Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background

This case study aimed to report the rare computed tomography (CT) features of advanced pericochlear otosclerosis, with an emphasis on a proposed new nomenclature to describe the imaging findings.

Case Presentation

A 70-year-old woman with recurrent rhinosinusitis presented to our center for clinical management. The CT scan revealed the incidental rare findings of advanced retrofenestral otosclerosis in the form of extensive symmetrical pericochlear tubular lucencies in bilateral otic capsules. We coined the new term “C-hoop earring” sign for this CT appearance. She was asymptomatic and declined further audiological or imaging evaluation.

Conclusion

Herein, the CT features of advanced pericochlear otosclerosis are described and the imaging and clinical connotations of the presence of the C-hoop earring sign are reviewed. This new terminology provides a more intuitive description of the imaging findings in the temporal bones for clearer understanding and communication in clinical radiological practice and education.

This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056379053250712052649
2025-07-22
2025-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/21/1/CMIR-21-E15734056379053.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056379053250712052649&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. MessineoD. RalliM. GrecoA. AriannaD.S. Double ring in cochlear otosclerosis: A limit to cochlear implantation? The solution is the surgical approach.Ear Nose Throat J.20211003_supplSuppl.235S237S10.1177/014556131989560131842623
    [Google Scholar]
  2. MangiaL.R.L. CoelhoL.O.M. CarvalhoB. de OliveiraA.K.P. HamerschmidtR. Imaging studies in otosclerosis: An up-to-date comprehensive review.Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.2021252e318e32710.1055/s‑0040‑171514933968239
    [Google Scholar]
  3. CholeR.A. McKennaM. Pathophysiology of Otosclerosis.Otol. Neurotol.200122224925710.1097/00129492‑200103000‑0002311300278
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LeeT.C. AvivR.I. ChenJ.M. NedzelskiJ.M. FoxA.J. SymonsS.P. CT grading of otosclerosis.AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol.20093071435143910.3174/ajnr.A155819321627
    [Google Scholar]
  5. YagiC. MoritaY. TakahashiK. OgiM. OshimaS. YamamotoY. HoriiA. Otosclerosis: Anatomical distribution of otosclerotic loci analyzed by high-resolution computed tomography.Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.201927651335134010.1007/s00405‑019‑05385‑w30887165
    [Google Scholar]
  6. MafeeM.F. ValvassoriG.E. DeitchR.L. NorouziP. HenriksonG.C. CapekV. ApplebaumE.L. Use of CT in the evaluation of cochlear otosclerosis.Radiology1985156370370810.1148/radiology.156.3.40232294023229
    [Google Scholar]
  7. ValvassoriG.E. Imaging of otosclerosis.Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am.199326335937110.1016/S0030‑6665(20)30815‑X8341568
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ZafarN. HohmanM.H. KhanM.A.B. Otosclerosis.StatPearls PublishingTreasure Island (FL)2024
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ÇanakciH. BülbülE. Bilateral cochlear otosclerosis: Clinic and radiologic findings.Anadolu Klinigi201924215515810.21673/anadoluklin.453418
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McClenaghanF. LavyJ. Does bilateral otosclerosis make pre-operative bone conduction more inaccurate?J. Otol.20211611510.1016/j.joto.2020.07.00233505442
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HodgeS. LopezI.A. CronkiteA. HouseJ. MatsuiH. IshiyamaG. IshiyamaA. Dynamic molecular markers of otosclerosis in the human cochlea.Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.2024133439039910.1177/0003489423122513438197255
    [Google Scholar]
  12. TavernierL.J.M. FransenE. ValgaerenH. Van CampG. Genetics of otosclerosis: Finally catching up with other complex traits?Hum. Genet.20221413-493995010.1007/s00439‑021‑02357‑134498117
    [Google Scholar]
  13. KarosiT. SzekaneczZ. SziklaiI. Otosclerosis: An autoimmune disease?Autoimmun. Rev.2009929510110.1016/j.autrev.2009.03.00919318139
    [Google Scholar]
  14. BoubakerF EliezerM PoillonG WurtzH PuelU BlumA GilletP TeixeiraPAG Parietti-WinklerC GilletR Ultra-high-resolution CT of the temporal bone: Technical aspects, current applications and future directions.Diagn Interv Imaging202510.1016/j.diii.2025.02.00339984415
    [Google Scholar]
  15. EminA. DaubiéS. GaillandreL. AouadA. PialatJ.B. FavierV. CarsuzaaF. TringaliS. FieuxM. Artificial Intelligence for otosclerosis detection: A pilot study.J. Imaging Inform. Med.20243762931293910.1007/s10278‑024‑01079‑w38926265
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BassiouniM. BauknechtH.C. MuenchG. OlzeH. PohlanJ. Missed radiological diagnosis of otosclerosis in high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone—Retrospective analysis of imaging, radiological reports, and request forms.J. Clin. Med.202312263010.3390/jcm1202063036675559
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BerrettiniS. LombardoF. BruschiniL. CiabottiA. RaffaelloC. ForliF. 3D fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging at different stages of otosclerosis.Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.2018275112643265210.1007/s00405‑018‑5093‑230191304
    [Google Scholar]
  18. PurohitB. Op de beeckK. HermansR. Role of MRI as first-line modality in the detection of previously undiagnosed otosclerosis: A single tertiary institute experience.Insights Imaging20201117110.1186/s13244‑020‑00878‑332430577
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ZamboniniG GhiselliS Di TrapaniG MaroldiR CudaD. An uncommon “third window” in retrofenestral otosclerosis.Glob J Med Clin Case Rep202294636710.17352/2455‑5282.000162
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056379053250712052649
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056379053250712052649
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test