Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2405-5204
  • E-ISSN: 2405-5212

Abstract

Introduction

In industrial processes, some impurities in industrial liquids are usually adsorbed on the bubble interface, thus affecting the bubble interface mobility. Sometimes, additives are also intentionally added to industrial liquids to optimize the hydrodynamic properties of discrete bubbles and improve industrial efficiency. Therefore, an in-depth study of the hydrodynamics of discrete bubbles in impure liquids is of great significance. The objective of this study is to explore the dynamics of bubble rising in ethanol-aqueous solutions, with the aim of understanding the relationship between bubble rising dynamics and the ethanol mass fraction.

Methods

The effect of the free-rising motion of individual bubbles was studied by controlling the ethanol mass fraction and bubble size, and images of the bubbles were recorded with the aid of a high-speed video camera when the rising motion of the bubbles reached an approximate steady state.

Results

When the equivalent diameter of the bubble was fixed, the ascending trajectories of bubbles changed from spiral lines to straight ones as the ethanol mass fraction increased. The larger the equivalent diameter of bubbles is, the higher the transitional mass fraction of the bubble ascending trajectory is. For single bubbles with the same equivalent diameter, as the ethanol mass fraction increased, the terminal ascending velocity of bubbles approximately decreased first and then increased; however, the aspect ratio of single bubbles initially increased and then decreased. There were three concentration regions corresponding to the apparent changes in the terminal ascending speed and the terminal aspect ratio of single bubbles as the ethanol mass fraction increased.

Discussion

The impact of the ethanol mass fraction on bubble rising dynamics, including the bubble equivalent diameter, terminal ascending velocity, and ascending trajectory, was thoroughly analyzed and discussed. The related mechanism of bubble dynamics was also discussed.

Conclusion

The bubble ascending dynamics were found to be related to ethanol mass fraction, and the dependence of the ascending dynamics of single bubbles on ethanol mass fraction was complex. The bubble terminal ascending speed did not change monotonically as the ethanol mass fraction increased.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204397799250925071106
2025-10-02
2026-02-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. RissoF. Agitation, mixing, and transfers induced by bubbles.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.2018501254810.1146/annurev‑fluid‑122316‑045003
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CardosoS.S.S. CartwrightJ.H.E. Bubble plumes in nature.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.202456129531710.1146/annurev‑fluid‑120720‑011833
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ZenitR. FengJ.J. Hydrodynamic interactions among bubbles, drops, and particles in non-newtonian liquids.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.201850150553410.1146/annurev‑fluid‑122316‑045114
    [Google Scholar]
  4. NiR. Deformation and breakup of bubbles and drops in turbulence.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.202456131934710.1146/annurev‑fluid‑121021‑034541
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ElghobashiS. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows laden with droplets or bubbles.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.201951121724410.1146/annurev‑fluid‑010518‑040401
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChengG. LiZ. CaoY. JiangZ. Research progress in lignite flotation intensification.Int. J. Coal Prep. Util.2020401597610.1080/19392699.2018.1541894
    [Google Scholar]
  7. TianC. FengJ. Prud’hommeR.K. Adsorption dynamics of polymeric nanoparticles at an air-water interface with addition of surfactants.J. Colloid Interface Sci.202057541642410.1016/j.jcis.2020.03.10632388288
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LiZ. FuY. LiZ. NanN. ZhuY. LiY. Froth flotation giant surfactants.Polymer2019162586210.1016/j.polymer.2018.12.023
    [Google Scholar]
  9. GuoD.S. LiX.B. ZhangH.N. LiF.C. SuW.T. ZhuH. Bubble behaviors during subcooled pool boiling in water and nonionic surfactant aqueous solution.Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.202015912008710.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120087
    [Google Scholar]
  10. TakagiS. MatsumotoY. Surfactant effects on bubble motion and bubbly flows.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.201143161563610.1146/annurev‑fluid‑122109‑160756
    [Google Scholar]
  11. JávorZ. SchreithoferN. HeiskanenK. Multi-scale analysis of the effect of surfactants on bubble properties.Miner. Eng.20169917017810.1016/j.mineng.2016.09.026
    [Google Scholar]
  12. TagawaY. TakagiS. MatsumotoY. Surfactant effect on path instability of a rising bubble.J. Fluid Mech.201473812414210.1017/jfm.2013.571
    [Google Scholar]
  13. JarekE. WarszynskiP. KrzanM. Influence of different electrolytes on bubble motion in ionic surfactants solutions.Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.201650517117810.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.03.071
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HuangJ. SaitoT. Influences of gas–liquid interface contamination on bubble motions, bubble wakes, and instantaneous mass transfer.Chem. Eng. Sci.201715718219910.1016/j.ces.2016.05.013
    [Google Scholar]
  15. HuangJ. SaitoT. Discussion about the differences in mass transfer, bubble motion and surrounding liquid motion between a contaminated system and a clean system based on consideration of three-dimensional wake structure obtained from LIF visualization.Chem. Eng. Sci.201717010511510.1016/j.ces.2017.03.030
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BasařováP. CrhaJ. PilíkováL. OrvalhoS. Mutable bubble surface mobility in water – propanol mixtures and its impact on bubble motion and deformation.Chem. Eng. Sci.202226011786110.1016/j.ces.2022.117861
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BasařováP. PišlováJ. MillsJ. OrvalhoS. Influence of molecular structure of alcohol-water mixtures on bubble behaviour and bubble surface mobility.Chem. Eng. Sci.2018192748410.1016/j.ces.2018.07.008
    [Google Scholar]
  18. OgasawaraT. TakahiraH. The effect of contamination on the bubble cluster formation in swarm of spherical bubbles rising along an inclined flat wall.Nucl. Eng. Des.201833714114710.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.06.019
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AoyamaS. HayashiK. HosokawaS. TomiyamaA. Shapes of single bubbles in infinite stagnant liquids contaminated with surfactant.Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.20189646046910.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.03.015
    [Google Scholar]
  20. PawliszakP. UlaganathanV. Bradshaw-HajekB.H. ManicaR. BeattieD.A. KrasowskaM. Mobile or immobile? rise velocity of air bubbles in high–purity water.J. Phys. Chem. C201912324151311513810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03526
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ChenJ. HayashiK. HosokawaS. TomiyamaA. Drag correlations of ellipsoidal bubbles in clean and fully contaminated systems.Multiph Sci Technol201931321523410.1615/MultScienTechn.2019031210
    [Google Scholar]
  22. LiuB. ManicaR. LiuQ. KlaseboerE. XuZ. XieG. Coalescence of bubbles with mobile interfaces in water.Phys. Rev. Lett.20191221919450110.1103/PhysRevLett.122.19450131144923
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HessenkemperH. ZiegenheinT. LucasD. Contamination effects on the lift force of ellipsoidal air bubbles rising in saline water solutions.Chem. Eng. J.202038612158910.1016/j.cej.2019.04.169
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sá’adiyahD.S. HayashiK. KurimotoR. TomiyamaA. Spatial evolution of CO2–contaminated water bubble flows in a vertical pipe.Chemieingenieurtechnik2021931-224725910.1002/cite.202000138
    [Google Scholar]
  25. NéelB. DeikeL. Collective bursting of free-surface bubbles, and the role of surface contamination.J. Fluid Mech.2021917A4610.1017/jfm.2021.272
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ShmyrovaA. ShmyrovA. Experimental study of the flow structure stability on the bubble surface.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2021194501205310.1088/1742‑6596/1945/1/012053
    [Google Scholar]
  27. LuoY. WangZ. ZhangB. Experimental study of the effect of the surfactant on the single bubble rising in stagnant surfactant solutions and a mathematical model for the bubble motion.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.202261269514952710.1021/acs.iecr.2c01620
    [Google Scholar]
  28. JuE. CaiR. SunH. FanY. ChenW. SunJ. Dynamic behavior of an ellipsoidal bubble contaminated by surfactant near a vertical wall.Korean J. Chem. Eng.20223951165118110.1007/s11814‑021‑1035‑6
    [Google Scholar]
  29. VakarelskiI.U. KamoliddinovF. ThoroddsenS.T. Bubble mobility in seawater during free-rise, bouncing, and coalescence with the seawater-air interface.Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.202265112977510.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129775
    [Google Scholar]
  30. MaT. HessenkemperH. LucasD. BraggA.D. Effects of surfactants on bubble-induced turbulence.J. Fluid Mech.2023970A1310.1017/jfm.2023.614
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ArkhipovV.A. UsaninaA.S. ChurkinR.A. Laws of the monodispersed bubble cluster ascent in a viscous liquid in the presence of surfactant.Thermophys. Aeromech.20243061061107210.1134/S0869864323060094
    [Google Scholar]
  32. SunH.P. SunJ. SuZ.Y. Experimental study on the lateral migration of a bubble contaminated by surfactant in a linear shear flow.Phys. Fluids202335404330110.1063/5.0140708
    [Google Scholar]
  33. LiuY. WangB. ZhaoD. Investigation of surfactant effect on ozone bubble motion and mass transfer characteristics.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.202311511080510.1016/j.jece.2023.110805
    [Google Scholar]
  34. RaiR. TripathiA. BhattacharyyaA. Bubble growth and detachment process in surfactant solutions: a study of 90% pure sodium dodecyl sulfate.Particul. Sci. Technol.202341574074810.1080/02726351.2022.2141162
    [Google Scholar]
  35. VegaE.J. MontaneroJ.M. Influence of a surfactant on bubble bursting.Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.202415111109710.1016/j.expthermflusci.2023.111097
    [Google Scholar]
  36. WangA. BanksE. EvansG. MitraS. Effect of surfactant concentration and surface loading on the dynamics of a rising particle-laden bubble.Chem. Eng. Sci.202428811981210.1016/j.ces.2024.119812
    [Google Scholar]
  37. BorzenkoE.I. UsaninA.S. ShragerG.R. Experimental and theoretical investigation of the effect of dissolved surfactant on the dynamics of gas bubble floating-up.Fluid Dyn.202459474175510.1134/S0015462824603073
    [Google Scholar]
  38. HoqueM.M. MitraS. EvansG. Bubble size distribution and turbulence characterization in a bubbly flow in the presence of surfactant.Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.202415511119910.1016/j.expthermflusci.2024.111199
    [Google Scholar]
  39. LiB. ZhengJ. DangC. KangY. JiaH. Experimental investigation on bubble dynamic behaviors in pool boiling of surfactant solutions.Int. J. Therm. Sci.202419810885810.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2023.108858
    [Google Scholar]
  40. RubioA. VegaE.J. CabezasM.G. MontaneroJ.M. López-HerreraJ.M. HerradaM.A. Bubble rising in the presence of a surfactant at very low concentrations.Phys. Fluids202436606211210.1063/5.0206793
    [Google Scholar]
  41. LiH. YuX. FuZ. QiuK. WangJ. LuS. Kinetics and dynamics of Gas-liquid separation and bubble generation in surfactant solutions: Role of bulk/interfacial properties and hydrodynamic conditions.Separ. Purif. Tech.202535512948310.1016/j.seppur.2024.129483
    [Google Scholar]
  42. ZakariA.G. MainulH.M. IrelandP. EvansG. MitraS. Dynamics of gas dispersion in a rising bubble plume in presence of surfactant.Miner. Eng.202522210914510.1016/j.mineng.2024.109145
    [Google Scholar]
  43. ZednikovaM. SemlerováT. OrvalhoS. HavlicaJ. TihonJ. Surfactant effect on bubble deformation and breakup after interaction with vortex structure.Chem. Eng. Sci.202530512114410.1016/j.ces.2024.121144
    [Google Scholar]
  44. KrzanM. MalysaK. Profiles of local velocities of bubbles in n-butanol, n-hexanol and n-nonanol solutions.Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.20022071-327929110.1016/S0927‑7757(02)00163‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  45. KrzanM. ZawalaJ. MalysaK. Development of steady state adsorption distribution over interface of a bubble rising in solutions of n-alkanols (C5, C8) and n-alkyltrimethylammonium bromides (C8, C12, C16).Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.20072981-2425110.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.056
    [Google Scholar]
  46. WuM. GharibM. Experimental studies on the shape and path of small air bubbles rising in clean water.Phys. Fluids2002147L49L5210.1063/1.1485767
    [Google Scholar]
  47. SaboniA. AlexandrovaS. KarshevaM. Effects of interface contamination on mass transfer into a spherical bubble.J Chem Technol Metall2015505589596
    [Google Scholar]
  48. VeldhuisC. BiesheuvelA. van WijngaardenL. Shape oscillations on bubbles rising in clean and in tap water.Phys. Fluids200820404070510.1063/1.2911042
    [Google Scholar]
  49. ManoharanS. DeodharA.M. ManglikR.M. JogM.A. Computational modeling of adiabatic bubble growth dynamics from submerged capillary-tube orifices in aqueous solutions of surfactants.J. Heat Transfer2019141505200210.1115/1.4042700
    [Google Scholar]
  50. TomiyamaA. CelataG.P. HosokawaS. YoshidaS. Terminal velocity of single bubbles in surface tension force dominant regime.Int. J. Multiph. Flow20022891497151910.1016/S0301‑9322(02)00032‑0
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204397799250925071106
Loading
/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204397799250925071106
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): bubble dynamics; hydrodynamics; impure liquids; interface pollution; Surfactants; velocity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test