Current Cardiology Reviews - Volume 18, Issue 3, 2022

Exosomes, as one of the extracellular vesicles’ subgroups, played an important role in the cell to cell communication. The cargos and surface protein of exosomes have been known to affect the cardiovascular system both positively and negatively in chronic heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and atherosclerosis. There have been several exosomes that emerged as potential diagnostic and prognostic markers in cardiovascular patients. However, the conditions affecting the patients and the method of isolation should be considered to create a standardized normal value of the exosomes and the components. CPC-derived exosomes, ADSCs-derived exosomes, and telocyte- derived exosomes have been proven to be capable of acting as a therapeutic agent in myocardial infarction models. Exosomes have the potential to become a diagnostic marker, prognostic marker, and therapeutic agent in cardiovascular diseases.

Heart Failure (HF) is among the major causes of global morbidity as well as mortality. Increased prevalence, frequent and prolonged hospitalization, rehospitalization, long-term consumption of healthcare resources, absenteeism, and death upsurge the economic burden linked to HF. For decades, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs), Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs), Beta-Blockers (BBs), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), have remained the mainstay of the standard of care for HF management. Despite their proven efficacy and cost-effectiveness, HF remains a global pandemic and is still increasing in prevalence. Sacubitril/ Valsartan (SAC/VAL) is an Angiotensin Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) that proved out to be a game-changer drug in HF treatment. Recent data indicated that SAC/VAL is more efficient and can improve the overall quality of life of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with fewer side effects. It is now incorporated in the guidelines as an alternative to ACEIs or ARBs to lower morbidity in addition to mortality in HFrEF patients. This review article will discuss the current guidelines-approved indications and highlight the potential emerging indications, in addition to the currently ongoing clinical trials that will expand the use of SAC/VAL.

Pacemaker Induced Cardiomyopathy (PICM) is commonly defined as a reduction in left ventricular (LV) function in the setting of right ventricular (RV) pacing. This condition may be associated with the onset of clinical heart failure in those affected. Recent studies have focused on potential methods of identifying patients at risk of this condition, in addition to hypothesizing the most efficacious ways to manage these patients. Newer pacing options, such as His bundle pacing, may avoid the onset of PICM entirely.

Background and Objective: Palpitations are a common symptom that may indicate cardiac arrhythmias, be a somatic complaint in anxiety disorders, and can be present in patients without either condition. The objective of this review was to explore the pathways and fundamental mechanisms through which individuals appreciate palpitations. Observations: Cardiac afferents provide beat-to-beat sensory information on the heart to the spinal cord, brain stem, and higher brain centers. Cardioception, a subset of interoception (‘the physiological sense of the condition of the body’), refers to sensing of the heartbeat. High cardioception is present in persons with lower body mass index, lower percentages of body fat, and anxiety disorders. Low cardioception (lower interoceptive awareness) is associated with psychiatric disorders, such as depression, personality disorders, and schizophrenia. CNS sites associated with heartbeat detection have been identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging studies and heartbeat-evoked electroencephalogram potentials. The right insula, cingulate gyrus, somatomotor and somatosensory cortices nucleus accumbens, left subthalamic nucleus, and left ventral capsule/striatum are implicated in both palpitations and heartbeat detection. Involvement of the brain as a primary modulator of palpitations rests on the data that various areas of the brain are activated in association with cardioception, the ability of focal brain stimulation to induce palpitations, the ability of central alpha receptor agonists and antagonists to modulate palpitations, and suppression of palpitations by transcranial repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Conclusions: Palpitations should be viewed as a pathway extending from the heart to the brain. Palpitations are, in part, a reflection of an individual’s cardioception awareness, which is modulated by body size, percentage of body fat, and psychological or psychiatric conditions. Palpitations can originate in the brain and involve central neurotransmitters. Treatment of palpitations unrelated to cardiac arrhythmias or anxiety disorders should consider the use of central alpha-2 agonists and possibly rTMS.

Heart failure is one of the leading healthcare problems in the world. Clinical data lacks sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of heart failure. Laboratory biomarkers are a non-invasive method of assessing suspected decompensated heart failure. Biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides have shown promising results in the management of heart failure. The literature does not provide comprehensive guidance in the utilization of biomarkers in the setting of acute heart failure syndrome. Many conditions that manifest with similar pathophysiology as acute heart failure syndrome may demonstrate positive biomarkers. The following is a review of biomarkers in heart failure, enlightening their role in diagnosis, prognosis and management of heart failure.

Artificial intelligence technology is emerging as a promising entity in cardiovascular medicine, potentially improving diagnosis and patient care. In this article, we review the literature on artificial intelligence and its utility in cardiology. We provide a detailed description of concepts of artificial intelligence tools like machine learning, deep learning, and cognitive computing. This review discusses the current evidence, application, prospects, and limitations of artificial intelligence in cardiology.

In the ever-changing landscape of device therapy for pulmonary embolism, it is important to understand the rationale behind the ongoing explosion in the development of new device therapies. There needs to be an in-depth understanding of risk stratification in pulmonary embolism and indications for therapy. Selecting the ideal device for a particular pulmonary embolism subset remains elusive and poorly defined. Knowledge of the risks, benefits, capabilities, and potential limitations of each device is crucial.

Background/Objectives: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators are used to prevent sudden cardiac death. The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was newly developed to overcome the limitations of the conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator-transvenous device. The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator is indicated for young patients with heart disease, congenital heart defects, and poor venous access, who have an indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator without the need for anti-bradycardic stimulation. We aimed to compare the efficacy and complications of subcutaneous with transvenous implantable cardioverter- defibrillator devices. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted using different databases. The inclusion criteria were observational and clinical randomized trials with no language limits and no publication date limit that compared subcutaneous with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. The selected patients were aged > 18 years with complex ventricular arrhythmia. Results: Five studies involving 2111 patients who underwent implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation were included. The most frequent complication in the subcutaneous device group was infection, followed by hematoma formation and electrode migration. For the transvenous device, the most frequent complications were electrode migration and infection. Regarding efficacy, the total rates of appropriate shocks were 9.04% and 20.47% in the subcutaneous and transvenous device groups, respectively, whereas inappropriate shocks to the subcutaneous and transvenous device groups were 11,3% and 10,7%, respectively. Conclusion: When compared to the transvenous device, the subcutaneous device had lower complication rates owing to lead migration and less inappropriate shocks due to supraventricular tachycardia; nevertheless, infection rates and improper shocks due to T wave oversensing were comparable for both devices CRD42021251569.