Skip to content
2000
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1568-0096
  • E-ISSN: 1873-5576

Abstract

Despite the improved understanding of nitric oxide (NO) biology and the large amount of preclinical experiments testing its role in cancer development and progression, it is still debated whether NO should be considered a potential anticancer agent or instead a carcinogen. The complexity of NO effects whitin a cell and the variability of the final biological outcome depending upon NO levels makes it highly challenging to determine the therapeutic value of interfering with the activity of this intriguing gaseous messenger. This uncertainty has so far halted the clinical implementation of NO-based therapeutics in the field of oncology. Accordingly, only an in depth knowledge of the mechanisms leading to experimental tumor regression or progression in response to NO will allow us to exploit this molecule to fight cancer.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/ccdt/10.2174/156800909787581015
2009-03-01
2025-09-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/ccdt/10.2174/156800909787581015
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test