.1007/s00216‑018‑1119‑2 29770838
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lighvan V.A. Arsalani N. Facile preparation of a novel red-emissive carbon dots powder formulation and its efficiency evaluation in latent fingerprint development using artificial intelligence. Microchem. J. 2024 206 111596 10.1016/j.microc.2024.111596
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Abebe B. Murthy H.C.A. Zereffa E.A. Dessie Y. Latent fingerprint enhancement techniques: A review. J Chem Rev 2020 2 1 40 56 10.33945/SAMI/JCR.2020.1.3
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kanodarwala F.K. Moret S. Spindler X. Lennard C. Roux C. Nanoparticles used for fingermark detection-A comprehensive review. WIREs Forensic Sci. 2019 1 2 e1341 10.1002/wfs2.1341
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bashir K. Amin M. Majid M. From invisible to visible: A concise review on conjugated polymer materials in latent fingerprint analysis. J. Polym. Res. 2024 31 8 235 10.1007/s10965‑024‑04086‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Alsolmy E. Abdelwahab W.M. Patonay G. A comparative study of fluorescein isothiocyanate-encapsulated silica nanoparticles prepared in seven different routes for developing fingerprints on non-porous surfaces. J. Fluoresc. 2018 28 5 1049 1058 10.1007/s10895‑018‑2268‑6 30032378
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Qiu Z. Hao B. Gu X. A general powder dusting method for latent fingerprint development based on AIEgens. Sci. China Chem. 2018 61 8 966 970 10.1007/s11426‑018‑9280‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ding L. Peng D. Wang R. Li Q. A user-secure and highly selective enhancement of latent fingerprints by magnetic composite powder based on carbon dot fluorescence. J. Alloys Compd. 2021 856 158160 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158160
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Peng D. Liu X. Huang M. Liu R. Characterization of a novel Co2TiO4 nanopowder for the rapid identification of latent and blood fingerprints. Anal. Lett. 2018 51 11 1796 1808 10.1080/00032719.2017.1391827
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ansari A.A. Aldajani K.M. AlHazaa A.N. Albrithen H.A. Recent progress of fluorescent materials for fingermarks detection in forensic science and anti-counterfeiting. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022 462 214523 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214523
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sreedhara R. Krushna B.R.R. Prasad B.D. A cost-effective intense blue colour cobalt doped gahnite pigment for latent finger print, cheiloscopy and anti-counterfeiting applications. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023 663 131038 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.131038
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huang M. Peng D. A rapid and dual-mode visualization of latent and bloody fingermarks using Cr- and Sb-codoped titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. 2021 56 9 5543 5554 10.1007/s10853‑020‑05651‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rajan R. Zakaria Y. Shamsuddin S. Nik Hassan N.F. Robust synthesis of mono-dispersed spherical silica nanoparticle from rice husk for high definition latent fingermark development. Arab. J. Chem. 2020 13 11 8119 8132 10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.09.042
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Latent fingerprint analysis & development techniques. 2025 Available from:https://study.com/academy/lesson/latent-fingerprint-analysis-development-techniques.html
/content/journals/cms/10.2174/0126661454375366250712140903
Loading
/content/journals/cms/10.2174/0126661454375366250712140903
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test