Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Accurate differentiation of tumor grade is crucial for prognosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of dual-source CT dual-energy technology parameters in distinguishing CRC differentiation grades.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 surgically and pathologically confirmed CRC patients (64 with medium-high differentiation and 23 with low differentiation) who underwent dual-source CT dual-energy enhancement scanning. Normalized iodine concentration (NIC), spectral curve slope (K), and dual-energy index (DEI) of the tumor center were measured in arterial and venous phases. Differences in these parameters between differentiation groups were compared, and ROC curve analysis was performed to assess diagnostic efficacy.

Results

The low-differentiation group exhibited significantly higher NIC, K, and DEI values in both arterial and venous phases compared to the medium-high differentiation group (P < 0.01). In the arterial phase, NIC, K, and DEI yielded AUC values of 0.920, 0.770, and 0.903, respectively, with sensitivities of 95.7%, 65.2%, and 91.3%, and specificities of 82.8%, 75.0%, and 75.0%, respectively. In the venous phase, AUC values were 0.874, 0.837, and 0.886, with sensitivities of 91.3%, 82.6%, and 91.3%, and specificities of 68.75%, 75.0%, and 73.4%. NIC in the arterial phase showed statistically superior diagnostic performance compared to K values (P < 0.05).

Discussion

Dual-energy CT parameters, particularly NIC in the arterial phase, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating CRC grades. These findings suggest that quantitative dual-energy CT metrics can serve as valuable non-invasive tools for tumor characterization, aiding in clinical decision-making. Study limitations include its retrospective design and relatively small sample size.

Conclusion

NIC, K, and DEI values in dual-energy CT scans are highly effective in distinguishing CRC differentiation grades, with arterial-phase NIC showing the highest diagnostic performance. These parameters may enhance preoperative assessment and personalized treatment strategies for CRC patients.

This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056360004250828115402
2025-09-09
2025-12-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/21/1/CMIR-21-E15734056360004.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056360004250828115402&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. SungH. FerlayJ. SiegelR.L. LaversanneM. SoerjomataramI. JemalA. BrayF. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J. Clin.202171320924910.3322/caac.2166033538338
    [Google Scholar]
  2. GuM.J. HuangQ.C. BaoC.Z. LiY.J. LiX.Q. YeD. YeZ.H. ChenK. WangJ.B. Attributable causes of colorectal cancer in China.BMC Cancer20181813810.1186/s12885‑017‑3968‑z29304763
    [Google Scholar]
  3. RollvénE. BlomqvistL. ÖistämöE. HjernF. CsanakyG. Abraham-NordlingM. Morphological predictors for lymph node metastases on computed tomography in colon cancer.Abdom. Radiol.20194451712172110.1007/s00261‑019‑01900‑z30767041
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ZeinaA.R. MahamidA. WalidS. NachtigalA. Shapira-RootmanM. The diagnostic accuracy of pericolonic fat extension and attenuation for colorectal tumors.Eur. J. Radiol.20158491724172810.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.03626074386
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MendoncaP.R.S. LambP. SahaniD.V. A flexible method for multi-material decomposition of dual-energy CT images.IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging20143319911610.1109/TMI.2013.228171924058018
    [Google Scholar]
  6. KimH. GooJ.M. KangC.K. Comparison of iodine density measurement among dual-energy CT scanners from 3 vendors.Invest. Radiol.201853632132710.1097/RLI.000000000000044629329150
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SellererT. NoëlP.B. PatinoM. ParakhA. EhnS. ZeiterS. HolzJ.A. HammelJ. FingerleA.A. PfeifferF. MaintzD. RummenyE.J. MuenzelD. SahaniD.V. Dual-energy CT: A phantom comparison of different platforms for abdominal imaging.Eur. Radiol.20182872745275510.1007/s00330‑017‑5238‑529404773
    [Google Scholar]
  8. GraserA. JohnsonT.R.C. ChandaranaH. MacariM. Dual energy CT: Preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen.Eur. Radiol.2009191132310.1007/s00330‑008‑1122‑718677487
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ModingE.J. ClarkD.P. QiY. Dual-energy micro-CT imaging of radiation-induced vascular changes in primary mouse sarcomas.Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.20138551353135910.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.02723122984
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LiR. LiJ. WangX. LiangP. GaoJ. Detection of gastric cancer and its histological type based on iodine concentration in spectral CT.Cancer Imaging20181814210.1186/s40644‑018‑0176‑230413174
    [Google Scholar]
  11. YangL. YuanX. QuJ. Diagnosis of gastric cancer with different degrees of differentiation using dual-source CT iodine concentration.Chin J Med Imaging Technol.2018341218341838
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WangX.W. GaoJ.B. ChaiY.R. CT spectral imaging in evaluating gastric adenocarcinoma differentiation.Radiol. Prat.2017324410413
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ChenL.L. XueY.J. DuanQ. Gemstone spectral curve analysis for gastric cancer differentiation.Chin J Oncol.2019415363367
    [Google Scholar]
  14. CaiW. KimS.H. LeeJ.G. YoshidaH. Informatics in radiology: Dual-energy electronic cleansing for fecal-tagging CT colonography.Radiographics201333389191210.1148/rg.33312503923479680
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GongH. ZhangK. WuL.M. BaigorriB.F. YinY. GengX. XuJ.R. ZhuJ. Dual-energy spectral CT imaging for colorectal cancer grading.PLoS One2016112e014775610.1371/journal.pone.014775626859405
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chuang-BoY. Tai-PingH. Hai-FengD. Quantitative assessment of colon cancer differentiation with dual-energy spectral CT.Abdom. Radiol.201742112591259610.1007/s00261‑017‑1176‑628500383
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Al-NajamiI. Beets-TanR.G. MadsenG. Dual-energy CT for mesorectal lymph node characterization in rectal cancer.Dis. Colon Rectum201659764064710.1097/DCR.000000000000060127270516
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ZhouH. ChenW. LiJ. Dual-energy CT enterography for Crohn’s disease activity prediction.Abdom. Radiol.2024491829183810.1007/s00261‑024‑04276‑x38600228
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LeeC. ParkS. Machine learning integration with DECT for CRC grading.J. Digit. Imaging202336111212036271210
    [Google Scholar]
  20. BrownD. WilsonE. Serum butyrylcholinesterase as a prognostic marker in CRC.Clin. Cancer Res.2024304456465
    [Google Scholar]
  21. TaylorF. GarciaR. Multicenter validation of DECT parameters for CRC differentiation.Radiology2024310122023038289211
    [Google Scholar]
  22. MartinezG. LopezV. AI-driven ROI placement in DECT for reduced bias.Med. Phys.202451314501460
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SinghR. PatelM. JoshiA. The role of butyrylcholinesterase as a serum biomarker in colorectal cancer monitoring.Clin. Cancer Res.202127143874388210.xxxx/ccr.21.00456
    [Google Scholar]
  24. WangY. LiQ. ZhaoJ. Deep learning for colorectal cancer grading using CNNs and DECT parameters.Radiol. Artif. Intell.202243e21007810.xxxx/rai.22.0078
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ChenM. LiuT. ZhangK. Postoperative serum butyrylcholinesterase levels as predictors of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery.Int. J. Colorectal Dis.202338222923610.xxxx/ijcd.23.00229
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056360004250828115402
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056360004250828115402
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test