Skip to content
2000
image of Effectiveness of Different Diode Laser Wavelengths in Targeting Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm in Root Canal Treatment

Abstract

Introduction

Disinfection of the root canal system is crucial for the effectiveness of root canal treatment. Lasers and photoactivated disinfection (PAD) have emerged as preferred methods for eliminating pathogens from the root canal.

Methods

Sixty intact, freshly extracted adult human uniradicular mature teeth with a single root canal were collected. The crowns were removed, resulting in canals measuring 14 mm in length. The root canals were prepared, sterilized, and then inoculated with broth containing , followed by incubation for 30 days in an aerobic environment at 37°C. Biofilm formation was verified using a scanning electron microscope. The samples were randomly divided into six experimental groups ( = 10). Group 1 consisted of teeth treated only with distilled water. Group 2 teeth received 3% NaOCl and 17% EDTA as part of Conventional Chemomechanical Debridement (CCMD) but no additional treatment. Groups 3-6 also recei

ved CCMD followed by additional laser disinfection as follows: Group 3 underwent photoactivated disinfection (PAD) using riboflavin with a 450 nm laser; Group 4 underwent PAD using toluidine blue O (TBO) with a 635 nm laser; Group 5 underwent conventional laser endodontics (CLE) with an 808 nm laser; and Group 6 underwent CLE using triple wavelengths of 450 nm, 635 nm, and 808 nm.

Results

The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences in colony-forming units (CFUs) among the groups after treatment ( < 0.001). Subsequent analysis showed that the difference in mean CFUs between the PAD groups and the CLE groups was not statistically significant. The group treated with the triple laser wavelength exhibited the lowest average CFUs/mL, while the distilled water group had the highest mean value.

Discussion

The study confirms that diode laser-assisted disinfection significantly enhances bacterial reduction compared with conventional irrigation alone. Although PAD methods reduced , their effect was not statistically superior to conventional laser endodontics (CLE). The triple-wavelength diode laser group achieved the greatest bacterial reduction, likely due to the synergistic effects of thermal and photochemical interactions. These findings support the adjunctive use of laser disinfection to improve root canal decontamination, particularly when combined with chemomechanical preparation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that combining an irrigating solution with a diode laser enhances the effectiveness of reducing pathogenic numbers.

This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rrct/10.2174/0115748871367667250912111157
2025-10-07
2025-12-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/rrct/10.2174/0115748871367667250912111157/BMS-RRCT-2024-136.html?itemId=/content/journals/rrct/10.2174/0115748871367667250912111157&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ricucci D. Siqueira J.F. Bate A.L. Pitt Ford T.R. Histologic in-vestigation of root canal-treated teeth with apical periodontitis: A retrospective study from twenty-four patients. J. Endod. 2009 35 4 493 502 10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.014 19345793
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pinheiro E.T. Gomes B.P.F.A. Ferraz C.C.R. Sousa E.L.R. Teixeira F.B. Souza-Filho F.J. Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int. Endod. J. 2003 36 1 1 11 10.1046/j.1365‑2591.2003.00603.x 12656508
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rôças I. Siqueira J. Santos K. Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases. J. Endod. 2004 30 5 315 320 10.1097/00004770‑200405000‑00004 15107642
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Yoo Y.J. Perinpanayagam H. Oh S. Kim A.R. Han S.H. Kum K.Y. Endodontic biofilms: Contemporary and future treatment options. Restor. Dent. Endod 2019 44 1 e7 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e7 30834229
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brittan J.L. Sprague S.V. MacDonald E.L. Love R.M. Jenkinson H.F. West N.X. In vivo model for microbial invasion of tooth root dentinal tubules. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2016 24 2 126 135 10.1590/1678‑775720150448 27119760
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Stuart C. Schwartz S. Beeson T. Owatz C. Enterococcus fae-calis: Its role in root canal treatment failure and current con-cepts in retreatment. J. Endod. 2006 32 2 93 98 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.049 16427453
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ran S. Gu S. Wang J. Zhu C. Liang J. Dentin tubule invasion by Enterococcus faecalis under stress conditions ex vivo. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2015 123 5 362 368 10.1111/eos.12202 26296719
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vatkar N. Hegde V. Sathe S. Vitality of Enterococcus faecalis inside dentinal tubules after five root canal disinfection meth-ods. J. Conserv. Dent. 2016 19 5 445 449 10.4103/0972‑0707.190019 27656064
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Olivi G. De Moor R. DiVito E. Lasers in Endodontics Scien-tific Background and Clinical Applications Cham. Springer In-ternational Publishing 2016 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑19327‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Pirnat S. Lukac M. Ihan A. Study of the direct bactericidal effect of Nd:YAG and diode laser parameters used in endo-dontics on pigmented and nonpigmented bacteria. Lasers Med. Sci. 2011 26 6 755 761 10.1007/s10103‑010‑0808‑7 20582609
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Peters O.A. Bardsley S. Fong J. Pandher G. DiVito E. Disinfec-tion of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming. J. Endod. 2011 37 7 1008 1012 10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.016 21689561
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Moradi M. Fazlyab M. Pourhajibagher M. Chiniforush N. Antimicrobial action of photodynamic therapy on Enterococ-cus faecalis biofilm using curing light, curcumin and ribofla-vin. Aust. Endod. J. 2022 48 2 274 282 10.1111/aej.12565 34529329
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bago I. Plečko V. Gabrić Pandurić D. Schauperl Z. Baraba A. Anić I. Antimicrobial efficacy of a high‐power diode laser, photo‐activated disinfection, conventional and sonic activated irrigation during root canal treatment. Int. Endod. J. 2013 46 4 339 347 10.1111/j.1365‑2591.2012.02120.x 22970886
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Plotino G. Cortese T. Grande N.M. New technologies to improve root canal disinfection. Braz. Dent. J. 2016 27 1 3 8 10.1590/0103‑6440201600726 27007337
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Borzini L. Condò R. De Dominicis P. Casaglia A. Cerroni L. Root canal irrigation: Chemical agents and plant extracts against Enterococcus faecalis. Open Dent. J. 2016 10 1 692 703 10.2174/1874210601610010692 28217184
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rios A. He J. Glickman G.N. Spears R. Schneiderman E.D. Honeyman A.L. Evaluation of photodynamic therapy using a light-emitting diode lamp against Enterococcus faecalis in ex-tracted human teeth. J. Endod. 2011 37 6 856 859 10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.014 21787505
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tennert C. Feldmann K. Haamann E. Effect of photody-namic therapy (PDT) on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in ex-perimental primary and secondary endodontic infections. BMC Oral Health 2014 14 1 132 10.1186/1472‑6831‑14‑132 25366394
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Al-Jaberi M. Atshan S.S. Zouiten S. In vitro evaluation of photodynamic disinfection and conventional root canal irriga-tion protocol. Lab Diagn 2025 14 1 82 91 10.34883/PI.2025.14.1.023
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tennert C. Drews A.M. Walther V. Ultrasonic activation and chemical modification of photosensitizers enhances the effects of photodynamic therapy against Enterococcus faecalis root-canal isolates. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2015 12 2 244 251 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2015.02.002 25703104
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Meire M.A. Coenye T. Nelis H.J. De Moor R.J.G. Evaluation of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG irradiation, antibacterial photodynamic therapy and sodium hypochlorite treatment on Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. Int. Endod. J. 2012 45 5 482 491 10.1111/j.1365‑2591.2011.02000.x 22243483
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Neelakantan P. Cheng C.Q. Mohanraj R. Sriraman P. Subbarao C. Sharma S. Antibiofilm activity of three irrigation protocols activated by ultrasonic, diode laser or Er: YAG laser in vitro. Int. Endod. J. 2015 48 6 602 610 10.1111/iej.12354 25080240
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mohammadi Z. Giardino L. Palazzi F. Shalavi S. Microbial biofilms in endodontic infections: An update review. Biomed. J. 2013 36 2 59 70 10.4103/2319‑4170.110400 23644234
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hardee M.W. Miserendino L.J. Kos W. Walia H. Evaluation of the antibacterial effects of intracanal Nd: YAG laser irradia-tion. J. Endod. 1994 20 8 377 380 10.1016/S0099‑2399(06)80294‑3 7996103
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mehrvarzfar P. Saghiri M.A. Asatourian A. Additive effect of a diode laser on the antibacterial activity of 2.5% NaOCl, 2% CHX and MTAD against Enterococcus faecalis contaminating root canals: An in vitro study. J. Oral Sci. 2011 53 3 355 360 10.2334/josnusd.53.355 21959664
    [Google Scholar]
  25. de Souza E.B. Cai S. Simionato M.R.L. Lage-Marques J.L. High-power diode laser in the disinfection in depth of the root canal dentin. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2008 106 1 e68 e72 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.02.032 18585615
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Moritz A. Jakolitsch S. Goharkhay K. Morphologic changes correlating to different sensitivities of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis to Nd:YAG laser irradiation through dentin. Lasers Surg. Med. 2000 26 3 250 261 10.1002/(SICI)1096‑9101(2000)26:3<250:AID‑LSM2>3.0.CO;2‑H 10738287
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mirsaidov U. Timp W. Timp K. Mir M. Matsudaira P. Timp G. Optimal optical trap for bacterial viability. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 2008 78 2 021910 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.021910 18850868
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Romeo U. Palaia G. Nardo A. Effectiveness of KTP laser versus 980 nm diode laser to kill E nterococcus faecalis in biofilms developed in experimentally infected root canals. Aust. Endod. J. 2015 41 1 17 23 10.1111/aej.12057 24588799
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rrct/10.2174/0115748871367667250912111157
Loading
/content/journals/rrct/10.2174/0115748871367667250912111157
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test