Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Objectives

Retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors are uncommon, representing a small fraction of all primary retroperitoneal neoplasms. Accurate differentiation between benign and malignant forms is essential for optimal clinical management. This study assessed the clinical profiles and sonographic traits of retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors with the goal of enhancing diagnostic precision and developing therapeutic strategies.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors who completed surgical treatment and underwent ultrasound imaging was carried out. Tumors were classified based on sonographic features and blood flow characteristics as per Adler's grading system. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0. ROC curve analysis was carried out to determine the optimal diagnostic cutoff values.

Results

A total of 57 patients were included in the study. There were no significant variances in age, gender, or tumor localization among the groups. However, pronounced disparities were observed in tumor number, size, shape, definition of borders, internal echo pattern, structural composition, presence of calcification, and blood flow signals between the classic and malignant groups. Notably, malignant tumors tended to manifest as larger masses with indistinct margins and irregular shapes. The maximum tumor diameter emerged as a discriminating factor for malignancy, with a diagnostic cutoff of 9.9 cm, yielding an AUC of 0.754 from the ROC curve analysis.

Conclusion

This study outlines the distinctive clinical and sonographic features of retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors, with a particular focus on malignant subtypes. Ultrasonography emerges as a valuable diagnostic tool, contributing to the differentiation of tumor categories and potentially to the development of targeted treatment strategies. The identification of specific sonographic markers may facilitate the early detection and detailed characterization of these tumors, which could contribute to improved patient outcomes.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056348636241213120140
2025-01-01
2025-09-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cmir/21/1/CMIR-21-E15734056348636.html?itemId=/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056348636241213120140&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. CaroneL. MessanaG. VanoliA. PuglieseL. GallottiA. PredaL. Correlation between imaging and histology in benign solitary retroperitoneal nerve sheath tumors: A pictorial review.Insights Imaging202415113210.1186/s13244‑024‑01709‑538816511
    [Google Scholar]
  2. FischerovaD. SantosG. WongL. YulzariV. BennettR.J. DundrP. BurgetovaA. BarsaP. SzabóG. SousaN. ScovazziU. CibulaD. Imaging in gynecological disease (26): Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of benign retroperitoneal pelvic peripheral-nerve-sheath tumors.Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.202362572773810.1002/uog.2622337058402
    [Google Scholar]
  3. LiQ. GaoC. JuziJ.T. HaoX. Analysis of 82 cases of retroperitoneal schwannoma.ANZ J. Surg.200777423724010.1111/j.1445‑2197.2007.04025.x17388825
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LimZ. GuT.Y. TaiB.C. PuhaindranM.E. Survival outcomes of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) with and without neurofibromatosis type I (NF1): A meta-analysis.World J. Surg. Oncol.20242211410.1186/s12957‑023‑03296‑z38191386
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Val-BernalJ.F. HermanaS. HernanzF. MorenoG. Primary de novo malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the breast mimicking mastitis. Report of a case and review of the literature.Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol.2023641738210.47162/RJME.64.1.0937128794
    [Google Scholar]
  6. AhlawatS. BlakeleyJ. MontgomeryE. SubramaniamR.M. BelzbergA. FayadL.M. Schwannoma in neurofibromatosis type 1: A pitfall for detecting malignancy by metabolic imaging.Skeletal Radiol.20134291317132210.1007/s00256‑013‑1626‑323649401
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LinJ. MartelW. Cross-sectional imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: Characteristic signs on CT, MR imaging, and sonography.AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.20011761758210.2214/ajr.176.1.176007511133542
    [Google Scholar]
  8. TellemanJ.A. StellingwerffM.D. BrekelmansG.J. VisserL.H. Nerve ultrasound.Neurology201788171615162210.1212/WNL.000000000000387028341644
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ZhangX ZhengH LiG LiT Clinicopathological differences between classical schwannomas and cellular schwannomas in the retroperitoneum.J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.2024Dec183121030103810.1093/jnen/nlae104
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MartinE. CoertJ.H. FluckeU.E. SlooffW.B.M. HoV.K.Y. van der GraafW.T. van DalenT. van de SandeM.A.J. van HoudtW.J. GrünhagenD.J. VerhoefC. A nationwide cohort study on treatment and survival in patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours.Eur. J. Cancer2020124778710.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.01431760312
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KitagawaY. KimY. TsunodaR. TakaiS. Natural progression and factors predicting growth of Retroperitoneal schwannoma.J. Nippon Med. Sch.2020871131610.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87‑10331564688
    [Google Scholar]
  12. UnalO.U. OztopI. YasarN. UrakciZ. OzatliT. BozkurtO. SevincA. GunaydinY. Yapar TaskoyluB. ArpaciE. UlasA. KodazH. TonyaliO. AvciN. AksoyA. YilmazA.U. Clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors of primary thoracic soft tissue sarcoma: A multicenter study of the Anatolian society of medical oncology ( asmo ).thorac. cancer201561859010.1111/1759‑7714.1215026273340
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LiuQ.Y. LinX.F. ZhangW.D. LiH.G. GaoM. Retroperitoneal schwannomas in the anterior pararenal space: Dynamic enhanced multi-slice CT and MR findings.Abdom. Imaging201338120121010.1007/s00261‑012‑9882‑622484919
    [Google Scholar]
  14. BradfordD. KimA. Current treatment options for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.Curr. Treat. Options Oncol.20151631210.1007/s11864‑015‑0328‑625777573
    [Google Scholar]
  15. YuanZ. XuL. ZhaoZ. XuS. ZhangX. LiuT. ZhangS. YuS. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: A retrospective study of 159 cases from 1999 to 2016.Oncotarget201786210478510479510.18632/oncotarget.1897529285213
    [Google Scholar]
  16. JokinenC.H. DadrasS.S. GoldblumJ.R. van de RijnM. WestR.B. RubinB.P. Diagnostic implications of podoplanin expression in peripheral nerve sheath neoplasms.Am. J. Clin. Pathol.2008129688689310.1309/M7D5KTVYYE51XYQA18480004
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ZhuJ. YangZ. TangR. TangG. Comparison of pathological, radiological, and prognostic features between cellular schwannoma and non-cellular schwannoma.Eur. J. Radiol.202114110978310.1016/j.ejrad.2021.10978334049057
    [Google Scholar]
  18. FaribaB. HosseinD.M. YavarR. HaneyehS. Laryngeal myxoid neurofibroma misdiagnosed as myxoma: A case report. Chin -Ger.J. Clin. Oncol.2012119548550
    [Google Scholar]
  19. RodriguezF.J. FolpeA.L. GianniniC. PerryA. Pathology of peripheral nerve sheath tumors: Diagnostic overview and update on selected diagnostic problems.Acta Neuropathol.2012123329531910.1007/s00401‑012‑0954‑z22327363
    [Google Scholar]
  20. JoV.Y. FletcherC.D.M. Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: Clinicopathologic analysis of 63 cases.Am. J. Surg. Pathol.201539567368210.1097/PAS.000000000000037925602794
    [Google Scholar]
  21. JhaA. GuptaP. WahabS. GuptaG. ZaidiS.Y. Role of ultrasonography in detection of renal artery pseudoaneurysm caused by retroperitoneal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1.J. Med. Ultrason.2014411879110.1007/s10396‑013‑0467‑y27277639
    [Google Scholar]
  22. JinZ. WangC. WangD. LiX. GuoW. ChenT. Malignant and Benign Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in a Single Center: Value of Clinical and Ultrasound Features for the Diagnosis of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging.J. Ultrasound Med.20244312131
    [Google Scholar]
  23. AlhussenA. Anul HaqM. Ahmad KhanA. MahendranR.K. KadryS. XAI-RACapsNet: Relevance aware capsule network-based breast cancer detection using mammography images via explainability O-net ROI segmentation.Expert Syst. Appl.202526112546110.1016/j.eswa.2024.125461
    [Google Scholar]
  24. AlqarafiA. Ahmad KhanA. Kumar MahendranR. Al-SaremM. AlbalwyF. Multi-scale GC-T2: Automated region of interest assisted skin cancer detection using multi-scale graph convolution and tri-movement based attention mechanism.Biomed. Signal Process. Control20249510631310.1016/j.bspc.2024.106313
    [Google Scholar]
  25. KhanA.A. MadendranR.K. ThirunavukkarasuU. FaheemM. D 2 PAM : Epileptic seizures prediction using adversarial deep dual patch attention mechanism.CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol.20238375576910.1049/cit2.12261
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KhanA.A. MahendranR.K. PerumalK. FaheemM. Dual-3DM 3 AD: Mixed transformer based semantic segmentation and triplet pre-processing for early multi-class alzheimer’s diagnosis.IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.20243269670710.1109/TNSRE.2024.335772338261494
    [Google Scholar]
  27. KhanA.A. Detection of omicron caused pneumonia from radiology images using convolution neural network (CNN).Comput. Mater. Continua202274237433761
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056348636241213120140
Loading
/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/0115734056348636241213120140
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test